Sign in

Tony Cookson

@profcookson.bsky.social
1.9K followers 98 following 30 posts

Professor of Finance at CU Boulder. Likes academic research and interesting other insights. Husband, father of two.

PostsRepliesMedia
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 29/03/2025
New working paper “Immigration and credit in America” with Ben Guttman-Kenney and Will Mullins. Abstract screenshot attached and download link available here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... If you have thoughts, we would appreciate hearing them.
020
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 20/12/2024
011
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
The discrete choice model allows us to perform a counterfactual without coverage neglect -- i.e., what if consumers efficiently shopped by $/coverage? We estimate this would improve welfare by $290, on average, per year (or about 10% of annual premiums).
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
Why do consumers neglect coverage? 1) it is tough to know what total loss limit is "full" coverage (rebuild cost isn't home price). 2) even with dueling insurance quotes, it is tough to compare policies w different total loss limits. We think information provision could help.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
And, that's what we find (see column 3): * Consumers respond significantly to lower headline premiums in their insurance choice. * They are less responsive (and in the opposite direction) to the $/coverage price schedule.
110
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
In the last part of the paper, we test for and quantify the coverage neglect mechanism using a discrete choice model. The idea is that a rational consumer would compare cost per coverage, but a coverage neglected one would only respond to headline premium.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
Does underinsurance matter? Yes! For about 1000 total losses, we find that being more underinsured makes it less likely the household rebuilds and more likely they sell. Here, we're instrumenting for coverage choice using insurer average coverage ratio (leave one out).
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
What it is not 3: We find evidence against adverse selection on Wood Frame houses, which are *wayy* more likely to be a total loss, but are somehow not priced more expensively. Homeowners do not buy more coverage for such houses.
110
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
What it is not 2: Underinsurance is only weakly connected to having a mortgage or the mortgage's loan-to-value at the time of the fire.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
What it is not 1: Underinsurance is *not* because policies get out of date. If anything, older policies are better insured. We can see this because we observe contracts at inception and as of the date of the Marshall Fire (Dec 31, 2021).
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
Finding 3: Underinsurance varies *a lot* across insurers operating in the same market, and policyholder characteristics do not explain this variation very much. The flip of this? Underinsured households could have gone with an insurer who would have provided fuller insurance.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
Finding 2: Underinsurance is *pervasive* across household characteristics: income, credit score, and home value. High income folks are better insured. There's also a negative correlation to home values, but still most groups are underinsured.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
So, what do we find? Finding 1: Underinsurance is *severe and common*... 75% of households are underinsured, and 37% are what we call *severely underinsured* -- i.e., only insured for 75% or less of their home's rebuild cost.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
Our paper relies on detailed insurance contract data, matched to household-level information from a major credit bureau, housing characteristics, and after a major wildfire, recovery outcomes. Because of that wildfire, we also have accurate rebuild cost estimates.
100
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
🚨 New working paper! 🦶 "Coverage neglect in homeowners insurance" with Emily Gallagher and Phil Mulder Link: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... We study the problem of why people underinsure against total losses, a pressing issue as climate events make these more common. #EconSky
1103
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
Happy 20th Birthday, FRA! 2004-2024
060
Tony Cookson @profcookson.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Happy to see my review paper, "Social Media and Finance" (with Will Mullins and Marina Niessner) published today at the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (oxfordre.com/economics/pa...). We learned a lot doing this review. Ungated version here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
0100