iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

"females only in female spaces" = no females in spaces that aren't female spaces

000

Nils 🥚 @1wayoranother.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

"we just really want females only in female spaces" Doesn't this sentence construction mean they want to discriminate against females by not allowing them in any spaces that aren't "female spaces"?

100

Reposted by Alyssa Nguyen

The fact I support trans people has nothing to do with JK. The difference is I shared evidence that lesbians are overwhelmingly supportive of trans people. My question is why are GC’s repeating this myth about lesbians? Afraid of appearing anti-LGB or perhaps afraid to admit they’re just intolerant?

131

Do you even understand how language works? It's implied that what I've said about your actions are based on what I am able to observe and conclude from those observations.

"Tell me you don’t understand radical feminism etc." You don't. Her description was quite apt. What you claim to believe is one thing, but the policies you support fit that description to a T.

010

You're not even trying to understand what you're being told.

Alyssa Nguyen @alyssa3467.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

"this group being used to undermine the human rights of other groups namely women and lesbians, gay men and bisexuals." Once again, just because you think that's happening doesn't mean that it is. Repeating something over and over doesn't make it true.

130

Your twisted definitions have no power here. bsky.app/profile/alys...

000

Alyssa Nguyen @alyssa3467.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

They don't even meet the simplified definition of "feminist" found in dictionaries, let alone any of the more nuanced definitions found in feminist literature.

131

Alyssa Nguyen @alyssa3467.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

You're not a feminist either, by any mainstream definition.

bsky.app/profile/alys... You still can't demonstrate that this is true.

010

All you do is argue against what you think others believe without making any sort of effort to understand what others *actually* believe. As long as you do that, your questions will continue to be meaningless.

120

And yet, that's exactly what you do. And you will continue to misunderstand as long as you use nonstandard language. bsky.app/profile/call...

Unfortunately for you, dictionaries record language as it is used by the mainstream, which is not how you use it.

Your response to this effectively mirrors that of people against women's rights when they ask what rights women don't have that men do. bsky.app/profile/rebe...

131

You haven't demonstrated that it is beyond showing that you don't understand the relevant concepts. First, there is no such thing as a "transwoman" beyond it being a typographical error in trying to say "trans woman," which itself is short for "transgender woman."

251

It highlights how meaningless your question is quite well.

000

"Your position only succeeds in diminishing women, gay men and lesbians." That is patently untrue.

141

So you have problems with reading comprehension.

000

gthonks.bsky.social @gthonks.bsky.social · 20/09/2026

You mean only if you think someone is female. If they don't meet your standards, you'll come up with any excuse possible to exclude someone.

100

Reposted by Alyssa Nguyen

Kids with dysphoria do in fact have the opportunity to not transition. What you take issue with is not the lack of opportunity, but the choice the patient might make when *given* opportunity.

152

I wonder what he thinks about people living somewhere without being legal permanent residents…

Your Scary Ad Here @cooluser354.bsky.social · 16/09/2026

Reposted by Alyssa Nguyen

Conversion therapy for homosexual identified people is also "talk therapy." There was even a big case about it this year. That said, if conversion therapy for trans people is fine, what's the issue with it for homosexual identified people?

102

Transgender rights don't take away from women.

031

Weren't we promised lawsuits on a massive scale?

000

A.R. Moxon @juliusgoat.bsky.social · 17/09/2026

"I can think of many reasons why individuals harmed by “gender affirming care” may not want to go public with their experiences." So why don't you give some?

000

Reposted by Alyssa Nguyen

Same people who seem to think it’s bad for China to beat us at AI are perfectly fine with China beating us at high speed rail, solar energy, wind energy, shall we go on

8685442215

In the restroom, leading you to invent the flux capacitor?

230

I doubt you actually understood the testimony and/or legal brief.

And nobody told him he was in the wrong body, I assume? It's not a thing people tell each other from what I've seen.

120

Your lack of comprehension doesn't mean someone else is obfuscating.

000

You can't say that an intersex person is a girl, then in the same breath say that *all* people who have some of the body parts she has are boys, and then later claim that you're not ignoring exceptions.

010

The fact that you keep switching between and mixing up men/women and male/female, sometimes within the same sentence, shows you are quite confused. I wouldn't be surprised if you thought nouns and adjectives are interchangeable.

You can claim that all you want. That doesn't make it true. You've been contradicting yourself all over the place.

120

No, I don't. You are the one calling for that. You think some men are women and some women are men.

If anyone is trying to force roles on intersex people, and people in general, it's you and those who follow your ideology.

140

That is patently false. All of the bans on medical procedures have carve-outs for surgeries on intersex children, & if you think rights for transgender people requires adherence to gender stereotypes, you don't understand them at all. You literally said that all intersex people are male or female.

140

Anti-trans policies affect intersex people just as much. Did you not know that?

130

And yet you're the one trying to force men into women's restrooms because you think they are women…