rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/08/2026And that's not democracy! (Not even close). That's a rigged game that needs your participation to look real. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/08/2026Demanding people vote regardless of what's on offer is demanding that legitimacy be manufactured for a system that hasn't earned it. "Voting is a responsibility" translates easily: "your job is to ratify whatever we put in front of you. If you don't, the failure is yours." That's a stitch-up! 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/08/2026Anything to imprison people in the UK. So they can be more easily exploited and abused. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/08/2026Actions have consequences. Add your name: goodlawproject.org/s/abb8a1goodlawproject.orgJason Arday: Demand a public inquiry now | Good Law ProjectCommission an immediate public inquiry into how to ensure a responsible press given its contribution to Dr Arday’s tragic death. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026And possibly the actual lack of any real interest in the subject by those that are so upset by it... 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026What is required is the withdrawal of the belief that another holds power over you at all. A withdrawal of consent at the level where power was originally surrendered. You gave that belief. It was always yours to reclaim. The declaration comes first. The outer action follows. It was always so. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026You cannot comply your way out of a reality you are continuously choosing. But neither can you resist your way out! For resistance fixes the very thing you push against in your experience. 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026They've been given power... they are using it how they like... now getting it back is not so easy.... Historically it has been shown time and time again: giving power away - absolutely - to anyone (or any organisation) inevitably results in abuse of the ones that gave their power away. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026And that's not democracy! (Not even close). That's a rigged game that needs your participation to look real. 090
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026Demanding people vote regardless of what's on offer is demanding that legitimacy be manufactured for a system that hasn't earned it. "Voting is a responsibility" translates easily: "your job is to ratify whatever we put in front of you. If you don't, the failure is yours." That's a stitch-up! 1163
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026What about all the people that didn't get arrested? Where is their money! 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026It's straight out - abuse by the state. And that's what the state does: it abuses people, animals and the ecosystem, that's its main function. 040
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026Being in work or not isn't really the point. The point is are you living a life that you're satisfied with? Are you living a healthy life? Are you actually living a life that isn't one of simply surviving or being a slave to somebody else? 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026I guess that's because money is being used on other things like supporting the mass murder of children in Gaza? 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026I think we all need protection from the police... 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026And here's what we don't say clearly enough: the police have no legal obligation to protect anyone. But they do hold a monopoly on state-sanctioned violence - and they use it to prevent people from protecting themselves. That's not a social contract. That's a protection racket. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026"If they've got something on me, charge me." That's not a radical statement. That's someone asking for the rule of law to actually apply. The protection he needed wasn't from criminals. It was from the people with badges. 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026A Manchester cafe owner was detained under anti-terrorism powers, then offered money and favours to spy on his community and identify Muslims at his mosque with "extreme views." He turned it down. Then went public - because he said he needed protection from the police. 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026And here's what we don't say clearly enough: the police have no legal obligation to protect anyone. But they do hold a monopoly on state-sanctioned violence - and they use it to prevent people from protecting themselves. That's not a social contract. That's a protection racket. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026"If they've got something on me, charge me." That's not a radical statement. That's someone asking for the rule of law to actually apply. The protection he needed wasn't from criminals. It was from the people with badges. 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026A Manchester cafe owner was detained under anti-terrorism powers, then offered money and favours to spy on his community and identify Muslims at his mosque with "extreme views." He turned it down. Then went public - because he said he needed protection from the police. 100
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/06/2026He's doing his job: showing everyone just what a farce the UK governance system is. And he's doing it consistently, and still people aren't getting it? 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 12/02/2026Being involved in war crimes and genocide based on racial profiling is hardly the model of tolerance. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 20/12/2025The structure of most work places is volitional servitude. Trying to deal with the inevitable consequences of that, using even more legislation is avoiding the issue. That's trying to legislate shit to not stink. 💩🤦 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/12/2025If the way people relate to each other is primarily dependent on their perceived level of material wealth, what kind of fucked-up pretence of a toxic social environment is that? It's a disaster waiting to happen... 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 13/12/2025youtube.com/shorts/JuI0a...youtube.comCanadian TV show TEARS APART Trump in RUTHLESS parody videoYouTube video by Brian Tyler Cohen 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 08/12/2025If Venezuelan drug manufacturers are responsible for American deaths, are American food manufacturers also responsible for American deaths? Food kills far more people - by orders of magnitude. And, what about pesticide and herbicide manufacturers? The biggest life destroying groups on the planet. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 08/12/2025It's already a fairly authoritarian state, with everyone involved with coercive control, one way or the other. Just about everyone has to 'do what they are told' for one reason or another. Usually for material survival, which is a type of slavery. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/12/2025I guess system collapse of an unsustainable system is, by definition, inevitable? 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/12/2025We all pay the heavy price of a dead-end consumer culture, one way or the other. It's not like the environment wasn't already being completely destroyed, before flipping increased. The UK biodiversity collapse is a systemic issue, that putting rubbish in 'dumps' won't even touch. 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 01/12/2025The colonisers are now being colonised 🤡 (more than they were before) 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 09/10/2025The government is so anti-life. If it's not about starving children to death, then it's about destroying the environment 🤦 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 04/10/2025They know what they're doing. That's why it is sick, psychopathic and dark. Look behind the masks. It's pure destruction, and not much else. 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 04/10/2025Unending and escalating cruelty. 000
Reposted by @rockstarserious.bsky.socialMike Galsworthy @mikegalsworthy.bsky.social · 04/10/2025History repeats. That’s why in Europe we have the ECHR. 🇪🇺 291065402
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 28/09/2025Why does Starmer exist? Interesting questions, but are they really worth spending time on? 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 28/09/2025The thing is, Starmer is involved with a genocide that is based on racism! He supports Israel, which has a system of apartheid based on... racism. So why quote anything Starmer says?? It's all hypocrisy. Where's the value in quoting hypocrisy??? How is this in any way meant to be helpful? 031
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 22/09/2025It's amazing that people can't work that out for themselves. Still, it's helpful to hear a clear explanation. 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 22/09/2025I see why the membership has gone up. Considering the video message I just watched, that increase in membership is very encouraging. It's tempting... After all, the Green Party is the most democratic party ever, in the UK. Considering we're meant to be a Democracy, that's good credentials. 040
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 19/09/2025They're totally into a never ending conflict. They would feel completely redundant without it. 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/09/2025Yes, give it back to corporate control... !?! 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 17/09/2025You suggest putting a lot of time, energy, resources and attention onto pathological, antisocial violence based on ignorance and delusional thinking? 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025Nothing to do with any discomfort with Labour's and her personal involvement in war crimes and genocide...? 010
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025It's all tax payers' money being used up to defend the government's obsessive interest in mass murder and horrifying abuses. Which is in contradiction to so many responsibilities and obligations the government has regarding war crimes and genocide. It's a reckless abuse of tax payers' contributions. 020
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025Maybe he has an investment in denying their experience? Generally speaking, he seems to dismiss everyone's experience, except his, and he doesn't seem clear on what that is anyway. WTF he's doing in the prime role of an apparent democracy, is the obvious question here. But, yes, disturbing and sad. 040
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025Yes, they are, & that is because, they are both components of the same system, that has the same toxic agenda. The system doesn't care about either party, at all. They are just components being used by that very agenda. BTW: the agenda is around issues of domination, control, repression, abuse etc 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025I would suggest that it prevents democracy, to the point it can't really yet be damaged, because there's not enough of it present to be damaged. So, yes, proportional representation, would be a step towards the possibility of democracy. Great.. though I think it's all too late now... 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025For people lost in hypocrisy and lives of contradiction, 'free speech' in reality means 'not free speech'. Just in the way that 'care and concern' means 'not care and concern' or more directly, 'exploitation and abuse' 000
rockstarserious.bsky.social @rockstarserious.bsky.social · 05/09/2025So if there's any expectation that a benevolent parental figure in the form of a political party (or some kind of political 'leader'?) is going to save anyone - maybe get real? 030
