Sign in

christoph schmon

@tylium.bsky.social
644 followers 158 following 85 posts

international policy director @EFF.org | posts are mine but I share

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
The EU Commmission presented the 𝗘𝗨 𝗞𝗜𝗗𝗦 𝗔𝗰𝘁 to better protect children but its elements, from social media "delay" (gatekeeping the internet), "safety by design" (treating speech like a product) & age verification (privacy nightmare) come w/ fundamental rights concerns. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
EU Kids Act Won't Keep the Internet Accountable and Trustworthy
The EU Commission draft law to restrict young people’s access to the internet that it presented last week will come at a high cost: it will make internet access contingent on age, expand the use of in...
31413
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Similar to www.eff.org/deeplinks/20.... These bills are popping up everywhere.
eff.org
A.B. 1043’s Internet Age Gates Hurt Everyone
Legislators do not need to sacrifice their constituents' First Amendment rights and privacy to make a safer internet, but they can address many of the harms these proposals seek to mitigate.
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
100%. Branding is a strength
120
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
The EU Commmission presented the 𝗘𝗨 𝗞𝗜𝗗𝗦 𝗔𝗰𝘁 to better protect children but its elements, from social media "delay" (gatekeeping the internet), "safety by design" (treating speech like a product) & age verification (privacy nightmare) come w/ fundamental rights concerns. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
EU Kids Act Won't Keep the Internet Accountable and Trustworthy
The EU Commission draft law to restrict young people’s access to the internet that it presented last week will come at a high cost: it will make internet access contingent on age, expand the use of in...
31413
Reposted by christoph schmon
Mike Masnick @masnick.com · 27/08/2026
In case you wanted about 3,700 words on the problems with today's "settlement" that gives Meta way more power over how the internet works than it should have.
121535641
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
the jurisdiction bit is a lovely read for PIL lawyers. good reasoning by the court but dogmatically shaky.
010
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 04/08/2026
scraping is beautiful. great initiative
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
which work? we will all just tend our gardens
010
Reposted by christoph schmon
IFEX @ifex.org · 29/07/2026
🌐 A ruling by the EU Court of Justice could deprive online platforms of liability protection because of how they organize and disseminate user content, wrote @tylium.bsky.social for @eff.org buff.ly/KoCPNxL
buff.ly
New EU Court of Justice ruling on platform liability could cause collateral damage to freedom of expression - IFEX
A ruling by the EU Court of Justice could deprive online platforms of liability protection because of how they organize and disseminate user content.
01815
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
that's true.
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
with the "subtle" difference that the EU does not have centralized control over infrastructure and production mandates and there are no state-backed tech conglomerates like Huawei. (and ofc, deregulation does not automatically mean innovation).
100
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Why a recent Court of Justice case about drivers reporting police checks could cause collateral damage to freedom of expression in Europe. My latest piece argues that recent CJEU case law is eroding EU intermediary liability protections to the detriment of users. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
New EU Court of Justice Ruling on Platform Liability Could Cause Collateral Damage to Freedom of Expression
Intermediary liability laws around the world recognize that social media platforms, search engines, and other online service providers have become an integral part of our lives: they shape how we acce...
174
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
@hutko.bsky.social @daphnek.bsky.social @davidgreene.bsky.social @aleksandraq.bsky.social @laureline.eurosky.social
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Why a recent Court of Justice case about drivers reporting police checks could cause collateral damage to freedom of expression in Europe. My latest piece argues that recent CJEU case law is eroding EU intermediary liability protections to the detriment of users. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
New EU Court of Justice Ruling on Platform Liability Could Cause Collateral Damage to Freedom of Expression
Intermediary liability laws around the world recognize that social media platforms, search engines, and other online service providers have become an integral part of our lives: they shape how we acce...
174
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
There is one proposal in the EU's Digital Omnibus - #GDPR #reform - that actually could simplify something for users: requiring online interfaces to respect privacy signals. It's time to kill the cookie banners. killthecookiebanner.eu
killthecookiebanner.eu
Kill the Cookie Banner!
042
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
Intermediary liability protections (an important safeguard for freedom of expression) are being chipped away in the EU: ➡️ Russmedia: privileging content control ➡️ Coyote System: equating algorithmic organisation w/ control ➡️ AGCOM: expanding the notion of knowledge curia.europa.eu/site/upload/...
012
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
EU Commission plans for social media restrictions: -Phased access to social media+ paired w/ age verification -Safety by design -Parental controls & digital literacy -States may add restrictions for 13+ The report barely discusses the impact on fundamental rights. FoE is not mentioned once.
054
Reposted by christoph schmon
Steve Peers @stevepeers.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
EU tech law EU General Court dismisses Apple's legal challenge to being listed as a gatekeeper under the Digital Markets Act (as regards the App Store and IoS) curia.europa.eu/site/upload/...
curia.europa.eu
0199
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
"The mere fact that its servers are based in Europe is not sovereignty if users are denied control." Fully agree.
093
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
"Defending democracy: Europe’s endeavours to resist big tech" Great article by Alice Johnson on how Europe is tackling the democratic challenges posed by Big Tech and AI through regulation and digital sovereignty. Glad that my perspective was included. www.ibanet.org/Defending-de...
ibanet.org
Defending democracy: Europe’s endeavours to resist big tech
The EU has introduced regulation to address the threats to democracy and human rights presented by big tech through social media and AI – moves the US has characterised as ‘foreign censorship’.
020
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Meta just lost a landmark EU case (C-797/23) on #fair #compensation for news content. ⚖️ The CJEU upheld Italy’s power to force negotiations between platforms and publishers + let AGCOM intervene on remuneration disputes. This ruling have repercussions across Europe. curia.europa.eu/site/upload/...
curia.europa.eu
120
Reposted by christoph schmon
Electronic Frontier Foundation @eff.org · 05/05/2026
EFF joins 18 organizations in writing a letter to UK policymakers urging them to address the root causes of online harm—rather than undermining the open web through blunt restrictions www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
eff.org
EFF and 18 Organizations Urge UK Policymakers to Prioritize
EFF joins 18 organizations in writing a letter to UK policymakers urging them to address the root causes of online harm—rather than undermining the open web through blunt restrictions.
110943
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
What is "digital fairness"? This is the central question of the EU's Digital Fairness Act For us, it means ✔️privacy: no pay for privacy ✔️freedom of choice: no dark patterns and manipulation ✔️user sovereignty: limit contractual/technical lock-ins+ remote lockouts www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
Getting Digital Fairness Right: EFF's Recommendations for the EU's Digital Fairness Act
For digital fairness to work, the European Union must focus on addressing the root causes of harm, not requiring platforms to exert more control over their users. This means safeguarding privacy, free...
053
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
EFF is a great place to work! @eff.org We're hiring an Assistant Director of EU Policy to bolster our international policy work, i.e. • co-leading our legal advocacy efforts in Brussels • overseeing critical files related to tech regulation Check it out! www.paycomonline.net/v4/ats/web.p...
paycomonline.net
Assistant Director of EU Policy
...
33526
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
The EU’s Chat Control plan, which would mandate mass scanning + other encryption breaking measures, has had some good news lately. But it's too early to celebrate. This is a zombie proposal. It keeps coming back and must not be allowed to return through the back door. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
EU Parliament Blocks Mass-Scanning of Our Chats—What's Next?
The EU’s so-called Chat Control plan, which would mandate mass scanning and other encryption breaking measures, has had some good news lately. The most controversial idea, the forced requirement to sc...
11311
Reposted by christoph schmon
David Greene @davidgreene.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
When I first started doing free speech work way back in 1997 and harm-to-kids issues would come up (at that particular moment, the main concerns were 'satanic' music and violent TV), people would frequently admonish me that surely I would feel different once I had kids of my own 1/
1194
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
The EU’s Chat Control plan, which would mandate mass scanning + other encryption breaking measures, has had some good news lately. But it's too early to celebrate. This is a zombie proposal. It keeps coming back and must not be allowed to return through the back door. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
EU Parliament Blocks Mass-Scanning of Our Chats—What's Next?
The EU’s so-called Chat Control plan, which would mandate mass scanning and other encryption breaking measures, has had some good news lately. The most controversial idea, the forced requirement to sc...
11311
Reposted by christoph schmon
Owen Bennett @owbennett.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Great jobs like this doesn't often come up in the tech policy space. Do apply if it fits with your professional aspirations, even if you don't meet *all* the job description criteria!
012
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
EFF is a great place to work! @eff.org We're hiring an Assistant Director of EU Policy to bolster our international policy work, i.e. • co-leading our legal advocacy efforts in Brussels • overseeing critical files related to tech regulation Check it out! www.paycomonline.net/v4/ats/web.p...
paycomonline.net
Assistant Director of EU Policy
...
33526
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
also not sure how it would fully bypass content bans (which are tied to user accounts).
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
Is this not just a (gov provided) VPN service?
100
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
We’ve just published the “DSA Human Rights Principles: A Global Perspective” to keep the DSA enforcement rights-respecting and globally informed. They address the Brussels Effect and outline concrete actions to protect fundamental rights across borders. www.eff.org/issues/princ...
eff.org
Principles for a Human-Rights Centred Application of the DSA: A Global Perspective From the DSA Human Rights Alliance
The EU’s pioneering Digital Services Act (DSA) aims to foster a safer digital space by setting out new responsibilities for online platforms, supporting online expression, and giving users more contro...
042
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
𝐄𝐔'𝐬 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐂𝐮𝐭𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐆𝐮𝐭𝐬 𝐆𝐃𝐏𝐑 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 Read here for a complete breakdown: www.eff.org/deeplinks/20... @eff.org
eff.org
EU's New Digital Package Proposal Promises Red Tape Cuts but Guts GDPR Privacy Rights
The European Commission (EC) is considering a “Digital Omnibus” package that would substantially rewrite EU privacy law, particularly the landmark General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It’s not a...
02918
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Vielleicht. Meine These ist, dass die groesste Angst der Plattformen nicht die Haftung ist, sondern dass Ihnen die NutzerInnen und damit der Profit abhanden kommen. Deshalb setzen wir uns fuer user controls, strenges Wettbewerbsrecht und Interoperabilitaet ein. bsky.app/profile/tyli...
000
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
jedenfalls aendert auch strict liability in Ihrem fall die Situation nicht. Im Fall geht es um Probleme mit der Identitaetsverifizierung, Datenherausgabe und internationaler Kooperation.
100
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Ich haette jedenfalls X im Beschwerdeverfahren zur Kenntnis gebracht weshalb der Inhalt gegen oesterr Recht verstoesst und sodann X vor einem oesterr Gericht geklagt und dort Antraege zur Informationsherausgabe gestellt. Frage mich weshalb Herr Längle den komplizierten Weg gegangen ist.
100
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Wenn X ein eindeutig illegales Posting nicht loescht, koennen Sie ohnehin X vor einem AUT Gericht klagen. Es gibt in diesem Fall kein Haftungsprivileg und die int. Zustaenedigkeit ist gegeben. Das war auch der Aspekt in Ihrem Fall, der ein wenig verwundert.
200
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Must-watch: Cory Doctorow on the Daily Show, explaining how we can rescue the internet from “Enshittification”. www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2e-...
youtube.com
Cory Doctorow - Rescuing the Internet From “Enshittification” | The Daily Show
YouTube video by The Daily Show
032
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Genau: algorithmische Transparenz, Zugang zu Daten durch ForscherInnen, Beschwerdeverfahren etc. Viele moderne Plattformregeln sehen Risikominderungspflichten vor - mit vielen Fragezeichen. Die Idee, einen verantwortungsvollen Umgang zu vermitteln, ist auch gut, wurde bisher aber nicht umgesetzt.
010
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Ja, hatte ich gelesen. Probleme der Rechtsdurchsetzung gibt es leider immer, zT auch frustrierende (auch mit strict liability). Dieses Problem muss man angehen, und etliche Personen und Organisationen, auch ich selbst, arbeiten an der Evaluierung und praktischen Anwendung des DSA.
100
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Zeitungen veröffentlichen -ausgewählte- Leserbriefe. Intermediaere stellen einen offenen Diskursraum bereit, in dem alle NutzerInnen posten koennen. Der Grundrechtseingriff einer Vorabpruefung (Filter) ist schwerwiegend. Fuer recommender systems lassen sich spezifische Pflichten vorsehen (zb DSA).
320
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Verantwortung kann es dennoch geben, etwa für algorithmische Empfehlungssysteme oder dark patterns und Risken die der Anbieter kontrolliert (wie unter dem DSA vorgesehen - auch wenn die Durchsetzung nicht immer einfach ist). Diese Dinge sind moeglich ohne dass man das Haftungsprivileg aufheben muss
020
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Ich verstehe den Ansatz, aber der Vergleich hinkt weil Plattformen keine redaktionelle Kontrolle ueber jeden Drittinhalt ausueben (und nur dort gibt es das Haftungsprivileg). Wuerde man sie wie redaktionelle Massenmedien behandeln, muessten sie Postings vorab pruefen/filtern, was unzulaessig ist.
210
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Das Plattformprivileg ist ein Kernstück des Internetrechts in Demokratien, ohne dieses es zu Überwachung, präventiver Löschung strittiger Inhalte und einer Einengung des Raums für Anbieter und Ideen käme. Solche Modelle werden praktisch nur von autoritäre Staaten genutzt. Es gibt Alternativen.
130
Reposted by christoph schmon
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
After years of debate, "Chat Control", a dangerous law that could mandate mass scanning and weaken encryption, nears its final hurdle. Read here what is really cracking off. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20... @eff.org @thorinklosowski.com @fightchatcontrol.bsky.social
eff.org
After Years of Controversy, the EU’s Chat Control Nears Its Final Hurdle: What to Know
After a years-long battle, the European Commission’s “Chat Control” plan, which would mandate mass scanning and other encryption-breaking measures, at last codifies agreement on a position within the ...
03224
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
thanks. as you may remember, I always argued that (copyright) upload filters fall under Art 22 control. so I wonder how monitoring duties triggered by controller-risks - like in the present case - would intersect with it. impossible to conduct individual ex ante content control on UGC platforms.
110
Reposted by christoph schmon
Gateklons @gateklons.eurosky.social · 05/12/2025
Hmm, excellent point by @tylium.bsky.social, I hadn't thought of that. I guess they would benefit from that immunity. I think of Article 7 as mostly aimed at ex-post investigations while this would require ex-ante (prior restraint) but it works for both. Since by way of Article 22(1) GDPR all
122
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
re Art 22: "produce legal or similarly significant effects" ? also platforms will say the need to check it as it's "authorised" by eu law, right? my illustrative example is this: bsky.app/profile/tyli...
120
christoph schmon @tylium.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
yeah, or even more illustrative: the platform takes (organisational) measures and becomes “active” as a GDPR controller because a risk is triggered, but it still misses the dodgy prada bag, never gaining actual knowledge that it is fake. the safe harbour stays intact. if sloppy: GDPR fine.
020