iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Es ist unbegreiflich wie delusional euer Verein ist... meine Fresse.

000

Was soll das überhaupt bedeuten hier? Illegale abschieben ist noch nicht Rechtsextrem. Algemein ist es nicht rechtsextrem nicht deutsche Staatsbürger eines Landes zu verweisen. Es gibt so viele Punkte in der Politik neben diesen, aber die sind jetzt egal oder was?

100

Es gibt ein wenig mehr als nur 'Migration und Russland'. Habt ihr Affen mal Karl Marx gelesen?? Der spricht sich auch für die abschiebung von Ausländern im Kommunistischen Manifest zum Schutz der einheimischen Arbeiter aus. Oder ist Marx jetzt Rechtsextrem????

200

Es ist aber ein verbrechen bis vor die afrikanische Küste zu schippern, dort Flüchtlinge aufzugabeln und dann meilen weit weg bis nach Europa zu transportieren anstatt sie direkt zum nächst möglichen Hafen zu bringen. Das nennt man dann 'Schlepperei'

000

"Demokratischen Sozalismis" euer Verein ist einfach nur abscheulich. Wenn es nach mir ginge würdet ihr und der restliche Linke Haufen aus dem Bundestag verbannt werden. Jede Partei die fundamentale Reche wie Eigentum auch nur in erwägung zieht anzutasten gehört schlichtweg verboten.

000

Leute die auch nur ein stück rechts der Mitte sind werden täglich beleidigt, bedroht, verlieren ihren Job, werden zusammengeschlagen, Ausgegrenzt etc. Und eure Leute? Tja, the bezeichnen halt alles als Rechtsextrem was sie nicht toll finden, oder etwa nicht?

300

Fenix Dust @fenixdust.bsky.social · 03/10/2023

"Rechsextreme Propaganda Plattform" bedeutet für euch einfach nur alles Rechts von Stalin.

000

Reposted by Yang Chuan

Archidian diplomat lady

0195

Reposted by Yang Chuan

Fenix Dust @fenixdust.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

Archidian warship

0204

Yang Chuan @primax.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

You have 15 followers but you are the most blocked person says a lot about this platform

020

Yeah, I read it and as I mentioned on twitter, I gave you a more detailed explanation. (That was me too, wanted to see the full context)

100

Government does zoning and heavily subsidizes subprime loans causing market crashes < literally late stage capitalism Why is everyone on this platform economically illiterate? I don't know, but it's obvious

000

People voluntarily making video game content < literally exploitation!1!!! When I make a minecraft mod and don't get paid for it, am I exploited too???

000

Literally not what he or anyone ever said. Where do you read that???

110

Yeah... also far from reality. Many Billionaires regularly exploit government power to get special treatments and effectively gain power over other peoples property. That is literally the opposite of capitalism Also delusional, there are more then enough rich people who want to dismantle capitalism

100

So what actually happens here is that government failed. Artificially lowered interest rates, subsidies which leads to over- and underproduction in certain areas and regulations which made the expansion of different industries exponentially harder

000

Airlines got heavily destroyed duo to the patriot act and because of protectionist policies (that also includes shipyards and water based trade in general) And then there would be retirement which is nationalized since the "war on poverty" started (fun fact: It increased poverty)

100

College also never had been more expansive then today, as well as more subsidized. The collage loan system even got nationalized too, which lead to a skyrocketing of tuition fees.

100

No it isn't. It's government intervention and regulation destroying it. Subsidies are also a huge part of that. The government has increased healthcare costs for centuries, the mass transit got nationalized partly and also destroyed doing the panic of 1893 as a result of subsidization

100

Government taking over other countries and destroying private property in foreign nation is a lot, but not capitalism. Like I said, they destroy private property and even take it over, from foreigners. Capitalism is the protection of that very private property.

000

You kinda obsessed it seems lmao

000

Again... you feel strong about one thing that aligns with one party more, you might vote for that party as a liberal. That doesn't mean that the issue itself is liberal, even reps have liberal stuff and liberals conservative stuff in their portfolio

000

Oh man... this is not about political party believes. Again, I talk about political affiliation of individuals. I don't care what you think about the reps, nor is it part of this discussion. My statement is most young people are moderate and not overwhelmingly liberal.

100

That was an example of why "what someone votes" doesn't automatically mean they agree with everything they stand for. Just the issues they feel very strongly about. Is that hard to understand? And I honestly don't mean that in a rude way.

000

I don't know, anyways. Most of the questions aren't liberal. Believing in climate change and wanting background checks aren't liberal, they are pretty much moderate. And we can see very well that the total tends to the moderates

100

But here is an example; Imagine you're a moderate but very strongly pro abortion. What would you vote?

100

Same response bsky.app/profile/prim...

100

Voting and political self identification are different. Someone can be a moderate but feel very strongly about a certain issue and vote accordingly. I had to explain that now several times. www.linkedin.com/pulse/young-...

100

Ahh here is something a bit better. This includes both genders www.linkedin.com/pulse/young-...

000

So maybe Zack should read his own screenshot

100

Moderates can vote democrats too. I'm also not sure if that excludes non-voters, because the eagerness to vote can affect that number as well

100

I already got through this. Okay fair, the majority of young men and taking woman into account might balance that more out. But the statement "overwhelming majority" is just inaccurate. And no, what people vote does not directly correlate with believes.

100

What do you expect me to do? I now had a few conversations, most of them I started a lot nicer and guess what, they turned out exactly the same way.

100

He made a stupid, factually inaccurate statement. He said "Young people are liberals" that is not true, I'm young and I'm not liberal. Then he said the "overwhelming majority" is liberal, that was also wrong, the overwhelming majority identifies as moderate.

200

Then the hospital owns it. Someone owns it, they have possession about it and can do with it what they want.

000

Always interesting to see you guys talking about me if you know anything. Just like the stupid assumption that most young people are liberal (which they aren't, they are moderate.)

100

And I would say it is quite sad to think that "social media" is a space for normal interaction.

100