Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan and the iPhone were the most cited omissions on The Post’s list.

Three physicists give a firsthand account of disarmament efforts in the 1980s and 1990s.

Carnage in pursuit of power, revenge, personal financial gain, and ego.

Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.

We are looking for your support by signing the letter below. It calls on Springer Nature to ensure that as part of the sale, LabX Media will rehire laid off union workers, restore staff salaries to pr...

YouTube video by An Ordinary Insanity Film

Nuclear war is much more unpredictable than asteroids, but, unlike the dinosaurs of 66 million years ago, humans can avoid causing their own extinction.

A weeklong series on the catastrophic realities of nuclear war

YouTube video by Future of Life Institute

As longtime AMS Fellows, Brian Toon and Alan Robock have spent their careers studying how Earth’s atmosphere responds to extreme events—from asteroid impacts to nuclear war. Their 2025 book…

As we look back at Jesse Jackson’s life, it is important to remember he was part of a long line of African Americans who consistently made the case that race, colonialism, and nuclear weapons were ine...

YouTube video by 부산영어방송 Busan English Broadcasting

The New START Treaty and Nuclear Winter: Re-centering Global Risk in Arms Control Debates Monalisa Hazarikastrategic communications and partnership officer, SCRAP Weapons On 28 January 2026, the SC…

YouTube video by PBS Terra

Under the Trump Administration, international law, conserving nature, protecting children from war, developing renewable energy, and building peace are issues antithetical to US interests.

USA TODAY mapped the far-reaching potential consequences of a nuclear strike against America's 450 nuclear missile silos.

The Trump administration’s world view is that the US doesn’t need a climate science brain trust because it doesn’t like what the brains say.

YouTube video by The Late Show with Stephen Colbert

The film dispels the comforting illusion that technology can shield us from a nuclear attack.

OPINION: “What Trump is really doing is advancing a plan laid down years ago by plutocrats and polluters. And making a mockery of our country as he does so,” Michael E. Mann writes.

Trump’s assault on wind is a quid pro quo to the fossil fuel interests, plutocrats, and petrostate actors who helped return him to power.

Researchers should not have to endure death threats or public attacks when they engage publicly and try to combat misinformation.

YouTube video by The National Weather Desk

It has taken the United Nations nearly 40 years to commission another study on the effects of nuclear conflict. Better late than never.

The EPA is moving to repeal a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to fight climate change. Michael Mann, Presidential Distinguished Professor in the Department of E...

YouTube video by Michael Mann

YouTube video by Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

How Hollywood taught a generation to fear nuclear catastrophe

A scenario of America’s response to an incoming nuclear attack.

Buy Earth in Flames: How an Asteroid Killed the Dinosaurs and How We Can Avoid a Similar Fate From Nuclear Winter on Amazon.com ✓ FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders

Nuclear accidents are a fact of life for as long as these weapons exist.

"We believe the best hope for saving science and, perhaps, saving our form of democracy, is convincing at least a couple dozen Republican members of Congress that it’s up to them—that the stakes require exercising the prerogatives of the Congress to constrain excesses by the Executive Branch and resuming the serious conversations, debates, and compromise across the aisle and between the branches that used to be the way policy was made."

Deadlier weapons, more nations, autocrats in charge, disinformation and collapsing arms control — the risk of nuclear catastrophe is back.