pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 12hThe “for a long time” is the tell. And why “many people”? Did it take a while to get someone to give the answer she wanted? But if she did solicit advice on this from a qualified professional, I’d be interested in seeing that person (I’d settle for just one, frankly) step up & corroborate her story. 1160
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13hI have a B.A. in philosophy. But I know I am not a bachelor, an artist, or a philosopher. 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13hToday’s news (WSJ etc.) confirms my earlier guess: she left for the job in China after failing the California bar exam. 020
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14hAnd what’s with the request for attorneys’ fees? The federal government attorneys are salaried, not submitting a bill. I don’t think I’ve ever seen atty fees paid by a losing civil defendant to a prevailing federal agency. Is there any legal basis for that? Not that the feds will prevail anyway. 140
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 15hWhat this typically means is that one or more panel members thinks that the rehearing petition has identified a probable substantive mistake in the opinion, and they are considering issuing an amended version. If so, the time to petition for rehearing en banc would start over. 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 15hInterestingly, as I read it, the order specifically says they’re considering rehearing by the original three-judge panel, and *not* en banc. 100
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 16h“Personally”? Almost certainly not. He never spends his own money. Political committee funds that he controls, is much more likely. 160
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 15/10/2026Question for the next press conference: how many doctors travel with the President, and what are their specialties? 021
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/20261) allowing the size of the House of Representatives to grow as the US population grew. 2) prohibiting Congress from raising its own pay unless effective date was after the next election. #2 actually became the 27th Amendment about 200 years later. 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay...constitution.congress.gov 100
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026As my brother-in-law, an MD-PhD anesthesiologist, has been heard to say, “Any idiot can put a sick person to sleep. But it takes special training and skill to keep them alive during the procedure and then wake them up.“ 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026I wish your point were correct, but the real reason it’s the first amendment - contrary to popular belief - is that of the original 12 amendments proposed by Congress, the first two failed to win ratification. So the one that was originally designed as “third” by happy accident became the First! 230
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026Don’t care for Katyal that much. Would add David Frederick to the short list. And for criminal law, Michael Dreeben. 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026I’ve heard hundreds of appellate advocates over the years. Politics aside, Clement is the best of them. 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026No, not what the Legislature “chose”; at least, I doubt that. Just a tragic and unjust outcome they failed to anticipate when they enacted the statutory language. 010
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026/2 I was part of a team that fought this issue successfully on appeal in federal court in Philadelphia. Our client’s 21 year sentence was cut on a plea deal on remand to nine years. She’s straight and sober now snd working as an EMT. And the feds stopped prosecuting these sad cases. /end 010
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 14/10/2026This is so wrong, perhaps legally (I’m not an expert on state law), but certainly as a matter of social policy, to treat the addict who happens to survive as a murderer of their friend and co-user who happened to be the one who overdosed and died. In these cases, it could be either of them. /1 100
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13/10/2026Not my experience, in 50+ yrs since graduating law school, passing 2 bar exams, and teaching at 2 accredited law schools. Law grads are cautioned not to use anything but “a law school graduate” - not “lawyer” or “attorney” - until and unless licensed, so as not to confuse or mislead laypersons. 1120
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13/10/2026And Lindsey Graham, and Scott Bessent, and any number of others 010
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13/10/2026A Pepperdine Law School grad. A not-so-wild guess: she may have taken the bar exam in California but not passed. (Cali has one of the lower pass rates.) Rather than study more and try again, as many do, she may have decided to forge ahead with a job that did not require her to be a licensed atty. 240
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 13/10/2026Probably February or perhaps late January, would be my guess 010
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 12/10/2026No rehab center, nor any rehab center employee, would reveal such information in response to an outsider’s inquiry. 040
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 11/10/2026Um, isn’t it a “pool”? How can acting collectively in an official “pool” be prohibited? 271
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 09/10/2026/2 Only the educational system, reinforced by popular media and/or cultural/political movements (e.g., the civil rights movement, the women’s movement), can systematically change social norms. 120
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Many decades of criminology has consistently and conclusively established that “brutal punishment” does not change behavior. (I’m sure you didn’t actually mean what you wrote, that punishment should be meted out to people based on what they “try to defend,” i.e., what they believe or advocate.) /1 210
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026The history of the death penalty for rape is all about anti-Black racism. Justice Thurgood Marshall led the campaign to abolish it, which prevailed (as to adult victims) in 1977 and (as to child vics) in 2008. Only systematic change in the education of boys and social norms can change rape culture. 130
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026The CFR only governs federal procedures, while most civilian death penalty provisions in the US are state-level. But public executions are certainly obsolete. No state has held one since 1936 (KY). As for the Army Regulation, wouldn’t a case-specific order from the President or SecDef override that? 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Life imprisonment will do fine, thanks. Abolish capital punishment in all cases. 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026The last public execution in the United States was in 1936 (in Kentucky). Even for those who accept capital punishment, which I do not, it’s a feature that our civilization has rejected. 040
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Google AI tells me the last public execution in the US was in 1936, in Kentucky. 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026A *public* execution?! I thought our civilization had moved beyond that (a small step, I realize) a century ago, at least. 100
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 08/10/2026If you mean where he went for college, where he might theoretically have studied some basic political science and economics, it was Ohio State, not Harvard. 100
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Once (abt 40 yrs ago) when I was before the 3d cir a co-appellant’s attorney (a well-known Mafia hanger-on, later himself indicted), failed to show. I asked the court for leave to argue her appeal (my client’s girlfriend and co-defendant) as well as my own. Granted. I won reversal of both. 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 06/10/2026My mentor, the late Edward M Becker, put an end to one-word affirmances when he was chief judge of the Third Circuit (1998-2003). Now they issue at least a 3-page mem op (based no doubt on a law clerk’s memorandum). While those can be frustrating, honestly it’s a major improvement over the old days. 040
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Well, I guess the team consists of a bunch of doctors about as much as that country is actually a “democratic republic.” 000
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Undoubtedly a matter of minutes, on some stay-of-execution request in a death penalty case. 110
pdgpa @pdgpa.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Kagan is not a “Democrat.” She was appointed (many years ago) by a Democratic president, but I would be very surprised to learn she is registered to vote as anything but an independent. She is a former Harvard law professor and dean. And now a brilliant and totally fair-minded judge. 030