Sign in

David Van Dijcke

@packlesshepherd.bsky.social
89 followers 26 following 29 posts

AP @ UVA Econ. PhD in Econ from UMich. Metrics & big data. 🇧🇪. Views mine. www.davidvandijcke.com

PostsRepliesMedia
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Apply! I just joined and everyone is so friendly. Beautiful town and campus too!
000
Reposted by David Van Dijcke
UVA Economics @uvaeconomics.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Forthcoming in the Review of Economics and Statistics, by our colleague David Van Dijcke (@packlesshepherd.bsky.social). After RTO mandates at three large U.S. tech firms, senior employees left at higher rates, shifting the workforce toward junior employees. Paper: direct.mit.edu/rest/article...
direct.mit.edu
Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution
Abstract. Debates over return-to-office mandates have intensified since the COVID-19 pandemic ended, though their economic implications remain poorly understood. Using large-scale resume data, we anal...
031
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
Alternatively, you can click "Discuss with your AI", which hands off all the context you need to continue chatting with your subscription of choice. Have fun chatting! (3/3)
000
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
When you click it, a side screen opens up where you can chat with an AI model of choice. Since we don't store your API keys, you'll need to briefly reauthenticate through OpenRouter if you restarted the review session. You pay for the API costs directly, no hidden costs. (2/)
100
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
You can now talk to your coarse.ink review! Every review comment now has a "Discuss" button that lets you discuss it with an AI model of choice. The model gets all the context from the review, which lets you seamlessly continue the discussion. (1/)
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
Interesting, thanks for the review (pun intended). I was thinking of adding a deep literature search option -- currently it does a simple one through @perplexityai.bsky.social, but at some additional cost that can be upgraded to a deep lit search. Do you think that'd be valuable?
120
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 12/04/2026
No idea what that means lol
000
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
The project's spirit is very close to that of @chicagohai.bsky.social @chenhaotan.bsky.social: AI-assisted reviewing should be open and not for profit. Go check out their AI reviewer @ openaireview.org/index.html as well! If it's better, use that one, or submit proposals to create the best of both!
openaireview.org
OpenAIReview — AI-Powered Academic Paper Reviewer
Rigorous AI review to help you publish your best work.
030
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
Again, the whole system is open-source (github.com/Davidvandijc...) so there are no hidden costs, and you can check what the system does by looking at the source code. My hope is that many people will contribute code and submit issues to make this open system as good as possible!
github.com
GitHub - Davidvandijcke/coarse
Contribute to Davidvandijcke/coarse development by creating an account on GitHub.
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
As the underlying engine, you can choose among any AI model that's on @openrouter.bsky.social (which is nearly all models!). Less budget? Use any open-source model for <$1! For the best results, use SOTA models like Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, etc., at slightly higher cost.
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
Setup is easy: coarse.ink/setup Create an account at @openrouter.bsky.social , buy a couple $$ worth of credit, and obtain your API key. You can also log in directly with your OpenRouter account.
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
Reviews remain active for 90 days None of your data is stored beyond that, and all calls to whichever AI model you use are done with an explicit denial of data collection, so Claude/Gemini/ChatGPT/... cannot retain your data or use it for training See: coarse.ink/privacy
coarse.ink
120
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
The review is provided in an interactive panel with major and minor comments that you can trace in the text and tick off when done, see an example here coarse.ink/review/79c43...
coarse.ink
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
Some details on the performance comparisons to other popular systems are here coarse.ink/compare These are all judged by Gemini-3.1-pro, so caveats apply. Anecdotally, some of my colleagues and friendly ppl on X said it rivals reviews from Refine.Ink, when using a SOTA model.
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
I coded up an open-source, not-for-profit AI paper reviewer that rivals the performance of @reviewer3com.bsky.social, Refine.ink, and Stanford Agentic Reviewer (according to Gemini 3.1). Costs <$2! Live @ coarse.ink. Plug in paper, @openrouter.bsky.social key, and email. #econsky
34111
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 27/09/2025
Another "good" week on the US academic job market #econsky #econbluesky davidvandijcke.com/joe_tracker/
000
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Thanks for sharing!
010
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
Thanks for sharing!
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 20/09/2025
US academic economics market continuing to pull away from the COVID market this week. I created a little tracker for JOE here for those who want to play around with the data. Updates weekly: davidvandijcke.com/joe_tracker/ #econbluesky #econsky
160
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
The paper integrates causal inference, functional data analysis, and optimal transport, developing (FAST!) new tools for empirical researchers. If you use micro data or focus on inequality effects, I’d love to discuss potential applications! #EconTwitter (11/11)
030
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
The method opens up a large new class of RDDs for distributional policy evaluation. E.g.: local minimum wage impacts on wage distributions, district ed reforms on grade distributions, close elections on constituent outcomes... For more details: (10/) arxiv.org/abs/2504.03992
arxiv.org
Regression Discontinuity Design with Distribution-Valued Outcomes
This article introduces Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) with Distribution-Valued Outcomes (R3D), extending the standard RDD framework to settings where the outcome is a distribution rather than ...
100
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
The results suggest a classic "equality-efficiency tradeoff" under Democratic governors: Incomes at the top 10% of the distribution drop significantly, but this effect weakens and becomes statistically imprecise lower down the distribution. (9/)
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Finally, I illustrate the method's use in a close-election RD (or rather, R3!) design. I study how Democratic vs Republican governors affect families' income distributions within their states when they barely won/lost their election. (8/)
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
I validate both methods through extensive simulations, which show rapid convergence to the quantile treatment effects... ...unlike existing quantile RD methods, which do not converge (but remain useful in the classic setting!) (7/)
100
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
I develop uniform confidence bands and data-driven bandwidth selection for both approaches, which are fully implemented in an R package (available at davidvandijcke.com/R3D). (6/)
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
To estimate this unknown beast, I propose two closely related estimators. One extending local polynomial regression to random quantiles, and a functional version of that, based on local Fréchet regression (which has better mathematical and computational properties). (5/)
100
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
I propose a new concept of treatment effects for R3D: Local Average Quantile Treatment Effects. Instead of averaging over conditional scalar outcomes, they average over conditional distributions! This captures the average distributional shift across the cutoff. (4/)
110
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Standard RD methods can't handle such settings, as they don't account for the two levels of randomness—within and across distributions. R3D solves this problem by modeling outcomes as random distributions rather than random variables! (3/)
120
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
The method is useful when aggregate units receive treatment, but your outcome varies within the unit. E.g., firms receive a subsidy when their revenue (X) drops below a cutoff, and you want to study this subsidy's effect on the employee wage distribution (2/)
120
David Van Dijcke @packlesshepherd.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Hi Bluesky! I'm excited to share my job market paper (for the 2025-26 market)! It introduces a new extension of RDD where outcomes are entire distributions: Regression Discontinuity Design with Distributions (R3D). Thread below 👇 (1/)
24216