iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 23/06/2025

So the allies didn't won ww2 and brought peace?

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 11/04/2025

That you have to prove your identity before you vote? That shouldn't be an issue. The democrats positions in those issues brought us Trump. Good job.

000

Reposted by @rvc121.bsky.social

Nikki Petersen @nikki-m.bsky.social · 04/04/2025

My husband and I run a game store and after all the tariff announcements, he decided to write out kind of a "behind the scenes" of how we spend and spill it out for people who don't understand. He's had so many reactions and shares I wanted to bring it here, too.

8231201133

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Do you actually claim that if we would use very known methods of forest management that are not used in many places we will continue to see rise in the number of forest fires? Is that your actual argument? If it is wait a second and I will find proves you are wrong.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

That paper is really bad. Like really bad. Do you understand why it's wrong? Do you know basic facts about the greed? Do you want to discuss or continue with bad arguments?

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

I am not gonna continue this conversation. You did not do the bare minimum to understand is very simple argument. You are just proving is point. You are the same as RFK who said we should not use vaccines because they have side effects. This is a bad way to argue.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Wow you are really bad at arguments. You don't know what you are disagreeing with.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Read the articles you submitted. The quotes are not the issue.

010

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

That's a very bad claim. We know for a fact that forest management is much more significant to cause forest fires then temperatures.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Fossil fuel must be part of it, Like Alex always claimed. Also what is the connection between this and your weird reality denying comment on Fiverr stock?

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

I would not read cheap shots. If you have actual arguments I will read them.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Wow that's a new level of a bad argument. Amazing. Why am I not surprised you just deny reality.

300

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

I don't even need to read your lies anymore. Do you actually claims he denies global warming?((.,9,9>

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

Do you understand the concept of time?

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

What? You switched his arguments and then attacked the argument you made up?

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 05/04/2025

So? This is a logical fallacy and a dengourus one. If he is wrong can you show what his mistakes are? The idea that you need a specific credential to study a specific issue is wrong.

210

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 03/02/2025

So you didn't vote for kamela?

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 31/01/2025

We know that the benefits of cheap reliable energy are much greater then the risks of the impact of climate change on humans. How can you stand for science and never try to check the benefits vs the costs at the same time?

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

Or punish them in this case. Racists policies are not ok.

020

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

What? It's amazing the echo chamber you are in. Even Benjamin Netayahu, a compulsive liar and evader that calls almost everyone who disagree with him antisemitic, can see it wasn't a Nazi salute. Why can't you see obvious facts.

010

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

Well, those federal agencies violate so many pepole basic rights. Killing them is amazing and many people are freer and happier.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 20/01/2025

Why is it funny? This is what pepole like Trump does. They want more control and don't care about the law.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 20/01/2025

So your argument is that you don't like what he or other ate saying (or maybe you don't like them), so they are wrong? They supported this. Now they don't.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 20/01/2025

What did I missed? At first I thought it's a metaphor. Now I'm thinking it might be a nightvile inspired joke. Either way, what did I missed.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

Come on. You know many members in the UN violate human rights. China, Russia, many African and Middle Eastern states. If they don't violate human rights what does the concept even means?

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

What? No. That's not what I mean at all. I mean the declaration is contradictory. I never heard anyone who disagree with that.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

Read him. We disagree on some issue. He would obviously be against the right to Healthcare for example. He said government have very narrow responsibilities.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

If a government want to respect those rights it have to force pepole to act against thier will and never use force against them. I red it like t years ago so I don't remember the wording. But I stand by the concept of rights as it was understood by jhon locke. sometimes you have to take a stand.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

I don't agree with the declaration. I think it's really a bad document that changed the meaning of the concept. There was a philosophical fight about negative and positive rights. The declaration is kind of in the middle and contradicts itself. No one can respect the rights of the declaration.

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

Concepts have meanings. There is a definition of human rights. It's not whatever you like it to be.

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

The fact that I disagree with you means I'm not intelligent? That's one way to think about the world. If I was you I would try to look at the downside of for example universal Healthcare and how much harm it created. That requires real honesty.

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

They are absolutely not human rights. They are attacks on human rights.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

There is no leap. Those are human rights. If you belive in minimum wage or public health system you are against human rights. No leap just honest use of words.

400

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

Yes he had criticism of human rights wich are liberal concept and include property rights. There no rights without property rights.

100

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

I am pro fruitful conversation. I just think words have meaning. I want to understand your point of view and I want you to understand mine.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

New meanings? Do you belive in human rights as understood by jhon locke? What is the point of this argument? What do you gain from it?

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

You kept calling me ignorant for not knowing everything there is to know about your ideology. Are you ready to read a text or even listen to a lecture you would disagree with?

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

Yes. That's what orpole like you think when presented with other ideas. Religious thinking is dangerous. At least we agree on that.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

Not very brave. But at least kind of honest.

000

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

You can call me names for disagreeing with you. But that won't change my mind. And the idea that words means whatever you want them to mean is absurd. property rights are obviously human rights. If you oppose them why aren't you brave to say it. At least Marx was brave to write it once.

300

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

In the end of the day human rights have a meaning. It is a concept that Marx didn't invent.memarx reject human rights as they were understood for more then 100 years. I agree with the original meaning. And we both know I am right about this. You just can't belive anyone would support that concept.

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

We both know i understood him. You just can't belive in am pro selfishness. That's what confused you. There is a reason you call me names instead of explaining where I was wrong.

200

rvc121.bsky.social @rvc121.bsky.social · 26/12/2024

I don't make excuses. I disagree with you. I think selfishness is the highest of virtues. It's the opposite of oppression and exploitation. The idea that man have to choices sacrificing himself for others or others for himself is wrong and anti human. Are you open to listen to other ideas?

100