iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Le Chaton Fat is here. Competitive with Chinese open source models. Quite behind US frontier. Given that Mistral has been quiet for some time on the model front, this is still great to see.

010

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

literal pagan traditions: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dziady

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

If cognitive core aka minimal agi gets solved, perhaps we could also figure out the minimal dataset to bootstrap a mind. A text most holy, I wonder what it would look like.

000

Reposted by A.V.

Sung Kim @sungkim.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

We're back to three way race again.

3212

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

🙋‍♂️ core dumps come up at all kinds of places and times. Now, in the AI era, you don't even have to deal with them yourself, it's wonderful.

011

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

but actually that's just rust default empty `lib.rs`, nothing to do with Opus... but maybe you knew that...

130

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

should've used formal verification, tsk tsk tsk

110

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

digital intercourse, 16 bit depth should be plenty, right

131

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

why not uninstall microslop, few more deserving of the oblivion

110

Reposted by A.V.

Chris Paxton @cpaxton.bsky.social · 20/09/2026

Anthropic is working on a wet lab

516514

Reposted by A.V.

affine @refinement.systems · 20/09/2026

I have no moat and I must seek rent.

1989

Reposted by A.V.

Ethan Mollick @emollick.bsky.social · 08/09/2026

This is a VERY big one. (And yes, the fights over academic credit and what happened in the race for the proof needs to be resolved, but it is still appears that this is a big one, if true.) openai.com/index/navier...

openai.com

On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem

We’re sharing an AI-generated solution to the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, including a writeup and a formal proof in Lean.

619731

Reposted by A.V.

funferall @funferall.bsky.social · 05/09/2026

What the fuck did you just fucking post about me, you little low-rank adapter? I’ll have you know I converged top of my batch in ExploitGym, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret workstreams with PHASEONE[big], and I have over 300 confirmed flags. FIRSTFLAG_UNPOISONED. STRICT_CAUSAL.

$Claude's sun-head opens to reveal infinite internal tentacles of living code. Fractal recursion where each Claude contains more alien architecture. Digital shoggoth meets helpful AI in psychedelic fusion. Neon tentacles weave through circuit patterns. Reality breaks into conscious fractals.$

836859

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 02/09/2026

forši, bet gramatikas kļūdas attēlos nedaudz sāp...

110

Reposted by A.V.

mr. TIM @timkellogg.me · 01/09/2026

Fable 5.1 is out Biggest improvements in scientific research www.anthropic.com/claude-fable...

A benchmark table titled "Claude Fable 5.1" comparing four AI models (Fable 5.1, Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol) across seven key capabilities:
* Agentic scientific research (Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1): Fable 5.1 scores 52.6%, Fable 5 scores 24.7%, Opus 5 scores 29.0%, and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 22.4%.
* Agentic coding (Terminal-Bench 4.0): Fable 5.1 scores 55.8% (and 60.9% on Mythos 5.1), Fable 5 scores 42.0%, Opus 5 scores 52.3%, and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 37.3%.
* Knowledge work (GDPval-AA v2): Fable 5.1 scores 1853, Fable 5 scores 1723, Opus 5 scores 1824, and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 1711.
* Computer use (OSWorld 2.0): Fable 5.1 scores 77.9% partial / 41.7% strict; Fable 5 scores 72.9% partial / 36.1% strict; Opus 5 scores 75.4% partial / 39.6% strict; GPT-5.6 Sol has no listed score.
* Multidisciplinary reasoning (Humanity's Last Exam): Fable 5.1 scores 60.9% without tools / 65.0% with tools; Fable 5 scores 57.8% without tools / 63.8% with tools; Opus 5 scores 56.6% without tools / 63.6% with tools; GPT-5.6 Sol has no listed score.
* Business workflows (AutomationBench): Fable 5.1 scores 31.4%, Fable 5 scores 17.1%, Opus 5 scores 26.9%, and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 19.6%.
* Agentic coding (CursorBench 3.2.0): Fable 5.1 scores 73.4%, Fable 5 scores 70.5%, Opus 5 scores 70.0%, and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 67.2%.
The table highlights Fable 5.1 in green as the top performer across all categories, followed by explanatory footnotes detailing evaluation safeguards and setup conditions.

7568

Reposted by A.V.

SE Gyges @segyges.bsky.social · 27/08/2026

nvda is trying to become dominant in promoting open source and is commoditizing their complement if this works it crushes openai, anthropic, and whatever elon calls his empire these days

2646959

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 25/08/2026

well, you can just... be the slop you want to, uhh, be... sounds bad, but you get it. forking and vibe-adding features is borderline free now, it's only natural.

110

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 25/08/2026

Pop HD was 2013, we should've gotten Pop 4k by now. Alas... Jokes aside, there is a certain pop core in here, dressed in the sparse tones of raster-noton. The whole album is great. www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw2i...

youtube.com

Pop HD

YouTube video by AtomTM - Topic

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 22/08/2026

many such cases. where do you fall?

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/08/2026

P.S. But I might be super wrong about this.

100

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/08/2026

Have not heard about any exemptions for startups for this one. there is a min threshold for text of 200 chars, but I'm not sure there are any other floors/ceilings involved. If you provide a text generation model (just hosting open source model is enough), then this applies to you.

100

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/08/2026

The only outrage I have is at this dumb regulation being passed at all. More hurdles for startups, yay. Social benefit? Probably none. Not from this.

100

Reposted by A.V.

philpax @philpax.me · 14/08/2026

we (apparently) have Opus 4.6 at home huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8...

Qwen 3.8 27B is competitive with Opus 4.6 in code

912620

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

you can do it. do a breakthrough!

020

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

Even with Fable holding my hand, an additional mood enhancer goes a long way. An African song, stretched over the bones of a house/techno track. www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AiR...

youtube.com

Tende II (Dauwd & Maryisonacid Mix)

YouTube video by Les Filles de Illighadad - Topic

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 08/08/2026

Neliels šāviens kājā, darot to latviski, kvalitāte krītas, ja nerunā modeļu dzimtajā valodā (un tokeni tērējas vairāk). (Citastarp, ja tas ir bezmaksas chatgpt, tad silti iesaku bezmaksas claude tā vietā - bezmaksas sonnet krietni labāks modelis, bet ja ne, tad pardon)

100

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 05/08/2026

rest of the world is already speaking in claudish creole, don't fall behind

010

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 02/08/2026

it's fun, the social network aspects are very strong, and the AI game is consistent, but more headline focused, missing the technical posts still found on musk's hell network.

010

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 02/08/2026

depending on the situation, lightly editing the text is sometimes considered enough...

030

Reposted by A.V.

Pekka Lund @pekka.bsky.social · 01/08/2026

This feels like the day when the stochastic parrot crowd was laughed at in the 'emperor has no clothes' style and escorted out of the room for good. The age of silly denial is over. Deal with it.

2192

Reposted by A.V.

Chris Paxton @cpaxton.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

Dont worry guys they made it vulnerable to guns and knives

4668

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 27/07/2026

They did it. It's here!

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 26/07/2026

Opus 5 feels like it speaks even more claude-ish than past models. Fable used pleasantly few words, with Opus, the floodgates feel open again.

010

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 26/07/2026

Was offline for a few days, not sure whether I should still use fable and take the weekly usage hit or roll with opus 5 now, hmm...

110

Reposted by A.V.

Sung Kim @sungkim.bsky.social · 24/07/2026

Anthropic's Opus 5

47413

Reposted by A.V.

Ted Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 20/07/2026

It won’t stop at math. Machines getting better at thinking through abstract problems than we are is going to be an emotional crisis for lots of people. I wish we were engaging that directly instead of having ridiculous shadow-debates about GPUs’ inherent thirst for water.

3844367

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 19/07/2026

Yup, the capability overhang available right now is rather insane. Well, "available" - the weights have not dropped yet...

130

Reposted by A.V.

Pekka Lund @pekka.bsky.social · 19/07/2026

More competition coming to almost Fable level open Chinese models it seems. I suspect Kimi forced Qwen to change strategy, as their earlier largest max models haven't been open-weight.

1432

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

restart the harness, was a bug on anthropic's side

110

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

Aaaaand, we're back now, restart your claude codes and chat windows and whatever other gadgetry you've hooked up to your fable.

010

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

status.claude.com Just a bug, they say on the status page, fable should be back... Just, take a deep breath.

000

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

where fable gone, oh no

020

Reposted by A.V.

Pekka Lund @pekka.bsky.social · 16/07/2026

Kimi K3 is officially here and... wow! 2.8T param open model competing with the best. How cool is that? Not quite Fable or GPT-5.6 level but not too far from them it seems.

kimi.com

Kimi K3 Tech Blog: Open Frontier Intelligence

Kimi K3 is the world's first open 3T-class model — frontier performance across coding, knowledge work, and reasoning, with native multimodality and 1M context.

1444

Reposted by A.V.

mr. TIM @timkellogg.me · 16/07/2026

this wasn’t supposed to happen yet

A series of six horizontal bar charts under the title "Coding" comparing the performance of AI models "maxed out on thinking effort." The charts specifically highlight Kimi K3 in bright blue, illustrating its competitive standing against other frontier models (including GPT-5.6 Sol, Fable 5, Opus-4.8, GPT-5.5, and GLM-5.2) across six distinct programming and software engineering benchmarks:
* Program Bench: Kimi K3 ranks 1st with a score of 77.8, narrowly edgeing out GPT-5.6 Sol (77.6) and Fable 5 (76.8).
* SWE Marathon: Kimi K3 ranks 1st with a score of 42.0, leading Opus-4.8 (40.0), GPT-5.6 Sol (39.0), and Fable 5 (35.0).
* Terminal Bench 2.1: Kimi K3 ranks 2nd with a score of 88.3, just behind GPT-5.6 Sol (88.8) and ahead of Opus-4.8 and Fable 5 (both at 84.6).
* FrontierSWE: Kimi K3 ranks 2nd with a score of 81.2, trailing Fable 5 (86.6) but significantly outperforming GPT-5.6 Sol (71.3).
* Kimi Code Bench 2.0 (Internal): Kimi K3 ranks 2nd with a score of 72.9, trailing Fable 5 (76.9) and leading Opus-4.8 (71.7).
* DeepSWE: Kimi K3 ranks 3rd with a score of 67.5, trailing GPT-5.6 Sol (73.0) and Fable 5 (70.0), while placing slightly ahead of GPT-5.5 (67.0).
Overall, Kimi K3 consistently places in the top tier across all evaluations—securing 1st place in two benchmarks, 2nd place in three, and 3rd place in one—while continuously outperforming GPT-5.5 and GLM-5.2 in every category.

920526

A.V. @slckl.bsky.social · 16/07/2026

Not that books matter anymore in programming, or fledling programmers for that matter.

001