Sign in

Yuda Song

@yus167.bsky.social
1.4K followers 188 following 12 posts

PhD at Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University | Interactive Decision Making | yudasong.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Yuda Song @yus167.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
We also dive deep into the similarity and difference between different verification mechanisms. We observed the consistency, distinction and ensemble properties of the verification methods (see the summary image). (8/9)
110
Yuda Song @yus167.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
In iterative self-improvement, we observe the gap diminishes to 0 in a few iterations, resembling many previous findings. We discovered that one cause of such saturation is the degradation of the "effective diversity" of the generation due to the imperfect verifier. (7/9)
110
Yuda Song @yus167.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
However, self-improvement is not always possible on all tasks. We do not observe significant self-improvement signal on QA tasks like Natural Questions. Also, not all models can self-improve on sudoku, a canonical example of "verification is easier than generation". (6/9)
110
Yuda Song @yus167.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
Our first major result is an observational scaling law: with certain verification methods, the relative gap increases monotonically (almost linear) to the log of pretrain flops, on tasks like GSM8K and MATH. (5/9)
110
Yuda Song @yus167.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
LLM self-improvement has critical implications in synthetic data, post-training and test-time inference. To understand LLMs' true capability of self-improvement, we perform large-scale experiments with multiple families of LLMs, tasks and mechanisms. Here is what we found: (1/9)
1124