Sign in

simongrothe.bsky.social

@simongrothe.bsky.social
44 followers 97 following 36 posts

PhD @UNIGEnews investigating the macroeconomic implications of economic inequality | Learned my macro @LevyEcon | He/Him

PostsRepliesMedia
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 13/12/2025
Ein paar Gedanken zu »Zerstörungslust« von @camlinger.bsky.social und @onachtwey.bsky.social 🫰Spannende Interviews zur faschistoiden Gedankenwelt der Gegenwart. Doch die Analyse eines »demokratischen Faschismus« hat vier analytische Schwächen👇
010
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
Aus aktuellem Anlass 👇
000
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
weitere gute Argumente auf die AfD zu fokussieren gab es neulich jn der @analysekritik.bsky.social www.akweb.de/bewegung/wid...
akweb.de
Widersetzen: Mehr als Brandmauerpolitik - ak analyse & kritik
Raul Zelik kritisierte eine zu starke Konzentration auf die AfD – doch genau dieser Fokus ist die wichtigste Motivation für antifaschistische Organisierung
000
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Die Brandmauer ist also für Linke kein "strategisches Hauptziel" sondern eine Lebensversicherung. 9/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Deshalb muss die AfD möglichst von der Staatsmacht isoliert bleiben. 8/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Mit der AfD an der Regierung werden die Repressionen so stark, dass es schwierig sein wird, die solidarischen Alternativen aufzubauen, die es in Kampf gegen Rechts braucht. 7/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Das macht die AfD mit ihrer neuen Jugendorganisation, die sich am 29. November in Gießen gründen will. 6/9
110
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Die anderen bürgerlichen Parteien wollen regieren. Sie sind taktische Rassisten. Merz baut kein militantes Vorfeld auf, um seine Ziele durchzusetzen. 5/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Die AfD arbeitet daran, die liberale Demokratie zu begraben, sie verfolgt ein völkisch-autoritäres Projekt. Auf jede politische Frage ist ihre Antwort: Ausländer raus. 4/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Trotzdem hat die AfD einen anderen Charakter als die restlichen bürgerlichen Parteien. 3/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Ja, die aktuellen Grundrechtsverschärfungen werden durchgesetzt, ohne dass die AfD in der Macht ist. 2/9
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Was für ein spannender, neuer Podcast von @sebfriedrich.bsky.social und @nschniederjann.bsky.social Nur am Ende biegt er falsch ab finde ich 1/9
111
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
Für Marx ist Bonaparte ein "Unfall", der durch die Uneinigkeit der herrschenden Klasse an die Macht kommt. Das passt auch heute. Er schreibt aber auch über das zu Grunde liegende Kräftegleichgewicht der Klassen. Das eher nicht.
000
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Das @dezernatzukunft.bsky.social gründete sich in Kritik an "rechtlichen Verpflichtungen" durch die Schuldenbremse im GG. In ihrem neuen Fiscal Space Indikator, sind 3,5% Militärausgaben auf einmal "nicht disponibel". So schnell kann's gehen, liebes Dezernat für Aufrüstung
130
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
You can read the @ineteconomics.bsky.social Blog here: www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives...
ineteconomics.org
Distributional and Macroeconomic Effects of Trump 2.0
The most likely outcome of the second Trump administration is a recession and an exacerbation of inequalities, and a further degradation of the living standards of working and middle-class Americans.
000
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
while every economic recovery has become more profitable. That is the REAL problem of the U.S. economy but Trump’s agenda will increase these trends rather than curing them. 20/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
This was driven by a dual goal: to access cheaper labor abroad and to discipline labor at home. The surge in inequality has diminshed aggregate demand, investment and productivity in the U.S. over the past four decades 19/20
110
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
One last note: This should of course not glorify the Biden years! The socio-economic misery of manufactring workers is REAL but is mainly due to a deliberate strategy by U.S. capital to outsource production. 18/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Therefore, when trying to pass-through the tariff costs, firms are competing for a shrinking pie of aggregate profits which further discourages investment. This was quite the reverse during the Biden administration where investment and government deficit increased. 17/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
And secondly, not only aggregate demand but also aggregate profits are likely to diminish. Aggregate gross profits are - by identity - given by the sum of the government deficit, investment, net exports and spending out of profits minus saving out of wages. 16/20
110
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
With such drags on aggregate demand, it is very unlikely that unemployment will reduce to a point were workers bargaining power increases to achieve higher real wages and hence offset the negative macro effect of the tariff shock. 15/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Exports are unlikely to boom either due to reliatory tariffs by U.S. trading partners. 14/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Looking forward, the response of investment to the tariffs and tax cuts during the first Trump administration was very low. Since they are again not accompanied by targeted fiscal measures, an investment boom is again unlikely. 13/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
At the same time, the all-time high of uncertainty indices is choking off the investment boom of the Biden administration 12/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
...while maintaining and expanding the tax cuts for the rich under the Tax Cuts and Investment Act. Income gains for the rich and declines for the bottom 40% 11/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
But this is fundamentally different under Trump. Instead of expansionary fiscal policy, the Budget resolution from February 25th mandates drastic cuts to fiscal spending to lower income households who have a low propensity to spend… 10/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
In the U.S., due to strong fiscal packages, unemployment was super low and real wages did increase. The strong U.S. recovery allowed for both: Increasing profit share in value added due to full pass-through AND increasing real wages. 9/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
In the paper, we show that these negative macroeconomic effects can be offsett by wage growth even when though this produces somewhat higher inflation. 8/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Capitalists have a lower propensity to consume than workers which drags aggregate demand. Foreign price shocks hence have a contractionary macroeconomic effect 7/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
As we pointed out in a recent working paper, there is an important macroeconomic story behind the scenes. When firms pass-through cost shocks with constant or increasing markups, they redistribute income from workers to capitalists x.com/SimonGrothe/... 6/20
x.com
Simon Grothe on X: "During recent wage negotiations workers were often told to moderate their demands to not spur inflation. In a new @LevyEcon working paper, @mnikiforos and I argue that nominal wage growth can have positive macroeconomic effects even when leading to higher inflation. 🧵 1/14 https://t.co/fKuKpAPadB" / X
During recent wage negotiations workers were often told to moderate their demands to not spur inflation. In a new @LevyEcon working paper, @mnikiforos and I argue that nominal wage growth can have positive macroeconomic effects even when leading to higher inflation. 🧵 1/14 https://t.co/fKuKpAPadB
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
The expansion of tariffs by Trump seems like the optimal setting for Sellers Inflation 2.0 – they present the most synchronized sectoral cost shock one could think of. But two things are different: 5/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
There is also evidence for a behavioral interpretation according to which firms expanded profit margins in periods of supply chain disruptions, see acharya for Europe, and @franzfranzoni with a global dataset 4/20
110
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
There is ample evidence for a structuralist interpretation of the hypothesis according to which profits played an outsized role during the past years from a historical perspective and for a range of countries (a lit review on this forthcoming) 3/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
The Sellers’ Inflation Hypothesis by @weber stated that firms took the synchronized cost shocks of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine as an implicit coordination mechanism to increase prices and profitability 2/20
100
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
At first glance, the Trump tariffs seem like the perfect setting for Sellers’ Inflation 2.0 – but two dynamics are fundamentally different, making the macroeconomic outcome… worse! New blog with @mnikiforos.bsky.social at @ineteconomics.bsky.social 1/20
110
Reposted by @simongrothe.bsky.social
Isabella M. Weber @isabellamweber.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
"The most likely outcome of the second Trump administration is a recession and an exacerbation of inequalities, and a further degradation of the living standards of working and middle-class Americans." Must read by @mnikiforos.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social
ineteconomics.org
Distributional and Macroeconomic Effects of Trump 2.0
The most likely outcome of the second Trump administration is a recession and an exacerbation of inequalities, and a further degradation of the living standards of working and middle-class Americans.
25721
simongrothe.bsky.social @simongrothe.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
🫶 Wie die Unternehmer lernten, die AfD zu lieben 🫶 Ein Essay für @jacobinmagazin.bsky.social über das Scheitern des grünen Wachstumsprojekts und die Offensive von CDU und AfD gegen Sozialstaat, Löhne und Sicherheit
0102
Reposted by @simongrothe.bsky.social
Fred Heussner @fredheussner.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Ihr wollt verstehen wie Kapitalismus und Rechtsruck zusammen hängen? Auf nach Tübingen! Dort gibt es Workshops und Vorträge zur antifaschistischen Ökonomik mit @skaufmann.bsky.social, @sabinenuss.bsky.social, @maxinefowe.bsky.social, @simongrothe.bsky.social und Moritz Zeiler.
1126