imho, you can't be confident in this question without believing in a metaphysical thing (god or some non-computational physics) or being ASI-pilled
PostCandide
@postcandide.151e.org
82 followers 347 following 478 posts
🇫🇷🇭🇰🇯🇵 blog.postcandide.151e.org
![jonny (nonvenomous) @jonny@neuromatch.social
OH what's this???
/etc/hatch/env
hmm a feature flag labeled as a "killswitch" for proxying requests to anthropic is certainly interesting to seeeeeeeeeeeee in meta's big AI bet.
edit: sorry to be a bit cryptic here, the implication was definitely corporate espionage, more clearly said: https://
retro.social/@patrick/117330254290603490
[screenshot of several lines of comments for an environment variable]
-----
ticho @ticho@mas.to
@jonny The way the comment is worded I don't think enabling this would relay anything anywhere - note the "Meta-internal proxy". It's probably only intended to be used inside their network, probably meant as an override for internal development.
------
@patrick@retro.social
@ticho @jonny The idea about such "internal proxies" is to get whatever would be sent to Anthropic plus - more importantly for Meta - what gets sent back in a log, so that they can train their own systems on the way Anthropic responds to users.
It's a common complaint about Chinese models that they were supposedly built like that, using examples of the Good American Models to "clone" the work. Besides the general "we may copy everything with impunity but how dare they copy our output" hypocrisy of the argument, it's interesting to see this in one of Meta's systems, too.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ruuthvgz75h7mdcjgqrc5g3j/bafkreigybljfka5inisoaeo4nz4jgrgfwdx4sg75vdf3tpngo7vs6e6bh4)
