iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

To anyone else reading this, that user did block me. So the question is: Is someone having an issue with removing a political influence on what is supposed to be an A-political governmental agency/entity suspect, or not?

000

No, it's what YOU are trying to do, discredit/dismiss a legitimate concern...even though you basically just confirmed the political nature of what should be A-political. Again, why is that? You blocking such discussion would just as easily confirm your intent here as suspect, but be my guest.

100

That you've tried to characterize my legitimate concern as "venting" only made your intent in this discussion more suspect. Regardless, based on both of YOUR inputs; "no one pays attention to them anyway", "none of them are trustworthy"...why not eliminate foxs' presence so it's not even an issue?

000

…and besides, do members of the military even need ANY news being televised in their work spaces to be able to do the jobs they’re there to do? What exactly was your point there, and why are you still implying no one should be considering this?

000

Given that fox “news” is basically pro-russia at this point, the fact that it is televised on U.S. military bases (entities that are supposed to be a-political) that smacks of a foreign influence operation. AND, that it’s owner is not even from the U.S. (in case you weren’t aware of that fact).

200

Except for the fact that what I’m doing can’t be considered “arguing” when you’ve ignored my main point, that fox “news” should not be present on U.S. military bases. It doesn't matter who does or does not pay attention to it, it’s whether it should even be present.

100

I am not trying to alienate anyone, I'm asking them to consider a negative influence on U.S. military bases...an influence individuals don't even need to pay conscious attention to for it to have a subconscious negative effect, especially on those who won't even consider that as a possibility.

100

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

No, you just keep conveniently neglecting to address fox "news" specifically as even being a potential problem. Why is that? Given all we know about it as a right-wing propaganda channel, why have you not agreed its message should not even be present on US military bases?

000

I wasn't talking about or generalizing individual soldiers, nor did I ever mention the word "fascists". I was talking about what soldiers are subjected to on military bases. That you couldn't make those distinctions for yourself wasn't exactly confidence inspiring.

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

Depends how many military bases around the world still have all of their tv's tuned to fox "news". Anyone still think that is by accident?

140

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 22/01/2025

Work with and help fund Jessica Denson and the team at Election Truth United to spread their messages more widely to the American people that dt disqualified himself Constitutionally from being potus with Jan 6, and THEN stole the 2024 election with the help of musk. Far too many just don't know.

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 18/01/2025

Which they already did last time around by separating and losing thousands of children in a purposeful bureaucratic shuffle, which they have recently been blaming on the Biden administration..."alternative facts" which their supporters have accepted no questions asked.

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 17/01/2025

If you start a club, let me know. I feel like I've already been a member for years. 😉

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 15/01/2025

This is not even a scenario Dems/Libs should be giving ANY airtime. The maga "right" may want the world to operate with a juvenile WWE mentality like they do, but that is no reason for the adults in the room to even stoop to the level of talking about it.

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 14/01/2025

Whatever works to remove cannon from the equation of influence/interference IMO.

000

Does Garland not have the authority to just drop the charges against trumps maralago, co-conspirator/employees so that cannons' legal reason (to ensure an untainted jury trial) no longer applies for her blocking the release of Smiths' report? Why force all this just to put THOSE two guys in jail?

011

....so if her excuse is eliminated...her "legal" reason for blocking is also eliminated. MUCH more important that the public knows the FULL report (for deciding about 14/3) than two country club employees being held accountable, especially when they were just following their boss' orders.

011

Merrick Garland could help by dropping the charges against the two maralago employees so that Jack Smiths full report could be released to the public record. Her claimed excuse for blocking it is to ensure they have an untainted future jury trial...

211

Garland could redeem himself somewhat by just dropping the charges against the two maralago employees so cannons' reason for blocking the 2nd part of Smiths report would be gone. If she's "worried" about its release tainting any future jury trials for them...no more worries, right?

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 12/01/2025

Garland could redeem himself somewhat by just dropping the charges against the two maralago employees. cannon would then have no further reason to block that part of Smiths report. Her current reason that it's release may taint any future jury trials for them is then eliminated, right?

000

You literally tried to specify FOR me that I was talking specifically about "Dems". But thank you for your assistance in my not having to talk with one more person these days who "thinks" their reality is correct when it obviously isn't. 😉

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 12/01/2025

EXCELLENT strategy. Drop the charges against trumps' maralago co-conspirators so FULL report can be released due to them needing no further legal/trial protection. youtu.be/j0iS1pdf5QQ?...

youtu.be

WHOA! Bill Maher, Jon Cryer Clash During Awkward Podcast Moment

YouTube video by Political Voices Network

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 12/01/2025

Please don't try to speak for me. Yes, the term "Washingtonians" included Dems, but not just specifically Dems, because there are MANY republicans who, after Jan 6, at one point or another over the last four years have ALSO condemned trump, but they TOO recently refused to back up their words.

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 10/01/2025

There was enough legitimate vote suppression/manipulation evidence that POTUS and VP could have fought/questioned the certification peacefully/legally too though based on 14/3. MANY Americans are NOT resting easily knowing that WASN'T EVEN TRIED.

020

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 09/01/2025

At what point does doubt of deserving benefit of the doubt become legal action? DO IT NOW Washington Democrats! www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiLv...

youtube.com

CRAZY LEAK: Trump Made SHADY PRIVATE CALL to Supreme Court Justice!

YouTube video by Pondering Politics

000

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 09/01/2025

It's understandable to feel that way, but as a person who lives in a very red part of the country, I STILL know for a fact that despite much of the news, reported voting results, and most of the people local to me saying that the election represented a majority of America...that is NOT reality.

Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 08/01/2025

Reposted by WhoToTrust7

NEW: Smith has filed his opposition to Aileen Cannon’s injunction. He transmitted the report to Garland yesterday, who intends to make Vol I PUBLIC and to keep Vol II only to Congress as it’s still pending. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25...

s3.documentcloud.org

728189464324

Reposted by WhoToTrust7

snikpoh.bsky.social @snikpoh.bsky.social · 08/01/2025

Re: housing pets

18539

Reposted by WhoToTrust7

Kaylan_TX @kaylan.bsky.social · 08/01/2025

Please share for those who are impacted by the fires in Los Angeles who have animals🙏

5533472480

Reposted by WhoToTrust7

Kaitlin Is Just Getting Started @gothamgirlblue.com · 09/01/2025

Still angry about this, especially as Democrats act like 75 million of us who voted against Trump don’t exist, like his mandate was 1984 style. Meanwhile, Trump is having casual chats with Sam Alito and I hate it here

533046

WhoToTrust7 @whototrust7.bsky.social · 08/01/2025

That's one way to view your posts anyway.

000

lol. Exactly, the repubs do the things they do FIRST. Odd that you seem to take joy in THEM doing that though.

lol. The point is, Dems wouldn't be in the position of being ascribed what you're ascribing to them if repubs didn't FIRST do the things they do.

I'm curious why you would even ask this question and try to place the focus on Dems when it's obvious repubs who do those things and whose obvious and blatant actions need to be the focus of attention?

You aren't SUPPOSED to "respect the winner" when you've watched them cheat the ENTIRE "game". Dems didn't even request going to the "instant replay" for verification ONCE despite multiple OBVIOUS infractions. WTF? Makes a person wonder if Dems deliberately shaved points to throw the game.