To conclude AI hallucinations are just a lazy lawyer problem ignores the world lawyers work in.

The Jesse Cole Keynote: Law Firms Aren’t Bananas. Or Are They? You know me and celebrity keynote speakers at legal tech conferences. Sometimes they’re

Make the office a place where lawyers spend more of their day being lawyers.

In today’s brave new AI world, the younger lawyers who can hit the ground running with practical skills and the ability to think through problems are going to succeed.

An interesting book by Dave Eggers came out several years ago called The Circle. It was later made into a mediocre movie, but the book has become

Lawyers are in the business of persuading people. That takes human skill and originality. It can’t be replicated by a bot.

When older lawyers demand people come to the office, they need to make it meaningful and ensure that people aren’t there just for the sake of being there.

The NJ Office of the Public Defender partnered with a think tank and a prestigious university to get the AI program it needed.

Neal Page: Sir, excuse me. I know this is your cab, but I'm desperately late for a plane, and I was wondering if I could appeal to your good nature and

I recently finished reading one of Scott Turow's legal thrillers. As most of you know, Turow is not only an author, but he was also a lawyer, and a trial

Clients need some ownership in how their firms use the technology. Firms and clients need to design workflows together.

AI made investors and vendors take notice of an industry that could be completely disrupted by a revolutionary tool.

The last day of any big conference. I’m always a little sad to see things ending. Crowds thinning. Exhibitors breaking down booths. People with roller

What NetDocuments has done is important because virtually no one has gone to the trouble of looking hard at the relationship between AI cost and accuracy.

When all is replaced by agentic AI, what are the long-term consequences?

Don't toss AI in the drawer alongside your gym membership card just yet.

There are no catchy, cutesy promotional themes as in years past. Instead, ILTA seems to be more focused on content.

We may already be at the point of no return.

It will be interesting to see where NetDocuments goes in the plaintiffs’ market

In today's world, many of the headaches associated with making a lateral move can now be alleviated with artificial intelligence and technology.

The businesspeople say one thing, the lawyers another. Just like always.

If you start a lawyer training session by saying we are going to start with a little fun game, you have lost your audience already.

There just aren’t that many criminal defense customers with the funds to buy a lot of tech and AI stuff.

Banning things people use in everyday life won’t work.

Not sure vibe coding is ready for legal prime time, at least not yet.

Courtroom View Network is a great example of using AI appropriately and in its proper place and combining it with non-AI tools.

Law librarians are 'uniquely positioned to wield influence' because their job is to help others, not to win.

Smart firms will read the Deloitte report and the tea leaves and prepare for change. But large law firms may not make the change until it’s too late.

It’s good to pay attention to what AALL is focused on. That’s why this year’s theme was eye-catching.

Those of us in the legal profession have a responsibility to sound the alarm about what our clients and the public as a whole put in chatbots

With the advent of AI, it becomes much more realistic for a fractional GC concept to work.

Like so many things with technology, the time and expense saved often trumps human accuracy and accountability.

It’s pretty clear that the solo and small law market is not capitalizing on the opportunities AI holds.

The more things change ...

The TR announcement felt a little different.

I’m not betting against Apple this time.

Just like with the advent of interstates, an entire culture may be lost.

Let’s not get too comfortable.

Never piss off a judge.

Several factors got midsize firms to this point.

Using AI in an educational way moves the relationship more to one of a team with a lawyer, client, and AI tools all working together to get better results.

Legal Geek is one of the few conferences that actually stops and tries to holistically figure out what the impact of AI will be.

More sophisticated in-house counsel are not waiting on outside providers to make changes in light of the efficiencies AI and automation can bring.

There’s a potential for greater liability and claims.

We have to start by recognizing that we actually have a problem.

If defense firms aren't keeping up, what were once their advantages may well become liabilities as plaintiffs’ lawyers become more sophisticated.

An educated judge can impose meaningful and appropriate penalties when lines are crossed concerning wearable technology.

The Global Institute is for serious legal ops professionals who want to learn and talk about the issues most relevant to their teams.

AI is only one part of what legal ops will use to better serve their clients. Firms first need to embrace legal ops to be successful.