srehto @srehto.bsky.social · 09/10/2026a judge in NY just called out THIS SAME MF for filing a fraudulent warrant 3 days ago 131
Reposted by srehtoSarah J. Jackson @sjjphd.bsky.social · 14/07/2026Remember when police murdered Philando Castile a four year old was in the car. Remember children watched George Floyd be suffocated. Remember 7 year old Aiyana Stanley-Jones murdered by police in her sleep. Sonya Massey’s son and daughter. This is the same cookbook, the same evil. I hope folks see. 111602562
srehto @srehto.bsky.social · 10/07/2026me: what's this russian guy saying in this gas station video google ai: listen buddy, we all get upset sometimes, we can talk it out. to cheer you up, why don't you watch this ten second video of a lady swearing on tv 000
Reposted by srehtojesse, head of endorsement deals at BOOingo Wireless @killgoldfish.bsky.social · 20/06/2026There’s Grand Theft Auto the crime but then there’s Grand Theft Auto the specific action that I’d only ever heard of happening in the video game Grand Theft Auto 012134
Reposted by srehtoAlice Ghostley @piegoblin.bsky.social · 19/06/2026Tell me if you can guess what this store is and then, tell me how TF IT STAYS IN BUSINESS 9214
Reposted by srehtoJon Seidel @jonseidel.bsky.social · 09/06/2026Grand juror: "Do you have unlimited tries?" Mecklenburg: "I don't think we have to worry about that." AUSA Matthew Skiba: "I think the saying is the second time is the charm." 1038863
srehto @srehto.bsky.social · 09/06/2026grand juror either wondering if the prosecutor accidentally indicted the wrong party or planning a crusade against crossing guards 91068157
Reposted by srehtoAndrew Chen @andrewtychen.bsky.social · 09/06/2026very unfortunate product naming 4333
srehto @srehto.bsky.social · 08/06/2026just gonna do a quick bluesky search to learn more about this brand 100
Reposted by srehtoJared Pechaček @vandroidhelsing.bsky.social · 08/06/2026oof sorry, unfollowing now. loved his unique take on religion. had no idea he refused to send troops to Tunip, though Tunip his city wept and its tears flowed and there was no grasping of its hand 640973
Reposted by srehtoJoanna Wyld @joannawyld.bsky.social · 06/06/2026One of those classic pairings, like bacon & eggs or gin & tonic 1015216
srehto @srehto.bsky.social · 31/05/2026a great discussion of whether raised pavers should be considered a tree well derailed by the judges getting hung up on "fictional case citations" and "claiming the court of appeals said stuff they didn't" 000
![[screenshot, NY district court order:] After the Court required a further submission to explain this incongruity, respondents submitted an affidavit from [highlight] Brenden Cuni, a Supervisory Detention and Deportation Officer with ICE [end highlight], who was responsible for conducting the background searches. DE 20-7. Cuni was notified “some time before 5:50 PM” that “Petitioner was detained.” Id. ¶3. He [highlight] searched five separate federal databases, all of which “yielded negative results.” [end highlight] Id. ¶5 (emphasis added). Cuni then “issued and signed the I-200, Warrant of Arrest, and checked off the boxes relating to ‘biometric confirmation of the subject’s identity and a records check of federal databases . . . .’” Id. Of course, since the records checks were negative, it was undeniably false, though represented as true in the warrant, that “biometric confirmation [and] records check of federal databases affirmatively indicate” that the petitioner lacked immigration status. DE 7-1. Cuni explains that [highlight] ICE then processed the petitioner, and in so doing, entered his data into those various databases. After processing (and after the warrant was signed and executed), Cuni ordered another officer to run “a second records check of the electronic federal databases, which then yielded positive results . . . because Petitioner’s information was now part of the system.” [end highlight] DE 20-7 ¶7 (emphasis added).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreidt3ztft33b7okblfhp4vxsj56r2ryopkqhpwuruyurjtehvpzff4)
![[popup box screenshot]
Translation
From: Russian To: English
I know there are times when emotions are just off the scale. If you are faced with something extremely unpleasant, something has angered you or you just want to let off steam – you will speak out.
I'm here to help you figure it out or just listen. Tell us what exactly happened, and we will look for a solution or a way out of the situation together!
To raise the mood and emotional discharge:](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreifeoxs3g4zx6dojzemmlvbnqsa6lszpm4365tas6gae3we43lxqf4)
![[screenshot:] As discussed, in opposing summary judgment, Megalomedia argued over and over again that (1) My 600-lb Life is a “reality TV-show,” but (2) the Exclusion does not apply to “reality shows.” On appeal, Megalomedia now argues that (1) the Exclusion does apply to reality shows, but (2) My 600-lb Life is not a reality show.
With due respect to our dissenting colleague, these are not “consistent positions.” They are 180-degree reversals worthy of an M. Night Shyamalan movie. [superscript 13]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreiewjt64woijmpjpjohirxlimuekqmcm2ict4a633ayqpi7y6umofq)
![[footnote 13] The good ones like Sixth Sense and Unbreakable. Not the other ones.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreierqa6ctybnivsrzmamdjzkrrvzeqltusevzvth6mejnwfh6euch4)
![text screenshot:
Put differently, the Department restricted its analysis, due to lack of congressional instructions, when considering real-world factors militating in favor of broadening the definition; [highlight] its decision to nevertheless go beyond congressional instructions to restrict the definition of professional degree” is as puzzling as it is legally erroneous. [end highlight]
The Department misses the mark in arguing that the new requirements are derived from applying noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis principles to the Act’s list of “example” professional degrees. Gov’t’s Opp’n to AANP’s Mot. at 17-18 (contending that “Congress’s [...]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreic4ftburnzbinm2yzzytlpcdnqti7vny2qjf3inrcj6cgnletgozi)
![screenshot: [...] further underscores the new definition’s departure from congressional intent.
[highlight] Defendants also fundamentally misunderstand and amateurly employ the canons they purport to rely on. [end highlight] Under the canon of noscitur a sociis, a word is “given more precise content by the neighboring words with which it is associated.” United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 294 (2008). For example, in a statute that imposes “an obligation to repay funds received as an [...]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreifbxpdkk3mjbl2dybv6vfv6yymux45ocvq2nshvg4cimb4h54wsby)
![[transcript end of page 18]
I don't know who wants to speak first.
MS. NOLLER: Your Honor, Lisa Noller for Defendant Fagan. I'll go first.
So there's obviously very little case law on what to do here because this is a pretty unique circumstance, one that I've never seen in over 30 years of practicing in this court. A couple of things are clear. Rule 48 does allow you to dismiss a complaint, and the Court has discretion to supervise cases on its docket. There's Supreme Court case law, Hasting and Griffin are two cases that give you a lot of discretion on whether to dismiss, whether to dismiss with prejudice or without prejudice, whether to sanction the government for its conduct here, or whether to impose discovery sanctions such as limiting testimony going forward. And you know, any decision you do make will -- do make will be reviewed with an abuse of discretion standard. So what to do, I guess I'll address that next. So what is clear when one watches the video that was displayed, it doesn't have an exhibit sticker, but that was displayed for Your Honor during Mr. Fagan's detention hearing, is that it depicts two individuals who have been identified under oath in a sworn complaint as being Mr. Edwards and Mr. Fagan. That's [...]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreigdunkrjwvucq6szdysijrqqt5n37itjkpfe5maxgyljdcp6beqoy)
![[transcript beginning of page 19]
[...] in paragraph 13.
The paragraphs in the complaint flow from there, Your Honor. That identification of Edwards and Fagan is joint, and it is pervasive then throughout the rest of the complaint that describes the conduct that is then -- that is then charged by complaint under oath.
We know that the complaint was presented to you on June 11th. As early as June 12th now we know that there's at least a discussion of the description of the video, which is Exhibit 2. There also was at least one conversation between the ATF and the front office to say that more evidence exists.
By June 15th, Exhibit 4 has now been sent, which is the email that describes the flight from the scene. The reason those different pieces of evidence are important, Your Honor, is because Exhibit 2, which has now been tendered to you, shows that Mr. Edwards is not Mr. Edwards.
THE COURT: That's what I believed after the detention hearing that I sat through and of -- have Mr. Fagan here in court with me and watched other videos [...]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreie3vhu6qk26fr6nalcxgce2zki45qijxpkteiajyw7hz7ok5ud7bu)
![old timey cartoon. a small girl with a bottle looks pleadingly up across a desk at a standing man in tails and apron with mortar and pestle. neat shelves are full of bottles of opium tinctures and liquid arsenic. a wall sign reads "ALL SORTS OF ( POISONS ) CONSTANTLY ON SALE".
bottom caption text:
FATAL FACILITY; OR, POISONS FOR THE ASKING.
Child. "Please, Mister, will you be so good as to fill this bottle again with Lodnum, and let Mother have another pound and a half of Arsenic for the Rats (!)"
Duly Qualified Chemist. "Certainly, Ma'am. Is there any other article?"
[from punch 1849, vol 17]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreiel725wuiqlqdbndsoake2lmgbasijhu4uz64tveelho25eheiggu)
![Q. Okay. Tell us, what is your current job?
A. Currently I'm the [redacted] with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
12 Q. And that's traditionally known as ICE, right?
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. And you said you were -- tell me your position again so that I can have it right.
A. [redacted]
Q. Okay. How long have you been with ICE?
A. I've been with ICE since 2001. So 24 years.
Q. And how long have you been the Assistant Field Office Director?
A. I have been [redacted] for eight years, but just six months in [redacted].](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n7g3m7slmoyhjbwbzleeejkb/bafkreiebcklyiaoxvfy42liyzxghd3pgqlta57hnrlypnl7us4gcrzjvj4)
