Sign in

Jakub Stauber

@stauberj.bsky.social
160 followers 369 following 16 posts

Political Science @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz Political Parties | Information Flows | Defence Spending jstauber.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
Read our full analysis of how this unfolded here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
100
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
The ultimate polarizing issue? Vaccination. 💉 While mask-wearing showed some divides, the intention to vaccinate became the single strongest indicator of societal polarization. By the later waves, your party preference was a better predictor of your health choices than the actual health risks.
120
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
Crucially, this polarization wasn't two groups drifting apart equally. It was asymmetric. The data shows that the widening gap was largely driven by a specific segment, voters of the radical right, radicalizing their non-compliance, while the mainstream remained relatively cohesive.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
So, when did the break happen? Our models show the fracture widening significantly after Summer 2020. As the crisis continued, the "fear" factor faded, and political identity took over. Polarization wasn't driven by the severity of the virus, but by the politicization of the response.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
Using 38 waves of panel data, we clearly see a massive "Rally around the Flag" effect in early 2020. 🇨🇿 Initially, fear of the virus trumped politics. Compliance was high across the board. The polarization we talk about today didn't exist yet. Society held together.
100
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
There is a common narrative that the pandemic immediately fractured society. But our data tells a different story. In our new article in Political Studies Review, we track the timeline of polarization in Czechia.🧵 @psrjournal.bsky.social @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz
121
Reposted by Jakub Stauber
Chapel Hill Expert Survey @chesdata.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
Check out chesdata.eu for the 1999-2024 CHES trend file, along with individual year surveys with both means and expert-level datasets. We are also happy to release an updated CHES Shiny (CHES Interactive on the website) at chesdata.shinyapps.io/Shiny-CHES/!
chesdata.eu
Chapel Hill Expert Survey
0146
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
Join us today! @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz
021
Reposted by Jakub Stauber
European Security @europeansecurity.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
New OA article: The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration by @tomaskucera.bsky.social www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration
The professional transnationalisation of Central and Eastern European (CEE) militaries has been a pivotal factor in their integration into the Euro-Atlantic security community. This article examine...
135
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
Thanks a lot!
010
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
Thank you!
000
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
7/7 🚩 European NATO can stop Russia without U.S. ground forces—if it acts decisively and prepares. Our full open-access paper here: 📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Don’t count on the U.S.: can Russia achieve a rapid breakthrough in central Europe?
The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has significantly worsened the European security outlook. Simultaneously, concerns are growing over the United States’ willingness to commit substantial forces ...
021
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
6/ Why does it matter? With U.S. focus shifting to China and political will declining, Europe must prepare to defend itself. Our work shows this is possible—but only if Europeans invest now in troops, reserves, and logistics.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
5/ 🗝️ Key findings: Numbers & readiness > technology alone Deep, well-prepared defenses lower risks Rapid NATO reinforcement is critical Tech helps but can’t replace manpower
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
4/ In the larger Russian force scenario (with conscripts): ⚠️ Europe would need ~20+ brigades, stretching its capabilities. Even then, success is uncertain without deep defenses & low troop exposure.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
3/ In the smaller Russian force scenario: ✅ ~10–13 European brigades (beyond Poland’s) are enough to prevent a breakthrough if deployed quickly. But: If Poland fights alone, Russia’s chances of success rise fast.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
2/ We simulate a Russian attack on northeastern Poland (Suwalki Gap) in the late 2020s. Two scenarios: 🇷🇺 ~120k troops (professionals) 🇷🇺 ~200k troops (with conscripts) We test how many NATO brigades are needed to stop a breakthrough in 3–4 weeks.
110
Jakub Stauber @stauberj.bsky.social · 04/07/2025
1/ 🧵 Can Europe defend itself if the U.S. steps back? Our new study asks: Can European NATO members alone stop a Russian breakthrough in Poland? We model two scenarios and here’s what we found 👇
354