Sign in

priamble.bsky.social

@priamble.bsky.social
157 followers 106 following 456 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Yes
2260 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
TL;DR: no. These are the two versions of Hazard 16. It's effectively been updated to remove any requirement to mitigate the hazard in any way.
130 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
Safety cover for bigots
An bin bag
011 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
000 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
The PIP assessor lurking in the youth center
070 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
- got called racist in greggs earlier lads
- tell us what happened lad
- I got called racist in greggs
- yeah but why
- I was being racist
- in greggs?
- yeah it was in greggs
030 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 13/09/2025
Just in case there was any doubt, Lord Hodge openly admitting the SC knew they were removing rights from trans people, and the "not a victory for either side" and the "not disadvantaging trans people" statements were lies

"I and my two female

colleagues who were the joint

authors, went through the act

section by section in

considerable detail, asking

ourselves which interpretation works," he explained. "Was the Equality Act meant to treat a trans woman with a gender recognition certificate as a

woman? And we came

unanimously to the view that it

didn't. Did we realise that would cause an outrage for people? Yes, because people had been led to believe by public authorities, among others, for the last 15 years that they had rights, which they didn't have. So I have some sympathy, quite a lot of sympathy, with the feeling that they had something taken away from them. He knew there would be controversy,

and was quite prepared, as he

puts it, to "take the flak".
110 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 11/08/2025
Not with that attitude
010 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Starmer rn:
000 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Literally just section 28 again
Picture from the film 'The Green Mile' of a man looking burnt out captioned "I'm tired, boss"
011 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
Principal Skinner meme
top text: Could it be the thing that happens with every civil rights movement?
bottom text: No, this time the kids are wrong
0470 0
priamble.bsky.social @priamble.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
ehrc just straight up implying that trans women are an inherent risk to women's safety. Disgusting that they think they can get away with this
Example

13.4.3 A council swimming pool has separate men's and women's changing rooms.
One of the aims of having separate-sex changing rooms is to safeguard women's
ability to access the facilities and use them safely. A woman is allowed to take her
male child under the age of ten into the women's changing room. This does not
undermine the aim, because it is unlikely that young boys pose a threat to women's
safety. It also contributes towards achieving the aim, because fewer women would be
able to use the swimming pool if they could not bring their children with them.
020 0