iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

The Public’s Science @thepublicsscience.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

In their response “The Standing the Public’s Deserves” Alondra Nelson & Jenny Reardon write:

It was that both treated the public as the object of science policy rather than as a participant in determining its purposes.

The Public’s Science @thepublicsscience.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

In the @bostonreview.bsky.social forum, "How to Save Science," @alondra.bsky.social and Jenny Reardon @scijust.bsky.social argue that neither of the architects of the postwar federal science framework adequately considered the role of the public. www.bostonreview.net/forum/how-to...

bostonreview.net

The Standing the Public Deserves

Alondra Nelson and Jenny Reardon respond to Zeynep Pamuk in our forum, “How to Save Science.”

165

The Public’s Science @thepublicsscience.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

That's the central question for The Public’s Science—A New Social Contract for American Research Policy—a two-year initiative reimagining American research policy around excellence, justice, transparency, and democratic participation.

111

The Public’s Science @thepublicsscience.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

75 years since Vannevar Bush's "The Endless Frontier" defined science policy, we ask: How do we build research that is genuinely publicly accountable, not just publicly funded?

153