Sign in

Stephan Rasp

@raspstephan.bsky.social
365 followers 100 following 13 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
Other minor updates: - Where available, we added 2022 as an eval year in the interactive graphics. - We added forecast activity as a metric for deterministic models, a simple measure of blurring. - More regions. Don't hesitate to file bugs or suggestions as GitHub issues. end/
000
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
Next, we added 4 new models to the public benchmark (which now also uses WB-X as a backend): - GenCast - Stormer - Excarta (HEAL-ViT) - ArchesWeather The probabilistic scorecard finally looks a little more populated :) 4/
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
To get started, check out the documentation: weatherbench-x.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ For an example of evaluating forecasts against sparse obs, see: weatherbench-x.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ho... Please don't hesitate to ask questions or report bugs/feature requests via a GitHub issue :) 3/n
weatherbench-x.readthedocs.io
WeatherBench-X documentationContentsMenuExpandLight modeDark modeAuto light/dark mode
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
WB-X is a complete rewrite of our evaluation code. We designed it to be as modular and powerful as possible with cutting-edge use cases like observation-based models in mind. We've used WB-X internally over the last year for most of our model development. 2/n
100
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
🚨 WeatherBench Update 1. WeatherBench-X, our new evaluation code, is now on GitHub: github.com/google-resea... 2. New models (plus other small updates) on the WeatherBench website: sites.research.google/weatherbench/ 1/n
github.com
GitHub - google-research/weatherbenchX: A modular framework for evaluating weather forecasts
A modular framework for evaluating weather forecasts - google-research/weatherbenchX
1218
Reposted by Stephan Rasp
Randy Chase @dopplerchase.bsky.social · 31/12/2024
2025 is here tomorrow, so let's reflect on 2024. Even without the final counts and the new AMS and AGU ML journals, 2024 has eclipsed 10% of all papers and had over 600 papers mentioning neural networks in their abstracts 📈
052
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
Sure. The y-axis shows the 3d T850 RMSE relative to ECMWF IFS HRES (so >100% = better). It's a crude attempt at normalizing different evaluations, so don't overinterpret the small differences. This is more about the bigger picture.
sites.research.google
Deterministic scores – WeatherBench2
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
So, for AIFS and GenCast I am evaluating the ensemble mean. I still use deterministic HRES as a reference. For AIFS I grabbed the NH HRES scores from the scorecard on the ECMWF website and then eyeballed the AIFS score from Fig 9.
010
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
Good idea, done: Rasp, Stephan (2024). AI-Weather SotA vs Time. figshare. Dataset. doi.org/10.6084/m9.f...
doi.org
AI-Weather SotA vs Time
The purpose of this spreadsheet is not to exactly compare different models but rather to get an overall sense of progress in AI-based weather prediction.
031
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
But you do raise a good point. for purely obs-trained models, this probably isn't a fair comparison. In this case the conclusions are probably the same but still.
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
True but in the medium-range the obs uncertainty is probably smaller than the forecast uncertainty, right? Radiosonde vs ERA5 RMSE ~ 1k, right?
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
What is the conclusion from GraphDOP being so far away from SotA? Is the setup still suboptimal in some way or is pure obs-based forecasting harder than some might have thought.
110
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
ECMWF with two new papers right before christmas. AIFS-CRPS: arxiv.org/abs/2412.158... GraphDOP (the first truly end2end global weather model): arxiv.org/abs/2412.15687 Here they are added to the SotA tracker: docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
4206
Reposted by Stephan Rasp
Stephan Hoyer @handle.invalid · 19/12/2024
Can incorporating AI improve precipitation in global weather and climate models? Yes! In the latest NeuralGCM paper, we show that training on satellite-based precipitation results in significant improvements over traditional atmospheric models: arxiv.org/abs/2412.11973
arxiv.org
Neural general circulation models optimized to predict satellite-based precipitation observations
Climate models struggle to accurately simulate precipitation, particularly extremes and the diurnal cycle. Here, we present a hybrid model that is trained directly on satellite-based precipitation obs...
1345
Reposted by Stephan Rasp
Tom Andersson 🌍 @tom-andersson.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
🌎
011
Stephan Rasp @raspstephan.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
👋
291