Natalie Christie Peluso 🧠 @nataliepeluso.com · 26/09/2026↪ Replying to @science.orgConfused about how this was published in Science without peer review. Isn't this better characterised as advertising? 2361
bcwbcw.bsky.social @bcwbcw.bsky.social · 26/09/2026↪ Replying to @nataliepeluso.comThis is an item in the news summary, written by some "Science" company employee, not an actual "Science"-submitted and peer-reviewed publication.6:31 PM · Sep 26, 2026 000
