iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 03/06/2025

Not inciting anything, but people should maintain their freedom of speech!

010

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 02/06/2025

Yeah, until they clearly identify themselves, you don't need to say anything!

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 16/05/2025

I'm gonna be like the old lady and bet on the immigrant because I want them to survive and the crazy gladiator characters to die painfully...if you get the reference...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 16/05/2025

Sounds like they've gone dystopian enough to go full Running Man. 😡

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 30/04/2025

What I find interesting is all these militant people who were arming and training to stop tyranny are super quiet as a tyrannical leader is rising. Like...what the hell?

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 29/04/2025

Line: We're doing this legally Line Right After: I'm not a constitutional scholar. In 1984 that would be called "New Speak."

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 23/04/2025

So, Republicans are trying to figure out how to get women to have children. Their answers are mostly out of the Nazi and USSR playbooks. They could try, IDK, universal Healthcare and living wages?! No one wants to have kids if they're gonna have to live in a dumpster...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 21/04/2025

In both his 1st and 2nd terms, he has directly violated the constitution for power and personal gain. This fits the exact originalist definition of High Crimes and Misdemenors, yet here we are again not impeaching him, maybe at all...WAKE UP AMERICA!

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 21/04/2025

Sounds like every movie I've ever watched with my mom 🤣

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/04/2025

Wow, "We're doing everything legally", and "I'm not a constitutional scholar", and "That's for the DoJ and courts" should not go together in the same statement. He's basically saying he doesn't care to know the law, so he can break it. And then Trump's DoJ can cover for him. W...T...F...!

160

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/04/2025

Agreed, if someone who does not identify themself tries to seemingly kidnap you or someone else, I would assume in circumstance, lethal force could be an option in response...

2101

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/04/2025

There have been multiple cases over the years where police forces have been made to not use quotas because it was found to be unlawful. However, this administration doesn't care...😡

0110

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 17/04/2025

Both good and bad. Good: At that point, he should be removed. Bad: The majority party will NEVER remove him. Good: Other people may need to make decisions. Bad: Other people may need to make decisions. Good: He's losing his mind. Bad: When the dictator loses their mind, things get really BAD.

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 15/04/2025

Articles if impeachment should be written and brought to the floor. It should be pushed and pushed until they have to vote on it. Not because an impeachment will happen. The Republicans are too cowardly. Rather, so ALL THEIR NAMES ARE RECORDED IN THE VOTE FOR ALL TIME!

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 14/04/2025

This is telling. People who are going to a UFC fight in Miami are probably mostly higher income people who believe in "King Leader." Meanwhile, the rest of AMERICA is pissed!

140

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 14/04/2025

He's a f#&ing moron. A smart administration would have started with building the infrastructure and helping with business models, and if terrifs were done, they would be years later when the infrastructure was already established. These terrifs were never about Made in America...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 14/04/2025

This is about civil disobedience at a massive national scale. This is about dethroning an evil would be king and stopping him from destroying our civilization. They are doing this because someone NEEDS to mobilize Americans to fight back in no uncertain terms. Full stop.

050

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 13/04/2025

I hope that some spaceships are built and piloted as well as some submarines...

050

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 11/04/2025

They're doing everything we expected them to do, and the people that voted for him are surprised... I can't even... no, you know what, they are just dumb. I can't sugar coat this. They're just dumb...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 10/04/2025

The tariff repieve actually scares me for 2 reasons. 1) He will now twist it and make him and Republicans look like heroes even while harming us, and people will believe him. 2) The tariffs are also used as a smoke-screen, so we forget about all the other illegal stuff. Full stop

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 10/04/2025

Even if it got through the senate, the powers of federal judges are enshrined in the Constitution. This is unconstitutional. To reign in judicial powers would require a Constitutional Amendment. We shall not respect this bill as law, even if the Senate votes in magority.

130

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 09/04/2025

So... even with lots of people on his side of the aisle finally seeing the danger, he's still gonna push us off the cliff. If enough of us were dumb enough to vote for him, our country deserves to fall. Rational reasoning. I just wish the smart people could be spared.

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 07/04/2025

Interesting, after aangry town halls and insanely vast world headline protests, some Senate Republicans are joining Democrats in bills and opposition. So people who tuck their tails just need to know where the backlash will come from...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 03/04/2025

But to be clear, I do think he understands it. The terriffs were never about improving our economy. They were a destabilizing tactic to prep other countries for invasion or financial control by the US. It's backfiring internally. He didn't brainwash the population enough for the design.

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 01/04/2025

He will probably go in the ballot and have an army of lawyers reinforce the narrative that he can win he just can't be sworn in. Then if he wins (probably through election restructuring), when the courts and senators say he can not take office, it will spark an insurrection or worse...all planned.

120

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 30/03/2025

Due to all the protest from both sides, he's gonna lie about what he already said now, just to try to play to the crowd but keep on doing what he's doing...dirtbag...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 30/03/2025

The terriffs aren't to improve the economy or even to make his friends wealthier. They are a destabilizing play. Then there's the question of why his hand-picked military officials are communicating on a system that can not be archived... Dangerous times ahead...

041

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 29/03/2025

Yes, I did, but there are things that concern me about how the whole meta ecosystem is run...

100

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

My account was just suspended on Facebook. I don't know why. They don't tell you... I'm afraid that things are getting really dark...

610

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

It's all part of the plan. Establishing the general citizenry as indentured servants to the upper class. Read about where the 'Right wing' came from in French history.

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

It's important to know the can of worms, and if to open it...especially with an aspiring dictator in power...

010

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

Funny story, that is the things in terms of law. If they could somehow be prosecuted for this under the Espionage Act, then legal precedent would require that Hillary, Biden, and a whole slew of others now be under that precedent, and would face equal prosecution under the law.

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

Yeah, this would be a case of negligence, among other possible crimes. I'm just not sure they literally violated the plain text of the Espionage Act itself. I do think there is a mountain of crimes this administration has done, they're horrific.

120

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

There are lots of things they should be locked up for, but unfortunately, this isn't one of them. "Knowingly" is important phrasing in the act. If they knowingly gave the information, then they are in violation. So...his drunk texts don't count.

1380

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

It's irrelevent. The conversation should have never been in an unsecured text. If they had kept it to Pentagon meetings or secured lines, this would not happen. ::Passes Hegseth a beer:: Keep chugging, Americans need to understand what they did...

050

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 26/03/2025

So, in a Pennsylvania district that Trump won by 15 pts and is a 23pt advantage Republican, a Democrat just won the state senate seat. There are state elections with this trend everywhere. I just hope it's enough to stop a rising dictatorship...

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 21/03/2025

Unconstitutional. Article 1, section 8 of the constitution. Only Congress should be able to make major changes to the Postal Service. Fuck Musk and Trump!

050

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

Also, courts have alternate sources of government funding and would be able to maintain for a period of time after a shutdown.

100

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

Not accurate, members of Congress still get paid during a shutdown and are required to maintain their positions.

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

I wore a long coat at school. Columbine happened. I made a deal with my Dean where I stopped wearing, but only for a week. He hated that, but I think he was actually scared to "Trigger me", eventhough I was harmless

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

The worst part is, according to the Constitution, it is actually illegal for a president or other elected federal official to show favoritism to private entities through statements or advertisements. I'm not sure if that extends to the cabinet, but it should... No one follows it though...😔

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

You got enough money, and people around you complement your obese weird body like you're a Greek god. Hell, they have your kids just to get a slice...🤣😶

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

Okay, Schumer has lost touch with what's happening. Trump already directly disobeyed a court order, is destroying the economy, and is going full authoritarian. We don't have a lit match, we have a burning house. This is why Schumer may be part of the problem...

100

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 19/03/2025

- Articles of impeachment for judges doing their job... - The President fully ignoring the law... - Laws being unconstitutionally used to deport and imprison people... - The DOJ bringing charges against news groups... If you blinked, you make not realize. This is already ab authoritarian regime. 😔

020

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

There is another dark reason they want to cut Social Security. Imagine putting a lot of money in a bank as savings. The bank gets new ownership, and they find a loophole where if they close the bank, they can take all that money and use it as they want, and you get none of it. Those fuckers...

110

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

He is removing institutions of knowledge and replacing them with propaganda and supremacist ideologies... Anyone who can not see what he is and what he's doing deserves what they get...

000

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 13/03/2025

Xchatbot Since WWII, Democrats have outperformed Republicans on the economy. GDP growth averages 4.23% under Dems vs. 2.36% under GOP. Job creation? 1.7% yearly for Dems, 1.0% for Republicans. Also, 9 of the last 10 recessions started under Republican presidents. Data speaks louder than party lines.

010

Speerical @speerical.bsky.social · 12/03/2025

So sick of this...inform your friends that executive orders are not laws. They're orders meant to follow established laws. An executive order defining English as the official language is not a law or constitutional. An executive order defining 2 genders is not a law or constitutional. ...so on...

000