iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social · 30/04/2026

Dr. David Morens - who is 78 years old and served his country for nearly 50 years - used Gmail, which he shouldn't have done. However, "[he] was stripped and handcuffed [by] a half-dozen federal agents carrying guns and wearing tactical gear [..] and jailed". www.science.org/content/arti...

science.org

Guns and bulletproof vests: How federal agents arrested Fauci aide

David Morens, 78, was stripped and handcuffed for email violations

13165121

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Prof Sheena Cruickshank @sheencr.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

Good summary of what the insanity that was the Fauci hearing yesterday was about- basically a senators vendetta against Fauci and overall an attack on science versus conspiracy theories. An absolute shocking display from the Republican senators involved.

theguardian.com

Anthony Fauci’s high-profile Senate hearing: what we learned

Six years on from Covid crisis, Republicans still politicizing science – and Fauci remains a political punching bag

66418

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Håvard Kauserud @drhyfe.bsky.social · 22/10/2025

Sigrid Bratlies skriverier om covid-epidemiens opprinnelse og anklager mot ledende forskere er og blir konspirasjonsteorier. En skandale at hun har fått så mye backing fra @langsiktsenter.bsky.social , kunnskapsløse journalister og kolleger www.aftenposten.no/meninger/deb...

aftenposten.no

Forskningen peker mot våtmarkedet – ikke laboratoriet

Sigrid Bratlie forsøker å fremstille debatten om pandemiens opphav som en kamp for akademisk ytringsfrihet. Men hun går på tomgang i de faglige argumentene.

011

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Øivind Bergh @essensielt.bsky.social · 30/07/2026

Sjokkerende oppførsel av Sigrid Bratlie, som kaller Anthony Faucis bruk av "the 5th" for "feig" og en "unnvikelsesmanøver", mens hun reklamerer for boka si. Bratlie ignorerer åpent det faktum at USA ikke lenger er en rettsstat. Lovgivende myndigheter kommer med åpne trusler mot Faucis liv og helse.

061

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Prof Gavin Yamey MD MPH @gavinyamey.bsky.social · 03/01/2026

Yup, as Norwegian physician Dr Per Helge Måseide says about the Great Barrington Declaration’s push for mass infection instead of mass vaccination, “infection-induced” herd immunity “never was, never is, and never will be, a scientific approach to combating contagious airborne infectious diseases”

02910

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 03/01/2026

This "aged well". Herd immunity var aldri, er aldri, og vil aldri, bli en vitenskapelig tilnærming til bekjempelse av smittsomme luftbårne infeksjonssymdommer.

050

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 01/08/2025

Nå skal Arbeiderpartlet ta velgere fra FpU, Unge Høyre og Unge Venstre: JA til alkoholreklame, lengre åpningstider på polet, mer ølsalg i butikkene, "pils i park". Men NEI til søndagsåpne butikker (for det er LO imot.....?).

vg.no

Støre åpner for å utvide pol- og ølsalget – og sier ja til pils i park

Statsminister Jonas Gahr Støre (Ap) sier ja til å lette litt på alkohollovgivningen og andre regler. Dermed matcher han flere punkter i Høyres «frihetsplan».

000

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

14 years since the horrific terror attacks in Oslo and Utøya 22. July. The feature I wrote in @thelancet.com from the trial: "The Battle of Breivik's Mind." www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

010

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Angie Rasmussen @angierasmussen.bsky.social · 14/07/2025

Because disinformation & lies have drowned out experts like Dr. Titanji and her colleagues who provide evidence-based clinical care vs and who genuinely care about people’s health. Flooding the zone with bullshit drowns truth. We need to stop playing defense & start fighting the propagandists.

416526

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social · 16/07/2025

It's worth looking at how far the lab leak conspiracy theory has gotten - here, Jeff Sachs👇 1️⃣ Came from lab ↩️ 2️⃣ It was engineered ↩️ 3️⃣ US-based technology ↩️ 4️⃣ US-made (UNC) and tested in China (🦇) ↩️ 5️⃣ Covered up by Biden Admin, ICs, Fauci, scientists ("inside job") All, completely made up w. 0️⃣ data

1219332

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 16/07/2025

Hvor spennende er det med global oppvarming?

000

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social · 15/07/2025

"NIH [.. is] instructed to nominate replacements that are aligned with the priorities of the administration of US President Donald Trump — and have been warned that political appointees might still override their suggestions and hand-pick alternative reviewers". www.nature.com/articles/d41...

nature.com

Exclusive: NIH to dismiss dozens of grant reviewers to align with Trump priorities

The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.

13522

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 10/07/2025

Hva skjedde med pandemien - som skulle komme før påske? Vi var jo bare én mutasjon unna?

010

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Alex Crits-Christoph @acritschristoph.bsky.social · 28/06/2025

Quick thread on the WHO's SAGO report on the origins of COVID-19, highlighting key points and even *new* data. Their summary is that a zoonotic origin of COVID-19 is best supported by available data. This is consistent with most scientific reviews and statements in the rest of the literature.

716582

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social · 27/06/2025

SAGO Report is out: 1️⃣ No new data in report 2️⃣ Not bioweapon, man-made, or engineered 3️⃣ All scientific evidence points to zoonosis 4️⃣ No evidence for lab leak 5️⃣ New evidence could swing the conclusion In other words, what we concluded in April, 2020. Five years later. share.google/4I8ac1DJMZOM...

share.google

WHO Scientific advisory group issues report on origins of COVID-19

The WHO Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), a panel of 27 independent, international, multidisciplinary experts, today published its report on the origins of SARS-CoV-...

9328142

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 27/06/2025

Vi vil selvsagt ha rovdyr i Norge. Bare de er snille mot alle andre dyr og mennesker. ps! Hva er egentlig et rovdyr? Spør for en venn... ds.

000

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Gunnar Roland Tjomlid @tjomlid.com · 11/06/2025

English version of my review of Bratlies book: A book filled with contradictions, cherry-picking of data, conspiratorial arguments, and serious accusations that undermine trust in research and contribute to making the world less safe in the face of the next pandemic. tjomlid.com/a-critical-r...

tjomlid.com

A critical review of "The mystery of Wuhan - The hunt for the origin of the covid pandemic" by Sigrid Bratlie

A book filled with contradictions, cherry-picking of data, conspiratorial arguments, and serious accusations that undermine trust in research and contribute to making the world less safe in the face o...

34116

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 15/06/2025

The @housedemocrats.bsky.social final report of the origin of the novel coronavirus oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-su...

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

000

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social · 17/01/2025

Grateful to scientists in Norway pointing out the massive asymmetry in the lab leak discourse that has been much-too prevalent in Norwegian (and much more extremely, U.S) media. It's time to focus on the science and leave the nonsense. [Part 1 translation in ALT - see next post for Part 2]

Knowledge-based policy for future pandemics

Are we about to have a toxic debate about the origin of the Covid-19 virus in Norway too?

In Morgenbladet on December 20, virus researcher Kristian Andersen talks about the search for knowledge about the origin of the Covid-19 virus. Where a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) first seemed like a plausible possibility, more and more data pointed to a transmission from animals to humans at a wet market. This is how good science is done, where one is initially open to several possibilities, but eventually lands on the explanation that is most supported by scientific facts.

This change in attitude was actually a controlled cover-up, according to supporters of the lab leak theory. Sigrid Bratlie at the think tank Langsikt is one of these. In a column in Aftenposten on September 15, she and researcher Gunnveig Grodeland wrote that "politics have been mixed up with what should have been open and free research." At a meeting in Oslo for Christmas, which Kristian Andersen also attended, Grodeland chose to make a public apology because in this column she could have accused Andersen personally of "acting unscientifically."

Bratlie, however, repeats her allegations about mixing politics and science in Morgenbladet's Christmas newspaper. Bratlie tells Morgenbladet: "(...) it was intended that Andersen's group would help calm China by disproving the lab leak." It can hardly be read as anything other than a conspiracy theory. Here she also accuses Andersen of gross scientific misconduct.

39817

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 14/06/2025

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s new CDC advisory committee is proof that America’s anti-vaccine era is truly beginning, @katherinejwu.com writes. theatln.tc/hOM6uyum

26287103

Per Helge Måseide @perhelgem.bsky.social · 14/06/2025

I have asked Sigrid Bratlie to write to @cellpress.bsky.social about lab leak. She haven't. Her approach is to lay a pressure on the editors. So much for "science communication"

130

Reposted by Per Helge Måseide

Gunnar Roland Tjomlid @tjomlid.com · 11/06/2025

En bok fylt av selvmotsigelser, cherry-picking av data, konspiratorisk argumentasjon og grove beskyldninger som bidrar til å svekke tillit til forskning og bidra til å gjøre verden mindre trygg i møte med neste pandemi. Les min anmeldelse og kritiske gjennomgang. tjomlid.com/en-kritisk-a...

tjomlid.com

En kritisk anmeldelse av "Mysteriet i Wuhan - Jakten på covid-pandemiens opphav" av Sigrid Bratlie

3498