iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Oh well, try to warn someone and they're just gonna say you're threatening them. Enjoy stepping on the rake I guess.

000 0

White queers are never beating the racism allegations. Glad to know you don't give a shit, have fun with the libs, I'm sure they have no further plans to capitulate to the right after the trans question has been settled.

100 0

All because you can't fathom a political movement white people aren't, and shouldn't be at the center of. That flag represents genocide to several groups that have been targeted by people waving it.

100 0

You're attacking someone who simply pointed out a singer is wearing a symbol that is currently the flag of a white-supremacist organization. And defending the usage of other fascist symbols because you might alienate people who want you dead.

100 0

You are currently scheming to try and use racist and genocidal rhetoric, symbols and ideologies to try and bring about socialism. You're essentially a nazbol.

100 0

Projecting your political projects onto others, I see.

100 0

Your political strategy is identical to Chuck Schumer's. But good luck with sacrificing minorities to appease the racists. I'm sure that won't backfire on you personally.

100 0

Not to say I don't know you understand that, just stating I understand your point and agree.

Is creating a more egalitarian society. As those societies, where there isn't a gender based hierarchy of power, seem to fare a lot better at dispensing restorative justice in these scenarios. Harsher punishments won't solve the problem. Fun as it would be to strap victimizers into a catapult.

Its not a perfect solution, but removing them from easy access to other victims is a tempting auxiliary benefit. But my opinions and inclinations probably shouldn't be the basis for a judicial system. Other societies and systems have had success tamping down this exact problem. The real solution-

Sure we don't *have to* banish people like him from society, but I wouldn't feel unsatisfied if that was the normal punishment in such cases.

I added nothing, Pike tortured that woman to death. Bipolar disorder and PTSD do not diminish her culpability in the slightest and people with those disorders do not normally engage in brutal murders. So you deflecting to that is inappropriate at best.

"Giving nazis ground" by explaining that wearing a prominent symbol used by hate groups might send the wrong message?

000 0

No, they're decidedly not. But feel free to waste your time. You're the one who decided to step into my mentions and bother me in the first place.

200 0

Lmao, yeah dude, suburban republicans are totally the way forward. Not like they've been a reactionary bloc since the suburbs came into existence. What a brilliant idea, let me know how it goes trying to radicalize the Karen demographic before they call the cops on you.

100 0

Yes, that flag for all of its history was a symbol of a genocidal colonizing presence on the continent. It has been used in that capacity since it's conception. It should be abandoned. Unless nationalist "socialism" is what you're after.

100 0

The historical symbol was used for genocide in the first place, or did you forget how New England was founded?

100 0

That anything can be co-opted by white nationalists & obliterate what it used to mean. It being used hundreds of years ago doesn't invalidate that today it is used differently. But feel free to get a japanese manji tattoo on your forehead & explain that "it's totally not a swastika" to onlookers.

Sūn Wùkōng @rexsimiarum.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

Sounds like we need to invade Israel since they feel so comfortable making threats like this. If Iran can't have them, neither can Israel.

001 0

Neil Breen's "Fateful Findings" comes to mind. Bad camera work, incomprehensible story, terrible writing, incompetent actors, and the entire movie feels like the set-up for a porn segment that never arrives, it's the most compelling thing I've watched in years.

Sūn Wùkōng @rexsimiarum.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

The "death"? It was a brutal murder. They tortured that poor woman to death and bragged about it. They smashed her skull in and carried a piece of it around to show off to other people. We can oppose the death penalty and discuss the killer's horrid childhood without minimizing her culpability.

120 0

Yes, but I don't think the entryist position of the DSA is very useful for this. It leads to the free rider problem, where the vast majority of people in the organ are not contributing to direct action and view electoral participation as a comprehensive solution in and of itself.

210 0

They have followed illegal orders in the past and they will do so again. They are the enforcers of capitalism, they exist to protect the elites and their property from the working class, to expect them not to do what their organizations were designed to do is foolish.

Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers showed us the way. This is how they did it. They reached more people and stayed in the zeitgeist more deeply and more poignantly than any electoralist organ has accomplished to date. Thats why the FBI found them to be a legit threat. The feds don't fear the DSA.

0102 0

That legitimacy can be leveraged into education of the masses of people that need this aid. People don't fight for a political figure off in Washington. But they will remember and stand beside a group that helped them through their darkest hours. People will listen to the group that fed them.

140 0

It's one approach of many, I think a better method is direct action. A tactic I've personally seen succeed is a socialist organization coming in where the government fails, for example, keeping vulnerable people warm and fed. If an organ can succeed where a government fails, it creates legitimacy.

260 0

Well, it's reliant on the DSA actually, yanno, winning. So we may be waiting for a while.

A Hillary supporter playing apologetics for rapists. Just like your hero Hillary did for her predator husband, Bill.

000 0

That's why the DNC fights them so hard, the inevitable failure of DSA to accomplish anything meaningful would give up the ghost and expose the futility of electoralism to the light. It will prove to a mass of people that peaceful revolution is impossible, and this will stoke violent revolution.

121 0

Dems don't want the DSA to get anyone in office because it'd draw their misanthropy into the light Even so, DSA could stack every house of congress & it won't fix it Capitalists would blow up the government before surrendering it, it will disillusion DSA supporters & accelerate radicalization.

361 0

Walter White: You're Goddamn Right

I do not care about the potential uses of AI. I do not care about what it might accomplish in a century. Today, in the real world, it's fucking everything up. From the environment to the economy. It's no coincidence that it's being forced on us by all of the worst people alive.

static.klipy.com

Alt: Walter White saying "You're Goddamn Right"

Urvi @theurv.com · 28/09/2026

Reposted by Sūn Wùkōng

There were more men in a single documented gang rape at one school than the number of competitive trans athletes nationally. But I’ve heard a lot more politicians being asked about protecting girls from one of these scenarios and not another… I’ll let you guess which is which.

132530874 0

Sūn Wùkōng @rexsimiarum.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

To survive in the real world, where global capital has the sway and power it does presently, requires any advancing socialist state to have a vanguard. Otherwise it is defenseless against predation by capitalist interests. But this isn't a completely incorrect interpretation of my views.

011 0

Sūn Wùkōng @rexsimiarum.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

There weren't any questions on my opinions of vanguardist positions. The questions were often too broad. My opinions would vary greatly depending on what the conflicts between state and localities specifically are. I respect the ideology of Luxemburg, but see the necessity for vanguard parties.

I sure wish that was an automatic disqualifier from being transphobic. But i'm glad you aren't using feminism to run cover for bigotry.

I don't know this person or even remember what they said, I think they blocked me.

100 0

I don't care. I'd prefer to be on it and not have to interact with people who support the genocidal actions of the zionist state.

I'd say it is a pretty big leap. But I've already clarified my position. It would take someone operating in bad faith to not understand my meaning now, agreed?

Funny part is, I have never said that in particular. Just voiced opinions that genocidal zionists don't like.

Probably because you're a social democrat, who thinks tankies are somehow a real problem. That's the basis of half the lists I'm on.

Did you interpret what I said as being "anti-stay at home parent" instead of "anti-transphobe parent who has alienated their children"? Because that would require a wildly bad-faith reading.

100 0