Sign in

Tony

@tonyprep.bsky.social
27 followers 151 following 199 posts

As far as social media is concerned, the only things I want to share with the world is the state of the world.

PostsRepliesMedia
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Wind "and" solar is not "a" source. Fossil fuels is still adding more that renewables.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Yeah, we scale those up by mining ever more minerals, destroying habitat and polluting the air and ground water.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
What's a "poaster?"
110
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 15/08/2026
We need neutrality, not scientists embracing their values. Their values can make them believe in solutions where there are none. The myth of "clean" energy, for one. Reducing environmental harm is great but ultimately will not halt environmental degradation.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
Thanks for detailing that there are many challenges but I also find the term "clean energy" misleading, as though a complete transition to renewables and batteries will have no detrimental effects. This just isn't true and it's disheartening to see a scientist lapse into the falsehood.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
Right, that could be the situation if we don't stop using fossil fuels soon. Got it.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
Crazy. And June has been near record highs, with days being second or third warmest so far.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
So, feedbacks now ensure that even net-zero doesn't stop warming?
100
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
It takes more than just electricity to "run" the UK.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
A minimum 10% drop from a year ago, maybe, but a definite 20%+ drop from February. Given the fondness for utes and SUVs that run on diesel, though, it could be significantly more than 20%.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
I can't see it taking only 3 months. With wells shut in, it may take more than a year for production to reach near pre-war levels, with a possibility that they may never reach those levels. Refineries need oil to refine, so oil production needs to completely recover. Definitely more than 3-4 months.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
It looks as though they are counting fuel on ships that are only 2 days, or fewer, away. But the MSO applies to stocks actually in the country. I thought another reason to escalate was if our suppliers are implementing fuel conservation measures. They are. South Korean, e.g., are restricting exports
250
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
But oil use still grew in 2025.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Well, they were people. Seems fine, to me.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 15/03/2026
That's a big IF, especially as fossil fuels are needed for everything, including building so-called renewables. Even if the transition were made, there would be another choke point for some critical resource.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 14/03/2026
Why would it be more secure? It requires all sorts of mined inputs from around the world. Including fossil fuels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 14/03/2026
The margin was one vote but 7,568 votes decided the election.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
Mind you, without fossil fuels, civilisation collapses. On the other hand, civilisation is unsustainable, so ...
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
All true, but I don't think most people are concerned with just survival. They want our global technological industrial civilisation to survive, also. So resisting the ultra-rich won't allow civilisation to survive. It's unsustainable.
020
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
Although there is no such thing as clean energy.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 08/02/2026
People need to understand that there will be no heaven on earth.
020
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 08/02/2026
If this is accurate, yes. The arithmetic of Sam Carana was appalling. We should already have lost the sea ice in summer but at least he now thinks we've got 18 months or so. So that's summer next year.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
The only "solution" (that is, to remove its climate impact - anything else is not a solution) is to end aviation.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 24/01/2026
dothemath.ucsd.edu/2025/09/a-th...
dothemath.ucsd.edu
A Theory Gone Flat | Do the Math
Am I really going to do this? Am I going to spend time on a topic so far from legitimacy as Flat Earth? Doing so risks affording a tiny bit of credibility to an idea that hasn’t earned it, as if I doth protest too much.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
They may be cheap but they'll still ruin the environment. Only more slowly.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
It's not clean energy, it has environmental impacts.
120
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
How are the produced ingredients sustainable? If they have to be produced (as opposed to simply harvested), they are not sustainable.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
As if God would need to send a warning, rather than fixing the issue.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 15/11/2025
You're not talking about freedom now.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
Can't say if it's related to number of doses. I only had the primary course and first booster. Never had COVID-19. Following the NZ data, when it was available, boosters reduced protection to the level of the unvaccinated. I can't see myself getting another, but it's up to the individual.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
Of course you don't; you're not a hunter-gatherer.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 08/11/2025
Hunter-gatherers had freedom. Civilised people less so.
200
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
Trump popularity polls averages, from multiple sources.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
Eh? So where do you get your data from?
100
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
I think it's called hopium.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
He still has an approval rating around 40%, so the entire country is clearly not embarrassed by him, strangely.
171
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 23/10/2025
The author was a vegetarian for about 20 years and it made her ill. She tackles the issue from multiple angles (environmental, empathy for the animals, health, economic) and explains how it doesn't make sense from any angle though she also rails against industrial farming for other reasons.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 22/10/2025
books.google.co.nz/books/about/...
books.google.co.nz
The Vegetarian Myth
We’ve been told that a vegetarian diet can feed the hungry, honor the animals, and save the planet. Lierre Keith believed in that plant-based diet and spent twenty years as a vegan. But in The Vegetar...
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Yes, I'm sure that the small amount of fossil fuels that could easily be collected might have had an impact on pre-civilisation human life but it's the industrial collection/extraction of those resources that really broke the world.
011
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Fossil fuels broke the world as soon as they were discovered. Now some want to keep that broken world by powering everything with energy harvested from renewable sources with non-renewable infrastructure. And if that's done too fast (assuming it's possible), it crashes the economy.
130
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 28/09/2025
Commited?
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
I hate them using the term "clean energy" as though it would fix everything.
130
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Our technological industrial civilisation is unsustainable. If you can think of a way to make it sustainable, I'm all ears. Note, though, that sustainable means "able to continue indefinitely." Reduced environmental impact is nowhere near enough.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
Hausfather is definitely clutching at straws and even clings to the notion that building renewable energy harvesting infrastructure is clean. We will never avoid the worst case scenario because that is the scenario we end up with as emissions continue. With modernity, they will always continue.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 11/09/2025
Climate pulse shows a less noisy tail. pulse.climate.copernicus.eu
110
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
Bill seems to be ignoring the environmental damage done by civilisation, even before climate change started being a big cause of ecosystem decline. Switching to solar solves nothing, especially as it requires a viable fossil fuel industry to actually be built and re-built.
010
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 17/08/2025
Right. It's impossible. No-one will vote for simplification and downsizing of their economy, no matter how much the facts show that's the best path for future generations, of all species.
000
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
If governments ever make climate sense, that is purely by coincidence, not design.
020
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
My bad. I missed that bit of the clip.
020
Tony @tonyprep.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
This is wrong. Conflating average lifespan with what individual lifetimes might be. Plenty of pre-industrial humans, even pre-historic, lived well past 60, even past 70. But child mortality in particular reduced the average.
250