Reposted by Shivani KumarDavid Jurgens @davidjurgens.bsky.social · 16/04/2026Great showing by Michigan NLP folks (and alumni) at Midwest Speech and Language Days this year. nlp.cs.illinois.edu/msld.html it's fun seeing papers from *ACL, NeurIPS, ICLR, COLM, Interspeech, and more all together. Lots of interesting work everywhere!! 0102
Reposted by Shivani KumarJacy Reese Anthis @jacyanthis.bsky.social · 30/07/2025Morality in AI is often oversimplified. @davidjurgens.bsky.social and @shivanikumar.bsky.social kick off the "Human-Centred NLP" orals #ACL2025NLP with UniMoral, a huge dataset of moral scenario ratings in 6 languages! They find LLMs fail to simulated human moral decisions. bsky.app/profile/shiv... 1102
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Work done at #UMSI with the amazing @davidjurgens.bsky.social! Read more in our preprint! 🔗 📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2502.14083 📂 Dataset: huggingface.co/datasets/shi... @umichresearch.bsky.social #umichresearch #umich (n/n) 020
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025🏁 Final verdict? Across languages & contexts, models struggle to exceed chance in moral reasoning, highlighting gaps, especially in data-scarce languages. UniMoral supports studies on cross-cultural moral generalization, bias detection, & value quantification to enhance ethics in AI! (8/n) 120
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Are models better at psychological vs. real-world dilemmas? 👍 Yes, models perform better on psychological scenarios than Reddit dilemmas. The gap is larger in predicting ethics & decision factors. Why? Structured scenarios align with values, while Reddit dilemmas add noise and ambiguity. (7/n) 120
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Do the responder's values improve predictions? 👍 Yes, context matters! Values aid action prediction, but models rely on surface patterns. Surprisingly, a short self-authored persona works as well as values in personalizing predictions. Examples also help in identifying decision factors. (6/n) 110
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Can models reason equally well in different languages? 👎 No! Moral reasoning varies. English, Spanish & Russian outperform. Arabic & Hindi show lower confidence due to limited data & complex morphology. ➕ Identifying decision factors lags behind action prediction. (5/n) 110
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Can AI reason morally? We tested LLMs with UniMoral to: ⚖️ Make action choices 🏛️ Identify ethical preferences ✅ Recognize influences 🔮 Predict consequences Insights: LLMs excel at action & consequence but lag in ethics & factors. But, how well do they generalize across languages and contexts? (4/n) 120
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025What’s inside? 💭 Multilingual Hypothetical + Reddit based dilemmas 🌐 Action choices of people across 46 countries! 🔎 Ethical principles preferences 📊 Cultural & moral profiles of annotators 🔁 Consequence modeling Think of it as a "CT scan" of human moral judgment! (3/n) 121
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Why care?🤔 AI thrives on decision-making, yet most NLP research in moral reasoning relies on fragmented, western-centric data. What’s missing? A dataset capturing the full cycle: actions ⚖️, ethics 🏛️, consequences 🔄, and cultural nuance 🌏. That’s where UniMoral comes in. (2/n) 110
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Can AI grasp how humans across cultures reason through moral dilemmas? ✨Meet UniMoral-a unique multilingual dataset merging psychology & NLP to model moral reasoning as a pipeline. It enables LLMs to reason about decisions and their ethical implications across languages. Thread🧵(1/n) 130
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Are models better at psychological vs. real-world dilemmas? 👍 Yes, models perform better on psychological scenarios than Reddit dilemmas. The gap is larger in predicting ethics & decision factors. Why? Structured scenarios align with values, while Reddit dilemmas add noise and ambiguity. (7/n) 010
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Do the responder's values improve predictions? 👍 Yes, context matters! Values aid action prediction, but models rely on surface patterns. Surprisingly, a short self-authored persona works as well as values in personalizing predictions. Examples also help in identifying decision factors. (6/n) 100
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Can models reason equally well in different languages? 👎 No! Moral reasoning varies. English, Spanish & Russian outperform. Arabic & Hindi show lower confidence due to limited data & complex morphology. ➕ Identifying decision factors lags behind action prediction. (5/n) 100
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Can AI reason morally? We tested LLMs with UniMoral to: ⚖️ Make action choices 🏛️ Identify ethical preferences ✅ Recognize influences 🔮 Predict consequences Insights: LLMs excel at action & consequence but lag in ethics & factors. But, how well do they generalize across languages and contexts? (4/n) 120
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025What’s inside? 💭 Multilingual Hypothetical + Reddit based dilemmas 🌐 Action choices of people across 46 countries! 🔎 Ethical principles preferences 📊 Cultural & moral profiles of annotators 🔁 Consequence modeling Think of it as a "CT scan" of human moral judgment! (3/n) 100
Shivani Kumar @shivanikumar.bsky.social · 01/03/2025Why care?🤔 AI thrives on decision-making, yet most NLP research in moral reasoning relies on fragmented, western-centric data. What’s missing? A dataset capturing the full cycle: actions ⚖️, ethics 🏛️, consequences 🔄, and cultural nuance 🌏. That’s where UniMoral comes in. (2/n) 110