Sign in

rickest-rick.bsky.social

@rickest-rick.bsky.social
509 followers 539 following 15 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
On its face I’ve always liked the micro-payment notion where readers pay per-item. Obviously no idea if it pencils out, what price would need to be, and assumes it’s frictionless enough to appeal. No getting around the economics of subscriptions maxxing out fast. I don’t recall a serious attempt.
120
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 19/10/2025
@profgalloway.com
001
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
Fantastic aesthetic.
100
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 30/08/2025
(Sadly I have no answers—but thanks much for putting this nifty photo account on my radar.)
010
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
What if instead — hear me out — they spent $499M litigating against this to keep those chumps tied up for several years *and* likely achieve a precedent for everyone else to cite. They’d still have $52.5B to go towards their monthly bills…
0100
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
I heard there are -160 whale boat captains who can use Murkowski’s clause, so she voted yes in exchange for ~checks math~ a 6.6m tax break which saves *maybe* 1M in taxes?! Total. For all of them. And probably less. Vs estimated 17M people who will be booted off Medicaid including in her own state.
020
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 22/06/2025
I’m sure it’s not trivial but between Signal-type anonymity tech, map APIs, and millions of motivated people with cell phones, it seems plausible to create an app to coordinate a massive neighborhood watch with more than one camera on these guys, wherever they go 24/7, with live location updates.
2225
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
@knibbs.bsky.social (I rudely failed to compliment and thank you for the piece, let’s chalk it up to character limit, pun intentional. Thanks!)
000
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
Ha right, Steamboat Willie is fair game. Thx for education.
000
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
I see. So - asked reductio ad absurdum, not combatively - every time a child draws Mickey Mouse outside an educational setting, they are technically infringing?
100
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
(Whether they have permission to train on it seems a different question, and is the tack taken in other suits; but not one I noticed in this article.)
000
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
I’m confused: if I render Darth Vader (with or without AI) and try to sell it, I am certainly infringing. But if I draw Darth Vader and just admire it, what is the infringement? Just the fact an AI (or pen) *can* infringe doesn’t seem conclusive so much as what the user does with it?
320
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
Maybe I’m a softy, but I’m in the ballpark of *any endeavor which evokes an emotional response in the beholder.* So chess can move the viewer the same as painting or poetry in that way. I’m probably agnostic on the question of intent also, so the right dam can be breathtaking, intended or not.
010
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 08/06/2025
I would happily pay a subscription for BS, and also for anybody else’s ATProto server that was running a good railroad. (I am in that camp that thinks the original sin of the internet was choosing ads over subscriptions as the primary model.)
subscription.am
subscription.am - This website is for sale! - subscription Resources and Information.
This website is for sale! subscription.am is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, subscription.a...
000
rickest-rick.bsky.social @rickest-rick.bsky.social · 08/06/2025
IANAL but reading through this 12406 it seems to end by saying “Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States…” How does that square here when Newsom is seemingly not involved?
271