Sign in

David Schmidt

@zipkus.bsky.social
139 followers 52 following 8 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 21/06/2026
It seems he has taken his "flooding the zone with 💩" policy up a notch...
020 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
If you don't trust your election process, you might decide the cure is to (securely) verify your exact vote on the other side. BUT if you allow this, votes can be proven—and thus bought. *Trust is essential.* Undermining it harms democracy. If you see this, ask yourself: Cui Bono?
030 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 17/05/2026
The writing style smacks strongly of AI.
000 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Replacing insane and incompetent leadership seems obvious to most of us, but let's also suppose that a correctly functioning government should largely contain the damage any individual can cause. Imho: Reform >> Replacement. (Reform might also make replacement easier.)
010 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
Oil again, no?
000 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 09/11/2025
Clearly not! And we might be closer than we think. ground.news/article/from...
ground.news
Researchers Claim to Identify Word-Like Patterns in Dog Barks
Dr. Kenny Zhu, a computer scientist at the University of Texas at Arlington, has compiled the world's largest video and audio catalog of canine vocalizations and identified potential phonemes and word...
010 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Quick reminder for our cleverest billionaires: Authoritarian regimes tend to stagnate economically as talent is stifled, resources are appropriated, and investment risk grows. If you value your engine of success, consider accepting sacrifices today to preserve democracy tomorrow.
080 0
David Schmidt @zipkus.bsky.social · 14/07/2025
Part of the empirical value of term limits is that corrupt officials lose their power and ability to protect themselves from consequences, isn't it? Seems useful to me. But I've long believed that voters will need to be the ones to implement them by voting against long incumbents. I usually do.
110 0