Sign in

srrrse

@without.boats
2.9K followers 135 following 1.8K posts

WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE

PostsRepliesMedia
srrrse @without.boats · 09/09/2026
Please stay seated for the Fly Over Penisland VR-exhibit, as it may cause dizziness.
0100
srrrse @without.boats · 04/09/2026
you can order power tools on wolt now but im holding out for makitas
030
srrrse @without.boats · 04/07/2026
Unlike hacker news commentators fable can admit when it’s wrong:
1120
srrrse @without.boats · 29/06/2026
this shit is just a little bit too millennial coded for me chief
Screenshot of Claude Code creating a plan called “I’m not sure was zany pancake”
050
srrrse @without.boats · 28/06/2026
For example here’s the take of Priya Donti, an actual MIT professor focused on the topic computing.mit.edu/news/3-quest...
“Overall, it's important to think about whether the types of investments we are making into Al are actually matched with the benefits we want from Al. On a societal level, I think the answer to that question right now is "no." There is a lot of development and expansion of a particular subset of Al technologies, and these are not the technologies that will have the biggest benefits across energy and climate applications. I'm not saying these technologies are useless, but they are incredibly resource-intensive, while also not being responsible for the lion's share of the benefits that could be felt in the energy sector.”
0120
srrrse @without.boats · 21/06/2026
0160
srrrse @without.boats · 16/06/2026
060
srrrse @without.boats · 15/06/2026
1210
srrrse @without.boats · 11/06/2026
check out knuth low key roasting him in this print only interview
161
srrrse @without.boats · 27/05/2026
hard to think of a more explicit expression of moral depravity than the tag on palantir’s chore coat
2543
srrrse @without.boats · 18/03/2026
The core concept of cybernetics is that we can, by iteratively feeding system output back into the system improve the steerage of the system toward our intended goals. It comes from the Greek for “pilot.”
2181
srrrse @without.boats · 13/03/2026
got some shocking news for people who post like this about information that has been written down
1291
srrrse @without.boats · 23/02/2026
Obviously I don’t agree. I think once these tools have become normalized someday this idea that sentience comes from the language will seem as absurd as this classic tweet:
1150
srrrse @without.boats · 21/02/2026
thinking a lot today about the futurist manifesto and Silicon Valley
1. We intend to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and fearlessness.
2. Courage, audacity, and revolt will be essential elements of our poetry.
3. Up to now literature has exalted a pensive immobility, ecstasy, and sleep. We intend to exalt aggresive action, a feverish insomnia, the racer's stride, the mortal leap, the punch and the slap.
4. We affirm that the world's magnificence has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. A racing car whose hood is adorned with great pipes, like serpents of explosive breath—a roaring car that seems to ride on grapeshot is more beautiful than the Victory of Samothrace.5. We want to hymn the man at the wheel, who hurls the lance of his spirit across the Earth, along the circle of its orbit.
6. The poet must spend himself with ardor, splendor, and generosity, to swell the enthusiastic fervor of the primordial elements.
Except in struggle, there is no more beauty. No work without an aggressive character can be a masterpiece. Poetry must be conceived as a violent attack on unknown forces, to reduce and prostrate them before man.
8. We stand on the last promontory of the centuries!... Why should we look back, when what we want is to break down the
mysterious doors of the Impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We already live in the absolute, because we have created eternal, omnipresent speed.
9. We will glorify war—the world's only hygiene-militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of freedom-bringers, beautiful ideas worth dying for, and scorn for woman.10. We will destroy the museums, libraries, academies of every kind, will fight moralism, feminism, every opportunistic or utilitarian cowardice.
11. We will sing of great crowds excited by work, by pleasure, and by riot; we will sing of the multicolored, polyphonic tides of revolution in the modern capitals; we will sing of the vibrant nightly fervor of arsenals and shipyards blazing with violent electric moons; greedy railway stations that devour smoke-plumed serpents; factories hung on clouds by the crooked lines of their smoke; bridges that stride the rivers like giant gymnasts, flashing in the sun with a glitter of knives; adventurous steamers that sniff the horizon; deep-chested locomotives whose wheels paw the tracks like the hooves of enormous steel horses bridled by tubing; and the sleek flight of planes whose propellers chatter in the wind like banners and seem to cheer like an enthusiastic crowd.
190
srrrse @without.boats · 10/02/2026
My favorite stupid claim in this stupid slop blog post is that a condition which has happened on average every 5.5 years since ‘93 is representative of societal collapse.
2160
srrrse @without.boats · 06/02/2026
030
srrrse @without.boats · 05/02/2026
0140
srrrse @without.boats · 04/02/2026
can i say somethin without everyone getting mad
130
srrrse @without.boats · 04/02/2026
Humans have language and are conscious. Computers have language and are not conscious so it’s not the language that makes the human conscious, It‘s something else entirely
0240
srrrse @without.boats · 31/01/2026
any time anyone more hype about AI than me says anything
Woody Harrelson in True Detective saying “I just want you to stop saying odd shit”
1411
srrrse @without.boats · 30/01/2026
Terabytes! Where could anyone acquire terabytes without “stealing”
2231
srrrse @without.boats · 21/01/2026
I have included the most relevant section in the alt text of this image of him giving the talk:
They need to negotiate with each other. They have to probe each other. They have to dynamically figure out a common language so they can exchange information and fulfill the goals that the human programmer gave to them. So that’s why this goal-directed stuff is going to be so important when we have this internet—is because you can’t write a procedure because we won’t know the procedures for talking to these remote programs. These programs themselves have to figure out procedures for talking to each other and fulfill higher-level goals. So if we have this worldwide network, I think that this is the only model that’s going to scale. What won’t work, what would be a total disaster, is—I’m going to make up a term here, API [Application Programming Interface]—this notion that you have a human programmer that writes against a fixed interface that’s exposed by some remote program. First of all, this requires the programs to already know about each other, right? And when you’re writing this program in this one’s language, now they’re tied together so the first program can’t go out and hunt and find other programs that implement the same service. They’re tied together. If this one’s language changes, it breaks this one. It’s really brutal, it doesn’t scale. And, worst of all, you have—it’s basically the machine code problem. You have a human doing low-level details that should be taken care of by the machine. So I’m pretty confident this is never going to happen. We’re not going to have API’s in the future. What we are going to have are programs that know how to figure out how to talk to each other, and that’s going to require programming in goals.
062
srrrse @without.boats · 19/01/2026
The silicon valley belief in the singularity has always been obviously a religious phenomenon. Here’s a definition of theology that I like:
Text from “What is Theology?” by Adam Kotsko, reading: “On the one hand, there is philosophy, which seeks after perennial truths that are knowable, in principle, by every human being with the time and inclination to think carefully. Despite their universal accessibility by the mind, however, these perennial truths can only ever be approximated in our material world. Hence the satisfactions of knowledge and contemplation come to take priority over the futile tedium of political reform. On the other hand, there is theology, which seeks to remain faithful to a concrete historical event that claims to encompass the meaning of all human history.”
0140
srrrse @without.boats · 09/01/2026
so soothing when the discourse looks like this
screenshot of a bluesky thread in which i have already muted all the participants
2512
srrrse @without.boats · 20/12/2025
“designed by an entity” is fire
Screenshot of a moron (handle intentionally obscured) asking if a survey was “democratically put together” or “designed by an entity”, with the implication that if it is the latter the survey results are invalid
0150
srrrse @without.boats · 07/12/2025
to be honest, this year has also made me much more in favor of hangings
The defendants at Nuremberg
0291
srrrse @without.boats · 17/11/2025
important life update is that i got the coolest sideboard for 50€
0240
srrrse @without.boats · 09/11/2025
Zohran campaign style image saying impl Copy for Arc<T>
1622
srrrse @without.boats · 01/11/2025
books
a stack of books on my dining table which reveal my broad and interesting taste, signaling to my followers that they should like the post to demonstrate their own taste, giving me a little dopamine hit
1140
srrrse @without.boats · 23/10/2025
Prompting “Caravaggio’s Berghain” 21 months apart. The second is improved in some obvious respects, but isn’t it also lacking something from the first?
“Caravaggio’s Berghain” generated by some free stable diffusion model in January 2023“Caravaggio’s Berghain” generated by ChatGPT in October 2025
160
srrrse @without.boats · 19/10/2025
framing things is fun
an engraving of Sleeping Hermaphroditus framed in a gold frame8 vintage Air France ads in a black frameTwo prints in green and white framesTwo photographs in a brown frame
0110
srrrse @without.boats · 19/06/2025
Again I post the Dijkstra:
1102
srrrse @without.boats · 15/06/2025
From Types and Programming Languages by Benjamin C Pierce: “Unfortunately, the power of dependent types is a two-edged sword. Blurring the distinction between checking types and carrying out proofs of arbitrary theorems does not magically make theorem proving simple-on the contrary, it makes typechecking computationally intractable! Mathematicians working with mechanical proof assistants do not just type in a theorem, press a button, and sit back to wait for a Yes or No: they spend significant effort writing proof scripts and tactics to guide the tool in constructing and verifying a proof. If we carry the idea of correctness by construction to its limit, programmers should expect to expend similar amounts of effort annotating programs with hints and explanations to guide the typechecker. For certain critical programming tasks, this degree of effort may be justified, but for day-to-day programming it is almost certainly too costly.”
141
srrrse @without.boats · 15/06/2025
I use the unwrap method because I have self-respect
Passage from Joan Didion’s “On Self-Respect”: “Like Jordan Baker, people with self-respect have the courage of their mistakes. They know the price of things. If they choose to commit adultery, they do not then go running, in an access of bad conscience, to receive absolution from the wronged parties; nor do they complain unduly of the unfairness, the undeserved embarrassment, of being named corespondent. If they choose to forego their work-say it is screenwriting-in favor of sitting around the Algonquin bar, they do not then wonder bitterly why the Hacketts, and not they, did Anne Frank.”
0201
srrrse @without.boats · 28/05/2025
tbh this is a pretty damning statement about java more than anything else
0260
srrrse @without.boats · 25/05/2025
There is actually good and bad language design
“Freedom of Speech” by Norman Rockwell
1370
srrrse @without.boats · 16/05/2025
what people aren’t considering that this is probably less hallucinatory than the information satya normally gets
0407
srrrse @without.boats · 05/05/2025
“You wouldn’t tariff a movie” meme
1321
srrrse @without.boats · 25/04/2025
Posted this on Twitter years ago, but this (from a concurrent skiplist implementation) continues to be the cutest piece of code I ever wrote.
3491
srrrse @without.boats · 11/04/2025
I don’t think it’s a good idea to encode peano numbers using type constructors to simulate dependent types
“Freedom of Speech” by Norman Rockwell
3240
srrrse @without.boats · 25/03/2025
The thing about memory safety Luddites is the quality of what they produce is objectively worse. At least most forms of Luddism have some sort of argument that automation traded away quality for cost
6541
srrrse @without.boats · 14/03/2025
AI systems like these have started to surpass humans in a number of domains - flying through the sky, traversing rivers, heating homes, keeping out the rain, just to name a few - and they’re getting better every day.
A DC-7The Ponte 25 de AbrilA radiatorWomen with umbrellas
0171
srrrse @without.boats · 14/03/2025
Gonna have a fun weekend
A UniFi 7 Pro WiFi Access Point, a PoE injector, an Ethernet switch, an RJ45 to USB-C adapter, and several CAT6 cables
0120
srrrse @without.boats · 06/03/2025
You vs the guy she told you not to worry about
Philips head screwsTorx head screws
0180
srrrse @without.boats · 05/03/2025
Dijkstra‘s remains the correct take on AI
“Finally, to correct the possible impression that the inability to face radical novelty is confined to the industrial world, let me offer you an explanation of the -at least American- popularity of Artificial Intelligence. One would expect people to feel threatened by the “giant brains” or “machines that think.” Tin fact, the frightening computer becomes less frightening if it is used only to simulate a familiar non-computer. I am sure that this explanation will remain controversial for quite some time, for Artificial Intelligence as mimicking the human mind prefers to view itself as at the front lined whereas my explanation relegates it to the rear guard. (The effort of using machines to mimic the human mind has always struck me as rather silly: I’d rather use them to mimic something better.)” -EWD
1294
srrrse @without.boats · 21/02/2025
Something we should bring back from the 80s is narrow serif fonts in advertisements
Don’t mess with Texas advertisementApple “Think different” advertisement
1220
srrrse @without.boats · 18/02/2025
Room is still under construction but it’s starting to get vibey
A projected video on the wall of my living room, with indirect lighting from the ceiling above
0150
srrrse @without.boats · 30/01/2025
The only clout that really matters:
020
srrrse @without.boats · 18/01/2025
Step 3
1170
srrrse @without.boats · 18/01/2025
Step 2
160