iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

The v1 chrome extension is still up and you can download it in preparation. Also download the app!

030

🔥 Bonus (experimental): highlighted text within the article showing where it diverges from other coverage. Click to see the exact contrast, line by line We’re deep in testing. When should we launch, and what’s missing? 👀

🧠 A lightweight top bar giving you key stats - how many outlets are covering the story, and which categories they fall into 📰 Headline analysis: hover over any headline, click the NewsCord icon, and see if it’s accurate, misleading, or manipulative

100

🟡 A floating NewsCord button always in view - no more digging in the extension menu 📊 A resizable side panel showing other sources covering the same story 🔍 Real-time comparison: the biggest differences in coverage and hidden agendas surfaced instantly

100

The goal: make the NewsCord extension your on-page companion - quiet when you don’t need it, powerful when you do. Here’s what we’re cooking: 👇

Execution? Not great. Too much friction having to dig into the extension menu each time. And soon, we were off building something bigger: a full-blown app. But now, we're circling back - with everything we’ve learned, rebuilt from the ground up with zero friction and max utility.

100

🚀 NewsCord Browser Companion V2 Coming Soon! (see demo) The first thing we ever built @newscord_org was a Chrome extension. It made sense - people are reading across different news sites, so why not offer instant context with a click?

140

How the Washington Post covers war crimes differently based on who is committing them:

051

Accountable Media's complaint template: accountable-media.com?title=the_gu... Their technology makes it quick and simple to email newsrooms, and they use a variety of techniques to maximise the likelihood of getting a response

042

This framing is replicated across many mainstream outlets such as: The Independent BBC Associated Press Washington Post NPR (horrific hearsay framing despite video evidence) Complain to The Guardian using the link below 👇🏼 (takes one minute)

162

Take action via @Accmedia48, where you can complain in under a minute. The Guardian must correct course and report without the compromised agenda of casting doubt when there is none. Israel deliberately massacred 15 ambulance crew members. It's as simple as that.

174

In light of this footage directly contradicting Israel’s narrative, journalists have a duty to qualify future statements, for example: "Israel, whose claims have repeatedly been disproven - including in the massacre of medics..."

040

Yet another Israeli claim has been proven false Will Western media finally start treating Israeli justifications with the skepticism they deserve? Our data shows that even when covering Israeli massacres, Western outlets devote more space to military justifications than to Palestinian suffering

142

Israeli 'justification' that "vehicles were approaching suspiciously without headlights or emergency signals" has been proven to be a lie. But the headlines are still passive. None of these headlines are directly stating that Israel shot and killed the ambulance crew.

173

Our app brings together sources from across the spectrum, empowering you to quickly compare narratives and see the full picture.

010

Using data that shows indiscriminate killing, then masking it with vague language, is deeply misleading

The figure comes from Gaza’s Health Ministry, which reports that most of the Palestinians killed by Israel were women and children. Yet the headline downplays this by framing it as a “war with Hamas,” suggesting a battle between equals rather than mass civilian slaughter

When reporting on the the very conservative Health Ministry figure of 50,000 Palestinians killed by Israel (past 18 months): - "people killed" who? Israelis too? - Who killed them? - "conflict" - "war with Hamas"

When it's an Israeli massacre: - Israeli military justification is given - Use of the word "allegedly" - "Palestinian health officials say"

NewsCord @newscord.org · 04/04/2025

How the media covers war crimes differently based on who is committing them 🧵 WaPo Russian massacre: reported with active language, attacker named, death toll given with no attribution. WaPo Israeli massacre: "officials say", dozens killed "as Israel expands..."

143

Thank you for the lovely shout-out ❤️

The Bandofla Podcast @bandofla.bsky.social · 04/04/2025

Reposted by NewsCord

@newscord.org big love to Newscord.... Never underestimate the valuable work you all do there. Really impressed listening to you at the West Norwood 4 Palestine event last night . . same to AccountableMedia and Ramsey, Hamza Yusuf at DeclassifiedUK and Lujane One day inshallah we will see justice

131

NewsCord @newscord.org · 02/04/2025

NewsCord 🤝 Accountable Media Powerful pipeline: - People see egregious coverage on the NewsCord app - Accountable Media sets up campaign - We notify everyone - Send complaint to outlet in 10 seconds - Demand accountability This notification was just sent out to thousands of our users.

020

We've seen Western media unite on this narrative stronger than ever before. Outlets covering the real purpose of the protests are few and far between. Our app helps sift through and find comparisons to reveal the gaps. Consume news differently with our app! We hope this thread was informative ❤️

020

It's worth including this excerpt from a Sky News article. Where Alistair Bunkali from Sky does say that these protests are not "simply anti-Hamas".

131

Here, our app captures a stark contrast in narrative between mainstream outlet CNN and alternative outlet @commondreams.org CNN causally relays "voluntary emigration plan" but Common Dreams calls it what it is: ethnic cleansing

This attempt to shift blame away from Israel for 17 months, and counting, of genocide is coupled with continued normalization of what was unthinkable even a year ago: the public calls for ethnic cleansing.

..and other journalists are involved with Hamas is not sufficient and does not justify killing him. So it is clear: there are Israeli journalists with direct lines of communication with anti-Hamas individuals in Gaza and the mainstream is using these sources to rapidly spread a one-sided narrative.

Well, here's on of his earlier tweets, where he peddles Israel propaganda that Hossam Shabat, the journalist Israel assassinated, was a Hamas sniper. This is despite @rsf.org conducting an investigation and concluding that the evidence provided by Israel to suggest that Hossam...cont.

The point is that, by and large, these protests are Palestinians uniting to call for the end of the genocide and the end of Israel's blockade of all aid. But it does beg the question: is the BBC's primary source Ariel Oseran reliable?

This is the primary source used by the BBC on their Instagram post. We're not going to speculate on the legitimacy of the anti-Hamas chants. That's not the point of this thread.

This video published by Ariel Oseran on X shows the person filming the footage starting an anti-Hamas chant, "Hamas out".

Political skew is meaningless when it comes to how the genocide has been covered. Across the board, the protests have been generalised as "anti-Hamas".

This narrative also fuels Netanyahu’s claim that “the plan is working,” emboldening Israel to justify the illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing of Gaza they openly advocate.

Framing these protests as “anti-Hamas” based on slogans from a minority whitewashes the past 17 months, rewrites history, and absolves Israel of blame. It manufactures the reaction: “See? Even they think it’s Hamas’ fault.” This paves the way for Israel’s next phase of genocide: ethnic cleansing.

Yes, some anti-Hamas chants are heard, but there’s no evidence to suggest these protests are solely “anti-Hamas.” By generalizing them, Western media shifts blame from Israel’s destruction of Gaza, its massacres, and its blockade that’s starving and suffocating the population.

130