Solarpunk is a delightful aesthetic (green == good!), and I think that there *are* things we can do to make that aesthetic viable (and at least kind of sustainable), but doing it well requires a lot of careful thought and expertise! You can't evaluate environmental impact by vibes alone.
Which is why my problem with Solarpunk isn't that it is insufficiently radical, it's just... bad.
Like, 99% of the people contributing to it know nothing about civil engineering or agricultural science or ecology and just think "nature is when green".
Why are there trees on top of buildings?!?!