Sign in

tomislavcaval.bsky.social

@tomislavcaval.bsky.social
139 followers 36 following 17 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 03/05/2026
Thats why I chose it. You optimized various condition, found the best one and they are still of lesser quality ( by my eye) then the ones we are critiquing. I do not need to check your pride data, I think your fragmentation data and reporting are sound.
100
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
I just think its unfair to hold authors to a higher standards than one uses for their own reporting:
200
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Totality of spectral quality seems sufficient enough to convince me downstream validation should be performed. One can always cherry pick a stand alone “shitty” spectrum.
220
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Photo dump from a great time last week at EBF Barcelona. Grateful for the opportunity to share our #glycotime efforts!
020
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Fumbled through the interview, but slipped at least 6 #glycotime mentions
020
tomislavcaval.bsky.social @tomislavcaval.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
Arrived at European Bioanalysis Symposium. 3 days of talks, should we keep count of (if any) times #glycotime takes the stage?
020