iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Trinition

Sherrod Brown @sherrodbrownoh.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

If you’re planning to vote in this year’s election, register to vote NOW. Register to vote, update your information, and check your voter registration status at iwillvote.com/OH.

610055

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Bad news for the U.S. who has rolled back investments in green energy, thanks to Trump. The rest of the world will leapfrog the U.S. setting the country back for a generation or more.

120

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

I have this same thought all the time. Ford's Nixon pardon -> Trump And don't forget, some of the same people involved in Watergate helped get Trump elected (e.g. Roger Stone). And the idea of Fox News was born out of the minds of the salty losers of Watergate.

110

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

"Nobody knows 'vagan' has an E in it." -- Trump, next week

030

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

I suspect Putin whispered this to him, knowing that Trump privately understands the spike in oil prices is bad for him. Putin is good at manipulating people, and Trump is easily manipulated. So he's co-opting Trump's Iran problem to turn him against Ukraine. And none of Trump's yesmen will tell him.

120

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Many would, e.g. those with Republican Secretaries of State and Governors.

040

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

I saw several. I suspect there would be more but they're picking their kids up from practice and helping with homework and such.

110

Reposted by Trinition

Senator Amy Klobuchar @klobuchar.senate.gov · 29/09/2026

Before calling someone a “dirtbag,” the Senator should have had his facts straight. An apology is in order. Glad one of us knew the difference between the Atlanta Hawks and the Iowa Hawkeyes!

2525253696283

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Wow! Is he going to support legalisation to bail them out, too?

030

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Elections are done, so now they do what they want. Next: mobilization

1211

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

I'm not sure if the combative pro-impeachment folks on BlueSky are really right-wingers trolling, or misguided lefties who can't handle opinions not 100% aligned with theirs, but I've had to mute/block two in recent days because they get angry, twist words and lie rather than discuss and debate.

000

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

You are. They make this choice every day. It's called out here on BlueSky every day, with news clips highlighting it.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

The J6 impeachment failed, and that was the closest we had to any Republicans actually wanting to oust him. If the J6 impeachment failed, why would a lesser impeachment succeed? Impeachments are quasi-judicial political things. You need political pressure on those voting to impeach & convict.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

You are lying about me. Why? No need to extrapolate and alienate. You're just like the last person I ended up blocking because they resorted to name calling and lies when they couldn't have a mature disucssion.

000

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

And you're also a rando, with no evidence that impeachment is fruitful. You've started with the assumption that your way is the right way and attack anything that is not aligned. You are not helping your cause.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

How do you get rid of one with impeachment but WITHOUT CONVICTION & REMOVAL? Impeachment is the beginning of a political process, one which we know the current political climate does not favor. If Americans show up and vote blue, it will tilt Congress and send the GOP a message. Then you impeach.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

N=2 is indeed small. I larger N would give more confidence. But I still believe conducting those experiments has a public perception cost. I know you disagree. We can agree to disagree. I won't even be mad if they try again. I'm just not clamoring for it because I think it's counter productive.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

You don't need an impeachment for that. If Democrats can take the house, they can start having public committee hearings and bring I witnesses to testify.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

You think more failed impeachments will remove a fascist regime?

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Nothing? Except 100% of the Trump impeachments? And the vociferous support GOP congresspeople give in their public statements every day?

101

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

SCOTUS emboldened him too, sure. But learning a GOP majority would protect him no matter what? That also did. Impeachment is political, not just legal. It depends entirely on whether Congress can be persuaded to convict. That requires political pressure from voters.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

You're missing my point. If there were no downsides to dozens of failed impeachments, then yes, try and try again. I believe that piling on dozens of failed impeachments will make the public numb and embolden and armor Trump.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Again with your extremes and alienation. 🙄

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

"The cost of trying is zero" I disagree. Which is why I think it is a harder choice than you do. I've already explained this.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Your single-mindedness is your shortcoming, IMO. I agree with fighting, public pressure, protesting, etc. I'm just disagreeing that more impeachments without removal would be beneficial. That's it. So I'm going to keep fighting too, but without alienating potential allies and with pragmatism.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

How many impeachments did Nixon survive?

000

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Agreed. Two things to note: It was threat of impeachment that scared Nixon. That does not scare Trump. It was enough people in his own party willing to turn on him. We do not have that today.

000

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

He was acquitted once. Not twice. And not a dozen times, which is what would happen under your proposal. Dodging removal a dozen times would further armor Trump.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

No, trying was correct. Both were impeachable offenses. The morally correct thing to do would've been to convict and remove him, but we learned there are too many that put party over country. We know many understood what Trump did was wrong, but feared for their career and party more, empowering DJT

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

I've already explained. I'm sorry you couldn't understand.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

As I said elsewhere, IMPEACHMENT without REMOVAL, especially REPEATEDLY SO, is actually counter-productive. It sends the exact opposite signal. You may disagree. You've shown nothing to change my point of view. All you've done is repeated yourself, and made incorrect insinuations about my beliefs.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

You claimed, "Why are you so insistent that our elected reps should lie to us?" I've not insisted any such thing. But you think arguing this way is fruitful, but it's not.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

You're missing the point still. When a president is IMPEACHED but not REMOVED, it sends a signal to the lay person that the president is INNOCENT. This is not what it actually means, but how the public receives it. And that emboldens the President.

400

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

You keep putting words in my mouth. Your abrasive style is why so many people block you and mute you. This is further evidence that you just don't get it. The world is bot as black & white as you think it is, and humans are far less rational than your approach is suited for. Argue elsewhere.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Repeated impeachments is not how you reach them. You, and others in this thread, have enumerated lots of ways that aren't impeachment. Republicans are very effective at getting their message out, and they're not impeaching anyone (certainly not repeatedly).

300

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Agreed. And none of those things listed are impeachment.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Which 15 hate him enough to vote against the leader of MAGA?

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

You can repeat that through news cycles, advertisements, speeches. You don't need impeachments to get the ideas into circulation. McDonalds and Coca Cola didn't need impeachment advertising.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Agree to disagree. Repetition without results is how people get worn out and stop paying attention.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

I'm not pretending there isn't evidence. I'm saying the public will get bored with what bubbles up through their news sources when theres yet-another-imeachment. The problems with the impeachments was never lack of evidence (even if there was more). Republicans lack a spine.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

This is just silly. Pelosi was no perfect savior, but if you're arguing she was in cahoots with Trump, then we're done.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

I disagree. What emboldened him was knowing that Republicans wouldn't ever let him be removed. He views it as surviving an assassination attempt. The Democrats tried to remove him, but his loyal Republicans protected him. That showed him he can do whatever he wants.

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

> There was enough evidence for 50-100 impeachments. bsky.app/profile/trin...

100

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

I agree with that idea, but flooding the zone with dozens of impeachments would end up with headlines like, "Democrats try yet another hopeless impeachment". The impeachment process needs to be poignant, not dilute.

200

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 17/09/2026

But he's not acting as President in this, is he? He's just a Trustee appointed by the President that happens to also be the President.

100

Reposted by Trinition

JM =^D @jm539581.bsky.social · 13/09/2026

Tee Higgins with a diving catch just before the 2-minute warning

1354

Trinition @trinition.bsky.social · 13/09/2026

Kushner also said Ukraine's unwillingness to give up some of its land is impeding peace. I wonder if Russia promised them mineral rights to that land.

021