Sign in

Daniel Schuman

@americalabs.org
15K followers 797 following 1.1K posts

Progressive institutionalist with an interest in modernizing Congress and strengthening our democracy. Bluesky is my penance for working at an org that once encouraged Congress to tweet. Like what you see? More at firstbranchforecast.substack.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 31/08/2026
As they contemplate how to fix the House, they must think through what are the mechanisms for controlling the House, who exercise it, and who should exercise it. You see, the eras of power in the House change because who pulls the levers changes when members collectively change the old system.
An image illustrating the three mechanisms of power: who writes the bills, which bills get to the floor, and who is elected to the House.
172
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 31/08/2026
Periodically, the way the House governs itself becomes untenable. Old arrangements lead to gridlock, power grabs, and a mismatch between what the American people want and the chamber delivers. When that happens, forward thinkers summon forth a new political arrangement.
An image showing the give eras of power in the House of Representatives.
1115
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 31/05/2026
I've found polling that shows that people prefer him over her, but I didn't see the why.
110
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 31/05/2026
I found it as a story that Ari Fleischer told about this dad. jweekly.com/2006/11/03/f...
230
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 31/05/2026
Just a reminder that Ari Fleischer is a terrible human being.
Tweet from Ari Fleischer: 'The Democrats do a January 6th every day, every week. Their target is ICE.

J6 was a riot.

THIS is an insurrection."
7364
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 21/05/2026
Whoah. As @hoyer.house.gov is arguing to member COLA, court issues opinion that says (cursory look) 27th amendment stops approps from varying pay in the way it has for 15 years. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
1123
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/05/2026
The room has a weird design. The raised dias has the spots for the most senior committee members, with their staff sitting behind them. Then tables in front, where members sit 10 to a table, with Dems on my left and Repubs on my right.
110
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/05/2026
In front of the committee chair is a plaque: "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." See my potato photo below.
1105
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 29/04/2026
Well, that's nonsense. House Republican Appropriators are once against trying to prevent GAO from litigating when the president has made an impoundment, which are (of course) illegal. H/T @nehls.bsky.social
03718
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 29/04/2026
I'm starting to read the just released leg branch approps committee mark for the House, and it still has the antiquated "death gratuity." Life insurance now exists and this practice is no longer welcome.
152
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/03/2026
Was at the @archive.org last week and saw an old friend.
A photo of an Appel IIGs, including 3.5" hard drive.
2231
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 28/01/2026
Statement on the U.S. Government's withdrawal from the Open Government Partnership. Also online here: americalabs.org/2026/01/28/s...
United States Quits Open Government Partnership
Civil society groups had pressed U.S. to meet transparency commitments

January 28, 2026 — The United States has formally withdrawn from the Open Government Partnership (OGP), a voluntary international collaboration founded in 2011 by eight countries, including the United States, to advance government transparency, participation, and accountability in partnership with domestic civil society organizations.

In March 2025, eleven civil society organizations urged the Open Government Partnership to place the United States under review for "rolling back existing flagship commitments," and calling for U.S. suspension if the administration failed to work with civil society to advance meaningful transparency commitments. A July 2025 letter renewed the request, citing accelerating attacks on government transparency, across anti-corruption efforts, civic space, fiscal openness, justice, and the foundation of open government. 

A December 2025 OGP report found that "the second Trump administration revoked or replaced several executive orders that supported key commitments, including those related to equity, data transparency, and law enforcement accountability. It also disbanded the federal advisory committee in February 2025. These actions have undermined or halted the continuity and durability of reforms initiated during the action plan cycle."

The U.S. government withdrawal statement, signed by General Services Administration Administrator Edward Forst, was replete with misstatements and omits the fact the first Trump administration participated in the Open Government Partnership. The statement takes no responsibility for its dismantling of the domestic Open Government Federal Advisory Committee. Nor does it note the administration's increasing attacks on the press, the removal of data from government websites, the failure to collect and share information about government activities.

The following statement may be attributed to Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute and former chair of the Open Government Federal Advisory Committee:

"The Trump administration is not only the least transparent government in American history; its policies are antithetical to democracy, of which transparency is an essential element. Today's withdrawal from the Open Government Partnership is yet another data point in a broader pattern of opacity by this adminis…
01610
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 25/01/2026
It appears Schumer has seen where his caucus members are going and is running to get ahead of them.
1321723
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/01/2026
It's a good thing the market is closed right now. This press conference is...
1160
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/01/2026
Hmmm.
1217
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/01/2026
Ummm, what's happening?
4245
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 11/12/2025
Today, the Senate Rules Committee will vote on freezing senatorial pay during a partial gov't shutdown. This bad faith resolution may stoke some populist support, but it's terrible policy. It puts pressure on senators to change their votes even when the holdup is the House or the president.
Senator Mitch McConnell
Chair, Senate Rules Committee
Senator Alex Padilla
Ranking Member, Senate Rules Committee


Dear Chair McConnell and Ranking Member Padilla:

The standing of Congress with the American people was badly damaged by this fall’s prolonged government shutdown. S. Res. 526, proposed by Senator Kennedy to withhold senators’ pay during future shutdowns, is a ticking time bomb that would deepen that harm. The resolution threatens the Senate’s political independence, undermines its democratic character, and would inflict collateral damage. As you consider the measure at your December 11th markup, we urge you to not let it advance.

During the most recent shutdown, the Senate had no negotiating partner: Speaker Mike Johnson dismissed the House for all 43 days of lapsed funding under his unilateral authority in House Rule 1, clause 13. Under similar conditions, senators seeking to resolve a shutdown could again find themselves with no practical way to reach agreement—yet with their pay effectively held hostage by actions of the House. A comparable dynamic could arise if both chambers reached agreement only to have the president veto the legislation.

Senator Kennedy’s resolution is designed to pressure senators to change their policy positions until the House, the Senate, and the president align. Under his proposal, senators’ pay would be withheld so long as any part of the government remains unfunded.

For many senators, the financial effect would be modest. But not all senators are wealthy—and Congress already faces a worsening representation gap that discourages qualified individuals of ordinary means from serving. Conditioning congressional pay on the strategic decisions of other actors would exacerbate the problem that only the wealthy can realistically afford to hold office. The Senate should not become an elected aristocracy.

Shutdowns are disruptive and damaging, but the source of the problem lies elsewhere. Withholding compensation does nothing…
2267
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 08/12/2025
The National Defense Authorization Act often contains matters unrelated to the national defense. To wit:
Authority of Marshal of the Supreme Court and Supreme Court
Police.
1105
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 25/11/2025
Thank you, Catherine Szpindor, for your service as the House's Chief Administrative Officer. Anne Dressendorfer Binsted
131
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
Also, she could move to censure other members, like committee chairs. Those would be privileged motions. If successful, House Republican conference rules say they should step down. But it could be waived.
832542
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
She's been in at least 5 years? If she's a short termer, she may have a little help, per CRS.
010
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
Here's how CRS explains their benefits. It appears the better pension benefit ended in 2012. www.everycrsreport.com/files/2023-0...
010
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
Here's Mel Watt from 2014. Note that the Speaker pro tempore is providing the document (laid before the House).
141
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
It doesn't have to be only this language. See Fortenberry from 2022. Letter to the House, letter to the governor (Nebraska)
161
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
Here's Mark Foley's resignation -- another Florida Member.
RESIGNATION FROM THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.
MURPHY) laid before the House the fol-
lowing resignation from the House of
Representatives:
H OUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES,
Washington, DC, September 29, 2006.
Hon. J. DENNIS H ASTERT,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Capitol Building, Washington, DC.
DEAR M R. S PEAKER: I hereby resign as the
representative of the 16th Congressional Dis-
trict of Florida, effective today.
Sincerely,
M ARK F OLEY,
Member of Congress.
H OUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES,
Washington, DC, September 29, 2006.
Hon. J EB B USH,
Governor, State of Florida,
Tallahassee, FL.
D EAR G OVERNOR B USH: I hereby resign as
the representative of the 16th Congressional
District of Florida, effective today.
Sincerely,
MARK F OLEY,
Member of Congress.
171
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 22/11/2025
This is what that letter looks like. From Congressional Record on November 14, 2024.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE
CLERK OF THE HOUSE
The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be-
fore the House the following commu-
nication from the Clerk of the House of
Representatives:
O FFICE OF THE C LERK,
H OUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES,
Washington, DC, November 13, 2024.
Hon. M IKE J OHNSON,
The Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
DEAR M R. SPEAKER: Pursuant to the per-
mission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II of
the Rules of the U.S. House of Representa-
tives, the Clerk received the following mes-
sage from the Secretary of the Senate on No-
vember 13, 2024, at 3:38 p.m.
That the Senate passed S. 2581.
With best wishes, I am,
Sincerely,
KEVIN F. M CC UMBER,
Acting Clerk.
f
RESIGNATION FROM THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be-
fore the House the following resigna-
tion from the House of Representa-
tives:
CONGRESS OF THE U NITED S TATES,
HOUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES,
Washington, DC, November 13, 2024.
Hon. M IKE J OHNSON,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
MR. S PEAKER: I hereby resign, as United
States Representatives for Florida’s First
Congressional District, effective imme-
diately, and I do not intend to take the oath
of office for the same office in the 119th Con-
gress, to pursue the position of Attorney
General in the Trump Administration.
Enclosed please find the letter I have
transmitted to Florida Governor Ron
DeSantis.
Respectfully,
MATT GAETZ,
Member of Congress
171
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 20/11/2025
If it makes you feel any better, the wayback machine didn't get my college newspaper for quite a while.
120
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 18/11/2025
Once corrected, I had it put it into ical format, and the rest is straightforward.
000
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 18/11/2025
But what it extracted was wrong, so I had to feed it corrections.
100
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 18/11/2025
I then uploaded the whole-year-in one calendar, and Chat GPT started turning it into data.
100
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 18/11/2025
I used AI to do it. There's probably a story or something in what it took to do. I first uploaded the month-by-month calendar, and ChatGPT freaked out.
100
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 14/11/2025
This doesn't seem good.
The Department of War may detail attorneys to serve as immigration judges on a reimbursable basis. The Department may also detail attorneys to serve as Special Assistant United States Attorneys on a non-reimbursable basis so long as a purpose of the detail is to provide training.

The Posse Comitatus Act does not preclude the use of military attorneys as immigration judges or Special Assistant United States Attorneys provided the details occur on a full-time basis and the detailees operate fully under civilian control and supervision.
11411
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 12/11/2025
Surely no senator would make use of the provision to sue the government that Sen. Thune snuck into the approps bill, right?
Lindsey Graham says he would sue the government.
96726
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 10/11/2025
Individual members of the conference may recommended changes to the Rules as the need arises... and may bring that proposal directly to the Conference for its consideration w/ 1 week notice. A self-executing rule change could provide for removal and require only a majority of conference vote.
26914
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 10/11/2025
I'm turning this into the First Branch Forecast newsletter, but some initial notes.
152
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 18/10/2025
You likely have it already, but it did show up in the movie Airplane II, from 1982.
1110
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 03/10/2025
They've got it exactly backwards. Why should Dems be willing to negotiate with Republicans on anything if the appropriations agreement can be changed at will by the administration? They key item to negotiate are provisions to ensure approps deals are followed by the admin.
1297
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 02/10/2025
Um. Going after the Southern Poverty Law Center?
7247
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 30/09/2025
Tonight the Senate passed a Potemkin member security bill that won't protect members but will prevent oversight. The "privacy protections" it provides are for members only -- Sen. Cruz objected to efforts to provide privacy protections to all Americans or to only federal, state, and local electeds.
26227
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 11/09/2025
Relevant language on congressional security in the recently Approps-passed CJS appropriations committee report See p. 43 docs.house.gov/meetings/AP/...
131
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
I don't know who needs to know this, but a new DOJ OLC opinion dropped on Tuesday. www.justice.gov/olc/media/14...
Whether the Creation of Natcast Violates
the Government Corporation Control Act
The Government Corporation Control Act applies to an agency that brings a corporation
into existence, even if the agency does not retain ownership of or control over the
corporation.
An agency cannot avoid the strictures of the Government Corporation Control Act by
enlisting private individuals as proxies to incorporate an entity that would otherwise
violate the Government Corporation Control Act.
The creation of Natcast violates the Government Corporation Control Act because the
Department of Commerce exercised undue control over the private persons who in-
corporated Natcast to oversee Congress’s multi-billion investment in the semiconduc-
tor industry.
075
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
So, it looks like you can provide public announcements of classified briefings. Rep. Steil, House Admin Chair, put out this press statement. cha.house.gov/press-releas...
010
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
That squad is shrinking...
Massie says HFC members running for higher office — and seeking Trump’s endorsement — has disrupted his Epstein effort.

“I think if I lose my reelection, lose my primary, there's no hope for the Freedom Caucus to be independent in the last two years of Trump's administration.”
041
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
I thought you'd appreciate the irony of using free Google satellite view to take an image of the agency responsible for using satellites (and other mechanisms) to take pictures of others.
210
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
I agree it's likely misleading language, used to get clicks? Look at the AP lede: "The top ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee says a classified meeting planned with a key U.S. spy agency was called off after it was criticized by Laura Loomer, a far-right conspiracy theorist."
100
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
This is a brilliant way to use speech or debate clause protections.
Thomas Massie: "The survivors said that they had decided to compile their own [Epstein] list. But the reality is, if they try to release that list, they're going to be sued into homelessness... what my colleague Marjorie Taylor Greene volunteered to do, and I've volunteered to do as well, is to read that list on the floor of the House of Representatives, because our founders put into the Constitution Speech or Debate Immunity, which says that we can't be prosecuted for what we say on the floor of the House."
14441241030
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
The statement is a quote of Sen. Warner. Who wrote it? IDK, but his office attributes it to the senator. He seems to average a statement on his website every 2-3 days. It would make sense that he or a senior staffer reviewed it, and that he (or a senior staffer) directed it be issued.
210
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/09/2025
Right, but NGA's location is not classified, and we're not talking about disclosing the location, but the fact of the meeting itself. (Yes, it could be a classified address, but address != fact of the meeting.) FWIW, Google maps has the location for the NGA.
120
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/08/2025
Here is a fatal flaw: the number of bills introduced should not be used as "a primary measure of legislative productivity." Ironically, it is not appropriate to use legislative effectiveness scores from the Center on Effective Lawmaking to measure legislative effectiveness b/c they don't measure it
130
Daniel Schuman @americalabs.org · 04/08/2025
This is incorrect. The Statements of Disbursements have been published online since around 2009 (as a PDF). There's scrapers and tools available from Sunlight + ProPublica to get that data. It's been published as CSVs since 2016 and those CSVs were improved recently with more metadata.
220