Sign in

iiinova is part of the Atmosphere — an open, public network where you own your identity.

robinhouston

@robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
128 followers 3 following 865 posts

Maths etc. 🌉 bridged from ⁂ mathstodon.xyz/@robinhouston, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 11/10/2026
(The RID is nopert too btw: github.com/bence-hervay/nopert-rid)
github.com
GitHub - bence-hervay/nopert-rid
Contribute to bence-hervay/nopert-rid development by creating an account on GitHub.
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 09/10/2026
How can you keep black from making Snaky? snaky.gotrevor.org
snaky.gotrevor.org
Snaky 15 × 15: play White against a proof
Try to stop Black from building the Snaky hexomino on a 15 × 15 board. Black plays a strategy whose win is proved in Lean.
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
I feel this is getting a disproportionate amount of attention on here, relative to the 369 papers that haven't been withdrawn
241 4
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
New nopert just dropped – and it's a corker! github.com/dwrensha/StellatedTetrah… Via @david
github.com
GitHub - dwrensha/StellatedTetrahedron: proof that the 11/20 Stellated Tetrahedron does not have the Rupert property
proof that the 11/20 Stellated Tetrahedron does not have the Rupert property - dwrensha/StellatedTetrahedron
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
@pozorvlak We're certainly seeing a lot of progress!
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
@pozorvlak I wanted to vote that we will not see claimed solutions to any of them in that time frame, but that didn’t seem to be possible in your poll.
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
They’ve just withdrawn three of the papers: * Algebraicity of Weil classes on split abelian eightfolds * Algebraicity of Kuga–Satake Correspondences for K3 Surfaces * The rational Hodge conjecture for products of K3 surfaces github.com/openai/math/blob/main/hi…
github.com
math/history.md at main · openai/math
Contribute to openai/math development by creating an account on GitHub.
1249 24
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
I didn’t even notice this one at first. This is cool! Talk about a weird machine. > 376. Universal computation in forced Navier–Stokes flows. Constructs viscous incompressible flows starting from rest on a fixed flat three-dimensional domain that perform universal computation under smooth […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
103 3
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
@gro-tsen.bsky.social Confusingly, I think the count of 372 is correct! There is no problem numbered 045, 061, 070 or 123.
010 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
Ha ha ha, the article is 84 pages long and most of them look like this. I don't know what I expected.
A screenshot of page 71 of the article. It is just a long list of lists of three-digit numbers.
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
Snaky is a winner! Man, I wasn't sure if that would ever be resolved. github.com/openai/math/tree/main/pr…
github.com
math/preprints/Snaky-in-21-Maker-moves-September-25-2026 at main · openai/math
Contribute to openai/math development by creating an account on GitHub.
110 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
It's a good thing I went to bed just before this dump dropped, or I would have been up all night
110 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
Holy ****, they solved Hilbert’s tenth problem over ℚ‽ And I'm still on the first page of the problem list.
210 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
Looks like something big dropped overnight: github.com/openai/math/tree/main/pr… This is going to take some digestion…
111 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 06/10/2026
This is not my fight, but I don’t at all relish the prospect of the criteria by which mathematicians are judged becoming subjective ones. That opens the door to so much potential corruption that it makes my heart sink to think of it.
mathstodon.xyz
001 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 06/10/2026
There's an amazing new result in algorithmic complexity today. 3SUM is the problem: given a list of n numbers – there are different versions of the problem, depending on whether the numbers have to be integers or not – determine whether three of them sum to zero. There is an O(n²) algorithm […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
002 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 04/10/2026
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT9wAQSV5_4
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 04/10/2026
And a nice essay from Christian Szegedy: docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-…
010 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 03/10/2026
You can make it match up perfectly by slightly squashing the octahedra.
011 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026
@dpiponi Yes. I’m surprised this letter has so few signatories: sites.google.com/view/release-the-p…
101 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
If there's anyone here who isn't yet sick of the AI/maths discourse, you might enjoy reading Kevin Buzzard's take on it: xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/10/0…
xenaproject.wordpress.com
To grieve, or not to grieve?
Recent events in the field of AI for mathematics have shown us beyond all reasonable doubt that the field is currently undergoing a rapid transformation, unlike anything that we have ever seen before. Language models are solving hard problems which … Continue reading →
200 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
A partially disassembled view.
The cluster of 20 magnetic octahedra disassembled into two pieces of different sizes
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
You can complete it to make a ball of 20 octahedra that don't quite match up perfectly.
A ball of 20 octahedra that don't quite match I perfectly, held in my right hand
110 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
Absolutely amazing progress on short superpermutations from Jay Pantone and his AI collaborators: github.com/jaypantone/superperm-upp… This breaks the existing records for all n > 7. Here is a superpermutation on 8 symbols of length 46,181 – a lot shorter than any that was […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
001 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 30/09/2026
Five regular octahedra don't quite make a ring.
Five regular octahedra don't quite make a ring.
113 3
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 30/09/2026
An interesting interview with Leo de Moura, the creator of Lean: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/machi…
podcasts.apple.com
Who Checks a Proof No Human Can Read? — Leo de Moura
Podcast Episode · Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST) · 30 September · 1hr 14min
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 29/09/2026
I don't know who needs to hear this, but Hanayama have made MASSIVE versions of some of their most iconic puzzles, and you can now get them shipped internationally so you don't even need someone in Japan to forward them. store.hanayamatoys.co.jp/categories…
The MONUMENT cast vortex puzzle on its display standThe vortex puzzle in my hand. It is bigger than my hand.
002 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 28/09/2026
@gro-tsen.bsky.social I completely agree! I never understood why I was supposed to find this surprising.
020 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 28/09/2026
He's just confessed how he did it! github.com/frazerpearce/TimeLord
github.com
GitHub - frazerpearce/TimeLord: TimeLord: choose your random future
TimeLord: choose your random future. Contribute to frazerpearce/TimeLord development by creating an account on GitHub.
229 9
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 28/09/2026
For my birthday, my brother-in-law gave me a 4992-digit hex number that, when used as a seed for Python’s random number generator, makes it so that printing a sequence of “random” ASCII characters actually prints a birthday greeting. I find it rather amazing that this is possible! This is the […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
41039 39
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 24/09/2026
64 kibisteps
22:16
Today:
Steps
65,533
Distance
54.61Kм
Flights Climbed
29
010 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 22/09/2026
And so has Chaim Goodman-Strauss: arxiv.org/abs/2609.24779
010 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 22/09/2026
@christianp That's an idea! I'll have to work out what the back looks like, though.
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 22/09/2026
Good news: Felix Flicker has written a nice short readable paper about it. arxiv.org/abs/2609.23783
arxiv.org
Matching Rules for a Three-Dimensional Strongly Aperiodic Monotile
A recent pre-print [arXiv:2609.19214] proposed a three-dimensional (3D) strongly aperiodic monotile: a shape that tiles Euclidean space only aperiodically and which admits no symmetry of infinite order. The proof takes the 3D Chair tile identified previously by Lee and Moody, and adds geometric decorations to the faces so as to force aperiodicity (without these decorations The Chair also admits periodic tilings). Here we establish general requirements on face decorations to achieve the same end, in order to facilitate the search for physical realisations. We find that the requirements are minimal. We provide matching rules using three colours of arrow. They are not equivalent to the original rules, but force the same tiling by forcing Chairs to compose into `Superchairs' with doubled linear dimensions. In this process the matching rules themselves compose uniquely, which is the core of the earlier proof. Relaxing this constraint further we find that the same structure can be forced using only a matching rule based on the colours of squares, regardless of orientation. Any physical system encoding these rules (geometrically or otherwise) will force the strongly aperiodic monotiling. We provide simple examples.
210 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 20/09/2026
I appreciate that many of you despise the concept of ‘vibe math’ on principle, but I think this is a nice case study in how to do it responsibly – without subjecting mathematicians to nonsense or unreadable slop. overreacted.io/how-i-vibed-a-proof-…
overreacted.io
I vibed a proof of Conway's conjecture
Comments
131 3
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
It's a joy to see Alex from Another Roof getting so much funnier, more confident, and more ambitious. And an interesting topic too! youtu.be/5A7U6grJSDo
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
A nice essay from Grant Sanderson @grant, part of the ongoing series of guest posts on @tao's blog: terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/18/i…
terrytao.wordpress.com
If math is more than proof, we need to better celebrate the rest of it
[This is a guest post by Grant Sanderson. This blog post was initially written in a different file format and converted using AI. — T.] A sentiment echoing throughout the mathematics community right now is that solving problems and generating proofs have always served as proxies for the true goal of mathematicians, which is to […]
022 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
(Exciting for me, I mean. Not necessarily for you.)
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 19/09/2026
This is exciting! A video about a puzzle I designed. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vifHZWX7sTM
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 18/09/2026
Are we going to be excited about the discovery of an elegant 3d aperiodic monotile, or sad that it was published as 60 pages of badly-written AI slop? Why not both! arxiv.org/abs/2609.19214
arxiv.org
A Strongly Aperiodic Monotile in Three Dimensions
Socolar and Taylor asked for a single, simply connected three-dimensional prototile that forces nonperiodicity by shape alone, admitting no weakly nonperiodic tiling; the Schmitt-Conway-Danzer biprism and the three-dimensional Socolar-Taylor tile admit screw motions or a periodic stacking direction. We exhibit a rational polyhedral $3$-ball $Q$, which we call Chair44 (R44): a seven-cube chair whose $24$ exposed unit panels carry tiny square-pyramid features, and prove, as a proof submission, that $Q$ admits tilings of $\mathbb{R}^3$ by congruent copies, reflections allowed, and that every such tiling has no translational period and a symmetry group of order at most $24$; every tiling is homochiral and carries a unique infinite hierarchy of nested supertiles. The solid was designed to a reading of the aperiodic-monotile phenomenon reached with the Six Birds emergence calculus (Section 3.3), and the construction turns on a single finite test, checked by machine: the tile's own contact rule survives coarsening, so that the decoded parent tiling obeys the tile's rule and no other. The proof combines a written geometric argument, that the features force every tiling onto a registered lattice, with exhaustive finite enumerations; the companion census is replayed by two independent implementations, every finite gate is kernel-checked in Lean 4 (modulo a named compiler hook per native_decide theorem), and the written geometric lemmas and the logical assembly are Lean theorems as well, so that the theorem is kernel-checked modulo the named compiler hooks; the written proofs remain as exposition.
373 7
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 17/09/2026
gowers.wordpress.com/2026/09/17/why…
gowers.wordpress.com
010 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 16/09/2026
If this is what it takes to keep the bots out, just let them in. This is too much
An incomprehensible captcha
020 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 15/09/2026
“According to rumors that I’ve heard, solutions to some very longstanding open problems in theoretical computer science (no, not P≠NP or other complexity class separations, but think about some of our other biggest problems). I’m told that the AI companies, having been burned by the hostile […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
110 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 15/09/2026
The Age of Wonders and Terrors, by Scott Aaronson: scottaaronson.blog/?p=10062
scottaaronson.blog
The Age of Wonders and Terrors
Twenty years ago, when the idea of AI taking over the world in our lifetimes still struck most of us as the unconstrained fantasy of those who knew too much science fiction and too little science, …
140 4
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 14/09/2026
And on proofsandprompts.com, especially @littmath's essay.
proofsandprompts.com
Proofs and Prompts
Notes from the common room
020 2
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 14/09/2026
I'm enjoying the recent series of guest articles on @tao's blog on the general topic of AI in maths: terrytao.wordpress.com
terrytao.wordpress.com
What's new
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao
140 4
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 12/09/2026
@pikesley I like your current display name
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
@pozorvlak Here is a visualisation showing how the 16-unit cluster sits inside the 64-unit cube: polyhedral-cube.robin-houston408914…
polyhedral-cube.robin-houston408914.chatgpt.site
Polyhedral Cube
Explore a space-filling 64-unit cube and reveal the symmetric 16-unit cluster inside it.
000 0
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
@pozorvlak The answer is yes! (Credit: Astra, which correctly understood what I meant by the undefined term cube-like.)
100 1
robinhouston @robinhouston.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
@pozorvlak Good question! I don't know the answer. There are actually at least two similar-looking but slightly different 64-unit clusters that work, so maybe the right question is whether this 16-unit cluster is contained in any cube-like 64-unit cluster. (Not that I have a rigorous definition […]
mathstodon.xyz
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
100 1