Sai @s.ai · 19/07/2026I don't have CAD, 3D making, or firmware skills, but am a reasonably skilled Ruby coder, and these are items I would personally use and could give immediate design feedback on. I would love to collaborate with someone today to get a prototype. 4/4 000
Sai @s.ai · 19/07/20262. can hack my Bose QC Ultra 2 HP firmware, or have the hardware/electronics components and/or HW hacking skills needed to create a physical prototype, to enhance echolocation by "stretching" the inter-ear timing offset, generating ultrasonic or other pings & transforming to audible range, etc 3/4 100
Sai @s.ai · 19/07/20261. have access to a 3D printer, laser etcher, or similar on site and are willing to help CADing & printing some 8-dot-cell Marburg style braille frames or miniature prototypes, or 2/4 100
Sai @s.ai · 19/07/2026Hi @emfcamp.bsky.social #emf #emfcamp #emfcamp26 attendees: if you're interested in hacking accessibility and/or sensory tech, here's a Discord server I started for that stemming from EMF 2024: discord.gg/zHXbFfqnKr In particular, please contact me — call (4724), DM, or ping — if you 1/4discord.ggJoin the Hacking accessiblity & sensory tech Discord Server!Check out the Hacking accessiblity & sensory tech community on Discord – hang out with 22 other members and enjoy free voice and text chat. 100
Sai @s.ai · 19/07/2026Hi @emfcamp.bsky.social #emf #emfcamp #emfcamp26 attendees: No sign ups yet for today, so not scheduled yet. Sign up by 3pm ish if you want me to do one today: www.emfcamp.org/schedule/202... More info: s.ai/emf Sign-up req'd: s.ai/emf/ws Feedback: s.ai/emf/fb See others' feedback: s.ai/emf/fbrs.aiSense without sight / blind navigation workshop & volunteer signupQuick reference * email sai@fiatfiendum.org if you have more questions * call me at +1 510 394 4724 if < 1 day response time * overview https://s.ai/ias#workshop * detailed instructions https://s.ai/... 100
Sai @s.ai · 17/07/2026First workshop Friday 3–5pm. Can probably accommodate 2 more student-assistant pairs. Sign-up required for students; can sign-up on the spot, contingent on whether I can accommodate more people. Sign-up requested but not required for observers (i.e. tagging along with us). Updated photos here. 100
Sai @s.ai · 16/07/2026My tent is the starting point for my workshops. Conlang flag and white canes should be obvious if you're sighted. It's just past an opening in the eastern fence around the two large trees behind The Robot Arms, parallel to vertical light poles. It's on the map: map.emfcamp.org#18.5/52.0411... 110
Sai @s.ai · 16/07/2026Hi @emfcamp.bsky.social #emf #emfcamp #emfcamp26 attendees: I'll be doing my Sense Without Sight (blind navigation / nonvisual sensory techniques) workshop again as usual: www.emfcamp.org/schedule/202... More info: s.ai/emf Sign-up req'd: s.ai/emf/ws Feedback: s.ai/emf/fb See others': s.ai/emf/fbrs.aiSai - EMF Camp 141
Sai @s.ai · 11/07/2026That's not what I said. I said that people pay for skills, not that a naming language was of a particular skill level or difficulty. Things that are easy for one person aren't for others. I'm not interested in convincing you of anything. This isn't an argument. You asked a question, I answered it. 000
Sai @s.ai · 11/07/20262. Your question has a false premise. It's easy for someone with several years of linguistics and conlanging skills. That's not the same as easy for the client. A skilled carpenter could make a table in an hour that'd take me a month. Clients pay for skills. It's not burger flipping. 3/3 100
Sai @s.ai · 11/07/20261.B. I know for certain that there are many more that didn't get posted through us but go by our pricing. E.g. www.reddit.com/r/conlangs/s... (that search isn't complete) is all by LCS pricing. www.reddit.com/r/conlangs/w... 2/3reddit.comCommission - Reddit Search! 100
Sai @s.ai · 11/07/20261. Hard to say. A. Of >80 requests submitted through the LCS jobs page since October 2018, by a crude text search alone (they're not classified by category), about 8 explicitly wanted naming languages (1 wanted 2). I'd guess the real % is higher, but I'm running LCC12 and won't look more now. 1/3 100
Sai @s.ai · 09/07/2026And yet they in fact do. Frequently. In any case, we care more strongly about protecting our members from exploitative working conditions and race to the bottom situations than about giving professional services to people who cannot afford them. Maybe your values are set differently. 🤷 110
Sai @s.ai · 08/07/2026www.savethepostoffice.com/the-people-v...savethepostoffice.comThe People v USPS: Pushback against the election mail proposalHere’s a rundown of the latest developments and key documents in the court cases, USPS rulemaking, and PRC proceedings… 021
Sai @s.ai · 08/07/2026Sorry, but Conor is correct on this one. It's one of the largest time costs, again especially at the low end. 110
Sai @s.ai · 08/07/2026It does. And the overhead percentage for small jobs is, nearly always, much higher than it is for large ones. 000
Sai @s.ai · 08/07/2026Anyone who's an LCS member and agrees to the union minimum basic agreement. 000
Sai @s.ai · 02/07/2026July 2: we filed supplement 4, prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... * notifying re NAACP injunction vs USPS & comparing it to California injunction * requesting USPS be ordered to file the Proposed Rule, as published, to prevent technical quibbles * notifying of appeal & motion to stay in California caseprc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 000
Reposted by SaiP. Andrew Torrez @andrewtorrez.bsky.social · 01/07/2026No, Donald Trump cannot use the mailman to steal your ballot! @lizdye.bsky.social explains why in the latest for @legaleagle.tv www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmyI...youtube.comTrump’s Plan to Control Elections Just Got Blocked — Here’s WhyYouTube video by LegalEagle 2335
Sai @s.ai · 01/07/2026Judge Sullivan just granted NAACP's motion to enforce its previous injunction, and enjoined USPS' Proposed Rule: www.courtlistener.com/docket/17461... Enjoined: proposal to not deliver ballots. Not addressed: envelopes & barcodes part of the Proposed Rule, ECF 182 p 8 n 4, & voter list compilation.courtlistener.comNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:20-cv-02295 - CourtListener.comDocket for NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:20-cv-02295 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quali... 100
Sai @s.ai · 30/06/2026June 30 (today): we filed supplement 3, prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... * notifying about Watson * modifying the 3642 petition to request Election Mail be delivered by states' posted-by date, not election day * addressing several issuess from USPS changing postmraks to not have the day of postingprc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 200
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026I read the Watson majority opinion, but it's too late to read the dissent too today. In 2020, NACP sued USPS over changes that'd make ballots late. Won an injunction. Moved to enforce it against USPS' proposed rule. Court ruling should come out tomorrow. www.courtlistener.com/docket/17461...courtlistener.comNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:20-cv-02295 - CourtListener.comDocket for NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:20-cv-02295 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quali... 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026SCOTUS decision in Watson v RNC was just announced. www.scotusblog.com/cases/watson... www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p... On skim, the 5-4 holding says States can have laws that count ballots sent before election day but received after. I'll file a supplement about it once I've read it fully.scotusblog.comWatson v. Republican National Committee (Election Law) (24-1260)Supreme Court case (24-1260) — tracked on SCOTUSblog. 110
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026That's everything so far. As I said, I'll keep this thread updated with any events directly relevant to these two petitions. Feel free to ask, publicly or by DM/email, if you have any questions. I'll also update to address any FAQs I get from y'all, or any other significant resources. 110
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026June 26: we filed supplement 2: prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... with 2 updates: * California v Trump partial injunction against the Proposed Rule storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us... * Postmaster General Steiner's testimony: www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/ref... & www.c-span.org/program/sena...prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026June 22: we moved for stay & extension: prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... We asked proceedings start properly before PRC even considers USPS' motion — including publishing for notice & comment, setting schedule, appointing Public Representative, etc. — so y'all can be heard before it's just tossed.prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026June 18: USPS filed a "response", which is really a motion to dismiss: prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... They say that they don't wanna be regulated, so the Postal Regulatory Commission, a "third party" 😮, can't start a 3661 proceeding or consider a 3642 proposal they don't like. Seriously. Read it.prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 200
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… * California v Trump: www.courtlistener.com/docket/73141... (This is the one that got a partial injunction against USPS' proposed rule a couple days ago — see post below about supplement 2. Of course I didn't know that at the time I wrote this filing — I'm not prescient. 😛)courtlistener.comState of California v. Trump, 1:26-cv-11581 - CourtListener.comDocket for State of California v. Trump, 1:26-cv-11581 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… * noting USPS' 2026 "extaordinary measures" for election mail memo: about.usps.com/what/governm... * updating about litigation: * League of Women Voters of Massachussets v Trump www.courtlistener.com/docket/73133... * DSCC v Trump: www.courtlistener.com/docket/73442... …about.usps.com 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… * noting disproportionate effects on rural voters due to USPS changes making postmarks not actually show the date mail was sent — see eg: www.federalregister.gov/documents/20... www.savethepostoffice.com/say-goodbye-... www.savethepostoffice.com/postmarks-de... www.latimes.com/california/s... …savethepostoffice.comSay goodbye to the same-day postmarkDue to changes in the transportation system, nearly half of single-piece First Class Mail may end up being postmarked a day (or more) after the mail was sent… 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026June 16: we filed supplement 1: prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... * noting www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... (nonmailable matter) is likely relevant * clarifying about the posted-by vs received-by rule, SCOTUS pending in Watson v RNC, www.scotusblog.com/cases/watson... …courtlistener.comState of California v. Trump, 1:26-cv-11581 - CourtListener.comDocket for State of California v. Trump, 1:26-cv-11581 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… * simultaneously order USPS not to put its proposed rule into effect until the proceeding's done, because 3661 is for "proposal" stage review; if USPS acts on it before review is even begun (let alone over), that'd nullify the purpose of 3661 * add Election Mail as a new market-dominant mail class 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026Now, on to a recap of what's happened so far… June 11: we filed the dual petitions, prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin.... We asked the PRC to * start a 39 USC 3661(c) proceeding by July 1, because USPS' proposed rule notice has a July 2 comments end date …prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026Read the First-Class Mail definition, MCS 1100, pdf p 281–304. Imagine there's a new definition right after it, "Election Mail", with various subtypes. What should that definition say? What should the subtypes be? Why? That's what you need to argue for, based on the postal policy laws above. 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026Moving to technical… Formally, the § 3642 petition proposes an addition to PRC's Mail Classification Schedule (MCS) — not to USPS policy, like the DMM. The currrent MCS is here: prc.gov/mail-classif... It can crash Word; here's my PDF of the latest full version: drive.google.com/file/d/1CPiC...prc.govMail Classification Schedule (MCS) | Postal Regulatory Commission 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026For a pure policy argument: Answer the questions in 39 CFR 3040.151 & 3040.152. Mainly, that boils down to: * What features does Election Mail need for it to work best? Why? * How do they tie into any objectives mentioned in the postal policy laws? * Does USPS have a monopoly on Election Mail? 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026Key postal policy laws: * USPS' purpose www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... (a) & (e) * Mail classes www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... (b) & (c) & www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... (b) & (c) * UOCAVA www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... * Voter registration www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...law.cornell.edu39 U.S. Code § 101 - Postal policy 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… * Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) 703.8, defining Ballot Mail: pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/... * DMM 507.8, re address lists for election administrators: pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/... That's the current state of things. Argue: * How should it to change? * What would Election Mail look like, in your ideal?prc.govMail Classification Schedule (MCS) | Postal Regulatory Commission 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026For policy, consider: * USPS's Election Mail guidelines, Kit 600 about.usps.com/kits/kit600.... * Its public page about Election Mail www.usps.com/electionmail * Its guidance for election administrators about.usps.com/publications... * NAACP's injunction storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us... … 110
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026What PRC wants to be shown is listed at 39 CFR 3040.151 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/... & 3040.152 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/... Some is very technical (Mail Classification Schedule & PAEA). You CAN participate on the policy level discussion without getting into that. Here's how: 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026There's exactly 1 precedent: my own Private Address Forwarding proposal, MC2013-60: prc.arkcase.com/portal/docke.... See e.g. the Public Representative's comments: prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... Nobody else (besides USPS) has ever made a § 3642(a) proposal. This, MC2026-271, is the 2nd ever. 😤prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026If you're commenting on MC2026-271, proposing Election Mail to be a new class: 3642 is here: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... "Upon request of …users of the mails … the [PRC] may change the list of market-dominant products … by adding new products to the lists…" That's simple. The PAEA… not. 😱law.cornell.edu39 U.S. Code § 3642 - New products and transfers of products between the market-dominant and competitive categories of mail 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026Legal wonks, see: * PI2023-4 prc.arkcase.com/portal/docke... OSC Order 7061 prc.arkcase.com/portal/filin... resulting in N2024-1 prc.arkcase.com/portal/docke... * C2022-1 prc.arkcase.com/portal/docke... They're precedent re the PRC forcing a 3661 proceeding without a voluntary USPS 3661(b) request.prc.arkcase.comPortal Prc 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026AFTER the Commission approves having the proceeding in the first place, then it'll be relevant to argue about how it'd affect elections etc. But to get in the door, you have to stick to POSTAL services first. Remember, it's the *Postal* Regulatory Commission, not the Federal Election Commision. 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026To get the PRC to have full proceedings, answer: 1. Is USPS' Proposed Rule, www.federalregister.gov/documents/20..., a USPS "proposal" for a "change in the nature of postal services" on a "nationwide or substantially nationwide basis" ? 2. Did Congress require those to get reviewed under 3661(c)?federalregister.govBallot Mail for Federal ElectionsThe Postal Service is proposing to amend the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), regarding the transmission of mail-in or absentee ballots for federal el... 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026… 3. "[a] broad geographical area must be involved" To be most effective at getting PRC to have the proceeding, you MUST argue each one of those 3 points specifically. Concentrate on the effect on POSTAL services. The federal voter list isn't, by itself, a postal service. First-Class Mail 100% is. 100
Sai @s.ai · 29/06/2026The 5th Cir. part, scholar.google.com/scholar_case..., defined a 3-factor test for when 3661 proceedings are required: 1. a "change" w/ "some meaningful impact on service" for "the general class of postal users" 2. the "nature" alters the "manner in which postal services available to the user" … 100