Sign in

Shiri Lev-Ari

@shirilevari.bsky.social
42 followers 24 following 10 posts

Cognitive psychologist studying language, cultural evolution, and (real life) social networks.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Shiri Lev-Ari
Cognition @cognitionjournal.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
1/10 A new paper by shirilevari.bsky.social shows that sound symbolism highlights the properties that distinguish referents from their competitors: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... A🧵
sciencedirect.com
Sound symbolism highlights relative distinctiveness: Evidence from English vocabulary
There is robust evidence that people associate certain sounds with meanings, yet the prevalence and importance of sound symbolism in natural language …
122
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
If you don't want to read my full paper (How can you not want to read a paper called "Sorries seem to have the harder words"!?), here's my summary of it: How to make your apology more effective – new research theconversation.com/how-to-make-...
theconversation.com
How to make your apology more effective – new research
Sorry really can be the hardest word.
000
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
So apologizers use words that are hard to produce (but not hard to understand), and this strategy works! Link: doi.org/10.1111/bjop...
doi.org
<em>British Journal of Psychology</em> | Wiley Online Library
Is someone who says ‘I'm genuinely sorry’ more sorry than someone who says ‘I'm really sorry’? The studies in this paper show that people use longer words when apologizing (Study 1) and interpret apo....
000
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Apologies with long words were perceived as more apologetic than those with shorter words that were matched for frequency. In contrast, word frequency did not influence how apologetic the sentence seemed.
100
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
But is this strategy effective? To test that, participants were presented with triads of apologies that had the same meaning but differed in word length or word frequency. The triad sentences appeared in random order and participants ranked them from most to least apologetic.
110
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Apology tweets of 25 celebrities and 25 non-celebrities were compared to other tweets by the same users. Apology tweets had longer words! In contrast, they didn’t have more infrequent words.
110
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Longer words and infrequent words are harder to produce, so these might be good candidates for apologies. But infrequent words are also harder to understand, so they will burden the addressee. A sophisticated apologizer might then use longer words but not infrequent words.
100
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
They make the apology costly by investing time, money, or effort (e.g., traveling specifically to apologize to a friend vs apologizing to them the next time you happen to meet them). What about making the apology itself more costly by producing words that are harder to produce?
100
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Apologies are cheap – anyone can apologize regardless of whether they’re sorry. So how do apologizers convince the recipients that they are sincere?
100
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
📢📢📢New paper: SORRIES SEEM TO HAVE THE HARDER WORDS Link: doi.org/10.1111/bjop... 🧵
doi.org
<em>British Journal of Psychology</em> | Wiley Online Library
Is someone who says ‘I'm genuinely sorry’ more sorry than someone who says ‘I'm really sorry’? The studies in this paper show that people use longer words when apologizing (Study 1) and interpret apo....
120
Shiri Lev-Ari @shirilevari.bsky.social · 16/01/2025
Poll: What proportion of the time does requiring authors to write ‘anonymous’ whenever they cite their papers leads reviewers to know who the authors are vs hides their identity? a) All the time b) 99% of the time c) <50% of the time bc it’s hard to get reviewers from the field
000