Sign in

Petter Törnberg

@pettertornberg.com
7.3K followers 221 following 591 posts

Associate Professor in Computational Social Science at University of Amsterdam Studying the intersection of AI, social media, and politics. Polarization, misinformation, radicalization, digital platforms, social complexity.

PostsRepliesMedia
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 29/09/2026
Pretty much sums it up! Great cartoon by Barry Deutsch / R.E. Ryan www.dailykos.com/stories/2026... For the paper length version of the cartoon: 😉 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
0173
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 25/09/2026
Will AI give us a shared basis for political knowledge, or will Democrats and Republicans end up asking increasingly different chatbots? New preprint: We find a self-reinforcing loop that can pull AI models apart politically. We call it the Centrifugal Alignment Spiral 🧵 arxiv.org/pdf/2609.28486
1439
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 04/09/2026
🛎️ Final call: Advanced School on AI Research Practice in Media and Communication. Apply by 15 Sept for VI MeLCi Lab Autumn School on AI research in media & communication. 📅 10–13 Nov. 🌐 Online PhD/postdoc/ECR melcilab.cicant.ulusofona.pt/training/vi-...
073
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 06/08/2026
We keep asking what social media does to voters. The wrong end of the pipe. Platforms don't just distribute politics — they teach political actors what kind of speech pays. So I measured the going rate: what X, Bluesky and Mastodon reward in public speech. 🧵 arxiv.org/abs/2607.04220
311343
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 07/07/2026
‘Polarization’ has become the master concept for diagnosing our current democratic crisis. But this is not polarization. It is the radicalization of the political right. By misdiagnosing it, we risk becoming complicit in the crisis. 🧵 Just out in Perspectives on Politics doi.org/10.1017/S153...
4834441428
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 01/05/2026
LLMs have been widely reported as left-wing biased. The finding has shaped policy and debate — with Trump banning "Woke AI". Our new paper challenges this story. It's not that the models are biased. It's that they think the auditor is. 🧵 w/ michelleschimmel.bsky.social‬arxiv.org/pdf/2604.27633
415750
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 24/04/2026
This is a fair point, and I'll consider bringing it in as I revise the paper. My reason for not mentioning it in the preprint is that approximately 0% of the population use these protocols (see figure, from journalqd.org/article/view...) But I do think they are still relevant for the argument.
220
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 23/04/2026
Social media is no longer social. Most of it is passive viewing of videos and pictures from people we've never met. But we're still studying social media like it's 2010. We've entered the post-social media era — and research needs to catch up. osf.io/preprints/so... preprint w/ Richard Rogers
392982945
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
As Twitter became X, use frequency has become strongly correlated with dislike of Democrats. The more you hate Democrats, the more you post and visit X.
12456101
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
Posting is correlated with affective polarization: 😡 The most partisan users — those who love their party and despise the other — are more likely to post about politics 🥊 The result? A loud angry minority dominates online politics, which itself can drive polarization (see doi.org/10.1073/pnas...)
828552
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
Twitter/X is a story on its own: 🔴 While users have become more Republican 💥 POSTING has completely transformed: it has moved nearly ❗70 percentage points❗ from Democrat-dominated to Republican-leaning.
529459
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
Politically, the landscape is shifting too: 🔴 Nearly all platforms have become more Republican 🔵 But they remain Democratic-leaning overall 🏃‍♂️ Democrats are fleeing to smaller platforms (Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon)
328432
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
Legacy platforms are losing ground: ⬇️ Facebook ⬇️ YouTube ⬇️ Twitter/X But ⬆️ TikTok and Reddit "Other" platforms - including Bluesky - has not seen significant growth as a whole. (But as we'll see, huge compositional changes)
1030855
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
Overall social media use is also declining. Between 2020 and 2024, more Americans — especially the youngest (18–24) and oldest (65+) — report using no social media at all. A small group of heavy users remains, but the middle is thinning out.
534464
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/04/2026
📉 Visiting and posting on X and Facebook has collapsed: nearly 50% drop! On X, it is mostly Democrats who have become inactive. Many still occasionally log on, but rarely and quietly.
9457128
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 19/01/2026
The impact of AI is not just a matter of what AI can do. It is shaped by the economy in which AI is forged. Today, AI is emerging inside technofeudalism — built on lock-in, dependency, and rent extortion. Our new preprint explores what this means for the coming AI society. osf.io/preprints/so...
3175
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/01/2026
🚨 We are entering the AI society. After two decades of platforms reshaping markets, communication, and governance, a new shift is underway: AI is transforming society. What should we expect from the 'AI society'? 🧵 📄 Our new paper faces this question: osf.io/preprints/so...
2196
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 08/12/2025
This paper is now out in Artificial Intelligence Review Bottom line: using LLMs to "simulate humans" sits in a no-man’s-land between theory and empirics—too opaque to function as a model, too ungrounded to count as evidence. Validation remains the core challenge. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
1398
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 04/11/2025
Meanwhile, climate researchers and activists are portrayed as emotional and irrational: 😢 Crying protesters ⚠️ Angry crowds 🚫 “Ideological fanatics” The contrast is deliberate: Climate denial looks calm and factual. Climate action looks hysterical and extreme.
11810
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 04/11/2025
Most people study what misinformation says. We decided to study how it looks. Using novel multi-modal AI methods, we study 17,848 posts by top climate denial accounts - and uncovered a new front in the misinformation war. Here's what it means 🧵 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
33920
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 30/10/2025
Posting is correlated with affective polarization: 😡 The most partisan users — those who love their party and despise the other — are more likely to post about politics 🥊 The result? A loud angry minority dominates online politics, which itself can drive polarization (see doi.org/10.1073/pnas...)
528756
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 30/10/2025
Twitter/X is a story on its own: 🔴 While users have become more Republican 💥 POSTING has completely transformed: it has moved nearly ❗50 percentage points❗ from Democrat-dominated to slightly Republican-leaning.
2038170
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 30/10/2025
Politically, the landscape is shifting too: 🔴 Nearly all platforms have become more Republican 🔵 But they remain Democratic-leaning overall 🏃‍♂️ Democrats are fleeing to smaller platforms (Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon)
130643
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 30/10/2025
Overall social media use is declining. Between 2020 and 2024, more Americans — especially the youngest (18–24) and oldest (65+) — report using no social media at all. A small group of heavy users remains, but the middle is thinning out.
15528129
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 30/10/2025
Is social media dying? How much has Twitter changed as it became X? Which party now dominates the conversation? Using nationally representative ANES data from 2020 & 2024, I map how the U.S. social media landscape has transformed. Here are the key take-aways 🧵 arxiv.org/abs/2510.25417
18857339
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Who posts about politics on Facebook? 🔍 More affectively polarized voters post more - making our politics seem more polarized than it is (the infamous 'social media prism' @chrisbail.bsky.social) 📉 By 2024, political posting on Facebook dropped across the board — but especially among Democrats.
151
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Looking closer at the frequency of use, Facebook shifted right too. From 2020 → 2024: 🔵 Strong Democrats use it less 🔴 Strong Republicans use it more The platform’s core audience is now clearly more Republican.
151
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Overall platform reach, 2020 → 2024 👇 📱 Facebook & YouTube: still near-universal, little change. 📱 Instagram & TikTok: surged, especially among Dems. 📱 Twitter/X: flat or declining, biggest drop among Dems. 📱 Reddit: grew a lot on the left. The partisan sorting shows up in who sticks around.
182
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Here’s the partisan lean of platform audiences, 2020 → 2024. 📊 Instagram, TikTok, Reddit stay solidly Dem. 📊 Facebook & YouTube: modestly rightward. 📊 Twitter/X: sharpest move right. 📊 “Other” (Threads, Bluesky, etc.): flipped hard from red to blue. The sorting is unmistakable.
1134
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Looking at party affiliation, the partisan map hasn’t moved much outside of Twitter/X: 🔵 Instagram, TikTok, Reddit → firmly Democratic ⚪ Facebook, YouTube → still mixed 🔴 Twitter/X → the big flip The social media ecosystem has become more sorted.
150
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
Posting on Twitter tells the same story. 🔵 In 2020, posting on Twitter was correlated with being polarized Democrat. 🔴 By 2024, that gap reversed — Democrats pulled back, Republicans leaned in. Political posting on Twitter/X is now correlated with being polarized Republican.
181
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
This is where it gets wild 👇 In 2020, Twitter use was highest among people who loved Democrats and disliked Republicans. By 2024, it completely flipped: the more polarized Republican you are, the more you use Twitter/X. From blue stronghold → red megaphone. All for just $44 billion.
26132
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/09/2025
How much did Elon's takeover reshape Twitter/X? How did the partisan tilt of social media use change from 2020 to 2024? The ANES 2024 data is out — and this thread answers all your burning questions! 🔥
24929
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 20/08/2025
Somehow, Marx is suddenly popular with tech bros talking about AI. I just wished they would actually read him. Because Marx did have a lot to say about automation -- and it's eerily relevant to today’s debates. 🧵
12410
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 06/08/2025
Read the full preprint here: arxiv.org/abs/2508.03385 To our knowledge, this is one of the first time generative social simulation is used for theory development in the social sciences. We're looking for feedback as we move toward journal submission.
2352
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 24/07/2025
💥New paper💥 1)LLMs achieve superb accuracy detecting negative campaigning ACROSS languages and countries - enabling a new paradigm of comparative political research 2)We use this to carry out the largest cross-country study to date: 18M tweets from MPs across 19 countries arxiv.org/abs/2507.17636
23011
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 22/07/2025
(Chueri & Törnberg 2025b) So happy to continue coauthoring our life together, @julianachueri.bsky.social ❤️
6251
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 16/05/2025
From Elon Musk's DOGE to the UK's AI Action Plan, states are rapidly adopting AI as key tool of governance What happens when states see their populations through AI? Is AI quietly redefining the very nature of the state? Our new paper sets out a research agenda journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
1173
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 29/04/2025
Seeing Like a Platform has arrived in physical form! 😮 Of everything I've ever written, this is probably the work I'm most proud of. And it's free to read! www.seeinglikeaplatform.com Would love to hear your thoughts!
3516
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 31/03/2025
To test whether toxicity has become more common in international politics, we analyzed 18M tweets from politicians in 17 countries over 5 years. We found that elite political toxicity rose substantially over the period.
142
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 31/03/2025
Many feel that politics globally has become toxic and hostile over recent years. But is this actually the case? And if so, who's to blame? What issues are driving toxicity? We analyze 18M tweets from politicians in 17 countries to find out! w/ @julianachueri.bsky.social arxiv.org/pdf/2503.22411
46731
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 15/01/2025
We briefly discuss this distinction in the paper
1241
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 15/01/2025
:)
3422
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 14/01/2025
Misinformation isn't random - it's strategic. 🧵 In the first cross-national comparative study, we examine 32M tweets from politicians. We find that misinformation is not a general condition: it is driven by populist radical right parties. with @julianachueri.bsky.social doi.org/10.1177/1940...
16263843355
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 26/12/2024
The first harbingers of the nature of propaganda in the AI era. The AI assistant of a popular tablet got quietly replaced by a creepy Chinese state-censored model by ByteDance. This will soon get a lot more subtle and sophisticated.
26829
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 03/12/2024
It's not that it's just biased though. It's worse than that: it gives absurd, spiky responses. Other languages have a nice even beta-distribution. German has a weird bumpy thing, dominated by particular values. It seems broken. So I don't think normalizing / adapting thresholds is going to help. 😬
010
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 01/11/2024
LLMs have revolutionized text annotation. But with rapid adoption comes chaos. Researchers face serious questions about reproducibility, reliability, ethics, and bias This paper proposes a set of best practices to bring structure to LLM text analysis. sociologica.unibo.it/article/view...
121
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 31/10/2024
Misinformation isn't random - it's strategic. We carry out the first cross-national comparative study, examining 32M tweets from politicians. We find that misinformation is not so much a general condition: it is driven by populist radical right parties. with @julianachueri
173
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 24/10/2024
Here's the project's popsci summary.
021
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 21/12/2023
This pattern was further validated with random summaries from Wikipedia in German and English language. /6
010