Sign in

Bonum Continuing Education

@bonumce.bsky.social
32 followers 539 following 0 posts

Bonum Continuing Education - Your 🏡 for accredited, 🆓, SoMe #CME * Specialty handles 🩺 GI🩸Hem 🦠 ID 🧬Onc Solving clinical 🧩. Opinions ≠ med advice.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
#MMSM #MultipleMyeloma ⚡️#MedSky join me & my friend Dr. Krina Patel In a #CME 🧵exploring efficacy of quad tx in #NDMM 🔬PERSEUS, GMMG-HD7 & CONCEPT, CEPHEUS, IMROZ, ADVANCE, MIDAS +++ 🆓 CME from @bonumce.bsky.social 🔗 to CME ℹ️ 👉🏼 bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-CME Supported by an edu grant from Janssen
111
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
2/ Before we jump in, a few disclosures & important links🔗 1️⃣📖#CME info bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-CME 2️⃣Take the pre-survey 👉bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Pre 3️⃣Get the latest NDMM quad tx efficacy data w/ 🧵👇 4️⃣🏆Claim🆓CME bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post Now, let's get started!
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
3/🥼In your practice, which regimen are you using most often for 1L therapy in pts w/ transplant eligible (TE) #NDMM? ☎️ #MedSky #HemeSky 💬 reply and let us know what you do in your practice? 1️⃣ DVRd quad 2️⃣ IsaVRd quad 3️⃣ DKRd or IsaKRd quad 4️⃣ VRd 5️⃣ other triplet
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
4/💃Quads are taking center stage in NDMM Let’s look @ the📈 on quad tx PERSEUS ~🔑 trial: SQ dara➕VRd ➡️ ↑outcomes in TE pts 👉↑PFS @ 48m 84.3 v 67.7%; HR: 0.42; P<0.001 👉↑MRD- rate 75.2 v 47.5%; P<0.001 👉↑CR rate 87.9 v 70.1%; P<0.001 🎉 🆕 SOC ~ quad instead of triplet 🎉
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
5/ PERSEUS #ASCO25: sustained MRD- in pts on quad maintenance median follow-up of 47.5m 👉 ↑ sustMRD- at ≥24m w DVRd v VRd: 55.8 v 22.6% 👉 Pts w ≥12m sustMRD-: ↑ 48m PFS, regardless of tx 👉 Only 3.1% progression at 18m w DVRd v 6.8% VRd 🔑 DVRd ➡️ 2.5x ⬆️ ≥24m sustMRD- & ½ progression risk at ≤18m tx
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
6/🙋🏻What about replacing dara- with isa- in a quad? GMMG-HD7: IsaVRd v VRd induction ➡️ isa-len v len maintenance in TE NDMM 👉↑ MRD- rate 50% v 36%; p =0.00017 👉IsaVRd had ↓AE rates & ↓d/c rates v RVd 🎉🆕 SOC 👉Results ➡️ addition of IsaVRd as induction regimen for TE NDMM
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
7/⚡️GMMG-HD7 #ASCO25 update w/ PFS benefit in all quad recipients ↑CR 43.5% w IsaVRd v 34% w VRd ↑MRD- rate 66.2% w quad v 47.7% w triplet 👉PFS at 3yr benefit: 83% v 75% w/IsaVRd v VRd ↑MRD- regardless of maint v MRD+ (HR 0.61; P=0.002) 🔮Maintenance w Isa-len v len is on-going
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
8/🔬Exciting news for #mmsm Quad tx as🆕SOC for #NDMM Current EHA-EMN (1st optn) & NCCN (pref,cat 1) regimens for TE pts w/NDMM: 🎯DaraVRd➡️SCT➡️len maint 🎯IsaVRd SCT➡️len maint 👏to quad as 1L for TE pts👏 …but what about pts who are TIE /SCT-deferred?
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
9/CEPHEUS compared induction/consolidation w VRd ± daratumumab (D) followed by maintenance in transplant-ineligible (TIE) #NDMM The DVRd arm demonstrated which of the following outcomes? 💬 REPLY👇 1️⃣ Deep, more durable MRD- 2️⃣ ⬆️MRD- rates. No🔺in PFS 3️⃣ Similar efficacy, ⬆️VTE 4️⃣ ⬆️ D/C rate in DVRd arm
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
10/ CEPHEUS🔑 trial in TIE & SCT-deferrd pts DVRd ➡️ deeper, more durable MRD- rate TIE cohort: 👉Overall MRD- 63.2 v 41.4% 👉Sustained MRD @ ≥12m 48.7 v 26.3%; P<0.0001 👉CR 81.2 v 61.6%; P<0.0001 👉HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.79; P=0.0005 ↓D/C rate w quad 🎉DVRd new SOC for TIE NDMM🎉
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
11/Do results w isa show similar trends? IMROZ🔑trial IsaVRd ➡️ IsaRd v VRd ➡️ Rd in TIE pts w NDMM 👉IsaVRd ➡️↓time to MRD-: 14.7 v 32.8m 👉↑ PFS @ 60m: 63.2 v 45.2%; HR: 0.60; P<0.001 👉↑ CR: 74.7% v 64.1%; P=0.01 IMROZ results support IsaVRd as 🎉 🆕 SOC for TIE #NDMM pts
121
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
12/BENEFIT eval'd wkly bortezomib (V) in TIE NDMM IsaVRd➡️IsaVR➡️IsaR v IsaRd➡️IsaR➡️IsaR ↑MRD- rate @ 12mo 51% v 21%; OR: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.27-6.62;P<0.0001 18mo 53% v 26%; OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.89-5.28;P<0.0001 🔑Wkly V in IsaRd=deep responses Supports IsaVRd as🆕SOC for TIE NDMM
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
13/🆕SOC for pts w SCT-deferred or TIE #NDMM🎉 NCCN (preferred, cat 1) & EHA-EMN (1st optn) regimens: 🎯DRd ‘til progression; de-escalate prn 🎯DVRd ‘til progression; de-escalate prn(<80 yr old, not frail) 🎯IsaVRd ‘til progression; de-escalate prn(<80 yr old, not frail) #MMSM
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
14/Unfortunately, pts w high-risk (HR) #NDMM have 👎poorer prognosis & shorter survival rates vs standard-risk
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
15/ Based on results of GMMG-CONCEPT presented @ #ASCO2025, which treatment strategy should be used for pts w/ HR NDMM? 💬 reply/comment w/ your answer 💬 1️⃣ Initiate allogeneic SCT 2️⃣ Choose IV instead of subQ 3️⃣ Treat to MRD- then d/c tx 4️⃣ Treat to MRD- & cont maintenance
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
16/👏if you chose to treat to MRD- & cont maint GMMG-CONCEPT, largest cohort to eval MRD- in TE & TIE HRNDMM IsaKRd inductn & consolidatn➡️IsaKR maint➡️ ↑MRD- rate: 67.7% in TE & 54.2% in TIE Sustained ≥1yr: 62.6% in TE & 46.2% in TIE 🎉IsaKRd➡️↑deep remissions
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
17/📣GMMG-CONCEPT ASCO2025 update, TE pts: 73.2% MRD- post-consolidatn; p=1.91x10-13 86.8% MRD- @ any time 58.4% MRD- ≥CR 40.6% retained ≥2yr sust MRD- Med follow-up: 43m(0-90.2m) mPFS: 72.8m 5yr OS: 72% 6yr OS: 69% ⬆️2yr sustMRD-, ⬆️PFS, 69% OS @ 6yr IsaKRd:🆕SOC for HRNDMM
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
18/ADVANCE🔑trial demonstrating dara+ standard KRd ➡️↑outcomes in NDMM independent of TE ↑MRD- rate: 59% v 36%, adjOR = 2.5; P<0.0007➡️ 2.5x ↑MRD- rate w/DKRd 👉No new safety concerns ❓Impact on EFS, PFS & OS TBD DKRd👉1L for all pts on KRd backbone regardless of TE status
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
19/ Looking across trials... e.g. 🔬CEPHEUS 🔬IMROZ 🔬GMMG-CONCEPT 🔬ADVANCE… 🥅 MRD negativity emerges as benchmark to create a level playing field Across🔬, regimens, & now✅ FDA approved as clinical trial endpoint April ‘25
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
20/MIDAS eval’d MRD-guided consolidatn post 1L IsaKRd in TE NDMM Post 1L, no 🔼 in MRD- rates for all pts Tailoring tx to MRD post 1L may not ➡️ MRD- If respond to 1L tx may not need tandem SCT to reach MRD-; cont anti-CD38 &PI 🤔High # pts w t(11;14): impact time to MRD- results?
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
Joseph Mikhael MD @jmikhaelmd.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
21/ 1L in TE & TIE for NDMM 🔑 SUMMARY🔑 🎯Triplet WAS standard approach, but quad is🆕SOC 🎉Quad is preferred 1L for TE NDMM v triplet 🆕SOC: IsaRVd for TIE NDMM🎉 🎯MRD- emerging as a benchmark in🔬 & clin decision making 👏Great news for pts & Don't forget to claim #CME > bonumce.short.gy/NDMM-TW1-Post
bonumce.short.gy
NDMM ~ Tweetorial #1: Efficacy of Quad Therapies ***Post-Survey & Application for Credit***
Take this survey powered by surveymonkey.com. Create your own surveys for free.
011
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
1/ Best practices for 2L+ tx #MetastaticUrothelialCarcinoma 🧵 w🌟 @tiansterzhangmd.bsky.social & me ...assuming EV+P 1L ✅FGFR3 alts: THOR/erda 🎯Trop-2: sacituzumab govitecan 🏁HER2 IHC 3+: T-DXd Support by edu grants: Astellas, Gilead Sci, Merck, Seagen #CME from @bonumce.bsky.social ℹ️👇
111
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
2/ 📸👇COI & CME info👇 Full #CME ℹ️ bit.ly/muc_tw2 1️⃣ Answer Pre-survey 👉 bit.ly/muc_tw2_pre 2️⃣ Review #MedTweetorial👇 3️⃣ claim CME🏆bit.ly/muc_tw2_post #MedTwitter #OncTwitter #gucsm #BladderCancer #MetastaticUrothelialCarcinoma #OncX #CommunityOncology
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
3/Chemo-naive cisplatin eligible pts 👇Post-1L IO monotx👇 💡2L gem+cisplatin (or ddMVAC) pref'd 💡Erda for FGFR3 mut/fusion (THOR level 1 evidence for erda post-IO) 👉Cisplatin ineligible pts can get gem+carbo or EV (or erda if FGFR3+ alt) #OncSky
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
4/Preferred 2L tx for cisplatin-ineligible pts after 1L ICI monoTx ✅EV or ➡️gem + carbo or ➡️erdafitinib (if FGFR alt+) 👉Pembro alone is one of2L tx options for pts who progress after 1L platinum-based chemo and have not received ICI #OncSky
111
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
5/Other 2L options(depending on prior tx): ✔️Erda for FGFR3 alterations ✔️EV monotx Taxane if no access to☝️ ✔️Nivo or avelumab if no access to pembro + ICI naïve ✔️T-DXd for HER2 3+ IHC (gastric Ca scoring) ✔️Sacituzumab govitecan (FDA indication withdrawn) @pcvblack.bsky.social #OncSky
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
6/Atezolizumab EMA approved as monotx ✓1L in cisplatin-ineligible + PD-L1 +ve Based on IMvigor 210 & 130 trials 🔬IMvigor 130: ✅mPFS significantly longer in atezo+plat/Gem vs plat/Gem alone 🚫mOS not sign. longer in atezo grps vs plat/Gem alone @oncobellmunt.bsky.social @sandysrimd.bsky.social
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
7/ IMvigor130 safety results 👇 🎯 Fewer AEs ➡️ withdrawal of any agent in atezo only group 🎯 Most common TRAEs mainly related to chemo ✓ Anemia ✓ Neutropenia ✓ Thrombocytopenia #OncSky
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
8/Even w pembro➡️24 mo PFS rate in KEYNOTE-045 was 12.4%👉Pts likely to need subsequent line tx 🧐NCCN guidelines RE: next tx? Options (if not given prior): 🔶EV 🔶Erda for FGFR3 alt 🔶T-DXd for HER2 IHC 3+ (gastric Ca scoring) 🔶Saci(indication withdrawn, still in NCCN gdlns)
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
10/➡️Erdafitinib cont. 👍mOS and mPFS significantly ⬆️in erdafitinib group vs taxane or vinflunine THOR1 trial efficacy results 👇 #OncSky @achoud72.bsky.social @pbarata95.bsky.social @crisbergerot.bsky.social @paulobergerot.bsky.social @alisonbirtle.bsky.social @laurabukavinamd.bsky.social
122
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
11/Erda. Safety Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 45.9% w erdafitinib & 46.4% w chemo ⚖️Most AEs w erdafitinib manageable w dose modification & best supportive care 🛑Tx d/c rates 8.1% w erdafitinib & 13.4% w chemo #OncSky #BladderCancer
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
14/💡For phosphate of 8.0 mg/dL, withhold erdafitinib & restart once phosphate <5.5 mg/dL 🙌Erdafitinib=good option for pts w susceptible FGFR3 alt ⚖️What about pts who progress after 1L tx & no FGFR3 alt? ⚖️How does the changing 1L tx landscape w EV+P affect choice of 2L tx?
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
15/🏁What about T-DXd in mUC? 1st tumor agnostic ADC w FDA approval for Tx-refractory HER2+ IHC3+ Cas From DESTINY-PanTumor02 16 pts w/ HER2 IHC3+ mUC 56.3% ORR, mPFS 7.4mo, mOS 13.4mo No significant neuropathy 🔑AEs: pneumonitis, neutropenia, N/V, left ventricular dysfunction
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
16/Sacituzumab govitecan(SG) an ADC 🎯Trop-2 An active agent in mUC but failed to show stat. significant longer OS over taxane or vinflunine (VIN) in TROPiCS-04 ✅FDA approval w/drawn~Oct 2024 👉Let’s look @ original approval & possible reasons for a negative P3 trial
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
17/#TROPHYU01 Cohorts 1,2,3👇 1️⃣=113 pts who progrs'd after plat chemo+ICI ✅Notable efficacy compared to hist cntls Led to accel approval 2021 2️⃣=38 cisplatin-inelig pts s/p ICI tx ✅ORR=32% 3️⃣= 41 pts who progrs'd after plat chemo w 2L SG+pembro ✅ORR=41% mPFS=5.3m mOS=12.7m
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
18/🔬TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3 trial safety of sacituzumab govitecan👇 TRAEs led to➡️ ✋SG interruptions in 46% ⬇️SG dose reduction in 39% 🛑SG d/c in 15% @markuseckstein3.bsky.social @amandanizammd.bsky.social #OncSky
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
19/TROPiCS-04 Ph3 RCT SG vs chemo in pretx mUC 🚫sig. improvmt in OS w/ SG compared to taxane or VIN mOS: SG 10.3 vs chemo 9.0mo (HR:0.86; 95% CI:0.73–1.02; p=0.087) Grade ≥3️ TRAEs (SG): Neutropenia(35%; FN 12%), diarrhea (15%) G5 AEs: SG 7% (16 inf w neutropenia), chemo 2%
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
20/ @Uromigos thoroughly addressed of sacitizumab govitecan TROPiCS-04 findings presented at #ESMOAsia 🎧Worth a listen 👉 bit.ly/UromigosEp371 #OncSky
bit.ly
Episode 371: TROPICS-04 Results from ESMO Asia by The Uromigos
Jonathan Rosenberg joins Brian and Tom to discuss this important phase 3 trial and efficacy and toxicity signals.
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
21/Why TROPiCS4 neg for OS? Hard to est, consider: 🔸Late-line,hvly pretx pop 🔸Ltd primary G-CSF prophy in SG arm(~20%) 🔸~5% pts randomized to control never rec’d tx(~2% in SG arm) 🚫biomarker selection(UGT1A1 gene polym→⬆️tox?) 🔸~20% in each arm rec'd salvage EV(confounding)
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
23/🔑SUMMARY🔑 2L & later line tx in mUC 👉Erdafitinib FDA-approved w/ FGFR3 alt after prior tx 🎉NCCN guidelines updated Jan 2025 🔬Ongoing trials for SG in diff clin scenarios ✔️T-DXd for HER2 IHC3+ (based on gastric cancer scoring algorithm)
101
Reposted by Bonum Continuing Education
pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social @pgrivasmdphd.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Don't forget to complete the post-survey & 🏆 Claim #CME 👉bit.ly/muc_tw2_post
001