iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 07/07/2026

Looking forward to reading the chapter (and other chapters).

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 05/09/2025

Science is not always as good as it appears on print in a research paper. Ready to be scared by finding nasty truths. Try out INSPECT-SR for checking the trustworthiness of trial results when you do systematic reviews.

186 0

Reposted by Andreas Lundh

Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 09/08/2025

Development of a Tool for Addressing #COIs in Trials (TACIT) for Use in Systematic Reviews from @alundh.bsky.social @isabelleboutron.bsky.social @cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social @upcite.bsky.social is a PRC poster presentation Register to stop by, ask the authors questions! peerreviewcongress.org

peerreviewcongress.org

International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication

Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.

043 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 04/09/2025

All user feedback will be much appreciated.

000 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 04/09/2025

Kerry Dwan, Lisa Bero, @mjpages.bsky.social , Rachel Richardson, @tiagogp.bsky.social , Tom Jefferson, @isabelleboutron.bsky.social, Lesley A Stewart, and Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

100 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 04/09/2025

Thanks to all the great collaborators from the TACIT Working Group: Alastair Matheson, @angelacwebster.bsky.social, An-Wen Chan, Brett Thombs, Elie A Akl, @eturnermd1.bsky.social ermd1.bsky.social, Holger Schünemann, Jesse Berlin, Jonathan AC Sterne, Julian PT Higgins

ermd1.bsky.social

Bluesky

110 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 04/09/2025

At the peerreviewcongress.org in Chicago launching the public version of Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest (TACIT) for use in systematic reviews. If you want to know more visit www.tacit.one and try out the tool at osf.io/5fzv3 @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social #PRC10 #COI #Trials

peerreviewcongress.org

International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication

Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.

111 0

Reposted by Andreas Lundh

Bada Yang @yangbd.bsky.social · 13/06/2025

❓ In people with HIV, is using two different rapid tests together ('parallel testing') to diagnose TB more accurate than using only one? An 'incremental' accuracy question: few Cochrane Reviews have yet addressed such questions. Adult review: shorturl.at/r9CUG Child review: shorturl.at/nSosK

022 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 13/06/2025

Just received my copy of #PublishOrPerish by @maxhuibai.bsky.social. Can't wait to try it out with colleagues at @cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social

041 0

Reposted by Andreas Lundh

Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 27/12/2023

Want to see if your research has had an impact on public policy? Enter your info in SagePolicyProfiles to see the citations of your own publications in policy documents. You get a profile page. Here is mine as an example: policyprofiles.sagepub.com/profile/5920...

411444 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 06/12/2024

Interesting. Thx for sharing

000 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

A journal that appreciates its reviewers. The annual Christmas gift with a card from the EiC. Thanks @ugeskriftet.bsky.social

040 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 03/12/2024

The annual @cochranedkcebmo.bsky.social workshop with great presentation by Minna Johansson and other interesting talks and activities.

250 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

I'd like to join this nice company

110 0

Andreas Lundh @alundh.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

My experience is that often a reviewer may be highly qualified to comment on some aspects, eg as content/topic expert, but has little competence on other aspects, eg methodology. Would be great if editors could assign reviewers to different roles related to the manuscript.

1144 0