Sign in

Ben Wetherall

@wetherall.bsky.social
112 followers 171 following 10 posts

Fertility & Cell-Cycle scientist 🥚🔬 Research Associate with @SuzanneMadgwick.bsky.social NCL UK

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Christopher Thomas @ovarylab.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Check out our new review in Reproduction! 💥🥚🔬 In “The explosion of life”, @anitabichisecchi.bsky.social, @petramikec.bsky.social and I explore how live imaging has shaped our understanding of ovulation, revealing the cellular and tissue dynamics that drive egg release. doi.org/10.1093/repr...
Seeing is believing: historical snapshots of ovulation. Representative stills from landmark live-imaging studies capturing periovulatory
dynamics and follicle rupture.
0269
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Tanja Bueltmann @tanjabueltmann.net · 20/07/2026
Unless this “honesty” involves the recognition that immigrants are *not* the root cause of the UK’s problems *but* actually a part of the solution to them, this will be completely pointless. I cannot stress this enough. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
theguardian.com
Burnham to say UK must be honest about its challenges as he prepares to become PM
Labour leader will visit king to accept role on Monday and will start making cabinet appointments that afternoon
592057656
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
I’ll be force feeding my piece down your throats bit by bit for the next few days. This is about why loss of research capability in universities isn’t just a linear bit of market forces but a messy process of universities sometimes doing panicky short term cuts
You might think these research cutbacks in universities are the exercise of market forces, with the strongest departments surviving. But it is more complicated than that because of the complex cross-subsidies within higher education. Financial instability is largely driven by the drop in high-paying international students and the erosion in the value of tuition fees by
inflation over the past decade. Caught up in the crossfire of this instability and through no fault of their own, some of the top-ranked humanities research departments are closing, while our analysis shows the number of early-career academics in the humanities has fallen by 20 per cent over the past decade.
719168
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Fire Brigades Union @fbunational.bsky.social · 01/06/2026
The Fire Brigades Union has made a statement on the proposed EHRC Code of Practice on Services. Our message is clear. Equality matters, solidarity is essential, and we will continue to fight for both.
831965653
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
Wait, they're doubling down on this? 🤯 Copy + pasted bands and deleted off-target reactivity = "adjusted to clarify" ???
000
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
Thermo having what I beleive is referred to as 'a bad one'.
010
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
What a week at #DynamicCellVI. Thanks @bscb-official.bsky.social @biochemsoc.bsky.social for the opportunity to show off our work (@suzannemadgwick.bsky.social @caitlinsmalley.bsky.social)🥚🔬🧑‍🔬 A lot of great science, a little bit of dancing, and one truly upsetting pint of Guinness.
060
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Suzanne Madgwick @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
Super proud of 2nd year PhD student Caitlin Smalley presenting her studies investigating chromatin morphology in oocytes at #DynamicCellVI in the @royalmicrosoc.bsky.social session @bscb-official.bsky.social @biochemsoc.bsky.social
062
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Suzanne Madgwick @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
Super session at #DynamicCellVI rounded up by @wetherall.bsky.social presenting our Imaging Mass Cytometry work in mammalian oocytes 😊
073
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Suzanne Madgwick @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
Very pleased with this long effort through last year, now published last week. Thank you very much @apsphysiology.bsky.social and editors @mhverlhac.bsky.social and Michael Caplan for supporting our review article with @wetherall.bsky.social .
092
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Christopher Thomas @ovarylab.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
How does an ovarian follicle remodel in space and time to release an egg? 💥🥚 We have an exciting PhD project combining follicle culture, advanced imaging and quantitative analysis to understand the cellular dynamics of ovulation. 🔬 Co-supervised by me and @guignardlab.bsky.social. Please share! 🌱
An ovarian follicle poised for ovulation, with the oocyte at its centre. Cell membranes are shown in orange and DNA in blue.
13114
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 17/04/2026
@suzannemadgwick.bsky.social and I have written a review all about how weird the cell cycle is in our egg cells! 🥚 🔬 It's available now in the July issue of the @apsphysiology.bsky.social Physiology 📖 journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.... (will be on PubMed Central July 1st)
journals.physiology.org
Peculiarities of the Mammalian Oocyte Cell Cycle | Physiology | American Physiological Society
Oocyte meiosis, the process of egg cell formation, requires a highly regulated cell cycle with many unique features compared to somatic cell division. On the journey to create a healthy embryo, this special cell carries a heavy responsibility and must navigate a remarkable number of complex challenges. Most oocytes will never complete this journey; less than 0.1% are ever ovulated, and fewer are viable. However, the few that do complete it manage by the execution of a series of extraordinary adaptations through two rounds of cell division. In this review, we discuss some of these challenges and the adaptations that have evolved to mitigate them. This is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the cell cycle in oocyte meiosis but to highlight some of the differences between oocyte meiosis and a typical mitosis. We discuss features that make this cell unique and the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms that support them. We salute the few that make it and those that are sacrificed along the way.
061
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Prof Rachel Oliver @profrachelgan.bsky.social · 12/01/2026
Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.
Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues.  Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.  

A 2018 report  from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”.  This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research.  In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research.  For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times  published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””.  Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian  on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. 

I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship.  The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers.  You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”.  Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research.  This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.
25819298
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Capping off the year with some insane and impractical 6x17 photography using my recent obsession - a 3D printed medium format film camera.
051
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Python Software Foundation @python.org · 27/10/2025
TLDR; The PSF has made the decision to put our community and our shared diversity, equity, and inclusion values ahead of seeking $1.5M in new revenue. Please read and share. pyfound.blogspot.com/2025/10/NSF-... 🧵
python.org
The official home of the Python Programming Language
12363772727
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 20/09/2025
POV you're finally home after a week away
060
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Ignacio Arganda-Carreras @iarganda.eurosky.social · 18/09/2025
After an intense week of learning, coding and playing with advanced methods on #BioimageAnalysis, a well deserved BBQ 🔥 to recover our strength 💪 for tomorrow, the last day of the course 😢 Enjoy!
172
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 31/08/2025
I am not a bird watcher. I have no interest in bird watching. But the best piece of media I think I've watched this year was a 2 hour, un-monetised, amateur documentary about extreme bird watching youtu.be/zl-wAqplQAo?...
youtu.be
LISTERS: A Glimpse Into Extreme Birdwatching
YouTube video by owen reiser
010
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 22/08/2025
Excited to see my first book chapter is out with @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social 📖 edited by @binyammogessie.bsky.social Ever wonder what that big weird nucleolus is up to in oocytes?🥚 No? Well. I think we make a good case for maybe you should! link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-97173-0_6
link.springer.com
Canonical and Non-canonical Roles of the Nucleolus in Relation to Nucleolar Function in Oocyte Meiosis
The nucleolus is the most prominent nuclear organelle in almost all cells including mammalian oocytes and embryos. It is primarily responsible for ribosome biogenesis. However, non-canonical functions...
021
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Christopher Thomas @ovarylab.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
A fantastic primer by Martin Anger highlighting our work on separase control in oocytes! 🥚✂️ @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social @wetherall.bsky.social @plosbiology.org
063
Ben Wetherall @wetherall.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
New paper out = time to actually introduce myself! I'm Ben, a PDRA in the Egg Lab 🥚 with @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social @ Newcastle University. I study how oocytes organise chromsomes, developing some cool new tools along the way 🔬 👨‍🔬 Let's talk #fertility, #imaging, and all things science.
The chromosome periphery (Ki67) in a mammalian prophase oocyte.
141
Reposted by Ben Wetherall
Christopher Thomas @ovarylab.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Great collaboration with @suzannemadgwick.bsky.social, led by @wetherall.bsky.social! 🙌🏼🎉
093