Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 05/09/2026Is it hyperbole to call this fascism becoming reality on our streets? This isn't protest about legitimate concerns. It is dangerous and needs to be resisted. Proscribe the political parties that enable this. Ban the leaders from public office. 001
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 03/04/2026Remarkable person talking about an important subject: 000
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 26/01/2026People are hopeful at last. But angry too that our failed politics has led to gross inequality and the divisive rhetoric of the far right. Let's stop fighting one another and turn that anger to the real culprits, the super rich feeding off us and setting us at each other's throats. 000
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 14/01/2026Make 2026 a year for change. Stop rage scrolling and start fighting back. Get organised, get active and join the 180,000 in the Green party determined to make a difference. 021
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 10/01/2026The right to vote is often said to matter because people should have a say in how they are governed. But it is also a right to decide how others are governed. And that should impose an obligation to educate oneself and not vote from a position of ignorance: 010
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 19/12/2025"Low risk" of individuals being affected in hack of Government IT system. Tell me again about digital ID cards being a good idea.... 000
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 18/12/2025For those with "genuine concerns" about immigration of "young men of fighting age", how do you feel about this: 010
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 16/12/2025Now we need the names of the undisclosed billionaire comrades bankrolling Reform and the future will be a little brighter. 110
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 16/12/2025How many people does the BBC expect will renew their licence if it capitulates to Trump's shakedown? 011
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 11/12/2025This must be some dystopian reality we've stumbled into: (www.politico.eu/article/dona...) 000
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 09/12/2025A warning from a member of the 0.1% from 11 years ago. With economic, political and social inequality accelerating, we need urgent reform to our economy, for everyone's sake. join.greenparty.org.uk www.politico.com/magazine/sto... 121
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 08/12/2025Mental health issues seem to impact men with particularly bad outcomes and at stubbornly high rates: 130
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 06/12/2025...and only if the discrimination is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Nothing in the judgment address wider policy issues: 010
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 06/12/2025I had missed a bit of this story. I assumed Cooper had been expelled for his racist posts, but the official line appears to be that he was dismissed for not declaring social media accounts to the party: 100
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 03/12/2025Why? The law is clear: "for all purposes" except where s9.3 applies. But here's what the Justices say about clauses in the Equlaity Act from the FWS case: 100
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 03/12/2025Yes, those described in the GRA act s.9.1. The holder of a GRC is for all purposes legally of the sex assigned except where statute decree otherwise: 000
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 03/12/2025The law disagrees with you: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7... 100
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 02/12/2025The law has only established that under certain circumstances exclusion of trans people is not discriminatory. It is far from clear how that relates to wider questions not considered by the court. For example, see: uklabourlawblog.com/2025/05/07/t... 100
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 02/12/2025The law has only established that under certain circumstances exclusion of trans people is not discriminatory. It is far from clear how that relates to wider questions not considered by the court. For example, see: uklabourlawblog.com/2025/05/07/t... 100
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 29/11/2025Ridiculous, both from the EHRC and the guardian reporting. www.theguardian.com/world/2025/n... The Supreme Court did not rule that "the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex" The judgement itself makes this clear: 1103
Sinnesfrid @sinnesfrid.bsky.social · 29/11/2025The future looks very good. Yougov poll, voting intention 18 to 24 year olds> 000