Reposted by @tivi63.bsky.social
Amazon Prime Day is here again, here are the best deals from Razer available this time around.
Details:
playday.one/2026/10/06/amazon-prime…
playday.one
Amazon Prime Day 2026 | The Best Razer Deals
Blimey, it's already Amazon Prime Day again! As usual, when there are great deals to be had, we source them all for you, so you can grab a bargain and be about your day without wasting any time. Razer have got some brilliant deals running for the next couple of days, so whether you're in the market for a new mouse, keyboard or controller - you'll find them all here. Amazon Prime Day 2026 | The Best Razer Deals | Image Credit: Razer Razer Deals for Amazon Prime Day 2026…
![We’ve had Sen. [Ron] Wyden on the show many times to talk about Section 230. I won’t go too far down that rabbit hole. The dynamic there was that Section 230 provided the immunity that you’re describing, but it was immunity for speech that would otherwise be illegal. And so it was speech that was defamatory. There’s a whole category of speech that isn’t illegal. Are you saying that taking the 230 immunity away from the social platforms would somehow make them moderate lawful but awful speech? And I bring this up because I’m very curious about how you would apply it in the AI case as well.
Yeah, no, I think that is the case. That part of their argument was, “ We want to take down really nasty, offensive, racist content, but we will be afraid to do so if you don’t give us immunity. So give us immunity, and we’ll take all that bad stuff down.” They got immunity. And I don’t know if you’ve been on X lately; it’s a cesspool. So giving them broad immunity did not allow them to enforce their community policies. And the First Amendment prohibits the government from dictating speech or prohibiting you from saying things. It doesn’t prohibit a private party from saying, “We don’t want racist content on our platform.” So there’s no problem with a private platform saying, “That violates our policy. We’re not going to post it.” And they’re not utilizing that immunity in a good way. So why should they continue to have it?
Now, we may want to create a safe harbor for companies that are meeting best practices and standards. So we may want to narrow 230 instead of getting rid of it. What is the analogy in terms of AI? I’m not sure what the analogy is.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:x56l2n7i7babgdzqul4bd433/bafkreih3fcl7yh42ospec32jebremfrn6suiwvkewomsgcxspqmsf3lf3y)
