NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 11/10/2026Reminds me of the time I kicked a piece of rebar on a beach instead of a soccer ball. My toenail still doesn't grow right. I feel your pain. 010 1
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 10/08/2026I do like this one better, but I still prefer a single toggle that cycles through 3 options. 110 1
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 07/08/2026To me this is overthought, which I've done my fair share of. There are three possible states, just let me cycle through them. People will figure it out. Maybe you're technically correct, but the length of the article to save a few people a few seconds? KISS 000 0
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 27/03/2026Once @function is fully supported, would there be any reason to use light-dark() anymore? 000 0
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 17/08/2025Similar to my reply to Bramus, but it could be a pure CSS selector (thanks to :has) that has a reference to the current element: for="form:has(:scope) [name=field]" for=":scope + *" for="body #x" 000 0
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 17/08/2025I've been wanting this for ages. Pretty much everything on a web page is context dependent, so essentially if you have a way to define the context and then execute a selector pattern in that context, you could do almost anything. for="form:has(:scope) [name=field]" for=":scope + *" for="body #x" 000 0
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 03/08/2025Tit for tat has been shown to be the best strategy in game theory. 020 2
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 10/01/2025media.tenor.coma cartoon character is holding a flamethrower in a space sceneAlt: Earthworm Jim shooting plasma will riding a rocketship in space 020 2
NoYearZero @noyearzero.bsky.social · 08/11/2024Do you mean in terms of verbiage or how it functions? 000 0
