Sign in

Dr. Taraleigh Davis

@tdunc17.bsky.social
196 followers 390 following 38 posts

Assistant Professor of Public Law/Am. Politics @bradleyu | Political Science Ph.D. @UWM | M.A. @UCF_SPSIA | Emergency Docket | she/her

PostsRepliesMedia
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
What do we call the Supreme Court deciding cases quickly, without full briefing or oral argument? I asked 1,455 Americans in a survey, and the results are pretty interesting. New piece over at "In the Interim" on @scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com/2026/08/what...
scotusblog.com
What the public thinks about the emergency docket
100
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
Did you know that if a justice denies your emergency application in chambers, you can refile with a different justice of your choice? Which justice litigants choose to refile with tells a fascinating story. New piece over at "In the Interim" @scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com/2026/07/just...
scotusblog.com
Justice shopping on the emergency docket?
011
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
How often do courts actually cite Supreme Court emergency docket orders? Probably more than you think. New piece over at “In the Interim” @scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/how-...
scotusblog.com
How often do courts actually cite emergency docket orders?
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
It’s been a long time coming, but I am proud to announce that In the Shadows of the Emergency Docket: What Emergency Applications Teach Us About Supreme Court Procedure, Precedent, and Public Opinion is forthcoming from the University of Virginia Press!
152
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
Always an honor to be quoted w/ @trjumn.bsky.social @anthonymkreis.bsky.social Taraleigh Davis said that it seemed clear during the arguments in the Cook case that the justices want to protect the Fed. "But I didn't hear an answer to what legal principle actually distinguishes the Fed from the FTC”
071
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
The New York Times asked why the justices "bypassed time-tested procedures" in 2016. They didn't. They used exactly the procedures they have for decades. New piece in @scotusblog.com from my new monthly recurring series "In the Interim.” www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/what...
scotusblog.com
What the New York Times got wrong – and right – about the emergency docket
In the Interim is a recurring series by Taraleigh Davis on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket, using data to help explain how it works. Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak of […]
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
We treat emergency docket orders as data. But what if the public record doesn't reflect how the justices actually voted or why? My latest at @scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/what...
scotusblog.com
What really happens on the emergency docket
By now, readers of SCOTUSblog are quite familiar with the Supreme Court’s emergency docket, where parties come to the court seeking emergency orders, oftentimes without full briefing and oral argument...
022
Reposted by Dr. Taraleigh Davis
SCOTUSblog @scotusblog.com · 28/01/2026
Introducing the Interim Relief Docket Stat Pack
scotusblog.com
Introducing the Interim Relief Docket Stat Pack
For years, scholars and commentators have tracked the Supreme Court’s merits docket through detailed statistical analyses. SCOTUSblog’s Stat Pack has become an essential resource for understanding how...
044
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
Have you ever wished you had a Stat Pack for Supreme Court emergency applications like the one @dradamfeldman.bsky.social and @jaketruscott.bsky.social put together for the merits docket? Well now you do! Now live over on @scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/intr...
scotusblog.com
Introducing the Interim Relief Docket Stat Pack
For years, scholars and commentators have tracked the Supreme Court’s merits docket through detailed statistical analyses. SCOTUSblog’s Stat Pack has become an essential resource for understanding how...
021
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
Oh we are hearing motions and not just oral argument?!?
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 05/10/2025
"They're continuing this post-Dobbs federalism framework of returning any type of contested moral social issues back to the democratic process at the state level," Davis said.
010
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 02/10/2025
This expansion in turn boosts Trump's power, Davis added, b/c if administration officials know they are "likely to receive a stay on the emergency docket they can implement controversial policies immediately & fight the legal battle with the policy already in effect." www.reuters.com/legal/govern...
reuters.com
US Supreme Court expands its 'emergency' docket - and Trump's power too
As she has done several times recently, liberal Justice Elena Kagan last week sounded the alarm after another bold emergency action by the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority again let President Donald Trump carry out one of his policies without taking the usual time or deliberation to review its legality.
010
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
My latest piece at @scotusblog.com is out! I’ve spent years tracking how long it takes the Court to decide on emergency applications so you don’t have to. Here’s what I found. www.scotusblog.com/2025/09/is-t...
scotusblog.com
Is the emergency docket really for emergencies?
If you’re requesting emergency relief from the Supreme Court, how long should you expect to wait for a decision? In other words, does the court really treat emergency applications as […]
010
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 10/09/2025
“Missives of the type written by Gorsuch and Burroughs are highly unusual, according to Taraleigh Davis, a Bradley University professor who has written about the shadow docket.” www.reuters.com/legal/govern...
reuters.com
Judges vexed by Supreme Court 'shadow docket' rulings in Trump cases
An extraordinary spat is occurring within the U.S. judiciary concerning a flurry of Supreme Court decisions.
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 18/08/2025
I’m really excited to announce that last week I signed an advance contract with UVA Press for my book “In the Shadow of the Emergency Docket: Emergency Applications and the Evolution of Judicial Power” to appear in UVA Press’s book series Constitutionalism and Democracy!
050
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 29/06/2025
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
Why didn’t anyone tell me? :(
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Great read on the dissent - data contradicts Alito's claim granting emergency relief w/o gov’t response was “unprecedented” It only requests responses in 33% of cases & grants 46% of those. The Court granted relief w/o responses in 11% of emergency apps (16-21) Not unprecedented—just less common.
030
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
Jackson in her dissent (joined by Sotomayor) argued that application lacked urgency since the TRO would expire in three days, the Dept abruptly terminated over 100 grants with min. explanation & appeared arbitrary and capricious, harm to states and education institutions was significant and concrete
documentcloud.org
24A910 Order
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
SCOTUS just overturned a TRO in Dept of Ed v. Ca - deciding it was actually a preliminary injunction in disguise. They also determined the Gov’t would likely succeed in showing the DC lacked jurisdiction to order payment under the APA. Respond. Wouldn’t suffer irreparable harm if TRO was stayed
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 28/03/2025
Chief Justice Roberts requests a response by April 1st in Trump v. J.G.G. (24A931) AEA case with Judge Boasberg - Fun Fact at the end of last term it looks like we were up to 24A215 so from Oct 2024 to now we’ve made it to 931! #shadowdocket #trumpeo #aea
020
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 27/03/2025
Justice Kagan requests a response by April 3 in OPM v. American Federation of Government Employees (24A904) the SG requested an administrative stay as well as a stay of the injunction that ordered the rehiring of 16,000 probationary employees www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?...
supremecourt.gov
Search
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
Second and last case of the day Bondi v. Vanderstock - Gorsuch writes for 7-2 majority that the ATF’s rule regulating ghost guns is valid. Thomas and Alito dissent saying that the text of the Act doesn’t cover unfinished parts and that weapons parts kits aren’t “weapons” until assembled
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
Court issued 2 opinions this morning first in U.S. v Miller Justice Jackson writes in an 8-1 opinion that the trustee in the case can’t recover the money from the IRS. Gorsuch dissents saying the government can be sued because Congress removed their special protection in bankruptcy cases.
000
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 14/03/2025
Chief Justice Roberts requests a response by April 4th in Trump v. CASA (24A884) I think it’s notable the amount of time AND that there is no temporary stay of the lower courts in the meantime www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?...
supremecourt.gov
Search
110
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Throwback to Con Law in the Fall where my class argued the Glossip case - they came out 4-4 based on how they thought their justice would rule. (Yes Gorsuch recused but he was still there for the assignment’s sake) @bradleyupolisci.bsky.social
040
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Happy to share that my article on procedural legitimacy, the shadow docket, and support for the U.S. Supreme Court from APR is out! journals.sagepub.com/eprint/B7CHBCB… #shadowdocket #apr #courtlegitimacy
journals.sagepub.com
131
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
Autocrats in the Reputation Era: my new research shows they support independent courts when they fear karma’s coming. #firstview www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
The “Case” for Independent Courts: The Insurance Theory of Judicialization in Autocracies | Journal of Law and Courts | Cambridge Core
The “Case” for Independent Courts: The Insurance Theory of Judicialization in Autocracies
184
Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17.bsky.social · 15/01/2024
Fitting first post on this app! Y’all “I believe the study has the potential to add meaningfully to the literature on this topic, and so I am pleased to invite you to revise the manuscript along the lines suggested by the reviewers.” Aaaaaahhhh! My 1st solo R&R!
030