Sign in

Planet: Critical

@rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy
70 followers 0 following 86 posts

Investigating why the world is in crisis. 🌉 bridged from ⁂ www.planetcritical.com, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 19h
The only fair algorithm is a non-existent one
planetcritical.com
Why We Must Abolish A.I | Denise Utochkin
Why We Must Abolish AI | Denise Utochkin 0:00 /3755.364331 1× Denise Utochkin was a postdoc researcher at the University of Copenhagen investigating how artificial intelligence could be used in the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. However, Denise was fired from their postdoc for starting a campaign that sought to abolish AI altogether, after realising that the only way to produce and work with fair algorithms was to not use them at all. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ I invited Denise onto the show to contextualise AI for us, asking: what are its connections to capitalism, colonialism, extractivism, supremacy? Throughout the episode, we also discuss the moral purity of the left, the collapse imaginary, and actually end with a discussion on what kind of revolutionary action is helpful today—and what has been tried and tested and proven to fail. _Show Notes_ * Ali Alkhatib's _To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes_(link to PDF) * Yarden Katz's Artificial Whiteness: Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence (publisher's link; Anna's Archive link) * Plus Nick Land's Machinic Desire 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 05/10/2026
On joy and heavy responsibility 
planetcritical.com
Weaving freedom
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. When I think about freedom, I think about mountains. I think about glaciers. The ways they grow and expand, year-long and century-long in breaths and out breaths. The blue, white, grey, green, waters that gush from their scraping underbelly. The scars they leave on granite and quartz as they heave over rock walls. The devastation they have wrought on communities as, slowly and steadily, they have pressed down from the mountains, slowly and steadily they have crunched houses back into the twigs and pebbles with which they were made. And how now, not slow, not steady, they are retreating. 60,000 years of in and out breaths crunched into 200. Freedom is an essential part of the interconnected whole that makes us human, makes us living, makes us listen to ourselves, each other, the birds, trees, rock faces. Freedom is in colour, the way sand sparkles in the day and snow sparkles at night, the yellow of lemons, the green-orange of tangerine trees, the blood-red of blood. Freedom is letting yourself feel. Freedom is dancing though they say you look silly, belly-laughing though they say you sound like a witch, applying yourself with rigorous care to the things you find that you love, with the bow and arrow of earthly anger to the things that you find you need to protect. Freedom is committing yourself to a way that feels right in the world. It is saying no, not right now, you need to focus. Freedom is brave. It is crying, feeling the depth of your fear and your joy and your sorrow, it is swallowing tears and remembering the strength of your sinews and bones and feet. Freedom, sometimes, is not necessary. Our bodies, minds, and souls have needs that freedom alone cannot nourish. Mountains don’t care in the ways that people do. Mountains are not indifferent, they are not vindictive. They don’t love us, and they will not forgive us. Mountains are, and so we can be alongside them. In the mountains not caring I find an invitation to embrace my mortal caring. We get as close to the rock as we can, close enough to see crystals in the ice and diamonds in the granite, close enough to see the perches of butterflies and the peeping-out rock flowers. But that which holds us in the mountains is the same as that which pulls us away from them: our boundedness to each other. We realise, out on windy peaks and rocky ledges, just how much we love our homes and the people waiting for us there, who will worry if we don’t come home and who will eat and dance with us if we do. Just as mountains teach us that there is more to life than freedom, they teach us that freedom is more than its political, historical definitions would have us believe. Freedom is utterly entangled in the messy history of the world. People have fought and died for freedom, they have killed for freedom. Freedom: a people' s capacity for self-determination. An individual’s ability to do whatever they want, whenever they want. Political discussions of freedom are confusing. The origin of the political debate around freedom as I encountered it took place between two English men over two generations in the 17th century. One regarded freedom with fear. Left to his own devices, Thomas Hobbes predicted that man (for this was a conversation between men, in those days) would annihilate everything he encountered in order to execute and protect his freedom, his life turning out to be ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.’ Men must therefore willingly give up their freedom to political structures in order to live without fear. The other heralded the individual, celebrated freedom, but regretted to say that he could not grant the individual that freedom. John Locke, a 17th century British philosopher, saw freedom as man’s ability to act, or not, ‘according to the preference or direction of his own mind.’ The role of politics, according to him, was to create and protect conditions of freedom for each individual on the planet, so freedom must be marginally limited for the good of the whole. I am more interested in the shared characteristics of these two arguments than the disagreements. Both men saw freedom as ‘natural,’ as man’s unfettered, unfiltered state. What is ‘natural’ is defined through its contrast: it is not civil. It requires that man set aside the reality of living with (and because of) others. Both Hobbes and Locke, then, regarded freedom as in opposition to society: social rules and obligations were an undisputable restriction upon freedom. Freedom was considered to be wholly outside of ethics and morals; whenever man has to think about anything else, freedom ends. Freedom was solitary, unencumbered by the weight of being a social and ecological being. When I meditate, and let my mind wander to the edges of my breath, and feel blindly for a limit to my mind, I find there is none – that I am more of earth than the earth is of me. I think of osmosis. When there is more water on one side of a cell wall than the other, particles will move randomly. And yet, an equilibrium will be reached; somehow, without using up any energy, moving passively, water molecules will find themselves spread equally across the border. No agency is assigned to the molecules; they don’t move, but rather are moved. Sometimes I wonder if we assign too much choice to freedom. But then again, we are more complex than water molecules. Where I come from, it seems that what we lack more than anything else is the ability to hold two truths at once, the ability to see from two eyes two different worlds. I first learned about the importance of being able to see from two eyes from First Nations Canadian elders and the scholars who received consent to share their stories. Mi'kmaq elders Albert and Murdena Marshall developed a framework in 2004 to share an ancient concept, rooted in their peoples’ long history of learning to live with the settlers on their land in Eastern Canada: _Etuaptmumk_ , two eyed seeing. With Cheryl Bartlett, a biologist and friend, they described the framework as ‘learning to see from one eye with the strengths of Indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing, and from the other eye with the strengths of Western knowledges and ways of knowing, and to use both these eyes together, for the benefit of all.’ I believe that the wisdom of Two Eyed Seeing has something for us. It can help us digest what Italian Marxist scholar Alyssa Battistoni tells us succinctly in her latest book: that the earth is the constraint upon, and the condition of, our freedom. The biological requirements of our bodies to eat, excrete and reproduce, for instance, constrain us. And yet, simultaneously they give us the energy and direction that we need to survive and dream. From one eye, then, the earth is the condition of our freedom. From the other, it is a constraint upon it. As we learn to hold these two things apart and together – we have two eyes – we recognise a pattern. Our societies are undeniably a constraint upon our freedom, as Locke and Hobbes were getting at. What they missed: it is simultaneously a condition of it. Society is not the antithesis of our freedom but the ground in which freedom can take root and grow. Our caring responsibilities are also both constraints upon, and conditions of, our freedom. And one more: love is a constraint upon freedom. It is the condition of freedom. Freedom is ‘natural’ insofar as it is fluid, dynamic and interconnected. When I think about freedom, I think about mountains. I think about G, and the ways he showed me of going into them: ice axes turned from picks of survival to accessories for dancing; friends to be hugged at belay points; jokes to be shouted up right until when you start to fear for your life; a tactful, rousing silence when you have to fight for it. And I think about when he fell. Ice axes turned to wings, angels swooping down to meet him, to carry him away from his mortal body as his limbs became bloodless. _My heart sings to think of you_ _shrouded in gold_ _draped in the vulnerabilities we chose not to outgrow._ The freedom of mountains: live and let live, do all that you can to survive, to hold onto life, to get lost in the great beauty of the universe and find the limits of your pulsing, fighting body. The problem with this is that it often accompanies a retreat from society, echoing Hobbes and Locke’s assumption that society must be freedom’s antithesis. I see this in the climbing community, wherein people looking for freedom from social norms of success, freedom to be passionate about things that aren’t culturally or economically valuable, turn a blind eye to the reality that they are still embedded in that social, cultural, economic world. How can we be free in a shared world, then? How to be free amongst your neighbours, your family, the food that nourishes you and the ground that raises it, the people who wash and package it, the vehicles that transport it? Freedom is assertion. It is recognising that there is space for you in the world, and acting within that space. As glaciers recede and sea levels rise, as freshwater becomes polluted and groundwater dries up, we find ourselves driven to effect change, to be able to live freely once again and to protect the freedom of the things we love. Once I spoke to a friend about skiing in the woods. We celebrated together the sense of unadulterated joy and peace that this can bring about, whooshing down between tall, quiet, trees, focusing so entirely on your body and your surroundings so you can flow down the mountain without having to stop to navigate. Then, she said: _“_ Even ski touring you leave your footprint wherever you go… Two winters ago we saw a white rabbit, and thought it was beautiful. Later I told my friend, and he said, ‘You know when you ski on their lands they get scared and run but have no food because it’s the winter, so you waste all their energy, and they can die.’ And that really affected me. With flora also – I don’t pick up flowers anymore. But it makes me happy. It’s my freedom, to not do it. I don’t feel restrained by changing my habits. It’s fun to learn how to adapt, to be helpful.” _In the peace that comes with letting strawberry juice linger on your chin long past the time the taste is gone from your tongue — with letting mulberries stain your fingers till you are caught red-handed and grinning with fingers stained and nimble, with not a morsel of remorse._ The acts of care that we carry out towards each other and the beings on which we depend are the condition of and constraint upon our freedom. Learning the constraints gives us the chance to exercise our freedom inside the world, to find flow and sheer joy wherever we may be, to answer both to ourselves and our communities. It gives us the opportunity to come up against the places where our freedom is restricted and it shouldn’t be.__ It gives us the opportunity to exercise our bravery, to bring our childish and fearless curiosity with us into adulthood and spaces of communal responsibility, to get involved with each other in connected projects of liberation when we find our freedom is being inhibited by the same sources. When I think about freedom, I think about mountains. Mountains answer to calls that surpass our human frames of reference. In them I find a reminder, over and over again, that we have choices, and more likely than not we will all make different ones. That in our differences and our obligations and our joys we can live well together. Hobbes and Locke were wrong. Freedom is not outside of morals and ethics. Freedom is personal and individual, certainly, but each individual lives in concert with hundreds of others, and the tune sounds flat if there is no harmony to pick it up. It is bound up in innumerate decisions about what a good life is and how to go about living one. Freedom is in finding spaces where we can be free together. _none of us would have lasted long in the garden of Eden. we love too much the pleasures of loving the sweetness of each other’s breath and the joys of experiencing this world. we know that it is no crime to live messily, to mend and break hearts as we learn to sing in harmony, that there is nothing to forgive if you’ve been trying to be true. _ _one of us is not here anymore ————_ _he was, is, was, is,_ _love and life and joy and death._ _the rest of us are still here — that is why for me he still is – still the glue that we all were, that we all used to piece ourselves back together, (in the collective heartbreak of this earth), to be never truly alone again._ 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
From the archives: Our journey from agriculture to capitalism
planetcritical.com
Lisi Krall on How Economics Overpowers Culture
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Lisi Krall 0:00 /4475.199388 1× #### How can we change an economic system that has a life of its own? 10,000 years ago, homo sapiens began farming a grain surplus. This surplus led to the creation of societal and cultural hierarchies which divorced our species from our long relationship with the natural world. This week’s guest, Lisi Krall, argues that our current economic system of fossil-fuelled capitalism is an interpretation of that same system—and we must repair our relationship to the more-than-human world if we are to change the system. But it is a momentous challenge. One, she argues, we must not think culture alone can overcome. Lisi Krall is a Professor of Economics at the State University of New York Cortland where she researches political economy, human ecology, and the evolution of economic systems. She's also the author of Bitter Harvest: An Inquiry into the War Between Economy and Earth. She explains how systems self-propagate, evolve and dominate culture, arguing acts of local resistance are key to building a sustainable world, and warns against projects like the Green New Deal, which she claims is the status quo masquerading as the solution. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 28/09/2026
Escaping capitalist amnesia through the voice of the soul
planetcritical.com
Feeling (un)freedom
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. Amidst the numbing set of realities that face our species and our planet–that corporations are commoditizing ecosystems into inputs that become the shitty products we buy, that we choose to machinize living animals into factory farm inputs, that the hyper-abundance of wealth created by fictionalized financial schemes has enabled an ever-growing industrial war machine and increasing inequality–we are faced with the fundamental choice of _what actions we choose to take_**.** It feels like there’s no time to grieve what we’ve lost, whether it’s been collective histories, ecosystems, or lives. Many have no choice but to fight back. I’ve been lucky enough to be alongside Indigenous peoples fighting land dispossession from energy companies in Colombia and residents of my American hometown demanding accountability for the industries poisoning their air, water, and soil. But for so many of us, including myself, the gifts of capitalist abundance have materially served our needs. I live in a city where a desk job pays me enough to sustain a life surrounded by friends. I never worry about whether I will be able to eat, even if I scour the digital coupons of competing grocery stores I walk to. The current of my consumptive life frictionlessly carries me forward, pacifying me with comfort while physically separating me from the underbelly of cruelty undergirding our political economy. Modern global capitalism’s raw destruction–its pillage of ecosystems for fossil fuels, its subjugation of human creativity into mechanized labor, its increasingly dematerial and institutionalized integration into the paper pushing of corporate bureaucracy–cannot be separated from the material abundance that sustains my life. It produces the always-in-season produce section at the grocery store and the washing machine that churns my clothes in industrial soap. By the sheer privilege of chance, I have grown accepting these riches as given. But perhaps my freedom to consume was never a choice to begin with: it was a bargain made for me. In exchange for losing my freedom to control my food supply; succumbing to my wage-based employment that leaves me exhausted at the end of each day; and clawing meticulously to climb the job ladder to pay for continually escalating costs–I will never be bored. This freedom of choice creates a bounty of gifts, harmful and precious: of processed fast-food and the joys of traveling affordably; of YouTube short-video slop and medicine treating my grandmother’s degenerative illness. To some extent, capitalism is the hammer pounding exponentially more nails, and we use them both to build shelter and deepen our wounds. It feels impossible to verbalize the contradictions that permeate our economic and social lives; it feels much easier to numbly accept the world as it is. These material gifts, whether for our benefit or harm, are what make confronting the ecological and social horrors underlying their reproduction so easy to ignore. We are captured by _capitalist amnesia_ , pacified to the cruelty of capitalism’s frictionlessness, forgetting that we are feeling people above individual consumers and producers. _How can we act if it is so easy to forget?_ ### Our voices cannot be commoditized I am reminded of a voice that first came to me at the age of 15 after a terrible loss. Depression began whispering to me, then, from within me, within my own heart. Perhaps it had been there all along, waiting for the silence that only grief could produce. The voice told my body to collapse into space, rendering me heavy and invisible. At that moment, I did not feel the current of youthful joy and blissful ignorance I’d grown accustomed to throughout my childhood. Instead, I felt submerged in an ocean, buried deep with a bitterness that was quickly growing within my soul. I could not speak–all words would be unintelligible. I could not breathe–I would swallow water. But I could sit there, holding my breath, unable to escape the deep undercurrent and reach the waves above. All I could do was sit in the conviction that I was alone and feel depression uncovering my pain from wherever I had hid it, while the rest of the world continued on. Depression, for me, is that which I’ve only been able to articulate with time by excavating the remnants of truth by removing the debris of my reactions and rationalizations. Underneath self-criticism and distraction, there is pain and sorrow. But the voice coming from my soul is not a sickness–it is a friend that demands to be understood on its own terms. Amidst a world of distracted pleasures, depression is a voice forcing me to live with the fact that my shadows were to inevitably follow my body, that sadness could move me as much as the currents of passivity. These emotions are mine and mine only, the friction to a world carrying me along its current towards a destination I cannot choose. ### The heart tells me to stop In a frictionless world, my depression becomes my alarm, wiping away my capitalist amnesia. It hits me as overwhelming guilt and grief, as the streets of my city reveal their pulsing energy–a rat race. As I pass by the homeless, the jobless, the amalgamation of bodies who can no longer walk due to diabetes and heart disease where cigarette butts and the smell of urine fill the air, my heart demands that I stop, stay, and yell into the streets that this is all unfair. Like Octavia Butler’s Lauren Olamina in _Parable of the Sower_ , physically hobbled by empathy, I clench my teeth to keep my body from crumbling around my heart. I ask myself whether it is possible to express kindness to someone else when I walk away from them in need, whether I can swallow the reality of the structural circumstances that put people in precarity while accepting the limits of my empathy. My voice does not elucidate a path forward, but it reminds me that my material freedom cannot hide my soul’s cries. I cannot choose to feel what I feel. What freedom I believe I have dissipates into the complicity and guilt that I live while others die, in part due to my obligation to get my paycheck in a system that I’m clawing to stay alive in. My grief comes from the fact that humanity’s ability to serve one another feels inescapably stolen by the scarcity of time imposed by the labor we all must complete to individually stay afloat. My horror comes from the fact that if I were in the same situation, I would face the same indifference. My inner voice does not just scream at the vast inequity of human suffering. It screams at the numbness all around me. And it screams for an increasingly mechanized planet who cries out as its open wounds are repeatedly hammered into by a million nails. ### The language of loss My depression teaches me that to be moved by grief is to feel one’s heart speak the language of loss. Amidst waves of material comfort thrashing me into numbness, my heart voices the suffering that inevitably exists in a world increasingly mechanized and atomized into impersonal transactions. It uncovers the unfreedom of the role I’ve unwittingly played to keep working, consuming, pacifying myself instead of renouncing my inhumanity. To stop moving would be to be steeped in the pain and the sorrow of my unfreedom, but to continue would be to accept that I am a machine. Pain hurts me. But it is also a reminder that I can love deeply, for my love can only come from the understanding that I lost, lose, and will lose someone, something dear. And that is what makes me human, what gives me the freedom to love instead of remaining numb. American capitalism operates by separating the underclass and the unemployed into the incarcerated and the hopeless, while threatening those of us lucky enough to skim a small layer of the wealth and abundance beneath debt like milk foam from our disposable coffee cups. It’s much less painful to navigate the world under the justification of self-responsibility and impersonal privacy. But the painful, debilitating, unproductive empathy–the voice telling me that we are all suffering in a frictionless and disposable world, reminds me that I am much more moved by love than amnesia, much more willing to put my heart on the line for others than protect myself. There must be a purpose to the love brought by grief that numbness cannot replace, a reason why our hearts feel even when our brains may just as easily accept indifference. The rational choice is one that we’ve grown accustomed to taking–ignoring our grief in the pursuit of frictionlessness and numbness made possible by capitalism’s material riches. If we keep walking, if we keep working, then we can stop feeling.Conversely, depression has shown me the danger of mourning too long. To replace consuming with being consumed by pain, to atomize systemic problems into individual scapegoats, to resort to hating humanity as the only possible explanation of evil, have been the crutches of hatred making me feel morally righteous on my pedestal while my screams rebound back onto me.I try, with difficulty, to hear the voice of depression as a reminder that I may still love, even as capitalism metabolizes bodies and fossil fuels into frictionless cogs. Recognizing the inhumanity behind the painlessness reminds me that my screams are my song, my pain my prose, and my friction my flashlight in a colorless world. And if I may love through loss, then others must as well. Perhaps capitalism’s greatest strength–its ability to produce inconceivable material abundance while fundamentally altering our social chemistry–produces its weakness. Its waste products are the friction of emotion that it cannot commoditize, the language to acknowledge our unfreedom and to make sense of the road beyond our amnesia. For the more of us that follow our grief to love, the more of us may hammer new homes out of recovered nails. I grieve not only at the screams that engulf me, but also at the possibility that I will be so overwhelmed by the weight of the world that I will lose the capacity to grieve. I worry that my pain will slowly lead to indifference and acceptance, that the burdens of individual responsibility will consume my ability to care for others, that I will force myself to ignore that underneath the chaos of cheap thrills and mortgage bills lies a voice that capitalism cannot take away from me. My freedom is the ability to act based on what grieving tells me, even if the cost is pain. Depression is one part of what comprises my ensemble. Its voice sings alongside my joy, peace, and anger, and growing with it has meant learning how to listen to its essential notes while not letting it overshadow its counterparts. And when I listen to it and when I feel, I hear a composition ever more stunning and complete. I see it more and more in people around me–not just a sense that they are being cheated by a system designed for them to lose, but that they’re searching for the language to describe a loneliness and grief that consumption cannot quench. I share what my soul cries because it resonates with the voices that so many of us contain. They are searching for community. And that is our freedom as feelers–to remind others that we are not machines but rather humans that may _choose_ to listen to our voices and love even when we do not have to. This is our burden. This is our gift. _This piece was written by Rishab Jagetia in his personal capacity, and the opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the view of his employer._ 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 24/09/2026
The unbelievable reach of the plastics industry—and their lobbyists
planetcritical.com
How Plastic is Corrupting Our Bodies and Our Institutions | Jane Van Dis
How Plastic is Corrupting Our Bodies and Our Institutions | Jane Van Dis 0:00 /3750.396871 1× Since I first interviewed OB/GYN and independent researcher, Jane van Dis, on the dangers of plastic two years ago, the science has only become more stark. Not only are we discovering more ways in which plastics are harming our biological health—from changing our brain chemistry, our pregnancies and births, and polluting our organs more broadly—we're also learning exactly how the plastic industry buried this evidence as early as the 1950s, and continues to manufacture doubt for what is already a global public health crisis. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ On this episode, Jane walks us through the updated research about the impact of plastic on our health, and then reveals shocking stories which show the reach and power of the plastic lobby. She names the chemical companies that were instrumental in stacking the Supreme Court with corporate-bought justices who are not only tearing apart environmental protection, but actively dismantling the legislation that keeps corporate abuse at bay. Finally, she also explains in detail why the idea of recycling plastics is simply not a solution scientifically, revealing how the discourse has been deliberately muddied by that same lobby so they can continue polluting our environments, bodies and institutions just to turn a profit. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 21/09/2026
What is being free?
planetcritical.com
We have been reduced to a universe
✒️ My newsletter this week explores the question "What does it mean to be free?" It is the first in a series of essays produced on this topic by __The Grove,__ a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. Our pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. I am writing this in the final month of pregnancy, with our daughter sitting low in my belly, eagerly straining to meet the world. By the time you read this, she will be on my breast. By the time you read this, I will be a mother. And yet, perhaps I already am. The birth of a child requests—but does not necessitate—the birth of a mother. When, then, does motherhood begin? If not a child, what are the conditions that create it? Mothering does not have to belong to our kin alone; mothers abound in every shape and form because trusted guardians come in every shape and form. The clasp of the ancient and wise branches of an oak tree may be the very bosom in which one person feels safest. Mothers nurture and bend, mothers discipline and hold. Mothers and their bodies form the first webs of the world through which we explore what it means to be alive, to be here, to be now. When does one transform from the exploring subject to the web itself? When does one extend the invitation: I will nurture, I will bend, I will discipline and I will hold. Come. She came, and my body became two. The edges between who I was and who I hoped to become began to blur, just as the edges between who I am and she is took on more definition. As I approach the end of pregnancy, her presence feels singular, definite, and constrained. She is a wriggling paradox, her independence both encased inside and wholly dependent on my body, a body that is no longer singular, definite and constrained. My physical form has expanded beyond the confines of my imagination to grow our daughter; my body has become a whole world. I have been reduced to a universe. I have been reduced to a universe, the first she will ever know and the first she must soon go beyond. A beyond that is into an even greater universe, with as many mothers as she could hope for, as many webs as she can explore, as many worlds as there could be. Soon, she will be born, from me and into the bosom of Earth. Her childhood will be a long transfer of guardianship of her freedom. Her father and I will be the constraint upon and the condition of her freedom until one day she goes beyond us, as one day she must. Then, her independence will be encased inside and wholly dependent on Earth’s body, and on her community’s body, and on her own. Then, she will know the origin of her nature, and the wriggling paradox from which all life has come, and to which we all return. One day, we will all be reduced to a universe. Perhaps, then, motherhood begins with death: the death of the distinct edge. Perhaps motherhood begins when the boundaries of what is known start to blur, and the singular desire of something unknowable takes root. Perhaps motherhood begins when the need to go beyond leads you, finally, back. Perhaps motherhood begins with the death of a freedom that can only be granted, and the gift of a freedom that can only be given. The freedom that matters most to me now is the freedom to never be free of her. May my body forever be an expanse in whose clasp she feels safe; may my words forever be written for her, spoken for her, promised for her; may my choices forever be commitments to her. May I have the privilege of seeing her go far beyond her mother and father; may we be the compass points to which she returns, having found the very edges of who she is, of what the world is, of what may yet be. May we forever be reduced to her universe. I have come home to have our child, to my own mother; my first universe. I left sixteen years ago to go as far beyond as I could envision, and then farther still, and the edges of the world led me back here, back to the heart of where I come from, and who I hope to become. It is a profound wonder watching the edges of my own mother blur as she becomes an even greater expanse than she once was, as our daughter takes up residence inside her, too. Where my body encases, my mother’s encompasses, her orbit expanding over her growing family as she becomes beyond what she once was so that I may become beyond what I am. We are concentric circles of guardianship. We are a solar system of mothers. We have been reduced to a universe, together. Perhaps motherhood begins with a reduction into the infinite; from here, the paradox of life wiggles her way into being. Perhaps I would have never found freedom without my daughter’s father, whose own expansiveness revealed the brittle edges of a self I was desperately fighting to protect from the world. Through him, I let the world move through me. With him, I learned the greatest beyond is the one contained within each other. Is there any greater miracle than finding that your heart beats in another body? That another throat sings with your song? That your soul has gone beyond the confines of your flesh and made a world within a world on an Earth and not a single part of it can be reduced to anything less than a universe? May we never be free of each other. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 17/09/2026
From the archives: The Economics of Modern Colonialism
planetcritical.com
Fadhel Kaboub on Decolonise To Decarbonise
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Fadhel Kaboub 0:00 /3479.450839 1× Fadhel Kaboub is a former Associate Professor of Economics at Denison University where he researched political economy, decarbonisation, colonialism, and the financial and agricultural policies necessary to facilitate a global—and just—green transition. Since recording, Fadhel has been appointed Under-Secretary-General for Financing for Development at the international intergovernmental organisation, Organisation of Educational Cooperation. This episode is thrilling. Fadhel explains the traps of inflation, debt, globalisation, and the financial and agricultural policies weaponised by the global north to exploit the global south. He walks us through the three structural traps which keep wealth pouring out of the global south into the global north, amounting to modern colonialism. And he explains why we _can_ afford a just transition, revealing the exciting mechanisms of Modern Monetary Theory by exploring the solutions global south countries can implement to ensure their sustainable development. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 07/09/2026
From the archives: My inaugural lecture at OST University
planetcritical.com
Making Sense of the Crisis
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. Last week I gave my inaugural lecture, _Making Sense of the Crisis_ , to engineers and faculty at Switzerland’s OST University. In it, I explore how narrative subsumes biophysical reality, and how to break out of simple, linear constructs to create possibilities which reflect the complexity of earth's systems. This talk is a synthesis of everything I’ve learned from Planet: Critical; an attempt to grasp at the big picture by using poetry to reveal systems. It was truly an honour to write it, and I’m thrilled to present you all with it. I’m blown away by the response and support my lecture has received. A huge thank you to Professor Henrik Nordborg of Global Climate Compensation for the warm invitation, and for being such an excellent host. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
020
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 03/09/2026
A radical theory which explains how life is metabolically organised
planetcritical.com
The Dynamic Energy Budget Theory | Starrlight Augustine
The Dynamic Energy Budget Theory | Starrlight Augustine 0:00 /2527.071247 1× Starrlight Augustine is the director at the Institute of Ecotechnics, a research initiative developing technologies that exist in harmony with nature. She heads up their agroecology division, which is based at Synergia Ranch in New Mexico where she applies a little known but radical theory of biology: Dynamic Energy Budget Theory. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ DEB theory is a way of understanding how energy flows through organisms and through their living environment, and how the living environment flows through organisms themselves, providing a big picture overview of the metabolic organisation of life itself. Starrlight explains the theory in depth, including what makes it distinguishes itself to other theories of biology, before describing how she applies it practically on the farm to improve their yields and reduce their impacts. Rather than release it as a separate episode, I've included the interview I recorded with Bas Koojiman, the originator of the DEB theory, for anyone who would like to do a deeper dive into the science Bas Koojiman on Dynamic Energy Budget Theory 0:00 /2383.725624 1× 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
From the archives: Confronting Reality
planetcritical.com
We Need More Than Vision
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. Last week I spoke with Kim Stanley Robinson, author of a the acclaimed climate-fiction novel, The Ministry for the Future_,_ about the role of writing, of art, of fiction in particular in the face of a crisis. He gave a fascinating overview of science fiction’s response to the world over the past few decades, exploring the role of stories, narrative, and how citizens can both grapple with and demand change in their societies. This was such a wonderful interview. To me, the most important idea Stan raised was there being a story for the future—a story for what we must do, a story with which to build the world—and, therefore, the most important one we can tell. One version of this story is laid out in Stan’s novel, _The Ministry for the Future,_ an almost step-by-step plan for making progress towards a sustainable future. But why is telling that story not enough? Why is telling that story not enough to get people on board, to make people realise the magnitude of the problem? Why is the story of how we achieve sustainability and protect humankind, the biosphere and our planet not enough to get people going? Is it that—perhaps—we are missing the story for _right now?_ A coherent story that explains why that second story of the future is necessary; a story that reveals exactly what is wrong with the present moment, and why every moment we reinvest in it detracts from the possibility of bountiful, healthful and equitable life for all. The problem isn't that we don't have the science or that we don't know what's going on. The problem is cognitive dissonance, that huge amounts of the population all around the world don't know or don't believe the facts. So how can we create a story about our present that adequately reveals the need for action? And why is envisioning a better world simply not enough to inspire action? Have we become so alienated from one another that we just don't care enough to create a world in which everyone is safe? Is it that the story that we live in now is one of scarcity and fear? That it’s therefore almost impossible to imagine a world of wellbeing and abundance? And, because of its very unknowable nature, that better world in which we keep everyone safe is not only alien, but dangerous? What does this story for now look like? And does it involve talking about how the world could be, or does it involve really nailing on the head how the world is? What is the story of the world that we live in today? It is a story of exploitation and extractivism, of inequality of oppression. It is a story that was written in the blood of slavery. It is a story that dictates some human beings to be worthy of luxury whilst others are not even awarded dignity. It's a story in which the vast majority of humankind has disappeared into the ether of history as if they never existed in the first place, even though without them, none of us would be here today. It's a story in which main characters are appointed so by birthright, and firmly believe themselves to be the protagonists, rather than living their own subjective experience of this world, just as everybody else does. It's a story of sending children down mines to dig out cobalt for our batteries. It’s the story of 80% of fashion workers in Bangladesh suffering rape. It’s the story of corporations finding loopholes by creating products in international waters to they can maximise their profit. Ours is the story of celebrating dangerous men simply because they have been celebrated for forever. Our is the story in which women are silenced and people of colour exist as people of colour, rather than just people. This is the story in which whiteness knows best. This is the story where men don’t know how to say sorry to one another. In our story, nobody seems to have the pen anymore. It's the story we live by, but don't want to take responsibility for. The story which cannot admit to its own fiction. It's a story that promised heaven and hell and the earth to men, and has flailed wildly to find meaning in those empty promises. It's a story in which you and I don't exist. But “they” do. This is merely a story, and in which people live and die. Yet we overcomplicate it because we didn’t believe meaning could be found in the laughter between friends, in the squeeze of a lovers’ hand, or that the kiss of a parents’ lips on their child’s forehead is meaningful enough. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/08/2026
From the archives: Population is Political
planetcritical.com
Nandita Bajaj on How Pronatalism Feeds The Economy
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Nandita Bajaj 0:00 /5183.763968 1× #### We’re in planetary overshoot. So why are governments coercing women into having children? Nandita Bajaj is the Executive Director of Population Balance, an organisation offering education and solutions to address the intersectional impacts of human overpopulation and over consumption on the planet, people and animals. Nandita also co-hosts The Overpopulation Podcast, and teaches at the Institute for Humane Education at Antioch University, where she researches prenatal ism and human supremacy and their impacts on reproductive ecological and intergenerational justice. This episode is about the dangers of pronatalism. Nandita reveals how the coercive pronatalist policies around the world coupled with cultural mechanisms are causing a devastating impact on the planet. She also explains how existing power structures benefit from a growing population, illustrating how our economic obsession with growth demands exponential population growth. Nandita also explores the elevation of rights—human, species and natural—as a cornerstone climate policy to tackle population and create a sustainable world for everyone, and everything. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 24/08/2026
Thousand-year-old spirits hum underneath the rumble of a modern metropolis
planetcritical.com
What is that song you sing for the dead?
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. _“When the world was new and Allah had created mankind from clay, he also made another race, like us in all things, but fashioned from fire. The djinns were spirits, invisible to the naked eye; to see them you had to fast and pray._ _‘Could you show me a djinn?’ I asked._ _‘Certainly,’ replied the Pir. ‘But you would run away.’”_ I don’t remember how old I was when I started to believe in magic. Perhaps it was something I had always believed in. Or it had always believed in me. It is hard to know. What do you make in this world and what makes you? I was 17 when I first read William Dalrymple’s memoir of Delhi, _the City of Djinns_. It affected me deeply, as if he was inviting me into one of the many gateways burrowed across my hometown, to embrace it in a way I never had before, like a seance allows one to cross through the veil between worlds. The other world is always felt to some degree, and through repeated labours of believing in this feeling, it can be felt more. This veil can slowly be thinned, until you stand in the peripheries of both worlds, where the land is hard and ancient. Here, there is a crack in the slab, the place where the dead dance with the living, and a sole daisy splinters out from the underworld. What has this land seen in its time? What has it created? What has it destroyed? Delhi is a haunted city. Haunted because it is a crumbling city. It rises as it falls, in rapid succession, and then does it again. New life breathes its first breath every day while an overbearing cloud of smog and air pollution colours the sky a dull grey-brown. A chronic decay settles on a metropolis that is teeming with vitality. The Yamuna river froths at the mouth, children and dogs playfight on her banks. Kindness and laughter is shared between pedestrians and rickshaw riders on busy traffic intersections, while a policeman unabashedly abuses a lone elderly Mussalman traveler at an airport gate. Kites circle the sky screaming with zeal and jubilee, and underneath them on the streets, women, young and old, are raped, killed, and forgotten. Delhi is haunted by its many djinns. Djinns are creatures of another realm: magical, dreadful, of their own volition. They tend to Delhi’s millenia-old gravesites and water the weeds at their feet. The Pir, a sufi guide Dalrymple meets, tells him they haunt the city because of how much they love it and cannot bear to see it empty, so they become faithful guardians of the land. They see it rise and fall time and time again. Burned by invaders, then risen out of its ashes like a phoenix, rebuilt, reincarnated. The city today exists as a collection of different fragments from time, ruins from ancient civilisations, the fiery soul of the medieval and early modern Islamic world roaring unfazed by the repeated attempts to make it disperse, echoes from the slaughter of riots, war, and the ripping of an old world into two nations, a new colonisation, and the agitation of the youthful cries for freedom that have never died. Delhi is a city “disjointed in time,” where one scene suddenly unravels into another completely different one, as if in a dream. As such, it allows its people to also be disjointed in time. Perhaps that is what is most appealing about its unruly grounds. If you are born in Delhi, or somehow find yourself drawn to its core, you needn’t belong to a human ancestor, you needn’t belong to a name, a family, or a lineage. The land under Delhi’s noise will make you a home immediately, as if you have always been there, as if you belong there in its arms. It knows how to host civilisations, to let life grow and prosper very well. Even when I did not feel a strong connection to my dispersed familial Bengali heritage, I always belonged to Delhi’s historic, chaotic earth. I think the city must have an immense centre of gravity, drawing me so close to the earth, never letting me forget that my body rests on its ground, never letting me drift too far away from reality. Nothing I could conjure up in my head could rival the beauty of what already exists. Where so many ages have been born and have come to pass, life continues to ripple outwards, creating possibility for many futures, creating passage for new life to flourish. As long as this effect can be felt, the ripple carries on. During the height of the pandemic, I was safe on the Vancouver peninsula in the comfort of a pleasant spring, old-growth trees, and western healthcare infrastructure. Across social media, I saw Delhi burning. The third wave of the Coronavirus had hit the capital particularly hard. Cemeteries were laden with corpses covered in white sheets, overcrowded. People upon people were posting information asking for oxygen cylinders and sharing phone numbers. I could feel the panic and devastation through my phone. Even worrying about my family felt like a moot activity, sitting so far away. Those images are scratched into my retinas. I felt like my understanding of the world changed completely, brazenly, setting on fire whatever ideas the child in me had carried so long. The next time I went back to Delhi, I felt it all over me. The landscape had changed. I felt a collective grief, a collective absence, a collective pain come over me, as if another age of the city had fallen to invasion, needing to renew. In 1857, the Mughal Empire finally fell to the British. At its royal seat in the Red Fort in Delhi, Bahadur Shah Zafar II, its last emperor, prayed for his descendants. He acknowledged that the great reign of his ancestors was now complete. It was time for others to rule. I was not born a Muslim, but the djinns don’t care about this sort of thing. The djinns always liked me. Wandering the cityscapes of the western world I feel a little lost. Like the djinns are far from me. They can no longer protect me and make sure that I keep rising like this old city I am rooted in. I don’t know what a djinn really is. Maybe it is the embodiment of grief in everything we do. Like the place remembers all the places that came before it. As it remembers, it continues to love what has passed. Grief is in the maintenance of love, the love of every breath of life ever taken, but has not lived to see the day today. Maybe that is what the djinn, the corporeal form of our shared spirit, is: a breath that we have taken together. After some of the pandemic’s worst assaults on the city, my feeling of collective grief is the settling down of one of these great djinns. When something is lost, it takes shape as a supernatural being and clouds the atmosphere. I wonder if now, in the brown polluted air, these djinns are losing their ability to live on. If this air is clogging the pores that are needed to be kept open so the djinns can be felt. Because the djinns can only be felt, they cannot be seen. And what of the city then, if the djinns are gone? How will it live on? How will it remember? Djinns feel feelings through living hosts. They feel through me. They make me dance like there is nothing to this world but ecstasy. They fill me with sorrow that is too much for my small body to carry. The djinns can only be felt by those who believe in them, they need belief to attach to, or they disappear into nothingness. The djinns are the only conduit we have to speak with those who have passed before us. If we lose them, we lose any connection to our ancestors. If I must speak to the old land, I must speak through them. Sometimes I think I am running on empty. There is nothing inside me to give to the world. But I don’t think that is right. I think I just can’t feel them anymore. I can’t feel the djinns, because something in my sky is polluted. Something is clogged. A collection of words, phrases, borrowed mental structures, meant to keep me alive and comforted somehow, while my wounds that still need to know and attach to the world with their own words lie open and corroding in the air. Fear and a grief that still needs to be felt covers the space between the land and my breathing. The djinns that attach to me demand an audience with me. Do I make them feel safe somehow because of how heavy I am? Are they running away from something? Are they being hunted? Do they have no place to go? Does no one believe in them anymore? My ancestors are not happy. They are wailing, afraid, angry. They cling to me, reminding me of the horrors they have seen. No one will take them, no one will bear any responsibility of sharing this world with them. No one will remember them. The cost of things that die before they are born is heavy. We are creatures of fear, this land tells me, so we need the djinns, phantasmal beings who embody our deepest dread. This is the only way our fears may speak to us, through the shadows, where we dare not set anything alight. We are afraid of what we might see, what horror may befall us if we could indeed see, if we could indeed meet this djinn and everything terrible he may bring. One cannot see djinns, one can only feel them, hear them whisper, feel their heat. What would happen if I walked into a dark room, felt something in the dark, and just stood calmly in its presence? As a child of Delhi, it is easier to leap into other worlds without thinking, to delight and rest in the company of djinns. Sometimes, I think the life that lives and grows on my body is also disjointed in time, frictive orchestral co-living of different experiences, different functioning to serve different needs, different adaptive mechanisms, concentrated in pockets of differently-weighing gravity, all making music, mostly cacophony, together through me. This is my experience of living as a disjointed person, longing for unity, longing for moments that sing like perfect harmony. The only unity I feel is when life rushes through me, pointing me in some direction, asking me to move towards something. Once I witnessed something in someone die. When they died, at the very last moment, their eyes gasped in expanse. In their final moment, they sought to experience as much as they possibly could have felt, knowing that in the next moment, all feeling would cease. I looked into those eyes and they took hold of me and burned me. Terror, exhilaration, frenzy, hunger, betrayal, contempt, fury, pain, sorrow, madness, ambition, and freedom; I felt everything. The eyes mirrored like Borges’ _Aleph_ , a single point in space through which one could see everything, because these eyes were attempting to see everything, a feat only possible at the moment of leaping into death. Every time something dies and turns into a djinn it sends a reverse shockwave into the living world. It creates a depression in the land. Like my back is being flattened by a strong blast of wind. My ancestor is the land but I am also the land. The land is my back, where everything heavy rests. Do we remember the djinns or do the djinns remember us? What do you make in this world and what makes you? What are they telling me? What would they say if they could speak? But can’t they speak? I feel like they are always speaking to me. They are whatever memory is left of a time when others used to live, when others used to rule. Now it is time for someone else to live. Our ancestors only tell us one thing. Let it all go.__ Live as much as you can. Sing. Feel until feeling ceases. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
We don't need techno-fixes, we need techno-discernment
planetcritical.com
Low Tech Lives | Philippe Bihouix
Low Tech Lives | Philippe Bihouix 0:00 /3077.859728 1× The world is full of good ideas and solutions to the crisis. But good ideas cannot trump the laws of physics, and solutions will only be such if they are deployed in a manifestly different way than our current high-energy, high-material, high-consumption regime demands. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Philippe Bihouix is an engineer and the author of _The Age of Low Tech_(UK version, US version), which examines why technological innovation is just not going to be enough to get our way out of our resource bottlenecks, the climate crisis, the biodiversity crisis, and rising inequality. On the episode, he lays out his thesis, explaining from an engineering perspective the constraints of renewable energy, the fallacy of a circular economy, the reality of how our metals are used and recycled, and the importance of the longevity of demand side technology. Instead, Philippe calls for "techno-discernment", a collective approach for choosing what we're using our finite resources for—and what we're choosing to leave in the ground for future generations. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
022
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 17/08/2026
How earth made herself at home on new soil
planetcritical.com
Two Ocean Currents
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. _This is a story from the perspective of the mother of my great grandmother, who lived through the turn of the 20th century (1900). It has elements of truth – the basic plot line – and elements of fiction – her ways of understanding and emotionally responding to all that happened. Back then, and now._ Sit down at this table with me, child, this table that I do not recognise, made from a material I do not recognise, in this land that you seem to feel so fervently is lost to you. Let me cook you something, you look too skinny. I was married to my husband when I was younger than you are now, and had my first child much younger than you are today. We lived in Punjab, in the north western part of India. My husband was a dreamer, in the language of your world. In mine, he was an irresponsible and selfish pissant. He used to go to the docks of the Gujarat province under the pretense of work – he was a chef’s assistant, a trader. Of sweets and spices, if you can imagine. The whole world was always on his tongue, at his fingertips. He would go away often, sometimes for weeks at a time, to the ports on the other side of the country in Gujarat. I used to gleefully imagine the scorn he might have received, a man from a small world out of place in the vastness of the dock. One day, I myself felt the way that the whole universe spun into place around that dock. I’ll tell you about that later. Suffice to say that eventually the scorn faded, and today it brings me joy to picture Kurpuram walking along old wooden planks over the glittering sea in between fishers and travelers, blown in by wind and ocean currents, soon to be blown out by the same forces of energy. He would have felt at home in the listlessness of his own body, the boundlessness of his imagination, the winds on the dock allowing the wind in his mind to feel at peace. One day, the wind picked up in his body at the same time as his mind, and he blew onto a boat bound for East Africa. It took me a while to realise that he wasn’t coming home. It took me less than a minute to realise I would be leaving India, likely never to return. What life did a woman have without her husband? My family wouldn’t take me back. There would be no way of providing for myself or my child. No other man would be able to touch me with my consent, though they would all be allowed to touch me without it. It would be a life worse than death. So I packed a bag for myself and my child and went to the dock. I was furious, I’m sure you can imagine. I stoked the fury carefully, then set it to one side and focused on the journey. I found that myself and my child were protected by watchful eyes as we crossed the country from Punjab to Gujarat. The path across religions and cultures was a treacherous one: the British had done their work well and nurtured the mistrust that we all regard each other with. Yet each day someone fed us and put shelter over our heads. And so each day I grew further from home than I had ever been, and I found that I could not look back. Finally, we arrived at the port in Gujarat. I saw the sea! Something rose and threatened to break from my chest, though it did not of course. This magnetic thing, the ocean was like my heart. It pushed and pulled with a strength unswayed by love or passion. Glistening and still in the sun, wrathful under stormy skies. I watched my reflection sway on top of its sun dappled depths before melting into the lightness of the sky and the darkness of the sea. I took my own steps on the wooden planks that brought people out to stand on the sea. I held my child close. It took a while to find out where Kurpuram went. _East Africa._ I found a boat, stepped onto its rocking body, let go of the land, let go of my life, held onto my child, felt new. We watched Mombasa rise from the ocean. It did not glitter in the way that your cities glitter now: as though they could pretend to be the sea stretching skywards, all that glass and plastic. It pulsed with something else, some energy I had never seen before. The loudness at the port was different, the ground felt different. The people looked different, though the whites were still in charge, of course. I found him in that golden town. A woman has her ways. You should have seen his face! ‘I was sent here,’ he tried to tell me, but I knew it wasn’t true. The whole world is a village when you are from India. Even before the existence of these wireless group messaging systems you describe, we had our ways of staying connected to our people. And we _were_ to be connected, for life. I had had plenty of time to perfect what I would say to him and I executed it flawlessly, there in that bar. The rage, the acceptance, the deal that we would grow together but never love. Finally, he understood. We would grow, and live, and never love. You can do that, you know. Your generation seems to have forgotten, though if you look closely that seems to be all many of you do. You can hold your family together, a glue so clear that you will not see it if you don’t look. Clothes mingling in the laundry pinned to the line, food eaten from plates that each person will come to use. Your husband and your children, coming face to face day after day at meals shared around the table. And one day, perhaps, love will grow. But again, maybe it won’t. There are things more important than love. Here, it was all different. He had left, we were not going back. There was a new life to build, new methods of survival to sink into. We stayed at the coast and he made a name for himself; he was quite a good cook, and a convincing salesman. I cared for the kids, sent them to school, learned the language, started a loaning scheme amongst the women around me. Micro-credit, I think you would say. Eventually we moved to the mountains, the promise of a new business ringing in his ears, the knowledge that I would be able to develop a new loaning system swirling around mine. That glistening ocean that we had lived beside for so many years had become a medium for us, and we were swayed together. We did not need the sea anymore. The cool forest was good for my children, they learned to take care of themselves and each other. Rhinos roamed the forests but the horses we had could sense them and would take off, alerting the children to danger. I could focus on my business, gathering new clients for my loaning scheme, getting to know the women here. Kurpuram sold timber to the British. He also hid the Mau Mau warriors, the Kenyan colonial resistance movement, in between the felled trees whenever the British came to look for them. Our cook would feed them if they ever passed by, too. The British and the Mau Mau. Justice never figured much into our calculations. The long and short end of the stick seemed to be a matter of perspective. We were at home and we would never belong again. Not Kenyan, not white, but still, at home. I told you of the dreams of my husband. And what of my dreams? No one ever asked me. Even now, you will not learn my name, only the name of my husband. I am proud of the life that I had. It was a life that I made. I kept my family together as we built lives for ourselves. I had children, who had children, who had children. I walked amongst trees and waves, sand and soil, people grown in lands distant to mine. I helped people like me live the lives they hoped for themselves. I have been a part of the dreams of others. Because of me, you dream today. I am proud because we are a part of the story that brought you to the earth’s door. And now, you are a part of us. And look at you, your bright face, your freedom. You have flown across the world, dreaming of other lands. You have my husband in you. You speak the language of our coloniser and possess all of the gifts he promised that we would have if we followed him. You have taken me around the places of this world that you wanted to show me. You have told me all the ways you think we are destined for destruction. The story of Kenya’s deforestation and drought today is my story, mine and Kurpuram’s. It is your story, too. The logs that hid the Mau Mau, that funded our family’s success, are, you say, the seeds of a country’s barrenness. We did what we had to do to survive. It’s all we can do. We were not alone. Do not underestimate yourself, your ability to change the world around you. You want me to react to your world? I am. It looks different, it sounds different, but the spirit of the people is the same. We are capable of building and destroying in equal measure. We had to cut down the forest to protect ourselves. It was what was demanded and expected of us. It seems that what you must do to protect yourselves today is the opposite. The tides have changed, it is time to let the trees grow back. You want me to feel? All I can do is tell you what I know. I was never one for feeling. I observed. I took every opportunity I was given without a thought for the consequences. The consequences of not acting were always worse. Looking back at my life from the comfort of many years and from the reality of yours today, I wonder what I could have achieved if I had been afforded the freedom to feel. I wonder if I would have managed to do anything. Perhaps my ruthlessness carved out a space of safety, allowed you to turn into the sensitive woman you are today. The path I took away from my insecurity has led towards your security, your ability to navigate through the turmoil of the planet, its rolling seas of people and damage. Let go of your haste to anger, your desire to blame. I spent years blaming Kurpuram for the way he abandoned me, but when I look back at the life I had, I find no grudge. It is easy to waste time on the things you cannot change. So what if this system collapses? It is not yours to hold onto, nor is it yours to shun. You want roots? These are your roots. Live well, knowing that soon you will be a root yourself. You want a love that transcends the ages? You will not receive it in the language you so desperately desire to hear it in. But it is there, for you and in you. I rejoice to see the freedom that you have, my child. Remember, even a free person is a part of a family. Family is all you have, and we will be with you, wherever you go. You don’t like the way the world works? Neither did I. All you can do is try to fix what you don’t like, and enjoy what you do. But be careful, please. Remember that you are never alone. What you live and dream and think is passed into you, my child. You tell me you are lost, that you have no home. You say ‘we’ are lost, you speak about some sort of whole as if it were whole. You speak like you have lost sight of the ground beneath your feet. You speak as if you had lost your body, lost the ability to check whether your pulse is beating. Rip out the tarmac if you have to. Do it with your own hands. Find the soil, and decide what it is that you will destroy. Decide what you will build. Go and do it. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 13/08/2026
From the archives: And why active citizenship is key to systemic health
planetcritical.com
Sally Goerner on Citizens vs Oligarchies
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Sally Goerner 0:00 /3798.095918 1× What happens when a small percentage of the population amass resources and power? Oligarchy. And polymath Sally Goerner says oligarchy is the final stage of most human civilizations—and a symptom of dysfunctional human systems.She joins me to explain why the future is integral and collaborative, why empowering people with vision and hope is key to creating systemic changes, why citizenship is the foundation of any human system, and how to measure the health of those systems.This is a far-reaching and impressive conversation covering neurobiology, history, sociology, political theory and systems thinking. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 10/08/2026
Searching for roots in America’s Capital
planetcritical.com
How the cherry blossoms grow
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. One of the advantages of living in Washington D.C. is being able to witness the annual bloom of the cherry blossom trees. For just three days, light pink fireworks pierce the sky in full bloom, as the spring breeze gently sweeps petals onto the ground. The cherry blossoms had been immigrants just like us, donated by Japan in 1912. Transported from afar, yes, but planted, rooted, admired, integrated into the woven fabric of the representation of _one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all._ The 250th anniversary of the longest-running democracy in the world arrived on July 4th. Amidst declarations from the Trump administration touting that the U.S. had finally reached net negative migration across the country, the nation’s capital was home to a spending spree of military parades, prayer events, and fireworks to commemorate a nation that had toiled through hardship and had now formed _a more perfect union_ of unimaginable prosperity. Or so we are told. ### A land of dreams and sorrows America had been the dream for my immigrant grandfathers from India, who settled in the 1960s to pursue higher education. My mother’s father, lured by the chance to carve his own path outside of his family, found his first job as an oil & gas engineer on the streets of the emerging fossil fuel hub of Houston, Texas, where the riches of black crude transformed lush wetlands and rolling prairies into snaking highways and sprawling suburbs. My father’s father began his PhD dissertation in the segregated halls of the American South and finished it after the passage of the Civil Rights Act. To my grandfathers, the 1960s in America were imbued with a dynamism only possible in lands so free with opportunities so abound. This was the land of rapid economic growth and affordable home ownership, of moon landings and multi-story department stores. Letting themselves be taken by the winds of America, they had planted roots. They brought their wives from India, had children, and hoped to see their legacies blossom in the bountifulness of our country’s soils. Sixty years later, I know a different America. Perhaps as a function of taking America’s material offerings for granted, I’ve learned to criticize the “price of progress” that my grandparents so greatly admired. I do not see abundant hope; I see merciless conquest. My blood pumps the panic of a nation’s capital struggling to control the raging, imperialist impulses of the most powerful man in the world. My lungs circulate the grief of pristine landscapes beaten into submission by concrete and fertilizer, ever-expanding and ever-destroying, sucking in water and oxygen and oil and shitting out its tailings into the scrapyard of forgotten people. There is no room to breathe. There is just corporate slop piled onto screens pacifying us into nameless buyers and sellers of products built by hands far away, constructed with the blood of rivers and the carcasses of mountain-faces. The price of progress is our lack of mercy. Other nations, ecosystems, our morality, strangled under the knee of human supremacy. _I can’t breathe._ It feels impossible to reconcile the differences between my grandparents’ Americas and my own. But my family’s history tells me that America’s endless advances have also been its fatal mistakes. America had promised my father success for his brilliance. His academic success, his ambition, and his outward confidence propelled him to become a physician. As he ascended, he held more stories in his heart: those of a doting father who had left his village in the hopes that his children could grow alongside America; the lives of his patients; his own children that had rooted to him; a son that admired the books sprawled upon his desk and the curly hair on his head; and a disease consumed him the faster he rose. The winds of America took him where they promised—economic stability and social status—but they took his demons too. They took the insecurities of a man desperately performing whiteness to escape his Indian identity and the pressure he put on himself to keep expanding in the land of opportunity. They gifted him the wealth that the American dream could offer, and the means to soothe a depressed soul with bottles of liquor. They gave him the status of physician and the means to hide an addiction through his cleverness. But he could only run so far, reach so high, before his heart’s decay caught up with his ambition. When he could no longer practice medicine, he pursued entrepreneurship with fervor. Everything was a problem to be solved, a challenge of personal will. Whether it was new medical innovations that he tried to commercialize, startups he joined ever so briefly before betraying his sobriety, or the next investment opportunity in a cryptocurrency, his yellowing eyes lit up and his hollowing cheeks filled. The books on his shelves transitioned from medical journals to self-improvement and stock market investment guides. He was manifesting the dream of America–that if he kept clawing and climbing out of the hole of self-loathing through his ambition, he could escape the demons that accompanied him. America was not my father’s killer. But his story is the thread of America that delivers wealth with loneliness, that offers expansion without a ticket home, that tells you to run and not look back but does not warn you of the abyss ahead. A country whose constitutional promise was endless ambition produces such great men, such hearts that can never plant roots because they are always looking to escape to virgin soil. The cherry blossoms show these faces of America. They are immigrants that settle and burrow roots in expansive lands. They are children who bloom into flowers, shining brilliantly and reaching towards the sun. And yet they can only go so far before they lose the support of their branch. As they fall, their children, their pollen and seeds, are carried away by the winds of America, trying to make sense of whether they are broken or free. ### The cherry blossoms speak My father taught me that there was always something to reach for in the vastness of America, whether it be wealth, status, or achievement. I reach like him, but outward rather than upward. Reaching led me to pursue climate advocacy and carried me thousands of miles away to another continent to study how Indigenous peoples defended their lands against corporate extraction. To a large extent, I reach outward to favor my imagination over the anger I have with my country. Reaching explains why I am enraptured by crises—they enable me to imagine utopias of a crisis-free world, a future squarely opposite of the present. Despite my criticism of my country, I am deeply American, susceptible to the unrelenting optimism fueled by conquest and greatness that courses through its veins. But I also believe my ambition and my actions are motivated by something that afflicted my father—I am equally as terrified of landing as he was. In continually searching for solutions and basing my identity upon some version of virtuosity, I protect myself from understanding my weaknesses. When not fueled by anger and optimism, I am consumed by indecision. When not motivated by morality, I am eaten alive by my cynicism. My greatest fear is that if I cannot accomplish greatness through ambition, I will be absorbed into the soil and forgotten. But if I can reach my hands everywhere—with the plight of others, with struggles far away, with empathy for the unnamed—I can save everything before I fall. Maybe I reach just as he did, because I can never place myself in a land, in a home, in a history, like the roots of the cherry blossom. As America celebrates its birthday, I believe many of us Americans feel lost amidst the cherry blossoms in a country which has erased so many histories to advance a singular one. _One Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for some._ The cherry blossoms teach me that a tree cannot stand tall to see those around it if it lacks roots. I’ve attempted to stop trying to save everything around me—the ecosystems, all the people I cannot see—because I know that I will fall like my father if I keep externalizing my inherent value. In doing so, I’ve aspired to make sense of the intertwining stories that form my own roots: my hometown’s tropical storms alongside its recovering prairies; of my grandparents’ losses and their dreams; of my father’s decay and my mother’s resilience; of my anger and my empathy. The blossoms, in their centuries-long endurance amidst an America of ambition and conquest, teach me that beauty endures by tending to the survival of stories and resisting their erasures. Like a political moment, the beauty of cherry blossom blooms also comes from its fragility, as the delicacy of perfectly perched flowers shakes at the lightest showers or faintest winds. For the vast majority of the year, the trees camouflage behind green foliage. Like successful movements, the trees continue to grow, even if their flowers are not searching for new soil. America can learn from this, both literally in its imperialist aggressions, and figuratively, as it contends with the multitude of stories that have been buried beneath its grand facade. In the bleakness of an administration hell-bent on conquest, it is the job of Americans to recover the stories that have been lost. My anger towards America’s paradoxes cannot subside, not while it manufactures steel beams for private prisons or abundant bounties of shelf-stable food in degraded soils, and not least while it grinds the world towards its vision of “development” while its residual petroleum corrodes the rail on which it spins. And yet, beneath my criticism for my country lies a deep love. My love comes not from America’s history nor its present, but for the soil that she has given my family’s triumphs and tragedies. That is what I celebrated on July 4th—the chance to remember the roots that shaped me and commit to protecting them amidst the winds of America. _This piece was written by Rishab Jagetia in his personal capacity, and the opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the view of his employer._ 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 06/08/2026
How a left-wing investigation into the OCCRP facilitated Trump and Musk's attack on USAID
planetcritical.com
Journalism in Crisis | Mark Lee Hunter
Journalism in Crisis | Mark Lee Hunter 0:00 /3391.430159 1× Mark Lee Hunter is an investigative journalist, a founding member of the Global Investigative Journalism Network and the principle author of Story-Based Inquiry: A Manual for Investigative Journalists. I asked Mark to join me to explain a little-known story of how a group of left-wing media outlets became instrumental in the gutting of USAID. This consortium of left-wing publications released an investigation accusing one of the world's most influential investigative journalism outlets, the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), of being in bed with the US government—an accusation that originated in Russia after Putin's offshore finances were exposed by the OCCRP. Their report made its way into the hands of the MAGA crowd, who then used it as justification to gut government funding for investigative journalism around the world—and act which is has enormous repercussions for us all. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ This conversations details exactly what happened, and Mark's published rebuttal of their investigation which shows how the journalists extrapolated conclusions from publicly available data. We then have a fascinating discussion about the importance of morality and strategy in journalism, with Mark warning that a fringe trend of finding facts to fit one's own bias is rapidly becoming more and more common in journalism today. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 03/08/2026
What would our ancestors say?
planetcritical.com
There is a world to confront
✒️ My newsletter this week explores the question "What would our ancestors say?" It is the first in a series of essays produced on this topic by __The Grove,__ a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. Our pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. My family tree is a violated-looking thing. On both sides, limbs have been snapped clean off by those who used to sit on them. On both sides, branches have been hidden from view or bent out of place or removed and grafted onto some other family tree. There is loss and pain and mistrust on both sides of my family tree; parts of it have been hollowed out by a rot that descended through the ages. There are members who claim they can distance themselves entirely from their roots. And I wonder, sometimes: _Do they not know what happens when a limb becomes a log, alone on the forest floor?_ Two years ago, my grandmother became an ancestor. When she died, at the age of 94, she was terribly worried about what the future lay in store for her family. That concern was global, watching in horror as what she had believed to be the wave of history lifting the world out of the trenches of the world wars became a curve that rapidly began to descend. This was the fear she voiced most readily and most often, watching the news with an impassive fortitude that belonged to her generation, and one she never wished to see bestowed upon her daughters and grandchildren. But she hid another worry, a gnawing anxiety that would reveal itself only in moments of quiet as she pondered her death. She held no illusions that she could change the world in her early 90s, her health rapidly deteriorated by too many months trapped indoors thanks to the pandemic. But she did believe she could hold her family, and in some way was aware she held us together. She worried about what would happen, when she was gone, to all of us. On her last birthday, which we share, we spoke about this. I told her not to worry, that she had done a good job, that whatever harms had been felt in the past were long healed. I didn’t lie to her. It just turned out that I was wrong. When I think about her coming back to us in the midst of a geopolitical, ecological and social crisis that has worsened dramatically in the two years since her departure, I know her first attention would be to her family, to the wounds and the separations. She would focus on us because she loves us, but also because this is her locus of power; my grandmother knew how to act to change her world. She would also focus on us because she believed that the world was coming apart because we as a society were not holding onto one another anymore, and if we cannot even hold onto those we love then what chance do we have to hold onto the rest? My grandmother was an avid writer of letters, and kept every one she ever received across the decades from those she managed to maintain a connection with despite the distance of culture, language, geography and time. The strength of my grandmother’s grip was renowned, and indeed it was the force of her commitment which produced her matriarchal steeliness. It was because she loved us that she was willing to confront us. And it was because we loved her that we did not run from her confrontations. I know what she would ask of me, now, were she to return. And I would say: _But Grandma, there is nothing left to say._ In the weeks I spent reflecting on how to investigate what my ancestors would say, I didn’t once consider whether or not they would say anything. It was simply a given, in my head, that those from whom I have descended would have very much to say on the state of world affairs, be it the side of German peasant farmers who immigrated to the American Midwest, or the tough Irish and Scottish labourers who built bridges and toiled in ship yards. My family mythology is the “tough stock” kind—from the boy who left Dundee at 16 to sail around the world, his adventures fighting Dutch slavers and journeying with pirates meticulously detailed in a diary, to the deeper ancestors who stole sheep, fought the Campbells and chose a name that translates to “ruler of the world”. I never once imagined that any of the people that walked this Earth sharing something of my genetic makeup would be silent in the face of tragedy and terror. How foolish, given I have living relatives who run from the confrontations that hold us together. In fact, that limb of my family tree which has abandoned itself to a slow hollowing out on the forest floor may be more representative of my ancestors than I care to admit: I do not belong to a people who liberated themselves from tragedy and terror. I belong to a people who grew silent in its face, a people who lost their lands and eventually folded their cultures and languages into the dominant Christian English hegemony. My words and my customs are lost to the silent ages, along with the knowledge that kept us proud and autonomous among wild and unforgiving landscapes. I belong to a people who forgot they were colonised, who legitimised the very entity that violated their way of life. I belong to a people who forgot who they are. Some months ago, I wrote a piece explaining Fanon’s philosophy of liberation, which emphasised that a colonised people must both attack the material conditions of their oppression and recover their self-recognition by turning away from the identity thrust upon them by the settler-state and practicing their culture. I wrote that the necessity of having something to turn towards explains the revolutionary impotence which afflicts the Minority World, where we cannot imagine ourselves as anything other than subjects of the state, thus legitimising its existence and reproducing the conditions of our own oppression. Admittedly, Fanon was writing about the particular conditions of the relationship between a colonised people and a settler state, but I think in a global economic regime which has set its sights once again on the exploitation of people and extraction of value within its own borders, it can apply to citizens who descend from those who only very recently enjoyed the luxuries afforded by belonging to the colonising state. These are the ties we must trace which can bind our sufferings together, which can unify our struggle. These are the losses and weaknesses we must dare to confront. The colonisation of Scotland and Ireland (and the North of England, and the Midlands, and Wales) took a different form to the colonisation of Fanon’s Algeria, but the colonising apparatus was forged in Europe against Europeans. That my ancestors never recovered themselves, that their struggles eventually petered out into vague protestations and religious bigotry, means that over time they came to accept the identity that the Christian English state thrust upon them: subjects of the king. Their vision for independence, autonomy, sovereignty and equality must have been erased in order to accept this great injustice as a fact of life, the very fact that I was born into. And how can one speak to the state of the world if one finds allegiance with the state that made it so? _There is nothing to say._ When we were filming in Cali last year, we were brought to a rooftop in one of the city’s ghettos where a group of Afro-Colombian grandmothers cook together, sing together, and feed the neighbourhood. They sat in a semi-circle and explained how they had come together, in particular the education programs they had participated in at a nearby community centre which was offering a radical political education for the neighbourhood’s residents. One of the women said to us: “Before doing that course, I would have never been able to raise my eyes to meet yours. I would have never lifted them off the floor. Now I can.” By learning the struggle of her kin, of the descendants of slaves all over the Americas, and learning that the racism she had been forced to live with was a descendant of that absolute injustice, that grandmother understood that she was not what racist ideologies and racist stares wanted to make of her. She found her way into another culture—hers—and in that culture began to see herself differently, differently enough to raise her head and hold my gaze while she talked. The ancestors of that grandmother had been ripped from their place in the world. Through learning about their tragedy and terror, she began to recover it for them, and for herself. Once she found her place, her history, she found her words. She found there was a whole world to confront. Perhaps, then, the question is not about what our ancestors would say, but what words we, as their descendants, can recover for them? What place for them we can carve out? What truths we can uncover? Perhaps our ancestors will have nothing to say until we do just that? Perhaps they will be unable to find the words if they have nothing yet to give their allegiance? If there is nothing yet worth giving up their silence for? Perhaps that is our task, as descendants: to give them something to say, to confront the world they folded into, like ghosts. In the last years of her life, my grandmother said her own mother would not recognise the world. Forty years is both but a moment and an impasse, a long journey for the living that the dead cannot make. I will have no words for the future that my descendants cannot give me, and I am tasked with both sending words back into the past and listening for words from the future. My descendants are insistent and demanding. This world is their inheritance. It is they who stress most fervently that we recover what was lost, that we liberate ourselves from prejudice, and that we promise to never again fold into a complicit dependence on that which wounds us. They will have to live with my choices far longer than I. My silence is their cross to bear; their words are my duty to hear. I know what my grandmother would ask of me. She would ask that I take everything good and precious that I was gifted from her and my mother and my aunt and use it all to defend her first great-grandchild. She would demand that I raise that child with steel and tenacity and will. She would ask that I sing that child the song she sang to me every night when she helped raise me. She would want me to tell my child stories about her great-grandmother, and the world she forged so that my little one could inherit a place and a language and a spirit with which she can speak through the ages with her great-grandmother. _Come child, there is so much still to say._ 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 30/07/2026
From the archives: Meet the secular preacher singing out against climate change
planetcritical.com
P:C ARCHIVES: Reverend Billy on How To Stop The Sixth Extinction
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Reverend Billy 0:00 /4822.785329 1× Reverend Billy is the world-famous secular preacher singing out against climate change, corporate greed and consumerism. Billy has been pounding the streets of New York for decades, preaching against Disney, against mindless consumption, and against the corporations putting our planet in danger. Together with his choir, The Church of Stop Shopping, Reverend Billy uses song and arrest as a form of protest, trespassing into banks, labs and private land to sing about the dangers of the sixth extinction event—and what we can do to stop it. Billy joins me to discuss his journey to secular preaching and the faith in humanity that drives the particular and beautiful protests of The Church of Stop Shopping. This is preaching like you’ve never heard it before. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/07/2026
From the archives: Stopping the system from fossilising
planetcritical.com
P:C Archives: Culture As An Act of Resistance
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. Last week I interviewed Colomian changemaker Isabel Cavalier on how to change a system. Isabel negates the binary of systems vs individuals, explaining that while cultural change starts from within, its impact and progress can be non-linear—much like climate change. Isabel effortlessly weaves political strategy with spiritual knowledge to explain how culture is the solution to the polycrisis, emphasising that we must re-embed individuals within communities to embody a politics of a better world. The individual vs the system is a false binary often explored by those trying to figure out how to stop humanity driving itself off the cliff of destruction. Indeed, I raised it in the episode. Politically, it’s an important question, as BP coined the term “carbon footprint” to offset responsibility to individuals as a strategy to protect its business ventures and obscure its role in the system of environmental degradation. Yet, Isabel deftly points out that individual change can and must be a part of systemic change; it is a mode of cultural change. What interests me is that the inner world is, perhaps, the last vestige of privacy available to us in a technological era in which corporations and governments live with us in our homes. There is no such thing as the private sphere in a world where the majority of people are online, living a mode of life as avatars with our data stored in the cloud which can be deleted only at the whim of a faceless corporation. Perhaps, then, the inner world is the last realm in which we have some autonomy to make decisions (despite that inner world being attacked, manipulated, cajoled, bullied and seduced by an outer world hungry for capital). Now, I caveat this with the awareness of the incredibly privileged position of many of the citizens in the global north who have much more autonomy than those being exploited around the world. However, we all lack autonomy to some degree. How can one exit the system and live "off grid” today? Wrenching oneself away from the tendrils of the economic system we live in demands a totality, perhaps an impossibility. And so we have no choice but to engage. The choice, then, lies in how we engage. As evidenced by BP’s devious campaign, narratives of individual choice, autonomy and responsibility are easily co-opted by industry. Individualising the problem of systemic violence is inherently problematic, and the power of consumers is often overestimated. In journalism, the gatekeeping theory proposes that journalists do not print what they think their readers want to read, but what they determine to be news according to a set of news values. What their readership want is only part of that value set. Supply, then, is the major problem, supported by Jevon’s paradox: the more efficient we make the world, the more energy we use. Positioning supply and demand side by side creates a false equivalence. Throughout Europe, for example, there is a huge demand for housing, for employment, a living wage. These demands are not being supplied. Let us, then, put aside our “purchasing power” as consumers (an increasingly ridiculous notion as wages stagnate, the cost of living rises, and wealth floods to the richest) and separate the individual from their consumption habits. Let us reorient as citizens. If the one area we have some vague notion is the individual self, and that individual is in relationship with the world, then changes made to the inner world can ripple out in relation. This leads me to be false binary I subscribed to during the interview of individual vs system. This is a deliberately disempowered understanding of the individual because the individual exists in relationship to others; the network of individuals, and their interactions, make up the system. Systems do not exist outwith individuals (or components) and their relationships. We are not hijacked by systems, although they do indeed move through us. We can, however, move through them. If a system is made up of its parts and the relationships between those parts then, by definition, we must change ourselves in order to change it. Of course, this all brings us back to question of urgency question: In a world where we have very little time to lose, do we have time for cultural change? Then again, do we have time for anything else? It is quite clear that power is not going to concede and disempower itself. It is quite clear that economic system is not going to change in and of itself. Therefore, the only place where humankind can still contribute to the discussion is within self and, therefore, within a culture that is created by the interrelating of those beings. It may be that culture is the only thing that can go up against power, especially in a technological world where power has access to huge amounts of technological force that vastly outstrips manpower. And certainly we will need a culture in which to catch people once machines replace jobs to the extent that we see a severe downward pressure on the real economy; by real economy, I mean people's capacity to feed and house themselves. On this, Isabel makes a fascinating point: systems change is not linear. We know that. Cultural change can therefore be nonlinear, too; cultural change can happen at an exponential rate. To evidence this, she references the uptake of ChatGPT and AI, tools almost impossible to imagine 10 years ago. Now, that may be cultural change going in a dangerous direction, but nonetheless it proves our capacity for exponential shifts in attitude. So what are the mechanisms and the tools and the relationships that we can put in place now that facilitate exponential cultural change? This is a critical question not because it seeks to fulfil utopian fantasies, but because culture may be all we have to fill the void left by power when our economic and political systems implode. Culture is how we are with one another, with ourselves, our environment. It’s our creativity and our care, how we are with ourselves, how we are with our local environment. Our arts, our writing. A dear and wise friend speaks of the role of story to create a crash-pad, and a toolkit for rebuilding with the parts. A story for cleaning up the mess. Culture is where ideas are born. Literature is where they’re tried out. Art is where inspiration seeds. Music is where belonging is made. And the only thing you need to engage with culture, as an individual, is someone else. Even in the darkest of days, songs will still be sung. Beats will still be tapped out by dirty feet. Scrawls will be scratched on walls. Visions etched onto scraps of paper. These cultural acts of resistance stop a system from fossilising. These are the acts of resistance that impede power from fully grasping onto us. Even if our mind is colonised, even if our body is colonised, we can begin to clean those cultural impediments forced upon us and allow for the call of something other from deep within to be heard. At the end of the day, it is our hearts which are easiest to decolonise. It is our hearts that beat the supply of vitality that keep us going. If culture lives in the heart, our first act should be to be with one another, and create. It is within these acts of cultural resistance that the beats of new world order is born. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 23/07/2026
A new understanding of what it means to be alive grounded in our physical selves
planetcritical.com
Being Alive | Melanie Challenger
Being Alive | Melanie Challenger 0:00 /3203.544014 1× What does it mean to be alive? Where does intelligence originate? What do we share with other living creatures? Where does the individual begin, and how do each of us fit into the living world? 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ These are the questions I pose researcher and writer, Melanie Challenger, author of _Alive: The Hidden Intelligence of the Living World_(UK version, US version). In this brilliant episode, we explore the definition of aliveness and intelligence, with Melanie revealing the ancient histories which have dominated our cultural understanding of intelligence. She offers a new definition, one grounded in our sensory bodies—a physical intelligence that comes from being here, being present, and being finite. We also discuss the supposed binary between individualism and collectivism, with Melanie challenging both the neoliberal hegemony and the environmental mantra of unlimited entanglement, offering a nuanced perspective which reconciles these two oppositional positions into something profoundly meaningful. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
110
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 20/07/2026
From the archives: how to kill a planet
planetcritical.com
P:C Archive: Media Complicity in the Climate Crisis
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. Last week, I interviewed Lucy McAllister on Anglophone media’s coverage of the climate crisis, and the phenomenon of “balance as bias”, in which journalists leaning on the time-old tradition of “balanced” reporting by giving space to the “other side” of the climate “debate” actually creates bias. The 2004 Boykoff & Boykoff study ‘Balance as bias’, which Lucy’s team updated, showed that journalists in the US elite press were “two sides-ing” the climate crisis by giving column inches to climate deniers. The updated study expanded the scope by collecting data from papers across five Anglophone countries. They found that reporting on the climate crisis has improved, with 90% of the articles in the study accurately reporting the science—that climate change is anthropogenic. However, there were statistical differences between the left and right wing, with some right wing rags such as the UK’s The Telegraph achieving just 70% accuracy. Lucy also said the problem spanned Murdoch-owned media across the five nations. #### Discourses of Delay Whilst coverage has improved, Lucy explains that the tactics for misrepresenting the climate crisis have become far more sophisticated. She revealed the phenomenon of “discourses of delay”, a subtle tactic deployed by the right wing who is no longer foolish enough to outright deny climate change. Instead, column inches are being given to climate delayers: those who want to delay action being taken, those who say that it's too expensive, those who claim labourers will lose their jobs, and those who claim it’s just not as much of a problem as the 97% of scientists who are in consensus on this topic would have us believe. These people are in no way denying that climate change is anthropogenic, but they are delaying our ability and our desire to take action. The work of Lucy and her colleagues show that, in some rags, more column inches are being given to these people in certain articles than climate scientists, policy-makers and other relevant experts. Here are some of the most popular discourses of delay: _It's too expensive. We need to protect jobs. It's impossible. If we degrow then we'll lose our global position. What about China's emissions? What about India's emissions? Population collapse is the real problem._ Even using hydrogen as heating is a form of delay because this technology is supported by the fossil fuel industry (blue hydrogen is made using fossil fuel energy) seeking to maintain relevance on a planet it is polluting to death. These are all ways of impeding the necessary action we need to take if we're going to provide a hospitable planet for human beings and the many species with whom we live. Lucy says these discourses of delay are a form of normalising not taking action—the more that it is said the easier it is to believe. Shifting Baseline Syndrome comes to mind, a psychological phenomenon where people adapt to the “new normal” and find it difficult to reorient themselves in the cultural norms and expectations of the recent past when things were very different. Most subscribers to this newsletter and many others will recognise that climate change is not merely anthropogenic, but a result of a voracious, growth-obsessed, neoliberal economic system—but you won’t see that on the news.* Instead, we are still subject to the individualisation of responsibility, the driving narrative that citizens as consumers are responsible for ecological breakdown, and that the best weapon in your arsenal is your purchasing power (a sick joke to make in broken Britain). Of course, this framing is a logical fallacy — if you're using your buying power to make changes then you're still subscribing to the economic system that is causing the problem. #### People Power? Let’s put to bed the myth that consumers have power, and that papers publish what their readers want. Studies have shown that the media doesn’t publish what they think their audience wants to know. Instead, journalists are gate-keepers of information, setting the agenda for public discourse. The belief of the "symbiotic relationship between publication and reader is simply false, no doubt a self-empowering narrative which denounces actionable responsibility. Once one decides upon your political slant, your paper of choice feeds you what they deem important, not what they think you deem important. publications don't publish. What they think their audience wants to read. The public square is dead, folks. What are the solutions? What are the framings that we can participate in? Lucy highlights that studies show that people respond well to positive framing and solutions journalism. Equally, reframing the climate crisis as a health problem, and an immediate problem, bolsters support for climate policies. Reporting on bottom-up community solutions which highlight imagination and creativity is also incredibly helpful. A critically important note is that the balance as bias phenomenon is much less present in global south media, in nations which are on the frontline of the climate crisis. Perhaps, then, if we want an accurate understanding of the climate crisis and what needs to be done, we must abandon privately-owned, for-profit, Western media, bound to the same economic superorganism cannibalising the planet, and the ideological dictates of corporate monopolies and maniacal oligarchs. Just a thought. _N.B. Channel 4’s news bulletin on Sunday April 30 invited Environmental Economist, Matthew Agarwala, to speak on Europe’s droughts. He drove home the link between the economy and the climate crisis, saying we can respond to climate crisis with policy or "decarbonise by disaster". It was a relief to see this framing on mainstream news._ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 16/07/2026
From the archives: The data behind this wishful thinking
planetcritical.com
P:C ARCHIVES: James Dyke on Net Zero Won't Save Us
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: James Dyke 0:00 /4441.691383 1× James Dyke is a senior lecturer in Global Systems at the University of Exeter. James reveals why net-zero targets for carbon emissions do nothing but provide an excuse to continue business as usual, posing an existential threat to humanity. He goes into great detail about the interplay of politics, economies, culture and the industrialisation connecting us all, explaining that while there is no one quick fix to the climate crisis, decarbonisation is possible—if we get rid of fossil fuels. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 13/07/2026
Learning to speak and swim through our emotions
planetcritical.com
Listening in water
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. Human language is powerful, complex, and offers us many avenues for creative communication. It is therefore natural for us to look for solutions to our ecological crisis through this knowledge system. But in this world, so wary of violence and consumed by distrust, is it enough? It would be worth more, I reckon, to offer you a logically-sound argument, if it could carry through some of the deeper emotional information my body is absorbing, and you could receive a more truthful telling of my reality and get a sense of where I am coming from. Then you could understand me as well as my environment better. Feeling deeply is surely an evolutionary asset, through which we can listen and learn from each other and understand our social environments better. In a world where we need each other to survive, where our existence is relationally constructed, understanding how we exist reveals to us where we exist. For an organism to survive and grow, especially in an ecological crisis, it is imperative to understand its environment as well as it can. Our social environment is one such physical place. In its deeper parts, we communicate through something fluid, where our sophisticated intellectual apparatus turns to the superiority of the physical, embodied, and emotional senses. Here we find an emotional ecology, a natural ecosystem, which facilitates social life. Navigating this ecology requires a more sophisticated and sensitive system than the one easily described in words. It is easy to miss, because it resists being experienced in words. I grew up in an incredibly patriarchal social environment whose abrasion and violence did not allow for my girlhood to exist and grow safely. I could not say how I felt. Society relegated me to make myself alone, in the quietness of my mind, unknowingly subjecting my growing body, my growing senses, to social erasure. Emotionally, I stayed awake and alert as my body navigated its fluid depths and taught itself its intricacies through evolutionary attunement, need, and curiosity. Socially, I grew mute. The part of my body that needed to integrate my emotional learnings into my rational mind became inactive because I did not exercise it. I did not use my voice. I hardly even knew it. Socially, I started eroding, but emotionally, I was so alive. Emotionally, I experienced life like any other child, and eventually had no choice but to make room to express my feelings, which were too large for my small body to carry. When no one wanted to speak to me, I spoke through music. When no one understood my fear, I looked curiously towards my nightmares. When no one wanted to acknowledge my anger, I busied myself with books, so I could understand the world that was not being truthfully revealed to me. On my own, I started to discover feminist ideas, historical analyses, and I was fortunate enough to be exposed to a schooling that fed me good writing and teaching. Yet, emotionally, I was still alone. Learning appeased me for a time, but I did not know what to do with this education. Somehow, it felt like my education would free me, but it never did. I clung to systems analyses to help me figure out the causal relationships that make up my world. Why do men and women treat each other a certain way? Why is our social system so entrenched in our economic system, or is it the other way round? Why do I feel compelled to think about my own life and experiences as something to extract from so I can turn it into commercial art? Such questions invoke heavy realities, and to deal with their weight, systems thinking itself became a kind of god worship activity for me. As long as I had a way to analyse why something was happening, almost mathematically, I lived under the illusion that I was somehow safe from it. Yet, I still remained who I was, a hypersensitive, racialised, queer, young woman living in an abrasive social environment. I had the whole world at my feet, but I had no voice. I was alone and I was afraid. My emotional reality was obscured to me, because in my social reality it had found no place. I was erased. As I grew older, I discovered that there were other people like me. In moments of shared tenderness, I could feel myself. In moments where others revealed tender parts of themselves, I could recognise myself. Parts of me that had long felt vacant started to spark with the excitement of being met. I became aware that there were parts of me that were unknown to my conscious mind. I became aware that these parts could be shared. I discovered the meaning behind my emptiness - it was the embodied memory of something true that had come to life in the past, had a physical effect in my emotional ecology, but had disintegrated before I could make sense of it, before I could speak and sound it out so it could find resonance in the social environment. When I think about it like this, I feel like a whale. That to navigate our social environments, we use something akin to echolocation. You speak to me, in words or in action, and it has an effect on me through my emotional ecology, this fluid space we share. I pick this up through my emotional senses and integrate it into my conscious mind. Then I speak to you, in words or in action, perhaps I thoughtfully choose silence, and through my reaction and resonance you understand where I am and who I am, and you also understand where you are and who you are. Through emotional interaction, we learn what our environment feels like, where there is softness that can allow us to grow closer and be emotional together, and where there is hardness that tells us to stay tough and more alert. This way we discover if we are welcome in each other’s waters. This way we discover community. With community, we become cultured. Our emotional world is not private, it is made up of our interactions with the social world. We need resonance and feedback to navigate it, especially when we are young. Our emotions offer us rich, nuanced data about our physical space, which our bodies can understand very well if we spend the effort needed to learn. Then, our bodies can learn to be immersed and present in our shared emotional ecologies, and better navigate the social world. This is imperative to build any real resistance against social violence. By continually practicing emotional presence and attentiveness, we can collectively respond by creating more deep-knit human cultures that are strong and resilient against social indignities. The environment is violent - to survive we must acknowledge this and respond together. We are natural creatures in a natural world. There seems to be an idea floating around that humans are not natural, that we are somehow far different from animals and how they communicate, because of technology, culture, and language. But the difference between humans and ‘the natural world’ is not that we are unnatural, it is that we are caged, and the world we think to call natural is still wild. If I tune into our shared emotional environment, using my empathy, I find that most of the people around me are in pain, or they are unable to move in ways they desire. They are stranded in waters they cannot swim in. They are even calling out for help, but until they understand their own condition and their own needs for connection, they cannot be met. Animals survive when they form cultures. Homeosapiens likely outlived other species of humans for this reason. Orcas around the world are famously learning new ways of hunting and surviving by forming local knowledge systems passed down from grandparent to grandchild. Culture is not something that can be easily taught. It cannot be industrialised and quickly reproduced. It needs to be demonstrated and learnt again and again by every generation. It needs to be understood and mastered so we may reap the benefits of our embodied communication systems. I realise now the point of my education. Good educators and good theory are not there to allow me to hide behind someone else’s words. They are there to fill me with courage, hope, and resonance so I too will speak. They are not teaching us through intellectualisms, they are teaching us through the impressions of experience they leave in us when they reveal truth to us. They are calling us through their song, so we will listen well and respond through ours, so we may discover community, so we may become a culture. What does it mean to socialise a human being? Is it learning cursive and grammar so I can copy the language of great writers or influential speakers? Or is it to learn the ability to think for myself and learn how to communicate intentionally with others in a social environment? Socialising tends to be thought about as learning how to behave appropriately in a social environment, but surely that is not the point of our social lives? Surely, learning how to be social is about learning how to communicate with others so we may navigate and survive a rapidly changing planet? Being ecological means we have to quit the fantasy that humans are separate from the natural world and can connect simply intellectually, severed from our emotional senses, because it makes us forget ourselves. We are not so different from animals who rely on their senses above all else, or from plants who have intricate parts and systems that support all their functioning. When we forget ourselves, we start to die. If I don’t maintain my connection to my soft self, one day I will no longer be able to utter my deepest experiences into the universe because I will have become so erased. The climate crisis is not just hurting our environment, it is directly hurting us. I see it all around me in my family who chooses stoic silence despite being deeply feeling just like me; in the sharpest and quickest peers and colleagues who would rather be correct and superior than come down to earth, confess their insecurities, and collaborate; and in my beautiful bright friends whose deep sensitivity has turned their day-to-day existence into a constant battle for mental wellbeing, making them want to disappear or wish for an end to their painful lives. I wish the world was a softer place. The very part of us that social violence is erasing, our emotional ecology, is what makes us sharper, stronger, and more capable of weathering our shared ecological crisis. It is what will bring us together and help us create culture so that we may survive. We must learn, again and again, how to listen and how to speak. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 09/07/2026
The UK initiative against food and energy insecurity
planetcritical.com
The Land-Based Living Collective | James Bullen
The Land-Based Living Collective | James Bullen 0:00 /2557.341655 1× We need to live differently. Part of that means learning how to live together differently, both with each other, and with the wider environment around us. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ James Bullen is the founder of the Land-Based Living Collective, a UK initiative aiming to create accessible, land-based communities that provide economic opportunities for the residents, nurture the land back to health, foster a sense of community and tackle some of our biggest modern problems such as food insecurity, energy insecurity and financial precarity. James has spent much of his adult life living in alternative land-based collectives like this, and is honest about the challenges of such a life—and also the great wonders it offers. His vision is grounded in meeting material needs, interweaving existing solutions to create an ecosystem of resilience that can both support its residents and facilitate them supporting one another. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
100
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 06/07/2026
Bridging sustainability with ecological being in a Mapuche community in Argentina
planetcritical.com
Finding faith in the ecological
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. In a Mapuche community at sunrise, an old man takes his freshly poured maté, the first of the day, out of the house to the usual spot. He pads softly past my bed while the rest of the family is still sleeping. I find him outside gathering wood. Old, gnarled pieces of wild thyme, grey and etched with drought, snag on my jumper as I bend over to pick some up from the sandy earth. In silence, he lights the fire and puts water on to heat over the handmade stove. He pours fresh yerba into the maté gourd and the hot water over the top, and invites me outside to join him. I stand next to Joel while he speaks in Mapudungun, his native tongue and the language of this land. In the directions of the West, South, North, and East, he offers first a prayer, and then a straw-ful of maté to the earth. The sun is already blazing over the land that we know today as Argentina. Joel's family has been traveling and living in this part of the earth, _Wallmapu_ , since long before European settlers laid claim to the land and turned his people into state-less refugees – since long before Chile and Argentina existed. Wallmapu stretches across the land between the Pacific to the Atlantic, ending slightly before the continent of South America tapers off and turns to loch and sea. Joel and his family are mapu-che: ‘people of the land.’ Yet, today Argentinians of Italian and Spanish descent tell his people to go ‘back to where they came from.’ They point at lines they drew in the sand, lines that many people have died for, lines that the wind will blow over in a couple of years or centuries. Regardless of ‘who’ the land ‘belongs’ to, the dry, clear air has begun to heat the vibrant blue sky which reaches down to us, though it cannot be much later than 7am. Inside by the stove, we perch on worn, comfortable chairs and he begins to speak more freely. _First, we express gratitude,_ he tells me.__ For the sun, for the water that flows down from the mountains and up from the earth. For the health of our families and friends, for the health of our animals._After that, we pray._ For good weather, for the health of our families and our animals.__ Joel is speaking to God, to spirits, to the earth. Not every Mapuche person does this; he learned the practice from his grandfather. He and a couple of his brothers would always follow his grandfather out in the mornings for the ritual, and listen while he spoke, Joel told me with a smile. I heard about this method of speaking to the more-than-human from many of the families that I stayed with towards the end of the three months I spent living in the community. First, you give thanks. Then you pray. You ask for what you want; typically, for some kind of care. On my first day in the community that was to be my home for the next three months, Camila, who would become one of my closest friends, offered for me to join her to turn off the water supply. _There are natural aquifers under the community,_ she told me, _30m deep. This water is what allows us to be here._ _The government came and helped us install pipes so that we could access it and share it amongst ourselves._ I followed her out from the community salon, where a visiting engineer was delivering a workshop to the community on how solar panels work and how to install them. The wind cut through my clothes in the clear air, the final chills of winter clinging to the shrubby sand-scape of the community. I was disappointed to realise we’d be driving – more so when we only drove for 30 seconds to the first well, making this a seemingly unnecessary use of fossil fuels. Driving will enable us to not miss too much of the meeting I thought, trying to justify this seemingly careless action to myself. We continued further up the hill to the next lever, which would divert the water flow. A bit more of a walk, I suppose, but isn’t that a part of living in the countryside? My first day in an indigenous community and already I was judging them — "unnecessary", "careless". Without even realising it, I was silently and harshly contributing to the narrative of the Mapuche that settlers all over the country have. This was a horrible realisation to grapple with. I am here to learn from and about these people, to write for and with them at a pivotal moment in their history as they develop the first community-owned solar farm in South America. Instead, I found myself watching the amount of ultra-processed foods they eat with increasing concern, sitting at the table in silence looking at air while people played games on their phones or watched TikTok. Gradually, the judgement began to fade and understanding set in. ### ** _The Waste Contradiction_** In the community, people would leave their cars running for 30 minutes while they went in to have a chat with a friend; they would leave gas running on the stove, flames flickering to heat nothing but the air above them; they would keep the TV on for hours, seemingly aware of it only when a ‘standby: automatic power down’ sign would come up, at which point they would pick up the remote to keep it on. More than once I saw a couple of people throw trash on the ground or out the window while they walked or drove. At this point in my stay I still had not witnessed a prayer ritual, an active practice of gratitude toward the land and life that I experienced with people like Joel. I did not yet know how to look for relationships between the Mapuche and their land. All I could do was compare it to myself: many of the Mapuche people I lived with did not care for the earth in the way that I have learned to care for it. The litter, the constant leakages of those government-installed water pipes, the seeming insistence on leaving things running – all of these things felt wrong to me, like a maltreatment of the earth and her gifts to us. Yet, over time I began to notice a cultural division between how they engaged with the practices and materials brought on by modernisation, and with those from their traditional culture. _The Mapuche never waste_ , Clemente, a grandfather, told me over dinner one night. The Patagonian plateau is harsh and unforgiving, and it is hard to scrape together enough for family members to ensure and ease each other’s lives. When the Mapuche kill one of their livestock, the word that they use is _sacrificar_ : to sacrifice. An elder will come out with a couple of their children or grandchildren (rarely daughters, though it happens occasionally), until they are old and experienced enough to do it themselves, and choose a goat. Dogs, children and parents will keep the herd together while someone grabs the animal. They sharpen the blade, kill the animal quickly; sharpen the blade, cut down its front and separate the hide from the skin while being careful not to get blood on the wool; sharpen the blade, hang it up and open it, saving the blood and organs to eat; sharpen the blade, separate the part of the carcass that they will eat that day and leave the rest to begin drying; sharpen the blade, so it is clean and dry for next time. This entire process is embedded with acts of care, from the cross-generational mentoring to the selection of the animal, from the family members who are inside prepping the spice mixes to the maintenance of the tool. And every part of the animal has a use: to feed the parents, kids and dogs who work together to shepherd the animals and could not live without the other; to provide leather for shoes, roofs, or horsemanship tools; to provide skins for blankets and horse saddles. Mapuche people suffered from hunger and cold, certainly. But ‘the Mapuche never waste’ not to be sustainable nor only from necessity, but because of the respect that they have for whatever it is they consume or use, an understanding of their dependence on it, a gratitude for its use. They take only what they need; they throw nothing away. While the Mapuche waste energy - leaving TVs, stoves and cars running - they are exceptionally careful with the natural resources that they use to survive. They take great care with the animals that they tend to, with each other, and with the non-breathing environment which surrounds them. I found this care and respect as much amongst community elders as I did with children. While staying in one particular family, I would go with the ten-year-old in the mornings to feed an orphan calf milk from a two litre glass coke bottle with a little plastic teat on it. He would giggle as the calf suckled the teat voraciously, and prepare himself for a speedy exit as the bottle began to empty, since the calf would try to suckle his black jacket if he stayed any longer. With the four-year-old, we would climb the fence to check on the orphan lambs, her crying out that they would be ok because she loved them. I once watched the two boys play a fighting game and stop abruptly when they realised they’d accidentally shifted from sand to grass and didn’t want to risk destroying the vegetation. Everyone in the community, I came to understand, grows up with an understanding that they are surrounded by the things that they need to survive, and there is a deep care and respect that emanates from that. ### ** _The Sustainability Contradiction_** When I first arrived in the community, I struggled to make sense of how this ancient culture with their ancient practices of care and wastelessness could be so—"unsustainable". That was the word that kept coming to mind. And yet its very presence in my mind highlighted a contradiction at the heart of the sustainability question I had not yet interrogated: _Sustainable for who?_ Sustainability asks that we live in accordance with the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. In many ways, then, the Mapuche _are_ sustainable: thinking about how to protect future generations is an important part of their, and other Indigenous, ways of life, as is living in accordance with the needs of the present. On the one hand, the Mapuche are only ‘sustainable’ out of necessity: as food and other resources that ease suffering become more available, and the cost that goes into making them becomes less visible, they are no different to the rest of us, using and disposing without much thought. On the other hand, ‘sustainability’ cannot begin to enable an understanding of how the Mapuche live. Calling the practices that I witnessed – the processes of turning animals to meat, their skins to leather and their hides to horse saddles, of monitoring water consumption, of playing away from fragile vegetation – ‘sustainable’ hollows out the point. It misses the principles and practices of care that ground them, the underlying faith which builds them into world-making. Sustainability is enmeshed within a global paradigm that asks the individual to locate themself within a whole. I began to understand that acting sustainably – recycling, eating locally, taking public transport – was only one way to care for the planet. All of the individual things which __ I had been doing for the invisible and unthinkable ‘whole’ of the planet felt increasingly isolated and irrelevant as I attempted to relate to the land in the way that the people who I lived with did, and not least because my return flights to Argentina produced more carbon emissions than many people in the community will in their entire lives. It is easy to know that the concept of the carbon footprint is a scam by British Petroleum, designed to displace responsibility for the ongoing climate crisis onto individuals. It is harder to live with the implications of that: we must figure out – or perhaps, remember – how to live in an integrated way. There is a shifting baseline under what our needs today actually are, who is responsible for meeting them, and the level of compromise that is realistic. Many elders I spoke with in the community talked about their suffering with a mix of gladness for their ability to keep from passing it to their children, and uneasiness at the increasing dependence of their children, and themselves, on human technological and economic systems. For instance, while the Mapuche in the community I lived in are dependent on the underwater aquifers for their continued survival on that land, they did not take much responsibility for the government-installed water system, as I witnessed on my first day in the community. While the community does maintain and monitor the system, residents in the community made no effort to create long-term fixes for leaky water pipes. Water would pool over dead land, creating birdbaths for the finches and meadowlarks, while people 50m away did not have enough to irrigate their vegetable patches. The community is not lazy; they were not involved in any of the technical or political decision-making processes that went into installing the water system, so have no sense of ownership or responsibility to fix flaws in that system. All of the unsustainable practices of the community members seemed to come from this: a rupture of interdependence, and an alienation from the local things and processes upon which we depend and for which we care. ### ** _Being Ecological_** In my three months with the Mapuche, I came to understand this distinction between the local and the global, and the practices both necessitate, as the difference between sustainable practices and ecological practices. If being sustainable means doing things, then being ecological means being things: doing because of what you are and how you are related. ‘Being ecological’ means living in awareness of your humanity. By that I mean that we are human, one species dependent upon many others for our survival. That a part of being human is reflecting, dreaming, relating. That these two parts of being human - being dependent on others for our survival, and dreaming - are not separable. Our bodies are not ‘ours’ in any singular biological way. There are around as many bacteria as cells that go into making us who we are. We are intimately, intricately, haphazardly woven together. We are fantastically dependent, emergent, constantly becoming bodies of water. Alongside the deliciously murky poetics of our miniscule makeup and our interconnectedness to the non-human world, we are co-existent alongside our neighbours, our families, our communities. People whose faces we know, who make us feel, who help us grow, who teach us how to live and how not to live. And we are co-created alongside nations, ‘imagined communities’, people we will never meet because they are on the other side of the world but with whom we share some kind of identity, with whom we identify. To make sense, and even find freedom, of and within these ‘inescapable troubles of interdependent existences,’ I return again and again to matters of care. Feminist care scholar Maria Puig de la Bellacasa creates a shape for the practice of care: it is ‘an affective state, an ethical obligation and a practical labour.’ Caring is the most fundamental relationship we can enter into – without it, we would not exist. Without a guardian’s care, any newborn child brought into the world would not survive. Inviting your friends round for dinner, sewing your clothes when they rip, showing your granny how to download whatsapp onto her computer – these are all ways that we show and receive care. Western political projects have worked hard to make care seem like something we only need to do if and as it suits us. Why learn to oil your bike chain if you can pay someone to do it for you? Why take care of your children if you can hire a nanny? Not all life-sustaining care work feels ‘good’ or even necessary. Caring work is not all as enjoyable as taking a candle-lit bubble bath, though increasingly ‘projects of care, feminist and otherwise, are full of romantic temptations that disconnect acts that feel good from their geopolitical implications,’ as feminist technoscience scholar of care Michelle Murphy kindly points out for us. These political projects have worked hard to make care seem like a privately maintained relationship, something that does not need to be seen or thought much about on a social or structural level. The kind of feminism they love is the kind that tells you not to have kids to be successful, rather than the kind which asks them to care-fully incorporate maternal and paternal reproductive labour into political and economic systems that currently seem to be made up of untethered individuals. Sometimes caring can look like sustainable doing, but it can be more accurately understood as ecological being. Sustainability tells us, we have to have knowledge, so that we can address the problems facing the specific things upon which we depend and for which we care. Being ecological does not address a problem. Problems are a part of what being ecological _is._ Being ecological requires that we accept that we live with, and because of, things we can never entirely know. When I think about being ecological, I think about faith. Perhaps because in the community they told me over and over again that without faith, you have nothing. Perhaps because prayer at its core is a form of care, demonstrating respect and gratitude for the more-than-human which sustains us. Faith gives us a way to care without the salve of certainty. It allows us to touch the essence of finitude, the parameters of our being alive, while we go about the mundane tasks that keep our hearts, and the hearts of others, beating. When Joel prays every morning he is not desperately hoping or clinging to a future of happiness or ease. He knows that sometimes things will be hard, that every day his own, and his family’s, health is a blessing. First he says thank you, and then he asks without expectation. Then he goes about his day. He feeds the animals, he tries to mend old and rusted cars, he watches his grandkids play with a gentle smile on his face. We sit around the table and hold hands while the kids recite mass. Usually I have been inside in the latter half of the morning, learning how to cook with Sofia, Lucia, or Alba – Joel's daughter, Sofia's daughter, and Sofia's mum – who love to cook. Peace and joy overflow from their beings as they gather ingredients and set up the chopping boards. They show me that whatever they have from their garden, with a little bit of flour and oil, is enough and tastes better than anything you could buy from the store. The food is always delicious here – it is made with care. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 02/07/2026
From the archives: How to navigate the climate crisis without triggering a global economic crash
planetcritical.com
P:C ARCHIVES: Simon Michaux on The Climate Crisis and The Climate Crash
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Simon Michaux 0:00 /4115.101565 1× So much of the hope we put in solutions for climate change falls away under a microscope. Did you know wind turbines aren’t recyclable, for example? Guess where they’re buried. Are enough people thinking about what happens when globalisation fails and post-industrial states like Europe and the US are left to mine their own materials? How can we mitigate climate change, truly, without plunging billions into poverty? Simon Michaux is working to find solutions to all these questions. As an associate professor in the circular economy solution unit at the Geological Survey of Finland, Simon models the mining and energy industries to figure out what we can do sustainably—and what is nothing more than greenwashing. He drops more than a few bombshells throughout this episode concerning energy use and politics, but also reveals a new energy paradigm he’s working on that could provide genuine zero emission energy. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 29/06/2026
We cannot be ecological without confronting loss
planetcritical.com
To remember together is to resist
✒️ Today's newsletter features an essay by a member of __The Grove__. __The Grove__ is a small writing collective I created to work with Anya, Rishab and Jess, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. These pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. I tell myself that I am in an urgent battle for a better future by working in the world of United States’ climate change policy. In 2026, the objective is clear: defend environmental regulations and policies that improve public health and protect our future. Our battle is not waged on the ground. It is waged in courtrooms and legal briefs, in white papers debating the future social cost of carbon dioxide and quantifying the damages of temperature rise in decades to come. This is how policies change; this is how we scale impact. But it is also how we hide from the present loss. As fractions of degrees tick upward, as species disappear from our lands and our seas, as the foundations for our survival grow dimmer and less certain and the punishment from Mother Earth more vindictive, I feel compelled to act through fear for the future. I shake with fear that no statistical model, however informed with data on our emissions and our rate of deforestation, can translate into the ungraspable loss we will face from mass extinction and an unlivable climate. The relief of defended regulations is outweighed by the continual stress that no victory will ever overcome the inevitable destruction of more intense hurricanes, floods, heat waves, and wildfires. But to truly mourn the loss we experience every day as human and non-human lives are lost to pollution and destruction is too damaging, too paralyzing. Mourning what we’ve lost means sitting in the reality that we’ve already lost irreplaceable beings with stories never to be recovered, that the walls of our biosphere are already crumbling around us and destroying the foundation upon which we’ve built our histories. If I mourn loss, I have to accept that I’ve lost control of what is happening and am powerless to change what has already happened. For that reason, I anxiously look to the future, preventing myself from truly experiencing the present moment. Much of this comes from the inherent privilege of my position, the fact that living in the capital of the richest nation in the history of mankind affords a separation from pain where physical confrontations with the violence of nature’s wrath are replaced by the politicking of policy planning in air conditioned suites. But I do not doubt that the fear motivating me, my anxiety for the future, and my aversion to feeling the present is an opioid to avoid facing the pain of my lack of control over the loss we have already incurred. I tell myself that the worst is yet to come, and for that reason _I_ must act to change what _I_ can still change. ### **May we reach for the dead to show us that we are alive?** There are moments, however, when I am thrust into the crisis of our present reality. In my hometown of Houston, Texas, neighborhoods have been sliced by railroad and highway expansion, opening the arteries of communities for industrial pollution to seep in. The pollution, however, does not overflow indiscriminately onto each parcel of baked concrete webbed by an elaborate infrastructure dedicated to extracting and processing oil and gas. Rather, the architects of pollution deliberately choose their victims—the Black and the Brown, the poor and the vulnerable—justifying billion dollar investments in poison plants with promises of “development” for such communities. These lies can only travel so far. Residents know the truth: where the black tar flows, cancer grows. In the community of Fifth Ward, where residents have banded together to demand accountability for cancer caused by Creosote pollution, sustained advocacy has garnered national attention to the injustices suffered by its residents. Hidden behind the contaminated train tracks in one such neighborhood lies a living reminder of what articulating the collective sense of loss encapsulates. The Houston Climate Justice Museum is a small parcel of swampy grassland, cleared and constructed in the hopes to raise awareness of how contamination has stolen lives from community members and as a meeting place for many of the community’s activists. It’s where they tell the story of Creosote poisoning through oral history. It’s where they communicate loss and build the community’s artistic graveyard. And it’s where they go to remind themselves of what they’re fighting for. Community members invite external folks like me to build our collective vocabulary for making sense of injustice and resistance. We know that the United States has routinely discounted Black and Brown bodies, but the museum communicates more viscerally, “this is what loss feels like.” On a sweltering summer day last year, one exhibit held an encased shirt with the names of those that have been killed by pollution. I stood there for a while, their names lodged in my throat. I felt the heaviness of grief at human lives lost to the cruel indifference of corporate extraction and the sweat produced by the intensive work to memorialize loss. Death was not a distant future–death was here, and _we were killing ourselves_. __The Houston Climate Justice Museum outdoor space.__ Temporarily understanding that reality was debilitating. But it was also undeniably beautiful, an irreplaceable moment of suspension in the acceptance of our circumstances and the decisions we could take going forward. The museum had not denied death on its doorstep—it had invited it gently, vulnerably sharing intimate loss with strangers because that was the only common language that we could speak when words failed us. Its message wasn’t something that could be rationalized in my brain, but rather something that physically occupied the space and held me tightly. Thinking about the future was a selfish act that allowed me to pretend as if _I_ had control over what _I_ could change. But being in the present, in a space created to share the stories of strangers, reminded me that our stories were irrevocably interwoven, that the bodies of the dead and the living were only separated by circumstance and chance. The crisis was not coming—the crisis was here. And yet, the museum could still create life in a place proclaimed dead by contamination by occupying space to bridge the stories of the living and the dead. Its decision to locate itself just meters from the railroad and continue convening people and communicating the stories of their friends and family were acts of defiance: _We are not going anywhere. You may take our soldiers, but their stories give us strength_. _Amidst irrecoverable loss, we will create art._ ### **To remember together is to be alive** The fear consuming me when hypothesizing uncertain futures makes it easy to discard the viscerality of past and present death and loss. But as the Wayúu people of the unforgiving Colombian desert had taught me, these states are worth holding onto. For the Wayúu, funerals are considered the largest family events, where hundreds if not thousands convene, including distant relatives who willingly slaughter their cattle and goats, far-flung friends who bring thousands of dollars of alcohol from hundreds of miles away, and grieving families who painstakingly construct customized tombs. The Wayúu typically hold two funerals for the perished, the first wake to bury the dead and the second wake five to ten years after to let go of the dead on their journey to their eternal resting grounds. When attending the second wake hosted by one family I knew, I quickly realized that the days-long event was not a memorialization of the past: it was a window between the living and the dead. Women engulfed each tomb with their collective cries, tenderly cleaning the dry bones of ones they had loved. For but a moment, they sang the song of ephemeral grief, their connection so intensely saturating the air with the pain of not being able to recover what had been lost. The dead had been lost, gone on their way to the afterlife. But the alive remained, because to live is to remember _together_. Mesmerizing and terrifying, such a ceremony is only made possible by a belief that a history of a people could be maintained through collective artistic tradition, and that bonds of solidarity could be strengthened by gathering _together_ in wonder of the brevity of life and the eternality of death. The families at this funeral understood something that I could never arrive at through my future-facing disposition: that accepting the crisis—in this case, death—opens the door to _togetherness_ and a shared language to experience being transfixed. I’ve met warring families who have repaired relationships due to the sacredness of sharing space at a funeral and clans where the speed of trust moved at the speed of collective mourning. I’ve seen communities build empathy by sharing stories of resilience to hardship. Resource scarcity is endemic to the unforgiving desert that many Wayuu call home, with climate change exacerbating the damage brought by drought. Control over their future is an illusion: they cannot decide whether the rains will come in ten years. But choosing resilience in the face of change is their reminder that they are still standing. Many communities accept that their greatest power comes not from fixing crises but rather by making sense of them in community. For it is the shared emotion of being transfixed by crisis that affords humans the ability to find beauty in what we’ve lost. And it is finding beauty in what we’ve lost that shows us that we’re still here. ### **Holding our breath** I, and others like me advocating for change, are so focused on what we need to do to prevent future crises that we’ve lost sight of what lies below, behind, before us. The depths of the ecological crisis lie too deep for urgent thinking to shine a light on where to go next. But if we choose to appreciate a crisis like we appreciate art—holding our breath and sitting in the reality that we lack control to fix it—we can begin to make sense of it while holding on tightly to one another. Then we may find the strength to bear the crisis without the specter of despair-induced urgency. Much of the ground surrounding the railroads in Fifth Ward is contaminated by a toxic plume of Creosote, but community members have recently begun experimenting with agriculture in the museum’s plot of land. It requires an immense strength to tend the soil of a ground that has poisoned brothers and sisters, to give back to a land that has taken life. But that is the essence of what a crisis demands of us. Because only in the beautiful, the terrifying, the sorrowful, may we find each other’s hands and re-tend our collective garden. Like a raging river, the ecological crisis has taken so much from us already. But we cannot let it sweep away our collective resilience in the face of loss, for that is much stronger than our anxiety for where the river ends. We must hold each other because it reminds us that we are still alive, that grief is our way of planting roots in a river we may not be able to dam, but in which we can still make life. _This piece was written by Rishab Jagetia in his personal capacity, and the opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the view of his employer._ 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 25/06/2026
Share:
planetcritical.com
How To Mobilise | Inea Lehner
How To Mobilise | Inea Lehner 0:00 /2499.718503 1× Climate Vanguard is a youth-led organisation providing political education to the public and activists across the Majority World. I'm joined by Inea Lehner, one of their core team members, to discuss their outreach, strategies and principles in supporting the climate movement, and Leftist movements more broadly. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Wonderfully, this conversation explores how Inea's own life has been changed through political education, particularly through her adoption of a materialist lens. She explains how Marxism helped her make sense of the world, and what it has to offer the youth of today in their quest to dismantle the inequities of capitalism and create a new vision for a better future. This vision is centred on political decentralisation, social infrastructure and, of course, the regeneration of Earth's body—which is all possible, she says, if we learn to build power from the ground up. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 22/06/2026
What does it mean to be ecological?
planetcritical.com
The Ivy and The Birch
✒️ My newsletter this week explores the question "What is being ecological?" It is the first in a series of essays produced on this topic by __The Grove,__ a small writing collective I created to work with AD, RJ and JI, three extremely intelligent, thoughtful and learned people in their mid-twenties. Our pieces are the result of our reading and writing together over four months. A few years ago, I moved to Athens to be closer to my best friend. She was the only person I visited multiple times a year, and being with her in that city made me fall in love with the place. Every visit felt like a dream. We talked like we only had a few days left to live; we ate the best food in the world; we survived our mornings on iced coffee; we smoked Greek tobacco in tavernas until the wee hours of the morning. At the end of 2023, when I found myself at a loose residential end after thriving in the London gift economy, I floated the idea of moving to Athens. We had discussed how much fun it would be for years. She quickly found me an apartment in a neighbourhood I didn’t know but was excited to discover, and two months later I arrived. I was persuaded that I was about to have the best year of my life, being physically close, finally, to the person I was closest to emotionally. It did end up being the best year of my life. Sadly, my most profound sadness that year, though, was her. I don’t ever expect to know what happened for her, and even now I struggle to put the pieces together of how our relationship could have so dramatically transformed in the blink of an eye. I arrived in Athens and everything was different. I spent the better part of a year trying to reach her, and in the moments I did I was elated. But something would settle between us again almost immediately, an invisible impasse that I could not find the edge of, no matter how long I struck out searching. Every few months I asked for her help in getting past it. I am sure a big part of her wanted to, and we would talk about it. But neither of us could find the words for the truth: the thing that was settling between us, the chasm opening up, was coming from her. It took me 18 months to realise that my best friend simply did not want to be my friend anymore, and it broke my heart. There had been some relationships I had believed would be as permanent as my life is long, and she was top of that list. It was utterly beyond my imagination throughout our friendship, and the 18 months of struggle, that our friendship could ever end. But it did. And not because of an event or a conversation. Simply, I woke up one morning and looked at a brief and impersonal message she had sent me, and I suddenly no longer had the energy to cross that impasse. In that same moment, I realised that all of my desperate and anxious striving to banish it had come from the painful awareness that if I failed, she would not attempt it for us. For 18 months, I had been bailing water out of a boat that was not only sinking, but had been stripped of its sails and oars; even if it could be patched up, there was no way to move past where we were. After my heart healed, I felt lighter than I had in months. Around the same time, an entire branch of my family tree broke away from the rest of us with no explanation. At any other time in my life I would have chased them down, in both anger and determination to set things right. But I had learned my lesson — that the world will not bend to my will, even when that will is full of love. I let them go because I understood that unless I wanted to spend yet more time sick with desperation and anxiety then I had to accept what was, and that only by accepting what was could I ever have a say in what could be. To be ecological is to be in relationship with the world around you. It took me thirty-two years to understand that means being in relationship with the world _as it is_ around you, so that you may also shape it. It took me thirty-two years to understand that my relationships never die, they merely change; they evolve and take new shapes as I evolve and take new shapes, and as the people I love evolve and take new shapes. I was once the girl that actively ended relationships. Now I sit with them, even as the other walks away, letting the new shape emerge, and letting it shape me. I cannot be friends with the person who does not wish to be my friend, nor family with those who do not wish to be my family. To believe so, as I did for so long, is wishful thinking, and fantasy has no correlation with ecology. Only by understanding what had become of my world, by plunging into an honest relationship with those who walked away, did I finally grasp that I do not wish to have friends and family who can so readily behave as if they are not that. I pulled my head out of the sand and gasped for air. I have the sensation that our collective fantasy is cracking, and through those cracks both pain and possibility is emerging. The fantasy of living well under exploitative, extractive systems can no longer be maintained as those systems collapse in on themselves, revealing nothing more than empty promises and rudderless leadership. We are each faced with a choice to either independently polish that fantasy so that it shines bright enough to blind us to the world as it is— our impending ecological collapse, biodiversity loss, climate catastrophes, economic losses and energy failures—or to face down exactly this moment in history so that we may yet, hopefully, have some say in our future. I am surprised by how many are choosing the latter, mounting opposition across the world to whatever piece of the corrupt puzzle they can. In the handful of public meetings I have attended since returning to Scotland, I am astounded by how common place talk of the climate crisis is, or energy security, or wealth inequality. So many of the locals with whom I share this territory are taking matters into their own hands instead of hanging around for more promises to be broken by local systems of bureaucratic government. These conversations extend far beyond the sphere of local politics. One of my favourite moments from the month of June was walking into the kitchen to find my mum and the electrician having a lengthy and detailed conversation about the war in Iran and the tangled web of Washington relationships which has driven its illegality. Each of our communities has living memory of hardship and suffering—I come from an area where Thatcher’s name is still regularly used as a curse. But what is curious about the state of the world right now is that so many communities who are not _yet_ suffering hardships as bad as those we remember are preparing themselves, conscious that something is coming down the tracks. Yes, our energy bills are too high and our food bills are climbing higher and the kids can’t find jobs and our local funding is getting cut and these are all terrible things, but rather than blame fleeting circumstances so many folk are, in my opinion, looking out at the world—really looking at it—and grasping at the bigger picture at play, putting words to it, joining the dots, and plotting out its advance. People know something is coming. They are readying themselves, slowly. They are refusing fantasy, for the fantasy cannot sustain even itself anymore. Is this what it means to be ecological? To find one’s footing in reality and dig deep? Some weeks ago, as we sat next to the fire pit, I looked upon the ivy growing around one of the birch trees in our garden and thought about how relationships in and of themselves are neither good nor bad, they just are. We will soon have to remove that ivy, which is determined in its slow suffocation of the birch tree, as we do every year. Their ecological relationship is not positive, but extractive; not mutual but violent. It would be foolish to romanticise the ivy and the birch as a symbiotic relationship, or even one that is working towards the greater whole of the wider ecosystem. Simply, the ivy is a strangler. Only with that acute understanding can we effect any impact to protect the birch, and by protecting it protect its neighbours, too. Only by taking the ivy for what it is can we truly become gardeners—beings capable of seeing what is and responding accordingly. That we may choose how to respond is not a gift of human greatness bestowed upon the world, it is the gift of love bestowed upon each of us. To only see what we wish to be true is to never be at home. To be ecological, then, is not to return to Eden, but to toil for it—here, now, in the way the world is. But we cannot begin to know the lay of the land if we are not willing to live in it, exactly as it is. And only when we know a thing can we begin to understand how to change it, for the betterment of us all. This is what distinguishes our human actions from the ivy’s compulsion to strangle the birch tree: we get to choose. Perhaps this is what it means to be ecological then: to be in the world as it is, to know the world as it could be, and to act with whatever power you have to make it so. This is why we uproot and plant. This is why we hold public meetings and protest and write and paint and gather. This is why we have always gathered. There is nothing unnatural about humankind and our manner of being, not unless we choose to turn away from the world and reach for what could never be. There are impasses that can be crossed and those that cannot, just as some rivers can be forded and others not, just as there are some mountains that can be ascended and others not. Enough of the world is full of promise that we need not chase down ghosts. There is a garden waiting for each of us to get our hands dirty. Tend to what is, not what once was. 🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 18/06/2026
From the archives: How mainstream economics is driving the climate disaster
planetcritical.com
P:C ARCHIVES: Steve Keen on The Economics of Climate Change
🌻 Dear community, this post was scheduled in advance of my maternity leave, which began in June. I will be back online and able to read and respond to all your comments in November. The best way to support me and my new family in this time is to upgrade your subscription, share this post with your community, and continue the discussion in the comments. P:C ARCHIVES: Steve Keen 0:00 /3642.137619 1× Professor Steve Keen was one of the few economists to realise that a serious economic crisis was imminent in 2005. He publicly warned the world, and helped his native Australia navigate the 2008 crash without the major repercussions that crippled markets everywhere else. He is now working on a new model of economics for a post-crash world. He joined me today to discuss why and how capitalism needs to be constrained, the economics of climate change and what mainstream economists and academics are getting wrong—to the detriment of us all. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 15/06/2026
Here's what to expect from Planet: Critical over the next four months.
planetcritical.com
I am officially on maternity leave! This is what the Planet: Critical schedule will look like over the coming months.
Dear community, My maternity leave officially begins today (only one week out from when our daughter is due!) I will be back to work in November, recording interviews and writing this newsletter. Here's what you can expect in the interim. ### Podcast I've spent the past three months recording a backlog of new episodes. These will be released every second week, in between hand-selected episodes from the Planet: Critical archive. You don't have to do anything differently—an episode will land in your inbox every week, as it always does. The archive episodes I'm republishing are some of my favourites, and were instrumental in shaping the way I see the world today. The new episodes feature some really exciting guests, ranging from activists to writers, and scientists to filmmakers. Stay tuned! ### Newsletter The newsletter over the coming month will also feature a handful of pieces from the Planet: Critical archives, and I'll be very interested to read your astute takes on how Planet: Critical has evolved since they were initially published. The vast majority of newsletters, however, will be brand new pieces, and I'm excited to report they won't just feature my writing! Over the past four months, I've been reading and writing with three stupendously intelligent, caring, learned and talented young people. I call this little writing collective 'The Grove', named as such because each of their styles remind me of a different kind of tree. Anya writes like a willow leans over water, creating new dimensions with her words the way a willow's leaves create a curtain between the world you know and the world that could be. Rishab writes like a pine stretching tall and straight to the sky, piercing the air without hesitation, fiercely reaching for the truth. Jess writes in the way a magnolia tree bursts into your perceptions, her descriptions as vibrant as they are delicate, petals creating a colourful path to follow as she weaves profound emotional insight into her conclusions. As for my own? Who knows. It was far more important I be the humus to The Grove's soil. We did three cycles of reading and writing together before I clocked off for maternity leave. The first cycle, we read the introduction of Timothy Morton's _Being Ecological_ and, after a lengthy discussion, chose the prompt: "What is being ecological?" Our second cycle, we read the essay _Our Ancestors’ Dystopia Now: Indigenous Conservation and the Anthropocene_ by indigenous scholar Kyle Powys Whyte. Together, we chose to tackle the question: "What would our ancestors think?" For our final cycle, we read the last chapter of Alyssa Battistoni's _Free Gifts_ and chose to interrogate: "What does it mean to be free?" Next week, my newsletter opens the first cycle, "What is being ecological?" The next week features Rishab's piece, followed by Jess', then Anya's. At the end of every cycle, the newsletter will then feature a piece or two from the Planet: Critical archives, before beginning the next cycle, which will always open with my response to our prompt. I am absolutely honoured to be introducing you all to these three incredible people. Each of them reached out to me of their own accord at some point over the past few years, and I was delighted when they each accepted my invitation to be part of this collective. I have been truly moved to watch their friendships develop in our bi-monthly meetings, and fortunate enough to now have met each of them in person. Working with them has been one of the main highlights of this year for me professionally, and I can't wait to pick it back up when I return from maternity leave. ### Planet: Coordinate For the past nine months, Robert has been working diligently on our first feature-length documentary about the anti-mining community we spent time with in Colombia. This has been a colossal amount of work—not only has he learned how to be a filmmaker, and how to use all the requisite software it demands, but has done it with footage in a language he doesn't speak. I am amazed at what he has successfully put together, and the quality of his hard work is evidenced in the fact that we have just received word that an international streaming platform wants to share the film with their global audience. So, around mid-September, you can expect a big announcement from us that the film is available to be watched! Paying Planet: Coordinate supporters will have access to a preview in the days beforehand, but the film will be available for everyone to watch for free afterwards. ### _HER BODY, OUR CHOICE_ The final manuscript is handed in and with the copy-editor and the legal team! Everything is on track for publication early next year, and I can't wait to share it with you. ### Subscriptions, emails, and everything else I am planning on being totally offline for a few months. I think it very important that Robert and I be present with our daughter and dedicate our time to getting to know her and welcoming her into the world. As such, I have no intention of checking my emails during these months. However, the info@ email address will be monitored by a close collaborator, and she will be able to help out with any problems regarding your subscriptions/memberships. I have no intention of wading through all my emails on my return from maternity leave so if you have contacted me on my address about something important during the coming months, _email me again in November_ and I will get back to you. Equally, I likely won't be able to reply to your comments for some months but **please keep commenting and sharing.** It's a really important way to support Planet: Critical, and I'm depending on you all to spread the word in the months I'm offline. We have worked exceptionally hard over the past four months to get everything ready for the next four months, and I'm sure you can all appreciate that the leave we have managed to carve out is less than I would be entitled to if I were employed. In no way do I feel short-changed—I would much rather come back to you all and do this work in four months than return to an employer in 12. But imagining what that return looks like is like groping around in the pitch black because this is my first baby and I have almost no experience about what to expect, and obviously cannot know the temperament or needs of my child before she arrives. I will do everything in my power to hit the ground running in November—but if I hit it only walking, please know that this is due to circumstances out of my control. ### See you on the other side! Thank you all so much for your support, compassion and care as I approach this milestone. I have been overwhelmed by this community's open encouragement for me to take this leave and not worry about work. Of course, I do worry, but am much less so than when I first announced I was pregnant. Enough of this community practices the values which I preach on this platform that I trust my taking this time to be with our daughter will not be considered a breach of our social contract—on the contrary, all of you who have written to me to express outright support, and upgraded your subscriptions to show that support, have deepened that contract, and our relationship. I think this is why this newsletter has become somewhat more personal over the past few months. I feel at home here with you all. Thank you for transforming this small internet platform into a genuine community. With kindness, Rachel __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 11/06/2026
How certain species became a scapegoat for capitalism
planetcritical.com
The Real Story of "Invasive Species" | Clare Follmann
The Real Story of "Invasive Species" | Clare Follmann 0:00 /3291.209592 1× Non-native species management has very little to do with ecology and everything to do with economics. That's what activist and writer, Clare Follmann, uncovered in her book _Scapegoat: What the Invasive Species Story Gets Wrong_ (UK version, US version). She joins me to explain how "invasive" species have been blamed for creating the conditions of environmental degradation — conditions that have actually been caused by capitalism, extraction and colonialism. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ In this fascinating episode, she reveals the linguistic tricks at play which colour the doctrine of invasive species management, and the insidious links between these protocols and racism and xenophobia. She gives illuminating examples of how extractive industries have blamed species for the problems caused by their pillaging of Earth, and emphasises that the very idea of non-native species forgets the diverse history of the planet which has seen species spread out all across the globe for millions of years. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
031
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 08/06/2026
Locals are rallying against the CATO, an allegedly "net zero", "zero waste" data centre which will "harvest rainwater" while providing "data sovereignty".
planetcritical.com
One of the biggest data centres in the world is being planned on Scottish soil. The plans for it are so obviously bullshit the developers must think we're fools.
I grew up in a Scottish region scarred by extractive infrastructure: quarries, coal mines, gas plants, coal plants, and one massive oil refinery. Gradually, much of that infrastructure has been decommissioned and shut down. The coal mines are long closed, the coal plant no longer running, the gas plants are being decommissioned and even the oil refinery is closing its doors. For a brief moment—of really only a few months—it looked like Fife would be extraction-free for the first time in over a century. But now a new industry has got its claws into our rich land: "artificial intelligence". One of the biggest data centres in the world is being planned not ten miles from where I grew up, to the horror of local residents. The CATO data centre, named as such after a Greek philosopher in an abysmal attempt to wash the project as an intelligent and thoughtful investment, proposes to take over agricultural land, woodland, and the ruins of a castle, next to the small, rural village of Auchtertool. The proposed site dwarfs the village, bumping right up against its boundary. The developers say the infrastructure will be in-keeping with the local surroundings but the plans submitted include a building longer than the length of the village stretching 35 metres into the air. The blue is the proposed 35 metre high building, dwarfing the village of Auchtertool in the bottom left corner. The data centre has been proposed by the ILI Group, a renewable energy property developer who has a habit, said a research librarian at the public meeting, of building out renewable infrastructure in Scotland and selling it off to foreign bidders. They claim that the data centre will be "zero waste" and "net zero", powered by Scotland's enormous wind energy capacity. Scotland does currently overproduce electricity to the extent that enough we could power every home in the country twice over. The data centre would use half of that—50% of residential demand—meaning there arguably _is_ enough green energy to run the thing. What the developers fail to mention is that data centres cannot rely on renewable energy because of the intermittency problem—sometimes the wind drops, or the sun doesn't shine, or the waves don't thrash, and when that happens, and not enough electricity is produced, data centres need a back-up. That involves turning on diesel generators. It was this very problem that made it more economically viable for Microsoft to begin building their own nuclear power plant for their own proposed data centre. Where will the enormous amounts of diesel come from for CATO? And who will pay the cost? And whose fuel will be redirected so that this mammoth fire hazard—built right next to Mosmorran gas plant which is slowly being decommissioned—can reliably stay on? CATO is being sold to Scotland as promising data sovereignty, but it will force a country which is nearing energy independence through electricity production to rely on the whims of the global fossil fuel trade. A particularly laughable claim is that the data centre will only use the equivalent of 239 residential homes' annual water usage (around 2 million litres). Perhaps ILI Group have a secret technology that is unavailable to the rest of the market, because the average water use for these data centres is 11–19 million litres per day_._ Their ludicrous claims do not stop there. In their planning documents, they write that they will collect the water they need by _"_ harvesting rainfall_"._ Scotland is indeed a wet country, but not that wet. How fortunate for the developers that they happened to choose a site right next to a loch which has been used to supply 12 million litres daily to the gas plant for decades—you know, just in case. The ILI Group claims that the data centre will create thousands of local jobs but, as one tech insider said at last week's public meeting, "data centres are built to run lean". In the purest vision of Silicon Valley, these mammoth structures only require a handful of staff to run, and engineering problems are often outsourced to foreign experts. Almost every single part of the data centre's construction and management will no doubt be supplied by foreign companies, from the hardware to the expertise. The only thing that will be required of Scotland is our arable land, freshwater, and political weakness. The ILI Group also insists that data centres—and this is but one of three planned across the country—are requisite national infrastructure. The Scottish Government has fallen in line with Silicon Valley's vision for the future and has developed an "A.I" plan for the future. Despite the very many dissident voices questioning why so-called artificial intelligence is a necessary industry at the public meeting, nobody in charge seems willing to challenge the techno-oligarchs who stand to make trillions by appropriating our resources, cutting our jobs, and cementing their grip on political power. "Artificial intelligence" is driving a socio-political change that none of us consented to. It is undermining democracy, increasing the wealth gap, worsening racist and sexist biases, and threatening our already endangered ecosystems. The benefits to the everyman are yet to be seen—perhaps the hope is that depending on ChatGPT for our every thought process will atrophy our brains to the extent we no longer notice how our collective future is being ripped away from us. The icing on the cake is that Fife Council, the local government body who has approved the first steps of the application, is not even demanding an Environmental Impact Assessment for the enormous site. In Scotland, these supposedly necessary pieces of national infrastructure do not yet have national legislation to regulate them. This loophole is what has seen over twenty planning applications for data centres be recently submitted on Scottish territory. Edinburgh Council did the honourable thing and rejected theirs, for lack of clear information as to the energy requirements and local impact. Fife Council have no such honour, it seems. The paltry Environmental Report supplied by ILI Group has cleared their conscience enough it seems—despite great swathes of it being redacted (bizarrely, the planning proposal is no longer available online). Fifers are not stupid folk. Over 250 locals were packed into a tiny village hall last week to hear the Chair of the Auchtertool Community Council lay out the proposal, their objections, and the steps they are taking to resist it. The crowd then offered solidarity and advice on different stages of the process. Not a single person thought the data centre was a good idea. The hall filled with sardonic laughter at the mention of the water usage, employment opportunities, "data sovereignty", and the alleged net benefit to the environment. Those who spoke up from the crowd, alongside the tech insider and the librarian, included former Fife planning officers, parliamentarians, a biologist, a lawyer, artists and locals who have been involved in decades-long campaigns against Mosmorran and fracking. The hall pulsed with possibility. I spoke to the dangers of handing over our precious resources during a worsening eco-crisis to an industry which generates revenue for a handful of men who are actively trying to dismantle democracy. Robert spoke to the need for, alongside legal objections, spilling out onto the streets in protest. We told them of a Colombian community that has fought off a mine for two decades by dismantling the company's machinery. Cheers went up. We are up against huge players. The Former Energy Minister for the UK and current adviser to the UK Government’s Board of Trade, Labour peer Brian Wilson, sits on the board of the ILI Group. He served under then-Prime minister Tony Blair, a man who is up to his neck in Middle East capital, foreign interests, and artificial intelligence projects. Blair has been pushing the current Labour government to adopt a.i. wherever possible—including the failed plans for a digital ID. Since leaving office, Blair has spent his years rubbing shoulders with autocrats all over the world. He helped secure Emirati cash for an environmentally disastrous plan to move Malaysia's capital. Those questioning his loyalties—and the dangers of his close ties to British government in such circumstances—are asking the right questions. The CATO data centre has links to some of the most powerful people in the country—and perhaps the world. They are not the ones who will suffer the consequences of its creation. They will never be forced to live next to its heat, its noise pollution, its localised droughts. They will soak up all the economic benefits and call any localised harm to the environment and people an "externality" for which they cannot be held accountable. Then, one day, in the distant future, their descendants will manufacture yet another industrial revolution and impose their own violent vision of the world on our own descendants, the great-great-great grandchildren of the miners who believed their sacrifice was buying their children a better life. But as long as rich men dictate what happens on our land, our sacrifices will only ever buy better lives for them. The people of Scotland deserve better than for history to ceaselessly repeat itself. We were locked out of our common wealth when the wealthy erected fences on our lands to keep us out. Every extractive innovation since has kept wealth flooding out of our communities: on coal trains, through pipelines, and now via The Cloud. And as that wealth flooded out, pollution flooded in—into our water, our lungs, and our local government. Resisting this mammoth data centre is about so much more than protecting the village of Auchtertool. It is about resisting hundreds of years of colonial exploitation, and resisting the insidious implication that the future is out of our hands. There are no better hands than ours to create what we need where we are. There are no better voices to speak for ourselves where we are. And there are no better ideas for where we are than those that grow from the soil where, united, we stand. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
020
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 04/06/2026
How using models for containing infectious diseases dramatically reduced violent crime all around the world
planetcritical.com
Treating The Epidemic of Violence | Gary Slutkin
Treating The Epidemic of Violence | Gary Slutkin 0:00 /3217.769478 1× Can violence be cured? According to physician and epidemiologist, Gary Slutkin, it can. Gary worked for decades treating some of the most virulent disease outbreaks around the world. Then he took that model and applied it to his hometown of Chicago to treat what he believed was an outbreak of violence. His results were shocking: by implementing similar strategies to infectious disease containment and treatment, violent crime could be dramatically reduced. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ He joins me to discuss exactly that, explaining the research revealed in his book, _The End of Violence_ (UK version, US version), which argues that violence is a pathogen, a contagion, which we can eradicate through tried and tested methods. Gary walks us through the exact methods he and his team at Cure Violence Global has used around the world to inhibit violence, and we discuss the particularities of sexual violence, state violence, and the absolute necessity of understanding that the epidemic is truly a crisis of male violence. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/06/2026
Why our distinctness from one another is as important as our connections with each other
planetcritical.com
Why Individuals Matter
In 2022, the Nobel Prize in physics went to a team who proved that everything in the universe is "non-locally real" on a quantum level, meaning that reality is fundamentally relational. You can imagine this in different ways, that we are all one body or that there are invisible strands connecting all the bodies, holding us all together in a literal web of life. We’re not even, technically, separated by space on a quantum level; what happens over there is also always happening here. It is a beautiful proof of our enmeshment, out interrelationality, our absolute interdependence. It suggests there is no such thing as distinct beings, but rather a continuum of beingness to which we all belong and through which we all express aliveness. This is somewhat echoed in the environmental mantra that we are not separate from nature but _are_ nature. Environmental thinkers and writers have encouraged all of us to perceive that oneness with the wider world, and with each other, as a means of bypassing the culturally inculcated belief that human beings are somehow other or superior to the natural world, and that we as human beings live individual lives. Ecology shows us time and time again that nothing lives in a vacuum; that, to live, we must be inherently intertwined with one another. Eradicating the violence with which homo sapiens have eradicated our fellow species necessitates feeling into that intertwinement and recognising the edges that contain us are far more blurred than we imagine. And yet. And yet I see a new pattern of thought emerging from very recent literature which challenges this absolute collectivism and seeks to reinstate the individual as intrinsic, valuable, and _real._ Rather than swinging the pendulum back along the binary of collective vs individual, researchers and writers like Alyssa Battistoni and Melanie Challenger (whose episode is out in a few weeks) are gesturing towards a whole which includes, protects and affirms the necessary distinctness of each living being within the wider collective. For Challenger, prioritising the collective over the individual creates policies which forget the organism for the species, such as conservation approaches which only consider the macro rather than what is done to individual living bodies. For Battistoni, her formula for freedom hinges on the necessary interaction between the individual and the collective, an ambiguous space which produces the conditions for human choices to become meaningful. These women are pulling at a vital thread, and doing so in such a way which reconciles what has previously been considered a tension, forcing us to ideologically take up a position at either end and staunchly defend it. I have always found this quite difficult, as my romanticism for the biological world which has come to me over the years of doing Planet: Critical never quite usurped a libertarian streak which I prize dearly (and by libertarian I mean the original sense of the word which inferred that the individual should not be interfered with by government or other institutions). I am invested in the particularities of my own freedom, or sense of freedom, and have always taken great joy in expressing it in whatever absurdist way I can manage in a world which increasingly felt divested of choice. And yet, my body is but one of many, and my life but one of many, and I am wholly dependent on the great vehicle of aliveness which marches time on Earth forward. I did not feel that these two beliefs and interests were at odds within me—but, equally, I had never been forced to put them to the test, so to speak. I am indebted, then, to the work emerging now which weaves these two vantage points as interdependent necessities; a friction, a balance, through which life itself emerges. It is the very fact of our distinctness from each other which creates the possibility to be together. If we were not distinct; if our bodies did not hold their shape, or if all the molecules of every living thing were identical, and we existed as one great super structure, one great river, perhaps, then there would be no experience of being other than oneness. And how can life emerge from oneness? How can evolution occur without the possibility of chance encounters between distinct creatures? How can bodies and environments shape one another into difference in the dance of accidental genetic gardening? How would complexity emerge? And language? Art? If we were not somewhat contained within ourselves within the whole, and instead lived as the whole, would we have anything to say at all? The limitations of our physical forms—our genetic certainties, our defined edges, our inbuilt entropy—are what make the relationships we choose to create and nurture meaningful. We are indeed all interconnected ecologically, biologically, genetically, culturally, and even on a quantum level, but the very finiteness of each of our experience of being alive limits the choices available to us, which makes the interconnections we actively commit to matter all the more. Matter matters, and more than we give it credit for. It is the genesis of constraint and freedom, of dependence and independence, of sovereignty and belonging. Matter contains but one, and this inherent limitation is what allows each of us to feel the very many all around us, and, within everything, find our place. Every year, an idea catches my eye that takes up most of my intellectual headspace. There is something crucial about this individual within a collective formulation which I think chimes nicely with the work we've been exploring on this newsletter about reproductive labour and feminism over the past few months, and it's what I'll be chewing over in the months to come. Our political institutions are imploding thanks to their inability to reconcile what has long been portrayed as a negative tension of incompatible poles rather than a necessary tension which holds the shape of the world. Much of feminism's adherence, too, to the absolute sovereignty of the individual has failed to produce a theory of liberation for all people—let alone all beings. The fact that we are both separate and enmeshed, together and apart, that we must make room for possibility by not collapsing into certainty—these are the very conditions which produce life, but also the very ambiguity which produces discomfort. And yet, this is where meaning comes from: from our choices, as per Battistoni, and from the distinct boundaries of our sensory bodies which feel their way through the world, as Challenger argues. We cannot make meaning without being both one and just one, both together and distinct. We cannot find the edges of what is possible if the world loses its edges altogether. The very first time I drank ayahuasca, I was overcome with the sensation that we are all one. And then a question came to me: _Why are we not one big tree?_ Why did Life divide herself into many? Soon, the answer followed: _Life divided herself in order to love herself._ That lesson has stayed with me since, but now I find new language to affirm it, in tandem with Challenger and Battistoni. We are divided so that we may come together, so that we may choose to do so, and so that our being with one another may mean everything to each other. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 28/05/2026
Share:
planetcritical.com
Building an Eco-Civilisation | Jeremy Lent
Building an Eco-Civilisation | Jeremy Lent 0:00 /3632.579909 1× In an age of bad news, it is so important to remember that everything we need to remake the world is already with us. From how we produce food to how we organise our political systems, the solutions we need have long been developed and tested. What we need now is political will and community vision—and to hold onto the fact that everything is still worth fighting for. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser, download it or watch it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Acclaimed author and integrator Jeremy Lent has spent the past years researching a vital book which explores how we can reform and revolutionise our most critical sectors, from finance to agriculture, in order to build a true ecocivilisation. _Ecocivilization: Making a World that Works for All_(US version, UK version) is a hopeful testament to both our past and our future, illustrated with real-world examples throughout the ages which show time and time again just what we are capable of when we put our minds and hearts together. On this episode, Jeremy walks us through his research, emphasising that such reforms would transform our relationships with each other and the wider world. This is a beautiful conversation which explores how we create the conditions for live to thrive—today, tomorrow, and for the rest of time. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 25/05/2026
On becoming humus
planetcritical.com
For Goodness To Grow
One of my favourite moments from my favourite comedy special, _Nanette_ by Hannah Gadsby, is when she puts her art history degree to perfect use and dispels the myth of tortured genius artist. She tells the story of being berated by a fan for taking anti-depressants. This fan insisted that without the willingness of the great minds of our time to feel the depths of their very souls, and all its aches, we would not have great art. He tells Hannah: "If Vincent Van Gogh had taken medication, we wouldn't have had _The_ _Sunflowers_." She rapidly deconstructs this dangerous myth, explaining that Van Gogh _did_ medicate, and painted many portraits of the psychiatrists who were treating—and medicating—him, and that a slight overdose of the foxglove plant, from which his medications were derived, can make the patient experience the colour yellow "a little too intensely". But, more importantly—most importantly—Vincent Van Gogh had a brother who loved him, a brother who supported him both emotionally and financially throughout the artist's difficult career and painful existence in the world. Hannah calls this Van Gogh's "tether", his connection to the world that made being in it possible, and made his art possible, and made all our wonderment at what he produced possible. The Van Gogh works we know and cherish grew from his brother's labour and love. Somewhere in my first trimester of pregnancy, I decided—on no research—that I wanted us to use reusable nappies for our child. I was directly warned against this by some, whilst others offered a more subtle rebuttal: "I'll let you find out on your own." Wondrously naive about the requisite labour of baby toileting, I persevered with my insistence and, once I completed my research, believed I had made the right choice. The simple fact is that, in a cultural and economic system of convenience, speed and profit-maximisation, fulfilling good intentions often demands more labour. This, I am willing to take on; frankly, this is the labour of parenting under that very system. This budding personal concept of my little labours of love, to prepare for our child's arrival, has extended to making my own natural ingredient cleaning supplies, hours spent online looking for second-hand cotton clothes, and replacing all the plastic in our kitchen with glass. My partner, Robert, and I visited every single charity shop in the area a few weeks back and came home with a life's supply of mason jars and an armful of children's books. We have also split the research requirements of pregnancy and birth between us, selecting the topics and titles together before swapping notes afterwards. We share the intention of being very deliberate guardians and advocates for our daughter. That includes how we advocate for one another and for her before she arrives. In one of the more recent moments that someone giggled at my commitment to reusable nappies, and the endless cycle of washing and drying which accompanies that decision, a look was thrown across to Robert who, being the eldest of many, knows far better than I do how much work having a baby in the house truly is. He offered a conciliatory smile, but said that, in fact, it is his job to help facilitate this thing I want us to succeed at. Even though I know him to be this man already, I was still moved by the steadfastness of his support. His praxis is not to meet my every whim, but to throw the enormity of what he has to offer at the things I truly believe are important. This is why he was willing to hit the ground running with me in South America and learn how to be a filmmaker on the job, and why he is settling in my home country for the first year of our child's life. While the standards we hold one another to create an atmosphere of curiosity and questioning (and while he is indeed often forced to talk me out of my spontaneous hyper-fixations), he backs me to the hilt when it matters. In this way, my decisions are no longer my own; decisions are always ours, even if they originate from one of us. In the days since that conciliatory smile, I've been mulling over this alternative labour he performs, and how it absolutely undergirds the more obvious forms. What I mean by this is that without his willingness to facilitate this decision of ours that I insisted was important, my workload would have increased massively. Our dissonance would have bridled my ability to succeed. Either I would have been forced to labour alone or I would have had to give up my good intentions. The fact of the matter is that, particularly in a world which maximises profit and convenience above all else, our good intentions mean very little without the wider web of community around us to facilitate, nurture and manifest those good intentions. That web is like the humus of soil, filled with billions of creatures who create the conditions for a seed to germinate and sprout; it is invisible to the naked eye, but an absolute requisite for goodness to grow. A feminist recently pointed out online that the one thing most of history's "great minds" shared was that each of these men had a wife who laboured, invisibly. Her commitment to raising the children and taking care of the home facilitated his quest for greatness. Her hours spent producing the conditions of their family's reproduction allowed him to squirrel away his own time in an office behind a locked door. This was also how I wrote my own manuscript. Every day, for months, Robert pushed three home-cooked meals in front of my face, and edited the podcast, and made the films and read each draft—just so I could focus on this thing that felt most pressing, most important. I met every tight deadline because he met my every need during that time, his labour unknown to my global audience, my editor and my agent, but absolutely essential. He has been my humus. He will be a wonderful father to our daughter. I suppose I am left thinking about how two-dimensional my previous understanding of reproductive labour truly was. I was still caught in a neoliberal worldview, whereby I viewed each woman as labouring individually to produce the conditions for life to thrive in her private environment. Now, thanks to Robert, I understand how absolutely necessary it is that each individual be supported by the web of wider work if her good intentions are to manifest. Better yet: we must all be intimately supported by the web of life's labour throughout the ages so that our collective intentions may manifest. The work we do to survive together can never be done in isolation from each other, just as the work any organism does to survive cannot be achieved in a vacuum. Every commitment I make to doing things the harder way because it is ethically sound is a demand upon my web of support to work with me to achieve this. These demands of mine were previously silent. Now I know to vocalise them and to express deep gratitude for the willingness of those who hold me to also share my load. Conceiving our daughter was the promise to be what she needs for the rest of time. But, at the eleventh hour, with her arrival imminent, I wonder how I could have been so shallow as to fail to grasp that there is a world of good intentions beyond my own; that, before being a parent, all this time I could have been humus. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 21/05/2026
Learning from nature, through art
planetcritical.com
Remaking The World | David Farrier
POD David Farrier 0:00 /3012.771224 1× What is the role of art in any crisis? To understand what is and to imagine what could be; to transcend and birth and promise. This is the message of today's guest, David Farrier. David is a professor in literature and the environment at Edinburgh University, and the author of _Nature's Genius: Evolutions Lessons for a Changing Planet_(UK version, US version). He joins me to discuss poetry, literature, relationality, language and intelligence. In this wide-ranging and meditative conversation, we discuss how space and time are made between species, how the entire world is evolving with and through the crisis, and what we can learn from Nature herself to meet this moment exactly where we are. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ From the Enlightenment to whale song, this conversation explores just how critical art is in a moment of breakdown to be a vehicle for transformation, for transmutation, and, perhaps most importantly, daring—mirroring Nature's very own life force. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 18/05/2026
Watch the most recent talk I gave at the ACSCC in April
planetcritical.com
The F Word
Hi everyone, I've been knocked off my feet by a nasty bug this past week, and, because I'm pregnant, trying to ride it out the old-school way with lots of ginger, lemon, garlic and anything else non-pharmaceutical I can get my hands on (any tips welcome!) On top of that, the deadline for the final draft of my book is the close of today! So in lieu of a written newsletter here's a talk I gave a few weeks ago at the Amsterdam Complexity School for Climate Change. Regular readers will notice a few common themes in this talk: violence; the importance of our bodies; the notion of a reproductive economy; freedom. In many ways, this talk is a bit of a sneak peek at my forthcoming book! I hope you all enjoy it! Please let me know in the comments what you think. I also want to directly thank the members who took out annual subscriptions after my last call for support. It is a huge relief to feel that these emails reach you, and I am very grateful to be in community with you all. Thank you for being here, Rachel __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 14/05/2026
We can't change the world by voting with our wallets—but here's what we can do.
planetcritical.com
The Myth of Individual Responsibility | Michael Maniates
The Myth of Individual Responsibility | Michael Maniates 0:00 /2756.260884 1× What can we actually do if we want to achieve real change? We have been sold a comforting lie that our purchasing power is the best way to change the world. But rather than offer anything substantial, this lie promotes a myth of individual responsibility that actually inhibits the drastic structural change we desperately need. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Michael Maniates is an environmental social scientist working on issues of environmental governance, sustainable consumption, and sociotechnical change, and the author of _The Living Green Myth: the Promise and Limits of Lifestyle Environmentalism_ (UK version, US version). He joins me to discuss how we were sold that big green myth, how it relates to the global neoliberal overhaul of the role of markets in the 80s, how it frustrates structural change, and what we can do instead. He also reveals the social science on how people react when their attempts to change the world through this very process are repeatedly frustrated—and how this impedes future action. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
001
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 07/05/2026
The only liveable future is a feminist future—but only if we shape what feminism must become.
planetcritical.com
The Eco-Crisis is a Feminist Crisis | Natasha Walter
Feminism for a World on Fire | Natasha Walter 0:00 /3063.329705 1× The women's movement sprang into being in a different world. How must it adapt to meet the challenges we face today? Natasha Walter is a journalist, the founder of the Women for Refugee Women Charity, and the author of multiple books, including her most recent, _Feminism for a World on Fire_ (UK version and US version out today). In it, Natasha investigates the successes and weaknesses of the women's movement, taking a scalpel to the most recent decades of feminist thought and action and revealing how they have been shaped by neoliberalism. She joins me to discuss just that, explaining how our hyper individualist economy has created a feminist culture which is more invested in the individuals success than in structural change and collective liberation. From there, we discuss care as an organising principle, and why this feminist school of thought must be seeded in climate camps, from degrowth theory to mobilisation. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ We also explore the effects of a neoliberal feminism on young women around the world, many of whom are now turning their backs on the women's movement to instead pledge allegiance to "tradwives" and other typically patriarchal forms of social organisation. We ask: What is feminism failing to provide these young women? And what about the women's movement needs to change to confront and overcome the political, economic and ecological crises which threaten our very future? __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 04/05/2026
What we need to recover ourselves.
planetcritical.com
When the world "collapses"
The Scottish mining village I grew up in has a rich history, a rich history which has slowly eroded into a quiet poverty. The main street used to house a butcher, baker, village shop, and a post office. The rail track which runs parallel to the shore used to carry coal when I was a child, and, before that, passenger trains into the nearest big town. Underneath those rail tracks were tennis courts built for the miners, and in the woods just a five minute walk away was a public, outdoor swimming pool. I am just old enough to remember it being there, and then ripped away. Deep in the woods in the other direction lies the ruin of a tropical garden of a former manor house long since torn down. This tropical garden housed tropical fruits, made possible by a feat of engineering which used coal and large stones to heat the garden walls so that pineapple could easily grow. The miners rebuilt it in their own time and enjoyed the fruits of their labours for years. It is now overgrown, and those who remember what once grew there are elders who will soon pass. There are families in my village who have been here for generations. These elders speak of spending summers in the sea and on the beach as children. The beach is no more thanks to the power plant which the rain track runs to; the soot from the coal turned the shore into a different, muddy ecosystem well-loved by birds but not to be swum in by us. I know that when the villagers were still swimming in the sea, it stretched West in a straight line towards an ancient village where the houses are painted pink and yellow and orange. Now, the coastline curves South first, eating into the sea, a vast stretch of artificial land made by the pollution from the coal plant which locals call the ash lagoons. The miners had a tough job, tough enough to significantly shorten their lives. Yet, somehow, they found the time to maintain the community and negotiate for themselves. They enjoyed a wealth of social infrastructure in comparison to what is now here: a takeaway, a pub. I remember when the post office shut down over a decade ago, and recently discovered that the last remaining post office on this five mile stretch which connects multiple villages to the nearest town was shut down last year. It is almost impossible to imagine, now, that this small village was once a bustling, thriving, independent community. Learning the history as an adult has helped me imagine what it could one day be again. But so much of our social infrastructure has changed, making it that much harder for the residents today to live with one another. Put bluntly: they don't need to. The buses run much less frequently then when I was a child because everyone has a car. Each roof sports antennas for internet and television. One of my mother's neighbours even cut down their three tall, proud fir trees to get a better signal. Without a cohesive and advocating community, things have started to fall apart. The medical centre went without a doctor for a few years—and when someone eventually took the job, an African man with a young family, he was beaten by a group of racist thugs. The miners who would have taken it upon themselves to punish those teenage boys died some time ago. The doctor left. The community garden which was only christened just over a decade ago, and sprouted a kind group of villagers to chip in and tend the soil, grown food, and care for the trees, has fallen by the wayside as the volunteers age and no young folk are keen to step up and do the work of keeping it going. The village hall is on the brink of being sold by the council, which the community council is fighting desperately to stop. This dedicated contingent have multiple business plans for it. The problem, again, is the shortage of volunteers. On the bus into town as a teenager, I would watch the elders of the village gather near the front and chat away for the whole journey, easily remembering each other's lineage and history. The bus is quiet, now. There are no regular passengers except the teenagers who are not yet old enough to drive. They sit with their headphones in, as I did. As I often do now. I've been thinking about the future of the land that raised me recently, and chewing on what its potent history became, every time I come across articles talking about the collapse of our global civilisation, an event timeline which has been accelerated by Trump's illegal war on Iran. Every day, we're fielding warnings about jet fuel and fertiliser running out, about potential food shortages, supply chain breakdowns, an economic crash, and a financial reset which could spike inflation. Alongside that, the artificial intelligence industry is causing numerous white collar job losses, soaking up water and energy, and is threatening to create a permanent underclass. Factor in what has long been on course: resource scarcity, diminishing returns on energy and investment, global heating and biodiversity loss, the future looks frightening and collapse _feels_ inevitable. But when I look at where I come from, and how my resident ancestors lived compared to how the locals live today, I can't help but think so much has already collapsed, is sinking in on itself, weighed down by promises that cannot be kept, by visions devoid of empathy. And any spark of resistance is extinguished by complacency, convenience or fatigue. Things are not just collapsing because of the state of the world. They're collapsing because of the state of us. It is for this very reason I dislike the word "collapse" to describe what we are living through. As Luke Kemp details in _Goliath's Curse,_ residents of empires which history dictates were in collapse often did not realise themselves. Collapse is not a singular event but a protracted and painful decline, a slow erosion of what is and an erasure of what could be. It is experienced as a new normal for every generation who accept worse living conditions than their parents (the housing market is our greatest example of this, to my eyes: my mother's generation would never have accepted to pay hundreds of thousands for a boxy city apartment, but my own generation readily saddle themselves with lifelong debt just to get on the mysterious "property ladder", unaware it likely now leads to nowhere.) I am still yet to find the word I prefer to use instead of collapse, but I am coming closer to a definition. Empires always eventually give out, and while their death rattle is often painful it does not signal the end of human society. On the contrary, the death of great vehicles of inequality are often a good thing for the 99%. But before we accept their demise, in the decades or centuries that we still labour under the conviction that things cannot be as bad as they seem; before we help compost these great societies in favour of something else, these Empires thrash madly, desperately trying to reproduce themselves through more violent extraction, extreme tax rates, colonial land grabs and war. And in trying to reproduce themselves, they attack the very conditions that their residents, the very life-blood of Empire, need to reproduce themselves. Dying empires undermine the very conditions that life needs to thrive. That is the pain we are all experiencing today. It is why the miners had tennis courts and swimming pools and a butcher and a baker and a shop and a post office, and why the village I come from seems, today, poor in comparison. We have been robbed. And we let it happen. Indigenous wisdom warns against thinking in event horizons and instead impels us to consider the great physiological web that cocoons and shields us first: collapse is not the sudden drop on a graph, or midnight on a doomsday clock, or a binary comparison between then and now and then again. Collapse is the gradual and subtle erosion of our social fertility, of our ability to live well together where we are. Like soil erosion, this erosion first sweeps away the top soil, exposing the roots of a place to the elements, undermining their ability to dig in deeper and hold on, rendering them vulnerable to change, to shock, to loss; making dust of our bonds. In the great neoliberal fantasy of Thatcher and Reagan, we have been eroded to that dust, swirling around each other as independent motes of impotence. It is not the world that will collapse but we who have been undone, and our great, invisible undoing over the many centuries in which capitalist values have dug themselves into our bodies and wrenched us apart from one another have shepherded the great undoing of the world upon which we depend, a great interlinking of the many worlds we once inhabited and cared for, as human beings have always done. Human beings secured themselves throughout history where our hominid cousins failed because we figured out how to produce the conditions for life to thrive. We gardened our way across the world, making living pathways for our kinfolk to follow. That green thumb is our living inheritance, but in so many places around the world it has become nothing more than a fossil. We cannot recover ourselves until we recover it, until we recover this way of being. I had the great fortune of bumping into one of my former interviewees last week at the Amsterdam Complexity School on Climate Change. We talked late into the evening about mobilisation and what needs to be done in the coming years. She told me that increasingly, for her, the crisis is not climate, scientific, or even political. It is a crisis of values, of the spirit; a rot at the heart of us which cannot sidestep or ignore, but which must be reckoned with with all of our strength and courage. Then she showed me pictures of her garden and the wonderful array of life she has devoted this spring to, and how that devotion is already reaping reward as the shoots of new growth reach towards the sky, towards her. Flicking through them, I thought to myself: _This is how we dig out the rot._ My mother called me about a month ago to tell me a village shop has just reopened, offering fresh produce, locally-sourced products, home-baked goods and, of course, coffee. She was so thrilled. It has been decades since the villagers had anywhere to sit and chat, or even to simply bump into one another. Visiting it was the very first thing I did on a trip back, and I smiled joyfully when another customer explained she had just left lunch bubbling on the stove and was nipping in to buy eggs. I returned every day, trying to show my support for this small venture which promises so much to a village that had almost forgotten its history. I sit by the window and watch the villagers dart in and out, like birds surrounding a feeder. They greet each other warmly, they swap tales when they have the time, they offer advice if they can. Something has begun on the land which raised me; a piece of infrastructure has been planted around which we can reseed and regrow, reaching for the sky, for each other. * * * _Dear community, I'll be taking maternity leave soon for a few months. We're working hard to make sure that Planet: Critical will keep running in the time I'm away (more on that soon). I am understandably nervous about being away from this website when it is my family's livelihood, so if you find value in Planet: Critical and have the means please_ show your support with an annual membership_._ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 30/04/2026
Learning to be—together.
planetcritical.com
Deep Ecology | John Seed
Deep Ecology | John Seed 0:00 /2571.477234 1× We don't need more ecological ideas, we need ecological selves. That's the message of this week's guest, John Seed, a longtime environmental activist who has been instrumental to the Deep Ecology movement. John joins me to explain exactly what Deep Ecology can offer us—a sense of place, time and connection in a world coming apart. He walks us through the philosophy and multiple exercises, revealing how our coming together with the world around us can also help us come together as people—to grieve, to love, to be. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or watch it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ This a beautiful, resonant and poetic episode, with John's wisdom and humility blooming forth to offer a vision which neither despairs nor denies, but is instead devoted to truths that surpass humans alone and encircle all of us, each of us, in this great web of life, to be held and to hold, even for just a moment. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
141
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/04/2026
On land, loss and peace
planetcritical.com
Oil and Vinegar
_Red Skins, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition_ is both a theoretical and practical investigation into how the recognition by settler states of indigenous populations as cultural bodies, often granted through land rights, has actually served to undermine their political identities and capabilities. Using his own people based in the Northern territories of Canada as an example, Dene-Canadian scholar Glen Sean Coulthard argues that the provision of land rights has come with such stringent conditions to deliberately neuter the possibility of a different political practice on that land, and thus that "recognition" as a goal has actually resulted in indigenous groups becoming identified by and with the settler state—the very thing which is the original source of their dispossession. He calls instead, like Fanon, for a turning away, and warns against recognition as a salve for wounds that can only be healed through self determination and autonomy, both of which are precluded by the deals the Canadian government made. It's a fascinating read, particularly when he gives the history of how Canada dismantled the possibility of any anti-capitalist economies or self-determining political bodies in exchange for the land his people sought. The very story of the Dene, and Canada's indigenous groups more broadly, warns that "the land" is not some magical portal through which we can step through by some great return into other worlds. The land is identified very clearly by the Dene as a kind of teacher, as a relational practice which informs human political projects, but which must be _practiced_. My reading of this in Coulthard's text is that the land is as much form as it is place, and that form can lose its shape even if the geographical contours hold. The land cannot save us unless it is permitted to shape us: > "Indigenous struggles against capitalist imperialism are best understood as struggles oriented around the question of _land_ —struggles not only _for_ land, but also deeply _informed_ by what the land as a mode of reciprocal _relationship_ (which is itself informed by place-based practices and associated form of knowledge) ought to teach us about living our lives in relation to one another and our surroundings in a respectful, nondominating and nonexploitative way." This made me think of my interview with regenerative farmer Kara Huntermoon when she dismissed the romanticism of urbanised populations spilling out into the country to recover the land. Kara rightly highlighted that this would likely be disastrous and harmful to the land, for our populations would be completely ignorant as to how to care for the it, let alone produce food from it. At the time I thought about this in a practical sense, about our collective lack of skills and practical knowledge with regards to how the land functions. But reading Coulthard, I began to understand it as an ontological problem, and imagine that great return as a mismatched transplant, like two bodies with incompatible blood groups fused together. All creatures come to learn how to live in the environment they find themselves, and human beings are no different. The knowledge we have lost, along with the skills, has created a global culture which is wildly inappropriate for a land-based society. That culture is also globally applicable, whereas land-based societies are culturally localised, informed, as Coulthard says, by where they are. Modern humans have been dislocated from that sense of place, not only through our disconnection from the land but also the fact that the technologies upon which we depend _can_ be transplanted with us. I have lived in six different countries _because_ I do not depend on the land to live, _because_ my culture is not informed by where it is, but rather informs what it lands upon. This creates a culture which is unreal, or dissociated, something akin to an extended PTSD attack. I thought about this very phenomenon recently reading CNN's explosive investigation into online "rape academies"—channels in which thousands of men educate one another on how to drug and rape their wives. Many of these men film themselves raping their wives, and sell these videos to other users, or upload them to internet sites willing to host such content. One such site received 62 million visits in the month of February alone. The story has inflamed the internet, as it should, with outpourings of rage, despair and confusion: _How could someone do this?_ When I think about my culture — imperialism, extractivism, capitalism — informing whatever land it lands on, rather than being informed by it, I readily think about how that extends to our own bodies. Particularly women's bodies. This is part of the thesis of my upcoming book. When we abuse the body of the Earth, we create the conditions for the abuse of women. Women become reduced to their female form, a body understood as a vehicle for the fulfilment of desire. In a culture of mass objectification, the deliberate dislocation of body and person—of land and culture—makes every body a slate upon which desire can be projected—even the body of the woman you have vowed to love and cherish. We cannot expect extractivism to only inform how we perceive the body of the Earth. It inflects our relationships with one another, and informs how we behave when we cross the threshold into our homes, the small piece of land that we each rule, as kings. We know what happens to a people when they are removed from their land. But what happens to their culture? It cannot be maintained without practice, without relationship. It cannot exist separate to those who materialise it, without the soil and the flesh and the imaginations. In the Kimberley, the Aboriginal people we spent time with spoke of how the spirits out on country were dying, now that the people had been moved off. They were not simply dormant myths that could be reawakened if and when the time comes, but beings which need, as much as the next creature, to live _with_ in order to live. Their spirits to them are as real as their elders, as their children. I believe them, for our cultures are as real to us as our own flesh. Their culture, what they call law, is dying without them. The land is weakening without them. They are weakening without both country and law. The three cannot be disentangled, cannot be disassociated, not unless one submits to existing in a fugue state. This is how I would describe many of the Aboriginal settlements in the Kimberley: off country, law begins to break down, to disintegrate, to become formless under the pressure of that other culture—my culture—which makes no distinction as to where it is. Similar tragedies scar the reservations in the United States and Canada. Land rights have not returned the law, and the elders we spoke with were very firm that this alone cannot heal their communities. They said that their people cannot simply go back to how things were, but neither can they move forward with the current state of Aboriginal-Australian relations. The only way they envisioned moving forward was the combination of spending time on country _and_ keeping law alive off country, a task they were finding incredibly difficult because of the influence of the settler-state. I remember being surprised, when speaking to them, that they did not envision a future in which their people would live on country full-time again. Their wisdom outshone my comprehension at the time. Their law had developed over 50,000 years of being on country. It did not sprout from the land fully formed and, as such, the land cannot guarantee them a cultural renaissance. Their world cannot share a border fence with the settler state. Land, too, is changed by loss. I wonder what this means for Palestine, for Iran, for the people of Sudan, and West Papua. When fresh borders cut into open wounds, what hope is there of peace? What has to be lost for a people to be let be? Which parts of themselves must they amputate in order to be allowed to live? And how can any negotiation ever be understood as "recognition" or "rights" or "peace talks"? The settler-state is as much cultural as it is material, and it lives in each of us, imprinting upon its environment without a care for the coordinates, for the particularities, for the roots. It refuses to be informed by where it is, and by who lives there. And so, it cannot change, it cannot grow, it cannot become anything other than what it is: a plague, a scourge, a spectre, a missile. This is not a thing with which one can share a border. The world is made of oil and vinegar. It cannot hold its shape if it cannot shape us, too. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
010
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 23/04/2026
Share:
planetcritical.com
The Truly Sustainable Alternative | Julia Steinberger
The Truly Sustainable Alternative | Julia Steinberger 0:00 /2951.902857 1× A flourishing human society doesn't have to cost the earth. In fact, our wellbeing and Earth's wellbeing hinge on the same thing: reducing inequality. Julia Steinberger is a renowned degrowth scholar at the University of Lausanne where she and her colleagues recently produced Living Well Within Limits, which shows there is no tension between human and ecological flourishing. Julia joins me to explain their award-winning research in this exciting and hopeful episode. To reduce our pressure on the planet and to improve our wellbeing, we simply need more public services. This would reduce our material footprints, energy footprints, and, of course, societal inequality. This is not a vision which has room for billionaires and autocrats. But by getting rid of them, we have room for all 8 billion of us—on a healthy, regenerating planet. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or watch it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
021
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 16/04/2026
These technologists promise revolution—but not the kind any of us want to see. 
planetcritical.com
Tech Titans Won't Save Us | Paris Marx
Tech Titans Won't Save Us | Paris Marx 0:00 /3239.001882 1× Silicon Valley's robotic grip on the world is destroying our social fabric. "Artificial intelligence" models are now baked into our militaries, economies and political institutions—without there being a clear benefit yet as to why. a.i. is behind the indiscriminate attacks on civilian lives in Gaza and Iran, has encouraged users to commit suicide in the United States, and helped one Canadian plan the worst mass shooting in recent history. Despite the risks to us and the planet, the incredibly wealthy individuals pushing our dystopia insist its for our own benefit, while cementing their political and financial power. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or watch it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Paris Marx is one of the most vocal tech critics in the Minority World, challenging the techno-capitalist hegemony on his podcast Tech Won't Save Us, his newsletter Disconnect, and his first book, Road To Nowhere_._ He joins me to explain the deepening relationship between the tech industry and the military, who and what is being sacrificed in the pursuit of "artificial intelligence", and Silicon Valley's disturbing vision for our future. These technologists promise revolution—but not the kind any of us want to see. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
020
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 13/04/2026
We can't tear down the conditions of our oppression because we don't know who we would be without them.
planetcritical.com
Revolutionary Impotence
At the end of Kurt Vonnegut's first novel, _Player Piano_ , the residents of the world's first fully automated utopia—in which machines perform humanity's every service, making work redundant and liberating their time—organise a national riot and trash the machines. But the book does not end there. As the organisers of the riot wander the streets in the aftermath, having decided to turn themselves in, they notice that on every corner people have gathered to repair those very machines. What begins as a triumphant scene resisting the material conditions of what turns out to be a dystopia ends in a quiet defeatism with humanity scrambling around in the dust to piece themselves back together. Discussing this book over lunch last week, I was reminded of Frantz Fanon's theory of the politics of recognition. An Algerian revolutionary and psychiatrist, who ended up advocating for violence as a mode of cleansing the colonised subject of the self-worthlessness mandated by the settler state, Fanon argued that this psychological dimension of oppression was as important as the material conditions of oppression, and that both had to be attacked and dismantled in order for a colonised people to fully emancipate themselves and achieve self-determination. He insisted the psychological element of this battle could only be done through turning away from relations with the settler-state, and back towards their cultural roots and practices, rather than integrating with it, for integration, he argued, inherently legitimised the very thing which dispossessed entire cultures and peoples of their right to exist as they are. Looking to that very vehicle of violence for emancipation only reproduced the conditions of oppression, if through a more subtle and insidious manner. Ultimately, Fanon did not believe that any colonised people could achieve their self-determination through _recognition,_ through becoming subjects of the state. Vonnegut's characters are not a colonised people. But they are the descendants of colonised people, even if that violation is mostly lost to history. Their lives of luxury are built upon the loss of a culture that can never be recovered. This becomes more evident with every passing day, as the horizon of freedom greets them with each dawn, a horizon they can neither reach nor escape. The citizens of this utopia have no idea how to fill their time now that it is unlimited and they are freed from the pressures and constraints of modernity. Rather than create a society of pure luxury and creativity, they begin to disintegrate under their unbearable lightness of being; there are no anchors in this new life for the very relationship which dominated their existence, their ancestors' existence, and erased their culture from the face of the earth—their social contract with the state—has ceased to exist. So why does Vonnegut have them repair the machines? Why not destroy the automated society and return to what was? I believe the great tragedy Vonnegut reveals in these final few pages is that there is no going back, whether we like it or not. There is no return to what was before because what was no longer exists. There is only what is, and what can be. Even Fanon does not advocate for a great return, but a turning away, a turning inwards. We cannot undo the violence of colonialism but Fanon suggests we can free ourselves from continued oppression by discovering a subjectivity that exists outside of settler-state, one a colonised people create together, through sharing and remembering and discovering what it is their ancestors decided to be, and what it is they decide to be. But Vonnegut's characters have no memories or practices to turn to. Whether enslaved or indentured or "liberated", their sense of identity is rooted in their relationship with the state. They are its subjects, and nothing else, and, because of this, any attack on the material conditions of their alienation cannot result in revolution; they are dependent on the very machines they despise for furnishing them with lives they fail to imagine could be otherwise. They repair them because it gives them something to do; they repair them because nothing else can be done. They have already become subjects of the automated state and, without any other cultural imaginary to hold onto, there is quite literally nothing they can do to be anything else. I think reading Vonnegut's novel like this helps explain the revolutionary impotence that afflicts the Minority World: _we don't know what we want because we don't imagine who we could be._ Most of us are the descendants of a culture long lost to history and our cultural identity is intimately wrapped up in our relationship with the state and the economy. Life is a series of individual achievements: graduating, working, earning, home ownership, marrying, parenting, vacationing, winning, retiring. We climb and we climb but there is nowhere to go. Those at the very top of our capitalist culture—the billionaires—break things down just to repair them because, like us, they are desperate for something to do. There is no emancipation from the treadmill because without it we would have to dictate our own direction and desires. Freedom would snap at our heels demanding so much more of us than the grind we submit to. If we reject the subjectivity of the culture we are born into—if we reject the state and the capitalist economy and all of the markers of success they validate us with—then we have to do the hard work of discovering who we want to be in the world. Turning away, without a culture, does not guarantee success. On the contrary, most turn away and towards another culture, costuming themselves as those who have rejected that they were born into but still have yet to find where they belong. They "reject the system" by picking and choosing spiritual practices and foreign pitstops and indigenous medicines, becoming caricatures of the very exploitative culture they seek to escape. They devote themselves to particular practices—like practising yoga for eight hours a day—but struggle to create the material conditions to live their lives because their single-minded devotion leaves little room for the culture into which that practice is woven, a culture which exists to sustain a collective. Sometimes people do turn inwards—but the buck stops with them. This is the "liberal feminism" that Natasha Walter discusses on the show in a few week's time, a politics of progress that hinges on self actualisation rather than collective liberation. It is the culture of self-care and self-protectionism that is particularly widespread among the youth. In my generation, it often appears as fitness culture, and the adamant insistence that you can change your entire world simply by changing yourself. These micro-cultures promote a delusional self belief that insists that the only world that can truly affect you is your internal one, effectively legitimising the material conditions of our existence by rendering them altogether invisible. We are suffering from revolutionary impotence because the continuity of the state is assumed. We are suffering from revolutionary impotence because we cannot reproduce ourselves without the state. We are suffering from revolutionary impotence because don't know the way forwards. We are suffering from revolutionary impotence because we cannot go back. We are suffering from revolutionary impotence because there is nothing left to turn towards. So what can we do? Fanon's dual-pronged theory for creating the successful conditions of revolution should give us pause. Rather than provoke anxiety about the dire state of our impotence, I think it offers an exhilarating avenue to imagine and deploy a localised activism which seeks to regenerate cultures and inter-subjectivity which do not depend on the state or capitalist development for validation. This work is already happening around the UK. Sometimes it takes the form of reawakening the Pagan ceremonies which banned by the Church hundreds of years ago. But it need not be as esoteric as this. The very creation of mutual aid networks and community gardens and collective home-schooling and numerous other initiatives up and down the country are a turning towards _each other_ and the revival of a lost culture. Such a culture cannot be built on practices alone, but the more we deepen our ties to one another—the more we fortify our relationships—the more possibilities will emerge as to how we can organise our lives differently and, from there, culture springs forth. For culture does not come into being through mandates. It emerges, winking, between us. Yet perhaps the most important thing we can do is return to the source of all culture: the land. We must recover and reclaim and rewild, for it is the particularities of where we are which must always define the limits of who we can be, and thus what we can achieve together. Learning the rains and the winds and the movements of the moon, and the bird song and the flower names and the way the grasses ripple like water, this great turning towards the land is actually a turning towards humanity everywhere, for this is what we all shared for the vast majority of human existence: a knowing how to be where we are. We cannot know what to do with ourselves if we do not know how to be where we are, for culture is nothing more and nothing less than a great cycling of information between where we are, what we do because of where we are, and who we become in doing so. The wheel of history is that cycle in motion, blurring until its progress looks unbroken; until today. If we do not lay the groundwork then revolutionary impulses slip away, leaving us repair what we smashed up and rebuild what we tore down. There must be something to turn towards before we turn away. That work begins today, and continues every day; when we reach out, we reach beyond the limits of what is and graze the surface of what may yet be, who we may yet become. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 09/04/2026
Share:
planetcritical.com
How Finance Ruined Capitalism | Hettie O'Brien
How Finance Ruined Capitalism | Hettie O'Brien 0:00 /3115.497914 1× Capitalism was envisioned—and is still defended—as a vehicle for growth. This growth was meant to increase everyone's share of the pie. But one of the most opaque and unregulated finance sectors got its fingers into that pie—and built a mechanism to extract wealth from the very companies, public services and infrastructure it buys. 🎧 __You can listen to the episode on your podcast app, in your browser,__ download__it or__ watch__it on Youtube (where automatic subtitles are provided).__ Welcome the the world of private equity, a shadow fleet of financial vehicles which are buying up our homes, schools, nurseries, roads, technology and everything in between—and yet that we know very little about. Journalist Hettie O'Brien, author of the newly released _The Asset Class: How Private Equity Turned Capitalism Against Itself_ , joins me to expose just how wide the influence of this crooked sector is, explaining how over the past few decades private equity has undermined democracy, caused avoidable deaths in care homes, lobbied—and secured—access to our pensions, and has driven economic stagnation. Crucially, private equity does not create value—it extracts it, with no thought for the consequences which are offset onto the rest of us while the super rich get even richer off of our misfortune. Get the UK version of The Asset Class today, or pre-order the USA version here. __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
000
Planet: Critical @rachel.www.planetcritical.com.ap.brid.gy · 06/04/2026
Lessons from the 20th and 22nd century.
planetcritical.com
Everything could have been so different. One day it will be.
The oil and economic crisis provoked by Trump's assault on Iran and the Iranian regime's strategic closure of the Strait of Hormuz is only going to get worse over the coming months. Prices are going to keep climbing and stockpiles are going to keep dwindling. Australia has less than one month's worth of fuel left; Asian countries are limiting how much consumers can buy at the pump; prices in Pakistan have rocketed 90-odd per cent; and Europe is going to face a summer of discontent as jet fuel shortages necessitate waves of cancellations. No matter if Trump and Iran reach a deal in the next few weeks—which looks increasingly unlikely given Iran's upper hand has the world in a chokehold—the seismic effects of this war will cause global seizures for months to come. What is so deeply frustrating about our exposed vulnerabilities—which _will_ translate into lives lost, worsening economic inequality, and more dangerous gender relations for vulnerable women around the world—is that these vulnerabilities have been artificially maintained at the behest of a handful of governments and industries. The world could have been so different had the democratic and socialist momentum of the post-war period not been deliberately undercut by the Minority World's refusal to share power. In the 1950s, a wave of socialist movements was revolutionising politics across Africa and Asia, two continents brought together by the first democratically-elected leader of newly independent Indonesia, Sukarno. As Vincent Bevins details in his phenomenal book, _The Jakarta Method,_ socialist leaders from both continents held an annual conference to deepen their ties and promote a unified vision of global socialism which would liberate the world from the inequalities and vulnerabilities provoked by capitalism. That dream was lynched by the CIA. Similarly imperfect but daring dreams of revolutionising the raison d'être of states were sweeping the Middle East, with newly-elected leaders nationalising their oil supplies to invest in public infrastructure, including education. Critical to their sovereignty was chasing out the vampiric European oil companies who had sucked their political power dry for decades. The Brits and their allies did their best to undermine these revolutions, keeping the flow of goods which should have been reserved for national development throwing through a global capitalist market. And lest we forget the anti-imperialist movement of Latin America which, despite its many coups and Western interventions, continues to default to a strident Leftist platform. Socialism isn't the only future that was ripped from us. National nuclear programs were cut all over the world in the 90s, leaving us dependent on non-local fuel sources and geopolitical calm. The inventor of solar panels was kidnapped in 1909, leading to his business shutting down, which stalled the technology's growth by 40 years. Pedestrianised city centres were ripped up to make way for private vehicles at the behest of automobile companies financing American politics. Fair tax rates which took up to 90% from the very wealthiest were only scrapped under Reagan. Countries like West Papua were promised their independence only to have it stolen away. Next week I'm releasing an episode with Julia Steinberger who explains that the most critical component of reducing our global energy and material footprints is the provision of public services. Had these socialist dreams been simply allowed to come to fruition, rather than cut off at the knees for daring to interfere with capitalist hegemony, it's very likely we would be living in a less material and energy intensive world today. A world of public luxury and private sufficiency was well within grasp, powered by whatever resources made the most sense for each localised context, be it nuclear, solar, wind, or fossil fuels. Land reforms which would have returned the commons to the people could have produced a global food supply independent of fertiliser whilst reducing economic precarity. Knowledge and technology could have been developed through open-source channels and shared widely. And it is highly likely the planet would have been better-off for our collective socialism because economic inequality drives environmental degradation. The world could have been so different, and we in such a better position today, had the public desire for better standards, fairer distribution and practical technologies been allowed to come to fruition. We would not be so vulnerable today to the whims of despots, billionaires and religious fanatics. Perhaps they wouldn't even exist; the waves of terror they unleash upon the world would certainly have smaller impacts. I do not believe in the narrative of progress but what we do see time and time again throughout history is the people's willingness to fight for their freedom and dignity and sovereignty—and a convulsion of powerful forces to arrest that development. I don't find this history depressing. I find it invigorating. We have been so close, so many times, to fundamentally changing the political DNA of our global hegemony, and our collective vision has barely changed across the ages: we want to eradicate inequality and improve our standards of living whilst contributing something to the world. The fight today to protect ourselves and our kinfolk from the worst of the eco-crisis is merely the most recent iteration of a battle between the haves and the have-nots since the dawn of modern states. That battle's progression has not been linear by any means, but the spirit and conviction by which it has been fought has not changed. Those powerful forces never cease convulsing to arrest us because we never cease to throw ourselves headlong at the horizon of history and dare it to expand. We may not see, in our lifetimes, the kind of revolution which will liberate each and every one of us from the violence by which mass inequality is maintained. But that is not the point. The point is where you choose to push back, with all your might, so that in fifty, seventy, one hundred years, the children of that dawn can know that resistance is their inheritance, and new worlds are always possible, because look, look, we were so close, so close not very long ago. * * * _Do you know something about a particular piece of history or technology that was lost to these powerful forces and want to riff on this piece? Feel free to write it up for the_ Commons section_of the website I tentatively launched a few weeks ago. Currently open to paid subscribers only._ __Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis. It is ad-free, paywall-free and 100% reader-supported. To show your support, leave a__ one-off tip__. or become a paying supporter.__ Sign up Share this article: X | Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit | Email Social Share Buttons Share:
011