Sign in

Tim Hannigan

@timothyrhannigan.bsky.social
434 followers 181 following 47 posts

Associate Professor of Strategy and Organization, University of Ottawa, Telfer School of Management.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
💥New | Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you? ✍️ Gorgi Krlev, @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social & @andrespicer.bsky.social #AcWri #SocialScience #LitReviews
blogs.lse.ac.uk
Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you? - LSE Impact
The potential for AI tool to assess and organise research literature presents an opportunity to rethink why they are undertaken in the first place.
088
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Laura K. Nelson @lauraknelson.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
This paper is causing a stir. My hot takes: 1. In my ideal world, we would be building boatloads of datasets and models like this, leading to a metastudy to synthesize findings. 2. Their use of GPT to structure text is, in fact, a great use of LLMs for research. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Epidemiology models explain rumour spreading during France’s Great Fear of 1789 - Nature
Epidemiological methods are used to show that the Great Fear of 1789, a series of peasant insurrections in rural revolutionary France, was driven by deliberate political action rather than spontaneous...
1151
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Alexander Hoyle @alexanderhoyle.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
Evaluating topic models (and document clustering methods) is hard. In fact, since our paper critiquing standard evaluation practices four years ago, there hasn't been a good replacement metric That ends today (we hope)! Our new ACL paper introduces an LLM-based evaluation protocol 🧵
Screenshot of first page of paper. It is here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.00828

Abstract: Topic model and document-clustering evaluations either use automated metrics that align poorly with human preferences or require expert labels that are intractable to scale. We design a scalable human evaluation protocol and a corresponding automated approximation that reflect practitioners' real-world usage of models. Annotators -- or an LLM-based proxy -- review text items assigned to a topic or cluster, infer a category for the group, then apply that category to other documents. Using this protocol, we collect extensive crowdworker annotations of outputs from a diverse set of topic models on two datasets. We then use these annotations to validate automated proxies, finding that the best LLM proxies are statistically indistinguishable from a human annotator and can therefore serve as a reasonable substitute in automated evaluations
35310
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Ian McCarthy @toffeeman68.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
The "Open Academic" A process model and a set of approaches for social-media-enabled academic openness. doi.org/10.1016/j.bu...
021
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Laura K. Nelson @lauraknelson.bsky.social · 26/05/2025
Attn: the special issue of SMR on Generative AI in Sociology is now online. The whole issue is fire, but the introduction by @thomasdavidson.bsky.social and Danny Karell is a must read, covering prompting, measurement, and simulations. It's a road map for soc sci research in the genAI era. +
journals.sagepub.com
Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Social Science Research: Measurement, Prompting, and Simulation - Thomas Davidson, Daniel Karell, 2025
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers new capabilities for analyzing data, creating synthetic media, and simulating realistic social interactions. This...
28941
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Laura K. Nelson @lauraknelson.bsky.social · 26/05/2025
Our article, with Nga Than, Leanne Fan, @tinalaw.bsky.social and Leslie McCall @stone-lis.bsky.social, proposes a framework (image 2) to (carefully) incorporate LLMs into the qualitative coding process. But read the entire issue, if it's your jam. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Updating “The Future of Coding”: Qualitative Coding with Generative Large Language Models
Nga Than, Leanne Fan, Tina Law, Laura K. Nelson, and Leslie McCall.
Abstract
Over the past decade, social scientists have adapted computational methods for qualitative text analysis, with the hope that they can match the accuracy and reliability of hand coding. The emergence of GPT and open-source generative large language models (LLMs) has transformed this process by shifting from programming to engaging with models using natural language, potentially mimicking the in-depth, inductive, and/or iterative process of qualitative analysis. We test the ability of generative LLMs to replicate and augment traditional qualitative coding, experimenting with multiple prompt structures across four closed- and open-source generative LLMs and proposing a workflow for conducting qualitative coding with generative LLMs. We find that LLMs can perform nearly as well as prior supervised machine learning models in accurately matching hand-coding output. Moreover, using generative LLMs as a natural language interlocutor closely replicates traditional qualitative methods, indicating their potential to transform the qualitative research process, despite ongoing challenges.Figure 1: Researcher-LLM-Researcher workflow. Circular diagram, starting at the top with Box 1: Design Coding Task (Researcher), moving clockwise to Box 2: Initial Text Classifiation (LLMs), going through high agreement to Validation (Researcher) and low agreement to Examine Ambiguous Cases (Researcher) in Box 3, then Box 4: Iterative Coding or Task Refinement (Researcher). Circling back to Box 1.
2317
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
John Thornhill @johnthornhill.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
The philosopher Harry Frankfurt argued that bullshit was "a greater enemy of the truth than lies are". But is generative AI-generated botshit even worse than human-generated bullshit? (Yes) My latest @financialtimes.com here: on.ft.com/3SikRPK
on.ft.com
Generative AI models are skilled in the art of bullshit
Large language models are unconcerned with truth because they have no concept of it — and therein lies the danger
27530
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Ian McCarthy @toffeeman68.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Best Article Award: Business Horizons 2024, with Tim Hannigan and Andre Spicer Here is the research article: doi.org/10.1016/j.bu... And here is an open-access pre-print version of the paper: dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn... #botshit
042
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Matthew Kirschenbaum @mkirschenbaum.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
What would be really good now would be if computer/data science departments established programs in reading and interpreting text. There could be theories of text, and examples of texts from other time periods and other cultures. Above all, students would learn how to look at texts very closely.
1111322
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 07/02/2025
I'm delighted to join the editorial team and begin my role as senior editor at Organization Studies (@orgstudies.bsky.social). I will be focusing on manuscripts surrounding fields, technology & organizing, interpretive applications of computational methods, and organizational wrongdoing.
1262
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 08/01/2025
I'm pleased to share our new article with Gorgi Krlev, Tim Hannigan (myself) and Andre Spicer in the Academy of Management Annals: What Makes a Good Review Article? Empirical Evidence From Management and Organization Research. journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5...
journals.aom.org
What Makes a Good Review Article? Empirical Evidence From Management and Organization Research | Academy of Management Annals
There is a long tradition of literature review articles in management. Despite attempts to establish consensus around what constitutes a high-quality literature review, there remains significant disse...
6254
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Ted Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 05/01/2025
Michael I. Jordan's 2019 essay on this is very good: rethinking AI as social infrastructure rather than something whose telos is necessarily to imitate individual human agents.
3264
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 24/11/2024
Neat tool showing themes of my work (using scholargoggler.com, via @drmaximvoronov.bsky.social)
1100
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Recent posts calling out tendencies to post about Bluesky. Maybe the platform is figuring out emerging norms and a genre repertoire? Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541–574
020
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 18/11/2024
We're very fortunate to host Ann Langley here today at Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa to share a process perspective on organizational identity
0110
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Maxim Voronov @drmaximvoronov.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
For any organizational researchers migrating to Bluesky, here is a starter pack to help us find each other. Will update, when I find more folks on here. go.bsky.app/H7TKNwu
214625
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
Great frame - Universities as social and cultural infrastructure. I would add that they can also serve as provisional institutional infrastructure for emerging fields
060
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
This week has led to a clear uptick in activity here on Bluesky. This is promising for renewing our ability to form relational publics and organizational possibilities. I wrote about this in my Org Studies Agora essay. Despite X imploding, we can form discourses and connect. doi.org/10.1177/0170...
doi.org
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
070
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 21/02/2024
This episode of Frontburner (CBC) with Gary Marcus was interesting. Good discussion about the pros and cons of generative AI use. It’s important to stress its value in prototyping, less in systems requiring reliability. I highly recommend giving it a listen podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/f...
021
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 29/12/2023
We’re facing a wave of botshit in organizations, which generative AI is creating. One of the big dangers of generative AI is that it brings the costs of bullshit down to zero. In a new article, we take a look at the phenomenon of 'Botshit'. Pre-print link: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
063
Reposted by Tim Hannigan
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 18/11/2023
Bloody hell so many good lines in this Jesse Armstrong piece on Sam Bankman-Fried including an extraordinary opening story www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/goi...
the-tls.co.uk
Sam Bankman-Fried: hollow fake or ineffective altruist?
Back in 2016, when Sam Bankman-Fried (“SBF”) was not a convicted fraudster but a young trader at Jane Street, a secretive high-frequency trading firm, he
032
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 03/11/2023
As we embark on Blue Sky, I’m remembering the practices that initially made Twitter compelling, from Follow Fridays, to hashtags, and finding connection with associated publics. This recent “Land of the Giants” podcast episode does a wonderful job documenting this podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/l...
112
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 31/10/2023
Looking over the 2024 EGOS sub theme calls for papers, I’m overwhelmed at how many fascinating tracks are being planned. There are 10 that I would absolutely love to be a part of. Decisions, decisions.. www.egos.org/2024_Milan/S...
020
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 24/10/2023
Neat video covering the history of the Rolling Stones “hot lips” logo. A collaboration between artist John Pasche and Mic Jagger, who was inspired by Hindu goddess Kali youtu.be/ykYfP7iqOto?...
000
Tim Hannigan @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social · 24/10/2023
The air here seems so fresh!
110