Sign in

Tim Feeney

@tfeend.bsky.social
1.2K followers 302 following 403 posts

Scientist, Physician, Husband, Dad, Editor @bmj.com, Nerd/Geek since before it was trendy. Epi/Biostat, Causal Inference, Epistemology. #episky thefeeney.netlify.app fediscience.org/@tfeend

PostsRepliesMedia
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Chandelier of stomachs
001
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
speed without compromise! well, maybe just a little compromise.
000
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
turns out these are not what you might expect.
120
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 23/11/2025
made me think of this
110
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
Out this morning, TARGET a guideline to help get target trial emulation studies to report a standard set of items #prc10 @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social @bmj.com @societyforepi.bsky.social
2113
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
That NEJM published this by these two clowns should make the journal a pariah among scientists. I don’t care what their official position is, they are liars and grifters and the worst of the medical community. Shame on the NEJM.
050
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
Include information about your DAG somewhere in the publication to let researchers and editors see what you were assuming. If you're feeling cheeky, include code that helped you assemble the DAG (I'm looking at you Dagitty) to make it easier on your readers to recreate the DAG for their use.
latex code for the DAGs in the paper
100
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
Next is to identify all the variables that directly cause the exposure, outcome or selection into your cohort of interest. These is ideally led by subject matter experts and this will likely benefit from discussion and iteration. Next identify the relationships between variables.
DAG without arrows but variables that might have an impact on outcome and exposureDAG with filled in relationships between all the variables
110
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
DAGs can be useful for identifying all sorts of biases, such as confounding, collider bias, adjustment for mediators (overadjustment), and areas where a sensitivity analysis may be needed. DAGs can help determine what variables may be needed which analyses may be challenging due to intractable bias.
example DAG with illustrative variables, exposure, outcome, confounder, mediator, and collider, shown.
120
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
XKCD comic illustrating that to solve the problem of too many standards usually all that is done is adding on another standard
111
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
TBH this view never gets old.
image of BMA house in London.
020
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 08/12/2024
We meet again Piccadilly line.
Piccadilly line transit map
220
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 30/11/2024
Got love these casual typos.
110
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 29/09/2024
I feel seen.
072
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 01/09/2024
The bayesians are insufferable #episky #statsky
Car with license plate that reads: #1JAGSFN
070
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 26/11/2023
Pocock BMJ 1985, can't believe we are still grappling with this.
Quote from journal article reads: "The second topic is an overemphasis on significance testing. Most trial reports in medical journals rely heavily on significance tests and pay inadequate attention to estimating the potential magnitude of treatment differences (for example, confidence limits are underused)."
010
Tim Feeney @tfeend.bsky.social · 24/10/2023
Spotted near Cary NC. :-O
Picture of a wall with the words”team R” written in chalk.
000