Sign in

tjitsvanlent.bsky.social

@tjitsvanlent.bsky.social
35 followers 13 following 9 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
Results show: -Faces were evaluated most positively when actions led to rewards. -Faces were evaluated most negatively when inactions led to avoiding punishments. -Faces were evaluated more negatively when inactions (vs. actions) led to avoiding punishments, showing the unique impact of inactions.
010
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
After learning, people were asked to evaluate the faces. (4/5)
100
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
Results on learning show that: -People found it easier to act to get rewards than to avoid punishments. -People found it easier to not act to avoid punishments than to get rewards. -There was no difference in learning to act or not act to avoid punishments. (3/5)
100
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
In our experiments, people learned to act (action) or not act (inaction) in response to images of faces to get rewards or avoid punishments. (2/5)
100
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
New paper in JESP: "On rewarded actions and punishment-avoidant inactions: The action–valence asymmetry in face perception.” In four preregistered experiments, we show that inactions influence evaluations of faces. (1/5) www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
On rewarded actions and punishment-avoidant inactions: The action–valence asymmetry in face perception
Although social interactions are ubiquitous, people often choose not to interact with others—for example, people may choose to not greet a stranger, t…
2115
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
Results show: -Faces were evaluated most positively when actions led to rewards. -Faces were evaluated most negatively when inactions led to avoiding punishments. -Faces were evaluated more negatively when inactions (vs. actions) led to avoiding punishments, showing the unique impact of inactions.
000
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
After learning, people were asked to evaluate the faces. (4/5)
100
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
Results on learning show that: -People found it easier to act to get rewards than to avoid punishments. -People found it easier to not act to avoid punishments than to get rewards. -There was no difference in learning to act or not act to avoid punishments. (3/5)
100
tjitsvanlent.bsky.social @tjitsvanlent.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
In our experiments, people learned to act (action) or not act (inaction) in response to images of faces to get rewards or avoid punishments. (2/5)
100