Sign in

Webster Ledger

@news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy
2 followers 0 following 109 posts

Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Town board, schools, development, civic life. Reported, not aggregated. 🌉 bridged from ⁂ websterledger.com, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 10/10/2026
The Webster Town Board holds a public hearing on the 2027 preliminary town budget at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 15, at 1002 Ridge Road. Both Verizon tower applications were tabled to the town Zoning Board of Appeals' Oct. 13 meeting.
websterledger.com
The week ahead in Webster: 2027 town budget hearing Oct. 15
The Webster Town Board holds a public hearing on the town's 2027 preliminary budget at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 15, at 1002 Ridge Road. Any person may be heard in favor of or against the budget. On Tuesday, Oct. 13, the town Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Both Verizon tower applications were tabled to that date at the board's Sept. 8 meeting. This edition covers the 12 days from Monday, Oct. 12, through Friday, Oct. 23. ## The 2027 town budget hearing The preliminary budget is on file with the Town Clerk and available for public inspection during regular office hours. A Town Board workshop starts at 6:30 p.m. and the Town Board meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Oct. 15, both in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Speakers at the hearing get five minutes each. A resolution to adopt the town's 2027 final budget is on the meeting's agenda. Previously in the Ledger: What's in Webster's 2027 preliminary budget, ahead of the Oct. 15 hearing (Sept. 30). ## The Verizon towers At its Sept. 8 meeting, the town Zoning Board of Appeals tabled both Verizon tower applications to its Oct. 13 meeting. The town Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 13, in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Six applications are on the agenda, including both Verizon tower applications under "Tabled Matters." Previously in the Ledger: Zoning board closes comment on both Verizon towers and tables them to October (Sept. 9) and Planning Board gives Webster North tower preliminary approval, tables Lake Road to Nov. 10 (Oct. 7). ## Day by day * **Monday, Oct. 12.** Webster Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road, is closed and reopens for regular hours Tuesday, Oct. 13. Village offices are closed. The Webster Central School District has no school for prekindergarten through 12th grade. The Webster Public Library is closed. * **Tuesday, Oct. 13.** The Webster Central School District Board of Education holds a regular business meeting at 5 p.m. in the second-floor Professional Development Center, 119 South Ave. The meeting's topic is "AI & Instructional Tech." Regular business meetings are livestreamed at websterschools.org/boemeetings. Anyone who wants to address the board should register with the district clerk by noon on the meeting day. The meeting's agenda is posted on BoardDocs. The town Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. (see above). * **Wednesday, Oct. 14.** The library's Board of Trustees meets at 7 p.m. in the Large Study Room (Blue). The meeting is open to the public. * **Thursday, Oct. 15.** The Town Board workshop is at 6:30 p.m., and the meeting and budget hearing are at 7:30 p.m. (see above). The village Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 6:30 p.m. in the Village of Webster Community Meeting Hall, 29 South Ave. All board meetings are streamed live on the village's Facebook page. * **Wednesday, Oct. 21.** There is a Conservation Board meeting at 6:30 p.m. The town's calendar listing gave no street address when the Ledger checked Oct. 9. * **Thursday, Oct. 22.** The West Webster Fire District's Board of Fire Commissioners holds a public hearing on the district's proposed budget at 5:30 p.m. at the West Webster Fire Station, 1051 Gravel Road. Any person may be heard in favor of or against the proposed budget. The Village Board meets at 6:30 p.m. in the Village of Webster Community Meeting Hall, 29 South Ave. * **Friday, Oct. 23.** A Family Carving Night for Pumpkins on Parade, program 301208-A, runs from 6 to 8 p.m. Everyone is welcome, the cost is $5 and registration is required. The town's fall program guide does not list a location. ## At the library Programs at the Webster Public Library, 980 Ridge Road, include these: * **Tuesday, Oct. 13, 1 to 4 p.m.** Short Films from the Rochester Intl. Film Festival, in the Community Room. The films are intended for adults 18 and older, and no registration is required. * **Thursday, Oct. 15, 1 to 2 p.m.** The Lunchtime Book Discussion, on "The Man Who Could Move Clouds," in the Large Study Room (Blue). No registration is necessary. * **Friday, Oct. 16, 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.** Library Trick-or-Treat!, a trick-or-treat trail through the library with a maze at the end. * **Saturday, Oct. 17, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.** A Halloween Drop-In Craft in the Storytime Room. All ages are welcome, and no registration is required. * **Wednesday, Oct. 21, through Friday, Oct. 23.** The Friends of the Webster Public Library fall book sale, in the Community Room. The Wednesday session, 4 to 7 p.m., is for Friends members only; memberships are sold online and at the door. The Thursday session, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., is open to anyone. The Friday session, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., is a bring-your-own-bag day at $5 a bag. The full schedule is at websterlibrary.org. ## Looking ahead: Saturday, Oct. 24 * **Drug take-back.** A fall drug take-back day runs from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Webster Justice Court, 1002 Ridge Road, behind Webster Town Hall and the Police Department. It is a drive-through event, with no appointment or registration needed. * **Early voting.** Early voting in the 2026 general election runs from Saturday, Oct. 24, through Sunday, Nov. 1. The Webster Justice Court Building, 1002 Ridge Road, is an early voting site, with Saturday hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eligible voters can vote at any early voting site in the county. Previously in the Ledger: How to vote in Webster for the Nov. 3 general election (Oct. 8). * **Book sale.** The book sale's last session is a bring-your-own-bag sale from 10 a.m. to noon in the library's Community Room, at $5 a bag. Anyone is welcome. * **Pumpkins on Parade.** Pumpkins on Parade runs from 7 to 8:30 p.m. on the Chiyoda Trail at the Webster Recreation Center, 1350 Chiyoda Drive. The event is free and open to the public, with no registration required. ## Finding the agendas The town posts agendas on its AgendaCenter page. The district posts Board of Education agendas on BoardDocs, linked from the board page at websterschools.org. The village links Village Board agendas from its meetings page. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2026
Early voting starts Saturday, Oct. 24, at 15 sites in Monroe County, including the Webster Justice Court Building. Registrations and mail ballot applications sent by mail or online must be received by the Board of Elections that day.
websterledger.com
How to vote in Webster for the Nov. 3 general election
Early voting for the Nov. 3 general election begins Saturday, Oct. 24. Webster voters can vote early at the Webster Justice Court Building, 1002 Ridge Road, or at any other early voting site in Monroe County. Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 3, and polls are open 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 24, is also a deadline. Under the state Board of Elections' 2026 political calendar, voter registrations must be received by the Monroe County Board of Elections by that day. So must mail ballot applications sent by mail or made online. ## Early voting Early voting runs Saturday, Oct. 24, through Sunday, Nov. 1. The county Board of Elections lists these early voting hours: * **Saturday, Oct. 24, and Sunday, Oct. 25:** 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. * **Monday, Wednesday and Friday, Oct. 26, 28 and 30:** 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. * **Tuesday and Thursday, Oct. 27 and 29:** noon to 8 p.m. * **Saturday, Oct. 31, and Sunday, Nov. 1:** 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. There is no early voting on Monday, Nov. 2. The board says voters can choose any of the county's 15 early voting locations. Besides Webster's, they include these two: * Penfield Community Center Braman Room, 1985 Baird Road, Penfield * Irondequoit Community Center, 450 Skyview Centre Parkway, Suite 200, Rochester All 15 are on the board's early voting page and its early voting map flyer. Every early voting site will have a Spanish-language interpreter, the board says. It lists an ASL interpreter at three sites: the Monroe County Office Building, Brighton Farmers Market and Henrietta Public Library. If you vote early, you can't vote again on Election Day, the board says. ## Registering to vote The county's registration page links to the state's online registration and to printable forms. A paper form needs an original signature, so it has to be mailed or brought to the Board of Elections, the page says. You can check your registration with the board's voter lookup. If you've moved, contact the Board of Elections to update your address before you vote. Affidavit ballots, also called provisional ballots, are available at early voting sites and on Election Day, the board says, so voters can complete a ballot even if for some reason they are not in its files. ## Voting by mail Any registered voter can request an early mail ballot without giving a reason. An absentee ballot requires one of the reasons the board lists, such as being away from the county on Election Day or an illness or disability that keeps you from the polls. Deadlines to apply for either ballot: * **By mail or online:** received by the board by Saturday, Oct. 24. * **In person at the Board of Elections:** Monday, Nov. 2. The county's absentee voting page links to the state's online application. To return a ballot: * **By mail:** it must be postmarked by Election Day, Nov. 3. The state calendar says the county board must receive it by Tuesday, Nov. 10. * **In person:** every polling site has a ballot drop box during early voting and on Election Day, the county board says. The state calendar's deadline to deliver a ballot to the board or a poll site in the county is close of polls on Election Day. In a June 9 release ahead of the June primary, the state Board of Elections urged voters to return mail ballots early. Under updated U.S. Postal Service guidance, a postmark reflects the date mail is processed at a postal facility rather than the date it was deposited in the mail, the release said. It said the postal changes do not alter New York's election laws. Voters mailing close to the deadline can ask for a hand-stamped postmark at a USPS retail counter at no charge, it said. If you request an early mail or absentee ballot for the Nov. 3 election and then decide to vote in person, you can't vote on a voting machine. You can still vote in person with an affidavit ballot, the board's early voting page says. Its absentee page adds that if your absentee ballot has been received, the affidavit ballot will not be counted. If it hasn't, the affidavit ballot will be considered. ## Election Day Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 3. Polls are open 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., according to the county Board of Elections. On Election Day, vote at your polling place. Find it by entering your street number, street name, ZIP code, last name and date of birth in the board's voter lookup. The board says polling sites are inspected for ADA accessibility, a friend, relative or election inspector can help you vote, and an accessible ballot marking device is available at early voting and on Election Day. ## Contact the Board of Elections The Monroe County Board of Elections is at 435 Smith St., Rochester. Its phone number is 585-753-1550. Office hours are Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
001
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 07/10/2026
The Planning Board granted preliminary site plan approval to Verizon's Webster North tower and tabled the Lake Road tower to Nov. 10. The board also approved a Ridge Road addition, signs for two businesses and two pole barns.
websterledger.com
Planning Board gives Webster North tower preliminary approval, tables Lake Road to Nov. 10
The Webster Planning Board granted preliminary site plan approval Oct. 6 to Verizon's 135-foot Webster North tower on Wildflower Drive. The board tabled the Lake Road tower to its next meeting, Nov. 10. Both towers had been tabled Sept. 1 and returned with new filings dated Sept. 29. The board also approved a building addition on Ridge Road, signs for two businesses and two pole barns, and heard an informational sketch plan for Olive Garden. ## Results by agenda item * **Webster North tower, 1222 Wildflower Drive:** preliminary site plan approval granted. * **Lake Road and County Line Road tower:** tabled to Nov. 10. * **Vital Sign building addition, 764 Ridge Road:** preliminary and final site plan approval granted. * **OptiCool signs, 855 Publishers Parkway:** approved. * **Himalayan Kitchen sign, 1075 Ridge Road:** approved. * **Pole barn, Pellett Road:** preliminary and final site plan approval granted. * **Pole barn, Gravel Road:** preliminary and final site plan approval granted. * **Olive Garden, 931 Holt Road:** informational sketch plan review with no vote. * **Minutes:** approved. ## Webster North, Wildflower Drive The board granted preliminary site plan approval for a 135-foot tower with a 4-foot lightning rod on a 14.2-acre parcel in an R-3 single-family residential district. The board closed the public hearing before voting. The approval vote was 4-2. The approval is preliminary. Verizon's Sept. 29 letter describes the application as one for site plan approval, special permit approval and an area variance. The Zoning Board of Appeals tabled both towers to its October meeting, Oct. 13. In its Sept. 29 letter, Verizon agreed to extend the federal shot clock, the deadline for the town to act on the application, to Nov. 20. Verizon's attorney said the company's radio-frequency engineer analyzed the Webster Presbyterian Church site and found it not viable, because it would not cover the project's western and central corridors. Verizon also said it flew an additional drone Sept. 11 and said the drone was not visible from neighboring properties. William Johnson of RF Engineering Consultants, the board's radio-frequency consultant, reviewed Verizon's church-site analysis. Johnson said the church site would not cover the area to the west and would overlap areas the proposed tower already covers. A Wildflower Drive neighbor said the drone was small and could be seen only by zooming in with a camera. ## Lake Road and County Line Road The board tabled the Lake Road tower to Nov. 10. The application is for a 125-foot tower with a 4-foot lightning rod on a 7.8-acre parcel in a large-lot residential district. In its Sept. 29 letter for this application, Verizon agreed to the same Nov. 20 shot clock date. Verizon was asked at the meeting to do two things before Nov. 10: * Ask the property owner to approach the conservation program described at the meeting as covering the land, about allowing a tower on the south edge of the parcel, near the woods. * Show photos of comparable tower sites and screening options. Verizon said it met with the owner on site and that he was firm he could not accommodate another location. In an Aug. 3 review, the board's radio-frequency consultants recommended that Verizon be asked to document its outreach to the owners of four candidate sites if the board finds the record does not show those alternatives were unavailable. Verizon said it would provide more documentation of that outreach. The company also asked the board to pass along a final list of what it needs so it can return Nov. 10 with a complete package. During the public hearing, attorneys for Lake Road neighbors said Verizon's search for alternative sites was insufficient. One attorney called the Seaway Trail an aesthetic resource and said the state environmental review should find that the project may have a significant adverse impact, which is called a positive declaration. Residents who live near the site said they have Verizon service without problems. One neighbor across the road said the tower would line up with a driveway and that landscaping would need to be planted at tower height to screen it. One speaker said a buyer for nearby property backed out after learning of the proposed tower. Verizon's attorney said the company evaluated seven candidate parcels, that the remaining property owners in the search area declined to negotiate and that Verizon cannot compel a lease. An owner who said her land is inside Verizon's search area said at the hearing that she was never contacted about putting a tower there. Verizon's radio-frequency engineer said the need is mid-band capacity, and that sector splitting would not provide mid-band service in this area. Verizon said it could add a different fence or landscaping and would welcome the board's comments on the driveway location. Verizon's representatives said a monopine-style camouflage tower would leave less room for other carriers and does not suit an open field. Verizon also said it could explore one if the board directs. ## Other approvals The board granted preliminary and final site plan approval for the Vital Sign building addition at 764 Ridge Road after tabling the application Sept. 1. The project is a 15,000-square-foot, one-story addition to an 11,000-square-foot building on 4.21 acres in the Commercial Outdoor Storage district. Conditions read at the meeting included a letter of credit and public works approvals. Final approval also required a letter of certification from the engineer before a certificate of occupancy. The board approved two non-illuminated monument signs for OptiCool at 855 Publishers Parkway and a 48.2-square-foot internally illuminated wall sign for Himalayan Kitchen at 1075 Ridge Road. The board granted preliminary and final site plan approval for a 768-square-foot pole barn on Pellett Road and a 1,140-square-foot pole barn on Gravel Road. Conditions read for the Pellett Road barn included personal use only, and the Gravel Road barn carried the same conditions. The board also approved its minutes. ## Olive Garden sketch plan, Holt Road A company representative presented a sketch plan to renovate and expand the former UNO Pizzeria building at 931 Holt Road. The plan includes new exterior stone cladding, redone landscaping and curbside to-go service without a drive-through. A sketch plan review is informational, and the board took no vote. The meeting heard that a licensed landscape architect should design the landscaping and that the dumpster enclosure needs a cover and solid screening. Two letters opposing the Olive Garden plan were read aloud at the meeting. The applicant was told to prepare and return for approval. The town's Property Under Review page lists the site for an area variance before the Zoning Board of Appeals Oct. 13. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 06/10/2026
Both of Verizon's proposed cell towers return to the Webster Planning Board on Tuesday, Oct. 6, each with a new filing dated Sept. 29. The eight-item agenda includes five public hearings.
websterledger.com
Both Verizon towers return to the Planning Board Tuesday, with new filings on each
Both of Verizon's proposed cell towers return to the Webster Planning Board at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 6, in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Each comes with a new filing dated Sept. 29. The board tabled both towers to this meeting on Sept. 1. The agenda lists eight items, five of them public hearings. The six other items are a building addition on Ridge Road, two sign applications and two pole barns, plus a sketch plan review on Holt Road. ## Webster North, 1222 Wildflower Drive Verizon is requesting preliminary site plan approval for a 135-foot tower with a 4-foot lightning rod. The item is listed as a public hearing. Verizon's Sept. 29 filing includes an analysis rejecting the Webster Presbyterian Church site at 550 Webster Road, which the church offered at the Sept. 8 zoning board meeting. The cover letter says the church site's "coverage footprint is displaced to the east, which would fail to provide adequate coverage for the western and central corridors of the project area." ## Lake Road and County Line Road Verizon is requesting preliminary site plan approval for a 125-foot tower with a 4-foot lightning rod. The board left the public hearing open when it tabled the item Sept. 1. Verizon's Sept. 29 filing for Lake Road adds a landscaping plan of 38 Green Giant western arborvitae around the lease area. The cover letter says the plan is meant "to screen ground-level equipment from view and minimize potential visual impact from passing vehicles." The letter responds to two law firms' letters. It characterizes them as objecting to the site's location and contending that Verizon's alternatives analysis is inadequate and that the project has not met state environmental review requirements, including for visual impact. ## Both towers In both letters, Verizon agrees to extend the shot clock, the federal deadline for the town to act on each application, to Nov. 20. Each letter is addressed to the Town Board, the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Each describes Verizon's application as one for site plan approval, special permit approval and an area variance. The Zoning Board of Appeals closed public comment on both towers Sept. 8 and tabled them to its October meeting, Oct. 13. ## Ridge Road addition The Vital Sign Building Addition at 764 Ridge Road was also tabled Sept. 1. The request is for preliminary and final site plan approval of a 15,000-square-foot one-story addition to an existing 11,000-square-foot building. The item is listed as a public hearing. Revised plans dated Sept. 23 and Sept. 29 and a stormwater report are on file with the agenda. ## Former UNO Pizzeria, Holt Road Item 8, listed on the agenda as Olive Garden, is a sketch plan review at 931 Holt Road. The review involves the renovation and expansion of the former UNO Pizzeria building, according to the agenda. A sketch plan review is informational, and the board takes no vote on it. The town's Property Under Review page lists the site for an area variance before the Zoning Board of Appeals Oct. 13. ## Signs and pole barns Two sign applications are listed: OptiCool monument signs at 855 Publishers Parkway (plan) and an internally illuminated wall sign for Himalayan Kitchen at 1075 Ridge Road. Two pole barns are listed as public hearings: a 768-square-foot barn on Pellett Road and a 1,140-square-foot barn on Gravel Road. ## How to comment Residents can speak at the hearings or send written comments through the town's Planning/Zoning Board Meeting Comment Form. The form asks that board meeting comments be submitted "no later than 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting." It says comments are "shared with the appropriate Board Members and included as part of meeting records." The town has posted video of past Planning Board meetings on its Agendas page. ## Also Tuesday The same evening, from 6 to 8 p.m., the town calendar lists a community meeting with Webster police on speeding at 1350 Chiyoda Drive. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 05/10/2026
The Town of Webster Highway Department collects leaves piled at the end of the lawn every fall. Here is where to put them, what to leave out and how the town announces each run.
websterledger.com
How Webster's fall leaf pickup works, and how to know when a run starts
The Town of Webster Highway Department collects leaves every fall, and residents don't have to bag them. The town's leaf pickup page says residents "can place their leaf piles at the end of their lawn." No start date for this fall's collection was posted on the town's leaf page, Highway Updates page or News Flash list when the Ledger checked them Monday, Oct. 5. The leaf page says, "We will announce each time a new run will begin." ## Where to put your leaves The town's leaf collection FAQ says, "Please place leaves at the end of your lawn, not in roadways or gutters." Gutters have to stay clear so water drains off the roads, the FAQ says. The FAQ also says placing leaves anywhere on the road surface "is illegal and creates a hazardous situation." Keep twigs, branches and other debris out of the piles. The FAQ says the town's leaf collection vehicles "are only equipped to collect leaves." ## How the zones work The town's posted zone map shows five leaf pickup zones. Each pass starts in Zone 1, the Bay Road area on the west side of town. Crews then work east to the County Line Road area, the FAQ says. When a pass is completed, crews loop back to Zone 1 to begin the next one, and the town makes multiple passes through the fall. The FAQ points residents to the zone map "to get an idea of when their street falls on our pass schedule." The town says it can't give daily street updates or make a special trip between runs. How long a full run takes depends on leaf volume and weather, according to the leaf page. ## How to hear when a run starts The town says it announces runs in these places: * **Highway Updates:** the department's updates page on the town website. * **Notify Me:** the town's Notify Me page offers a Highway list for "current projects, upcoming roadwork, leaf pickup, and snow alerts." * **Social media:** the town's own accounts. ## After the final pass The FAQ says the town will announce the date for the final town-wide pass. It also says, "After the final pass is completed, any remaining leaves will need to be bagged for your trash hauler." ## Village of Webster residents The Village of Webster runs its own leaf pickup through its Public Works Department. The village's Public Works page says the services on it are for village residents. Residents can check whether they live in the village on the village map. Village leaf pickup begins when leaves start to accumulate on the ground and runs until the beginning of December or the first heavy snowfall, whichever comes first, according to the page. Village crews "will traverse each Village street once a week to remove leaves from the curb." The village's leaf guidelines, as posted: * "Do not bag your leaves for Village curbside pickup" * "Do not place brush, rocks, pumpkins, wood, plastic, or other foreign material with your leaves" * "Do not place leaves in roadway, or on top of drainage structures, concrete, in gutters, or drainage ditches" The village also picks up brush, typically during the first full week of the month, with one pass down village streets. Its 2026 schedule includes brush weeks starting Nov. 2 and Dec. 7. Brush has to be at the curb no later than the Sunday night before the pickup week, which is Nov. 1 and Dec. 6 for those two weeks. Brush should be 1 to 6 inches in diameter and at least 4 feet long, according to the page, which lists other brush rules. The village says it cannot pick up brush left by a contractor's tree trimming or removal. ## Who to call Questions about a specific street go to the town Highway Department at (585) 872-1443. The office at 1005 Picture Parkway is open weekdays from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. through March 31, according to the town's staff directory. Village residents can reach the village's main office at (585) 265-3770. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026
The Webster Town Board approved two amendments to the town's state snow and ice agreement and a Dawn Circle fence license Thursday, each 4-0.
websterledger.com
Town Board approves state snow and ice amendments in 4-0 votes
The Webster Town Board voted 4-0 Thursday to approve two amendments adding funding to the town's agreement with the state Department of Transportation, under which the state pays the town to control snow and ice on state highways. Supervisor Alex Scialdone and Councilmen John Cahill, Nick Hunter and Garrett Wagner voted aye on roll calls for seven of the eight items on the agenda, the same eight the Ledger's preview listed Thursday morning. Councilwoman Jennifer Wright was absent. The eighth item was the minutes of the board's Sept. 17 workshop and meeting. The board took up a motion to approve each set. ## At a glance * **Snow and ice:** amendments for the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 seasons, 4-0 each. * **Dawn Circle:** a license for a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in a town stormwater drainage easement, 4-0. * **Police trailer:** a 2002 Doolittle cargo trailer to auction, 4-0, on a motion by Hunter. * **Routine business:** bills, a prepaid warrant and purchase orders, 4-0 each. Cahill moved the bills. * **Minutes:** a motion to approve each set of Sept. 17 minutes, workshop and meeting. The Ledger could not confirm the roll calls on those two motions from the town's recording. * **Open to the Floor:** a speaker asked that someone contact Webster Presbyterian Church about the Verizon tower proposed near Wildflower Drive. ## Snow and ice Both amendments add funding to contract D014752, the town's five-year snow and ice agreement with the state, according to the resolutions posted with the agenda. Under the agreement, which runs through June 30, 2029, the state agreed to pay the town $101,201.40 for 24.30 lane miles for each average season, in consideration of the town's work. The resolutions call that figure the estimated expenditure. Under Amendment No. 3, the expenditure reimbursement amount for 2024-2025 is amended to $146,669.20. Under Amendment No. 4, the base expenditure reimbursement for 2025-2026 is amended to $104,834.65. ## Dawn Circle fence Before the vote, the owners of the Dawn Circle property were asked whether they understood that "if we need to get in, that fence will be destroyed and the town is not on the hook for it." The answer was yes. ## Open to the Floor A speaker who said they had spoken on behalf of Webster Presbyterian Church raised the Verizon cell tower proposed near Wildflower Drive. The speaker said the church offered its property for Verizon to examine as a tower site, to help neighbors who do not want the tower, and that the church "does not need the money." "Somebody please call the church and let them know what your assessment is," the speaker said, adding that they were sure people in the community would also like to know the end result. The speaker told the board it did not need to answer that night. The town's recording shows no response from a board member before the presiding officer closed Open to the Floor. A representative of the church offered its property at 550 Webster Road as an alternative site at the Zoning Board of Appeals' Sept. 8 hearing on Verizon's towers. Verizon told the zoning board later that night that the church sits outside the company's search area and that a Verizon radio-frequency engineer vetted the property and found it does not work, the Ledger's recap of that hearing reported. The Planning Board's posted agenda for 7 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 6, at 1002 Ridge Road lists both of Verizon's proposed towers as tabled matters. One is the Webster North tower at 1222 Wildflower Drive. Verizon's counsel, Laura Smith of Nixon Peabody, told the zoning board Sept. 8 that the company also needs a special permit from the Town Board. ## Coming up Events mentioned at the meeting, with details from each organizer: * **Saturday, Oct. 3:** an America 250 celebration at the Webster Museum, 18 Lapham Park, from 1 to 4 p.m., per the museum's flyer. * **Sunday, Oct. 4:** the West Webster Fire Department's open house from 1 to 4 p.m. at Station 1 on Gravel Road. The department says a National Guard Black Hawk helicopter will be on display. * **Tuesday, Oct. 6:** a community meeting on speeding with Police Chief Dennis Kohlmeier from 6 to 8 p.m. at the Recreation Center, 1350 Chiyoda Drive. * **Friday, Oct. 23:** Family Carving Night for Pumpkins on Parade from 6 to 8 p.m. The Parks and Recreation fall program guide lists the carving night at $5 with registration required. * **Saturday, Oct. 24:** Pumpkins on Parade from 6:30 to 8 p.m. on the Chiyoda Trail at the Recreation Center. The guide says it is free. * **Saturday, Oct. 24:** a drive-through drug take-back from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Webster Justice Court, 1002 Ridge Road. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/10/2026
The Webster Town Board's 6:30 p.m. workshop Thursday, Oct. 1, is canceled. The board meets once that day, at 7:30 p.m. The posted agenda lists no public hearings.
websterledger.com
Town Board meets at 7:30 p.m. Thursday; 6:30 p.m. workshop canceled
The Webster Town Board meets at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 1. The 6:30 p.m. workshop the same evening is canceled. The posted meeting agenda lists eight items of regular town business: four resolutions and four routine approvals. It has no public hearings and no library item. **Fence license.** One resolution would approve a license agreement for a 6-foot wooden privacy fence on Dawn Circle. The fence would sit on land where the town holds a stormwater drainage easement. The board approved two fence licenses in town drainage easements at its Aug. 20 meeting. **Snow and ice.** Two resolutions would add funding to the town's snow and ice removal contract with the New York State Department of Transportation. One would cover the 2024-2025 season and the other the 2025-2026 season. The state transportation department says it pays municipalities that do snow and ice work on state highways through either a time-and-materials contract or a lump-sum agreement. **Police trailer.** Another resolution would approve sending a 2002 Doolittle cargo trailer from the Police Department to auction. **Routine items.** The board would also consider the minutes of its Sept. 17 workshop and meeting, bills, a prepaid warrant and purchase orders. The agenda says it is subject to change. **How to attend.** The meeting is in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. The room is behind the main Town Hall next to the Justice Courts, in the building with the blue roof. Open to the Floor, the public comment period, comes before regular business, and each speaker is allowed five minutes. The town has posted recent meetings on its YouTube channel, linked from the Agenda Center. **School tax.** For a Webster Central School District tax bill paid to the town's receiver of taxes, the town's school tax legal notice says, "From September 1, through October 1, no interest is due if the total is paid in full." **Budget.** The posted agenda has no item on the town's 2027 budget. For that, see the Ledger's explainer on Webster's 2027 preliminary budget. The Ledger will report what the board decides. For Thursday, Oct. 15, the town calendar lists a 6:30 p.m. Town Board workshop and a 7:30 p.m. meeting. The board set a public hearing on the 2027 preliminary budget for that day at its Sept. 17 meeting. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 30/09/2026
Webster's 2027 preliminary budget lists 6% more in appropriations across all town funds and 3.11% more to be raised by taxes, including sewer and special districts. The Town Board has set a public hearing for Oct. 15.
websterledger.com
What's in Webster's 2027 preliminary budget, ahead of the Oct. 15 hearing
Webster's 2027 preliminary budget lists 6% more in appropriations across all town funds than the 2026 adopted budget and 3.11% more to be raised by taxes, including sewer and special districts. The Town Board has set a public hearing on the budget for Oct. 15. The 29-page document, posted by the town in September, lists each fund and department line by line, with the 2027 figure next to the 2026 figure. ## The headline numbers The preliminary budget lists $23,567,025 as the amount to be raised by taxes, including sewer and special districts. That is $711,882, or 3.11%, more than in 2026. The board made the tentative budget the preliminary budget on Sept. 17, and the Ledger's recap of that meeting reported the levy and the estimated tax rate changes. ## How appropriations up 6% become a levy up 3.11% Across all funds, the preliminary budget lists $56,470,539 in appropriations. That is $3,198,225, or 6%, more than the 2026 adopted budget. A footnote says the totals include $5,049,442 in transfers between the town's own funds. The library's $3,000,768, for example, appears once as a general fund expense and again in the library fund. The levy covers $711,882 of the $3,198,225 increase. Measured against the 2026 adopted budget, two other sources cover the rest. Estimated revenues are $668,961 higher. Unexpended balance, also called fund balance, is money left over from earlier years. The preliminary budget uses $7,825,540 of fund balance, $1,817,382 more than in 2026. Most of that larger draw is in the town-wide general fund, which covers all 16,894 parcels in town. The preliminary budget appropriates $2,797,000 of that fund's balance, against $1,150,000 in 2026. The same fund's "Other Revenue" block is $4,447,200, against $5,023,266. Federal ARPA aid, $349,000 in 2026, is listed at $0. The fund's share of sales tax is $2,211,000, against $2,479,000. Mortgage tax is $1,100,000, against $1,000,000. Finance Director Paul Adams spoke about the use of fund balance at the Sept. 17 meeting, as the recap reported. ## What's new in the details The Ledger's Aug. 3 and Aug. 10 pieces covered the town's budget workshops. The lines below are all in the town-wide general fund. **Debt service.** The preliminary budget lists $2,426,798 to be raised by taxes for debt service, against $1,666,725 in 2026. Most of the change is in principal on the bond anticipation note for the Highway Building: $950,000, against $325,000. Interest on the same note is $1,037,112, against $967,306. The Ledger's explainer on town debt covers the Highway Building's $28.25 million authorization and how the notes work. **Transfer to the capital fund.** The general fund lists a $290,000 transfer to the capital fund, against $0 in 2026. **Insurance.** The line for the town's SMP insurance policy is $670,000, against $561,000. Adding a $5,000 line for official bonds and subtracting a $40,000 transfer in from the sewer fund, the town insurance section draws $635,000 from taxes, against $526,000. **Animal control.** The equipment line is $52,000, against $2,000. The department also lists new revenue of $6,500 from an animal control seminar. Animal control's amount to be raised by taxes is $123,150, against $69,950. **Advanced life support.** The advanced life support line, headed "WEMS PVEA ALS" in the document, is $150,000, against $100,000 in 2026. **Building maintenance.** The capital improvements line for town buildings is $50,000, against $150,000. Building maintenance as a whole draws $218,500 from taxes, against $318,500. **Employee benefits.** Benefits in the town-wide general fund total $6,463,000, against $5,967,000. The preliminary budget lists the police retirement contribution at $1,518,000, against $1,300,000. The police retirement figure is higher than on the July 14 police worksheet the Aug. 10 piece described, where the retirement contribution line fell $50,000. The employee retirement contribution is $643,000, against $563,000. The Aug. 10 piece covered the police medical insurance lines. ## A quick map of the funds Who pays depends on the fund. Town-wide funds cover all 16,894 parcels in town. Part-town funds cover the 15,397 parcels outside the Village of Webster, according to the budget's summary page. The town-wide general fund carries most departments, including police, recreation and debt service. It lists $17,389,223 to be raised by taxes, against $16,532,563. It also pays for the library through the $3,000,768 transfer, and the library fund has no levy of its own. The highway town-wide fund lists $1,306,066 to be raised by taxes. The general part-town and highway part-town funds each list $0 to be raised by taxes. Both balance on revenues and fund balance, as the Aug. 10 piece explained for the highway side. Sewer rent is billed to parcels outside the village with access to sanitary sewers. The preliminary budget lists a 2027 sewer rent of $249.54 per unit, made up of $141.36 for operation and maintenance and $108.18 for capital. The Ledger's sewer piece from Aug. 10 covers how that compares with 2026. The consolidated drainage district covers 20,310 units. It lists $708,663 to be raised, or $34.89 per unit. Neighborhood lighting, park, sewer and water districts are billed to the parcels in each district. ## The hearing and what comes next The board set the hearing for Oct. 15 by resolution at its Sept. 17 meeting. The town's 2027 budget schedule lists the hearing at 7:30 p.m. The town calendar lists the board's regular Oct. 15 meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Under Town Law §108, "any person may be heard in favor of or against the preliminary budget as compiled or for or against any item or items therein contained." The town's budget schedule lists adoption of the final budget at the same Oct. 15 meeting. Under Town Law §109(2), a town board in Monroe County must adopt its budget no later than Dec. 20. ## How to read it yourself The town posted the preliminary budget on its Detailed Budget page in September, as a 29-page PDF. The first page of the PDF summarizes the funds on one sheet. The department pages follow, each listing 2027 against 2026. In the two part-town funds, some department blocks show an amount to be raised by taxes. Each fund's recap at the end of its section shows $0. Each line code starts with a letter for its fund. In the operating funds, A is the town-wide general fund and B is the general part-town fund. C and D mark the highway town-wide and part-town funds, which the first page labels DA and DB. Sewer lines start with G, and the special districts carry their own letters. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 29/09/2026
A board-by-board guide to where Webster's town, village, school district and library post meeting schedules, agendas, minutes and video.
websterledger.com
Where to find agendas, minutes and recordings for Webster's public boards
Webster's town, village, school district and library each post their boards' meeting records online, starting from their own websites. Some town boards keep separate pages as well. The town and the village are separate governments, and our guide to how Webster is governed explains what each one handles. ## Town of Webster: Town Board, Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals **When they meet.** The town's Town Board page says the board meets on the first and third Thursday of each month unless otherwise specified. Workshops start at 6:30 p.m. and meetings at 7:30 p.m. The page says dates and times are subject to change and asks residents to check the town calendar. The Planning Board page says that board meets on the first Tuesday of each month at 7 p.m. The Zoning Board of Appeals page gives the second Tuesday of each month at 7 p.m. The town calendar sometimes sets a Planning Board or ZBA meeting on a different Tuesday, so confirm the date there before you go. The Planning Board and ZBA pages say meetings are held in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road unless otherwise stated, and the town calendar lists Town Board meetings in the same room. On the calendar, Town Board meetings are under Main Town Calendar, and the Planning Board and ZBA each have their own meeting schedule calendar. The calendar page also offers an iCalendar subscription. **Agendas.** Agendas post in the town's Agenda Center, which has a section for each of the three boards; click a board's name to open its list. A meeting appears there once its agenda is posted, so check the calendar for dates further out. Each listing offers the agenda as a web page or a PDF, along with a packet download. To be notified when agendas and results post, sign up for the Board Meeting Agendas & Results list on the town's Notify Me page. The town says that list covers the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board. **Results and minutes.** The Town Board page says agendas, meeting documents, results and minutes can all be found in the Agenda Center. After meetings, the town also posts a "Results for" item in the Board Meeting Agendas & Results section of its news page. Minutes go in the same Agenda Center listing as the agenda. A note on the Agenda Center says minutes are posted once a board approves them, so the newest meetings may not have minutes yet. For earlier years, the same note points to the town's Archive Center. **Video.** The Agenda Center has a Media column with links to meeting video. The videos are on the town's YouTube channel, which the town links from its home page. The channel's Live tab lists Town Board meetings and workshops, along with Planning Board, ZBA and Conservation Board meetings. For what each of the three boards decides, see our guide to who decides what in Webster. For how a ZBA appeal works, see our explainer on the Zoning Board of Appeals. ## Conservation Board The town's Conservation Board page says the board meets on the third Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. Meetings take place in the Webster Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road unless otherwise stated. The board's agendas, minutes and project reports are on a separate Conservation Board Meetings page, sorted by year. The town says that page shows past and upcoming agendas, so check it for meeting dates. Our profile of the Conservation Board explains what it reviews and how residents can take part. ## Board of Assessment Review The town's Board of Assessment Review page says its meeting schedule is decided each year and that meetings have historically been held in May. Our explainer on the Board of Assessment Review covers Grievance Day and how to file. ## Village of Webster: Village Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Historic Preservation Commission **When they meet.** The village meetings page says the Village Board meets on the second and fourth Thursday of every month, with workshops as needed. The page lists village Zoning Board of Appeals meetings on the third Thursday of every month. The page says both boards begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Village of Webster Community Meeting Hall at 29 South Ave. Confirm Village Board and ZBA dates on the village calendar. The meetings page lists the Historic Preservation Commission on the third Tuesday of the month at 7 p.m. at the Webster Museum, 18 Lapham Park. **Agendas and minutes.** The village meetings page has its own set of document links for each board. Under Village Board Meeting Documents, click Agendas, Packets or Minutes. Under Zoning Board Meeting Documents, click Meeting Agendas or Minutes. Those links open the village's document library on eCode360. **Video.** The meetings page says all board meetings stream live on the village's Facebook page, which it links. The page says past meetings are on the village's YouTube channel. ## Webster Central School District Board of Education **When it meets.** The district's board calendar for the 2026-27 school year says meetings are held at 5 p.m. at the District Office, 119 South Ave. The calendar gives the room as the second-floor Professional Development Center, unless otherwise noted. The calendar is linked from the district's Board of Education meetings page, where the link notes that the calendar is also in BoardDocs. **Agendas and minutes.** The board page links BoardDocs and labels it "Agendas, Calendar & Minutes." Open the Meetings tab in BoardDocs and choose a meeting to see its agenda and attachments. Minutes are posted in BoardDocs with the meeting they cover. **Video.** The district calendar says regular business meetings are live streamed on the Board of Education meetings page. That page carries a player for the next meeting. Below the player is a playlist of past meetings from the district's YouTube channel. The same page links a form for anyone who wants to speak at a meeting. ## Webster Public Library Board of Trustees The library's board documents page says the Board of Trustees meets the second Wednesday of the month at 7 p.m. and that everyone is welcome to attend. The town's Library Board page says meetings take place at the Webster Public Library, 980 Ridge Road, unless otherwise stated. The library says that when a meeting is remote, the public can get the Zoom link by emailing the library director. The board documents page points to the library's events calendar for more information. The board documents page lists each meeting's documents by date, most often as a single board packet. Earlier years are on the library's archived board documents page. ## Town records that aren't posted online For town records that aren't online, the town's Freedom of Information page explains how to file a request under New York's Freedom of Information Law. The page says completed request forms can be emailed to the Town Clerk's Office or mailed to Town Hall at 1000 Ridge Road. Questions go to the clerk's office at 585-872-7060. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
001
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 28/09/2026
The Village of Webster Board will hold a workshop Tuesday, Sept. 29, at 6:30 p.m. At its Sept. 24 meeting, the board approved an additional $69,000 for engineering on the village's wastewater treatment plant project.
websterledger.com
Village Board sets Sept. 29 workshop, approves $69,000 for plant engineering
The Village of Webster Board will hold a workshop Tuesday, Sept. 29, at 6:30 p.m. The board announced the workshop at its Sept. 24 meeting. The meeting recording does not say what the workshop will cover. The board's next meeting after the workshop is Thursday, Oct. 8, also at 6:30 p.m. At the Sept. 24 meeting, the board approved an additional $69,000 for engineering on the village's wastewater treatment plant project. The board also accepted the dedication of two streets. ## $69,000 for plant engineering The money is for additional construction-period engineering services from LaBella Associates, the engineering firm on the plant project. A LaBella project engineer said construction, expected to finish in late May, ran into summer, leading to cost overruns on the firm's end. The firm's monthly spending held at $15,000 to $20,000, roughly its rate from January through May, the engineer said. The $69,000 was described at the meeting as a flat fee for the firm's work from the beginning of June through the end of the project. Asked at the meeting how much of it had been spent, the firm said about $61,000, with the rest to cover closeout work, mainly clean as-built drawings and final paperwork. The engineer said the cost would come out of the village's contingency for the project, the reserve a project sets aside for unplanned costs. As of a budget review two weeks earlier, almost $500,000 was left, the engineer said, prefacing the figure with "I believe." The firm said a ribbon cutting for the plant project is planned for Wednesday, Oct. 14. ## Sampling shed The public works report said village sampling happens at the town's plant before the two systems' flows combine, and they mix more than expected, especially at high flows. A new location appears settled for the village's sampling shed, which is to get new electric service. Then come an online chlorine analyzer's real-time readings, described as a test the village has to do. ## Two streets accepted The board accepted an offer of dedication for two streets. Accepting a dedication generally means the village takes over ownership and upkeep of streets someone else built. ## Surplus list The board also took up a list of surplus declarations. The list included three pallets of old decorative brick that used to surround planters, which staff want to offer to architectural salvage dealers rather than send to auction. Staff said the rest of the list would go to auction: an old Equinox that had been the building inspector's vehicle, an old Ferris mower used at the well field and a roller trailer. ## Goats at Milton Case Park At the Sept. 24 meeting, the goats the Ledger reported were coming to Milton Case Park were described as busy clearing the area along the park's path. A number of people came to a Sunday opening where the goats were introduced. The goats had cleared about 75% of the fenced area they were in, the public works report said. A thank-you from the goats' farm, read at the meeting, said most of the goats are "adoptions and rescues." Residents were encouraged to walk the cleared path from the Wood Street entrance and to leave the fence alone. ## Local laws The village office said tracking showed the state received the village's local law filing five days before the meeting. The office had not yet received the state's letter. The public works report said an annexation local law had been filed and that staff were working with the county on survey maps for filing. The recording does not say which property the annexation law covers, or whether that law is part of the annexation whose remaining steps the Ledger laid out in August. ## What's next * **Tuesday, Sept. 29, 6:30 p.m.:** Village Board workshop. * **Thursday, Oct. 8, 6:30 p.m.:** Village Board meeting. A recording of the Sept. 24 meeting is on YouTube. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 25/09/2026
Oct. 1 is the last day to pay a Webster Central School District tax bill in full to the town's receiver of taxes with no interest, under the town's notice. The Town Board meets that night. The Planning Board meets Oct. 6, and the district lists no school Oct. 9.
websterledger.com
The week ahead in Webster: Town Board Oct. 1, no school in WCSD Oct. 9
Thursday, Oct. 1, is the last day to pay a Webster Central School District tax bill in full to the town's receiver of taxes with no interest, according to the town's school tax collection notice. The Town Board meets that night. The Planning Board meets Tuesday, Oct. 6. The Village Board meets Thursday, Oct. 8. The school district lists Friday, Oct. 9, as a no-school day. This edition covers the 12 days from Monday, Sept. 28, through Friday, Oct. 9. The town's Zoning Board of Appeals calendar listed no meetings from Sept. 28 through Oct. 9 when the Ledger checked Sept. 22. ## Day by day * **Wednesday, Sept. 30.** Community Office Hours with the town supervisor run from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. at the Liberty Lodge in Finn Park, 850 Maple Drive. The town's event page says there will not be a formal presentation. * **Thursday, Oct. 1.** A Webster Central School District tax bill paid in full to the town's receiver of taxes is interest-free through Oct. 1, under the tax collection notice. The Town Board holds a workshop at 6:30 p.m. and its meeting at 7:30 p.m. Both are in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. * **Saturday, Oct. 3.** The Webster Museum holds a 250th celebration from 1 to 4 p.m. at 18 Lapham Park. The museum's flyer lists pioneer games, butter making, apple tasting, penny candy and reenactors. The village's Sept. 8 newsletter lists the event as Celebrate America's 250th and says admission is free. * **Tuesday, Oct. 6.** The Planning Board meets at 7 p.m. in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road, according to the town's event page. * **Thursday, Oct. 8.** The Village Board meets at 6:30 p.m. in the Village of Webster Community Meeting Hall, 29 South Ave. The village's meetings page sets Village Board meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of every month. The village's public calendar listed the Oct. 8 meeting when the Ledger checked Sept. 22. The meetings page says all board meetings are streamed live on the village's Facebook page. * **Friday, Oct. 9.** No school in the Webster Central School District for prekindergarten through 12th grade. The district's calendar lists the day as a Superintendent's Conference Day. ## School tax: full payment through Oct. 1 The town's school tax collection notice says no interest is due from Sept. 1 through Oct. 1 if the total is paid in full. For a full payment made from Oct. 2 through Oct. 31, a 2% interest penalty is added to the entire amount of the bill. The notice says taxes are received at Webster Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road. Hours are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. A drop box in the Town Hall's front vestibule is open 24/7. For mailed payments, the notice says the postmark date decides whether a payment is on time. See the Ledger's Aug. 25 school tax explainer. ## The 2027 budget The town's Detailed Budget page listed a 2027 preliminary budget when the Ledger checked Sept. 22. The town's published 2027 Budget Schedule sets Thursday, Oct. 1, for posting the budget to the town website, with highlights in the Webster Today. Previously in the Ledger: Webster opens 2027 budget season with raises not yet negotiated (Aug. 3), Webster's biggest departments close budget season with flat levies, and none got there by spending less (Aug. 10) and the Ledger's recap of the Sept. 17 Town Board meeting (Sept. 21). ## On the roads A Sept. 16 town notice says part of Schlegel Road would close starting Sept. 21 for a Monroe County culvert replacement. The culvert crosses a Fourmile Creek tributary about a quarter mile west of Basket Road. The notice says local traffic will be maintained to driveways and to Pipeline Way, up to the culvert. Through traffic follows a posted detour via Salt Road, Woodard Road and Basket Road, the notice says. It says the project is expected to be finished in November, barring any unforeseen delays. ## At the library Programs listed by the Webster Public Library, 980 Ridge Road, include the ones below. The library requires registration unless a listing says otherwise. * **Monday, Sept. 28, 6 to 7:30 p.m.** Cook the Book Club, the library's first cookbook club meeting, in the Community Room. The library says the first meeting focuses on family recipes. Five seats were open on Sept. 22. * **Tuesday, Sept. 29, 3:30 p.m.** Rock & Roll from the Beginning, a talk and performance in the Community Room about learning to play rock and roll in an era with no formal instruction. * **Thursday, Oct. 1, 6 to 8 p.m.** Organizing, Preserving & Managing Your Research, the third course in the library's genealogy series, in the Community Room. The library says the earlier courses are not required. Registration is per class. * **Friday, Oct. 2, 1 to 2:30 p.m.** Stroke Prevention: Be Fast, in the Community Room. The presentation is from Lifespan, in collaboration with the University of Rochester Medical Center Neurosurgery Comprehensive Stroke Center. * **Saturday, Oct. 3, 1 p.m.** An acoustic blues guitar concert in the Community Room, with original songs and covers. * **Monday, Oct. 5, 6:30 p.m.** Extraordinary Women of the American Revolution, a talk in the Community Room by a Nazareth University professor. * **Tuesday, Oct. 6, 11 a.m.** Diverse Abilities Dialogues: Dyslexia, on dyslexia resources in the Rochester area, in the Community Room. The library lists Autism Up and the Parents Helping Parents Coalition of Monroe County as collaborators. The library says the event will stream on YouTube Live. * **Tuesday, Oct. 6, 1 p.m.** A Halloween movie matinee of "The Witches of Eastwick" (1987), rated R, in the Community Room. No registration is required. * **Tuesday, Oct. 6, 6:30 p.m.** Rochester's Olmsted Parks, an online talk on Zoom from Cornell University Cooperative Extension. The Zoom link comes with registration. * **Wednesday, Oct. 7, 6:30 p.m.** The monthly Evening Book Discussion, on "No Shred of Evidence" by Charles Todd, in the Large Study Room (Blue). The library says no registration is necessary. * **Friday, Oct. 9, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.** Drop-In Lego Fun in the Storytime Room, for all ages. No registration is required. * **Friday, Oct. 9, 10:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.** A Red Cross blood drive in the Community Room. The library's listing asks donors to register through the American Red Cross website. The full schedule is at websterlibrary.org. The library's number is 585-872-7075. ## Finding the agendas The town posts agendas on its AgendaCenter page. The district posts Board of Education agendas on BoardDocs, linked from the board page at websterschools.org. The village links Village Board agendas from its meetings page. Dates in this edition come from the town's, district's and village's own calendars and posted documents, the museum's flyer and the library's event listings. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 24/09/2026
The Village Board voted Aug. 27 to accept a bid from Kircher Construction Inc. for a concrete pad and toddler basketball court, the village's Sept. 8 newsletter says.
websterledger.com
Village of Webster accepts bid for toddler basketball court at Schantz Park
The Webster Village Board voted Aug. 27 to accept a bid from Kircher Construction Inc. for work on a concrete pad and toddler basketball court at Schantz Park, according to the village's Sept. 8 newsletter. The board also discussed updates to the Schantz Park rehabilitation project at that meeting, the newsletter says. Schantz Park is located between Hawley Drive and State Road, according to the village's parks page. According to the newsletter, the park's existing basketball court will be removed and a new 30 by 60 concrete pad will be installed in the same area. The toddler basketball court will have two partial half courts side by side, with shorter hoops and a surface the newsletter calls Versacord. A draft design plan printed in the same newsletter shows a separate half basketball court, labeled with a size based on a high school court, in addition to the toddler court. The newsletter says the toddler court is part of the Little Legends project, a playground and toddler basketball court for the village's younger residents. The village is partnering on the project with the Knox & Nash Foundation Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that was created in memory of twin boys, Knox and Nash, and that supports families navigating pregnancy, neonatal intensive care and infant loss. The foundation plans to have a booth at upcoming village events where residents can learn more about the Little Legends project, according to the newsletter. The village asked residents in June to weigh in on design ideas for Schantz Park. The Sept. 8 newsletter describes its draft design plan for the park as based on resident feedback. Residents can continue to send comments or questions about the Schantz Park rehabilitation project through the village's online comment form at villageofwebsterny.gov/parks, the newsletter says. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 23/09/2026
A stretch of the Hojack Trail has a new surface, part of a year of work that also added kiosks, signs, benches and plantings. The town credits a foundation fund, anonymous donors and RG&E.
websterledger.com
What's new on the Hojack Trail, and who paid for it
A stretch of the Hojack Trail has a new surface, part of a year of improvements that also added kiosks, signs, benches and plantings. Webster Parks and Recreation and Friends of Webster Trails cut the ribbon on the work Sept. 3. The town's release credits charitable contributions from the Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation's Trails Maintenance Fund, matching funds from anonymous donors and support from RG&E with funding the improvements. Friends of Webster Trails, the volunteer group that helps the town maintain the trail, listed some of the changes in a Sept. 4 post: two new kiosks with maps and trail information, wayfinding signs, point-of-interest signs, new trees and shrubs, and access bollards. The post says the group and its community partners designed and built that new infrastructure. The group's page for the trail notes several benches added along the route. The group's August 2025 announcement of the foundation grant put the grant at $181,086 and said the grant and matching funds would pay for resurfacing the trail from Holt Road to Drumm Road, along with drainage, plantings, signage and benches. The announcement named RG&E and the Town of Webster as key supporters of the project and described them as "owners of the trail section being improved." "The Hojack Trail receives significant year-round traffic from cyclists and pedestrians to cross-country skiers and snowshoers; we are confident that trail users will enjoy these refreshed amenities," Chris Bilow, commissioner of Webster Parks and Recreation, said in the town's release. "This trail work feels like a milestone moment, as it is the trail that led to the creation of the Friends of Webster Trails back in 1997," Anna Taylor, president of Friends of Webster Trails, said in the same release. The trail runs along a section of former Hojack Railroad tracks. The route stretches from Lake Road in the northwest corner of town to Phillips Road in the southeast, according to the town. Friends of Webster Trails puts the trail's length at almost five miles and describes the route as mostly flat. The group's trail page lists parking at Vosburg Road, Drumm Road, Van Alstyne Road and Orchard Road West. The page says restrooms are available in season at Charles E. Sexton Memorial Park, one of the spots the trail connects to. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 17/09/2026
The resolution would state an intent only. It names no site and no cost. A 6:45 p.m. presentation is set to compare the cost of leasing with building.
websterledger.com
Town Board votes Thursday on declaring intent to pursue a new library by 2032
The Webster Town Board will vote Thursday on a resolution declaring its intent to pursue a new library building by 2032, the year the current library lease expires. The Library Board of Trustees asked the town to state its plans. The resolution is a statement of intent. It names no site and no cost. It does not authorize spending, borrowing or a contract. Before the vote, Library Director Adam Traub and Town Engineer Keith Mortimer are scheduled to present a cost comparison of leasing versus building at 6:45 p.m., during the workshop. The cost comparison was not among the documents posted with either agenda. The workshop starts at 6:30 p.m. and the regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. Both are in the Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, behind the main Town Hall next to the Justice Courts. Open to the Floor, with five minutes a speaker, comes before regular business. The library resolution is item 14 of 15. Both agendas say they are subject to change. ## What the library resolution says The resolution says the library trustees sought "clarification regarding the Town's long-term intentions for the existing library lease set to expire in the year 2032." It says the board reviewed other options, including "location studies, facility assessments, land-use analyses, and consideration of capital and operational costs." The resolution states that the board "has determined that renewal of the current lease in 2032 would not represent the most prudent use of taxpayer resources, nor would it be the best support of future community needs." Its resolving clause says the board "hereby formally states its declaration of intent to pursue a new build for the library by the year 2032." The board would also keep working with the trustees and others "to explore, evaluate, and pursue long-term facility options." ## The two letters attached An Aug. 18 letter from Peter Knapp, president of the library's Board of Trustees, says the library board "respectfully supports planning for the construction of a new library facility by 2032 following the expiration of the current lease." The letter says new construction "represents the most significant financial investment among the available options" and "also offers the greatest ability to align the facility with future service needs." An Aug. 14 letter from Parks and Recreation Commissioner Christopher Bilow supports "the proposed construction of a new public library on the same property as the Webster Recreation Center (1350 Chiyoda Dr)." No other document posted with the agenda names that site. The resolution names no location. ## Comprehensive plan: a first step on environmental review Item 10 would classify the comprehensive plan update as a Type I action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The resolution would also declare the board's intent to be designated lead agency for that review. The Ledger's explainer covers how lead agency and Type I review work. The lead agency step is intent only. The resolution would direct town staff to notify the involved and interested agencies and seek their agreement or objection in writing. A town timeline attached to the item, marked "subject to change," lists these steps: * **Monday, Sept. 28:** public hearing held by the Comprehensive Plan Committee. The timeline gives no time or place. * **Thursday, Oct. 8:** the committee votes on its recommendation. * **Thursday, Oct. 15:** the Town Board refers the plan to Monroe County and sets its Nov. 5 public hearing. * **Thursday, Nov. 5:** Town Board public hearing; the board declares lead agency status. * **Thursday, Nov. 19:** Town Board workshop, final round of edits. * **Thursday, Dec. 17:** the board's environmental determination and plan adoption. A draft environmental narrative, also attached, says its purpose is to "support the determination that adoption of the Town of Webster Comprehensive Plan will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts." The draft's final page says the board "has issued a Negative Declaration." The town's timeline schedules the board's determination for Dec. 17, after both hearings. The Ledger's July piece covers where the plan stood then. ## The 2027 budget Item 5 would approve the 2027 tentative budget, making it the preliminary budget. That resolution puts the all-funds total to be raised by taxes, including sewer and special districts, at $23,567,025, up $711,882 or 3.11%, and says the real property tax levy does not exceed the town's tax levy limit. Its table estimates tax rates, a separate measure, rising 3.99% in the village and 4.18% outside. Item 6 would set the budget hearing for 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 15, at 1002 Ridge Road. The town's published budget schedule sets final budget adoption for that meeting. ## Road project grant administration Item 11 would authorize the supervisor to sign a contract with Colliers Engineering & Design for additional services on the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project, up to $35,000. The firm's proposal describes grant administration for the $9.8 million FAST NY Track C grant for infrastructure improvements near the Xerox campus. The proposal says the $40,000 from the firm's initial town contract "is nearly expended." The new fee would cover work up to award of a construction contract, which the proposal anticipates in February 2027. The board closed environmental review of the project Sept. 3. ## Grant consultant renewal Item 15 would renew the town's grant consulting and proposal writing agreement with J. O'Connell & Associates. The proposed contract would run two years, through Sept. 30, 2028. The rate would be $4,000 a month. The 2025 extension ran one year at $3,900 a month. ## Other items **Credit cards.** Item 7 would adopt a credit card acceptance and processing policy. The policy authorizes only four offices to take cards: the Justice Court, the Town Clerk/Tax Collector, Parks and Recreation and the library. Online Justice Court payments and Town Clerk card payments would carry a convenience fee. Parks and Recreation and library customers would not be charged one. No fee amount appears in the policy. **Arbitrage.** Item 8 would authorize an engagement letter with PFM Asset Management, up to $7,500, for an arbitrage calculation and any needed IRS filings. At the July 30 budget workshop, Finance Director Paul Adams said, "We probably should have the calculation done sooner than later," as the Ledger reported then. **Association of Towns.** Item 9 would designate Supervisor Alexander Scialdone as Webster's delegate to the New York State Association of Towns' Annual Legislative Priority Session on Sept. 23. **Fill permit.** Item 13 would grant a fill permit at 1636 Lake Road. The grading plan estimates 145 cubic yards of fill to eliminate "the existing permanent pool area," meaning standing water, in the rear yard. **Workshop.** The 6:30 p.m. workshop opens with a presentation titled "Buildout of Underutilized Space at the Town Court Building - Partnership with Monroe County Office of the Aging and Veterans Services Agency." **Also on the agenda:** Sept. 3 minutes, bills, a prepaid warrant, purchase orders and a Justice Court grant application. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 16/09/2026
The town's 2026 fall program guide covers preschool through 55+ programs. It lists four ways to sign up.
websterledger.com
How to register for Webster's fall recreation programs
Webster Parks and Recreation's 2026 fall program guide lists classes, leagues and events for preschoolers through adults 55 and older. Several family events, youth basketball and school-break camps start between late October and late December. The full guide is online. ## How to register The guide lists four ways to sign up: * Online, through the Parks and Recreation page on the town website. * Through the department's app. Search "Webster Parks & Recreation" in your app store. * By phone at 585-872-7103, option 0. * In person at the Webster Recreation Center, 1350 Chiyoda Drive. The guide lists office hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. weekdays, 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday and 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sunday. Registration for residents and Premier Members began Monday, Aug. 3. Registration for nonresidents began Monday, Aug. 10. The guide defines a resident as anyone who pays a tax bill to the Town of Webster. If a class has not met its minimum enrollment five days before its start date, the department reserves the right to cancel it. ## A sampling of programs **Preschool.** Preschool Adventures, for ages 2 to 6, meets Thursday mornings for $58. Session B starts Oct. 8 and Session C starts Nov. 5. **Youth basketball.** The Webster Basketball Association's instructional house league plays Sundays from Nov. 8 to Feb. 7, 2027, for $122 per player. The guide says those times and dates are subject to change depending on enrollment and gym availability, with definitive times confirmed at the beginning of November. Webster North Coast, the department's travel basketball program, is open to players in grades 3 through 8 who live in the Webster School District. Tryouts are free. Girls tryouts are at the Recreation Center on Sept. 23 and Sept. 26. Players must attend both dates. A league fee applies once teams are formed. **School-break camps.** Conference Day Camps for kindergarten through fifth grade run Nov. 19, 20, 23 and 24 at $40 per day. Holiday Break Camp, for the same grades, runs Dec. 28 to Dec. 31 for $160. **Adults.** Pickleball Lessons for Beginners, for ages 18 and up, cost $66. Later sessions start Sept. 30, Oct. 1, Oct. 19, Nov. 27 and Nov. 28. **55+.** Talks on Tuesdays are free lectures at 10:30 a.m. at the Recreation Center, with registration required. Topics include "Crossing the Main Street Bridge" on Oct. 6 and "Life of the Seneca" on Dec. 8. ## Fall events * **Mud Run:** Saturday, Sept. 19, at 1350 Chiyoda Drive. The family-friendly, noncompetitive, untimed event is for ages 5 and up. Participants can start any time between 10 a.m. and noon. The cost is $5 per person. * **Pumpkins on Parade:** Saturday, Oct. 24, from 6:30 to 8 p.m. on the Chiyoda Trail at the Recreation Center. The event is free and open to the public, with no registration required. A $5 Family Carving Night for Pumpkins on Parade, which requires registration, is Friday, Oct. 23. * **Family Scavenger Hunt:** Saturday, Nov. 7, 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the Webster Arboretum at 1700 Schlegel Road. The guide asks families to start by noon. The hunt is for ages 2 to 12 with an adult, at $5 per child paid at the event. The guide asks families to register ahead if possible and welcomes walk-ins. Proceeds go to the Friends of Webster Trails. * **Photos with Santa:** Saturday, Dec. 12, 1 to 3 p.m. at the Recreation Center. The guide says the department adds new programs and family events to its website throughout the season. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 15/09/2026
An estimated 12 goats from Kaizen Ridge Farm in Victor will arrive at Milton Case Park this month to graze invasive vegetation, the Village of Webster's Sept. 8 newsletter says.
websterledger.com
Goats are coming to Milton Case Park, village says
An estimated 12 goats from Kaizen Ridge Farm in Victor will arrive at Milton Case Park this month to graze invasive vegetation, according to the Village of Webster's Sept. 8 newsletter. The goats will be taking up residence in the park "to help clear areas around the park and trail," the newsletter says. The goats will be eating their way through "11 acres of invasive vegetation" and will remain on site for the grazing project, which "is expected to take a few weeks." The village parks page lists the park as Milton R. Case Memorial Park, located between South Avenue and Wood Street. The newsletter places the park off South Avenue next to Spry Middle School. Case Park is one of the parks the village maintains separately from the town. The goats will be "safely contained inside an electric fence," the newsletter says. The newsletter asks: "Please do not try to pet the goats, or tamper with the fence," and "Please keep your dog on a leash while in the park." Under the heading "Why Goats?" the newsletter describes goat landscaping as "a natural way to manage land without chemicals, heavy machinery, or fuel." The newsletter lists poison ivy, multiflora rose and Japanese knotweed among the plants goats have "a particular fondness for." The same newsletter page says the village Department of Public Works "is bringing on new staff this fall, to assist in clearing the brush and poison ivy" at the park. The newsletter says event information "will be posted soon, as we welcome the goats to our Village." The newsletter also links to Kaizen Ridge Farm's website. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 14/09/2026
The first installment of the school tax bill is due Tuesday, Sept. 15. The Town Board meets Thursday, Sept. 17. West Main Street in the village closes between Route 250 and Corning Park for a car show and beer walk Saturday, Sept. 19.
websterledger.com
The week ahead in Webster: school tax installment due Sept. 15, West Main Street closes Sept. 19
The first installment of the school tax bill is due Tuesday, Sept. 15. The Town Board meets Thursday, Sept. 17. West Main Street in the village closes between Route 250 and Corning Park for a car show and beer walk Saturday, Sept. 19. This edition covers the 12 days from Monday, Sept. 14 through Friday, Sept. 25. The town Planning Board and the town Zoning Board of Appeals do not meet in that stretch. The Planning Board's next meeting is Tuesday, Oct. 6. The town Zoning Board's is Tuesday, Oct. 13. ## Day by day * **Tuesday, Sept. 15.** The first installment of the school tax bill is due to the Webster Receiver of Taxes. Details are in the next section. Community Office Hours with the town supervisor, the town engineer and the director of community development run from 6 to 7 p.m. The town's calendar lists that session as a virtual meeting on Microsoft Teams rather than an in-person one. The town's event page says to register by emailing communications@ci.webster.ny.us, and that the link to join will be emailed as the date approaches. * **Wednesday, Sept. 16.** The Webster Central School District's Strategic Planning Committee meets at 1:30 p.m. at the Superintendent's Office, according to the agenda the district posted on BoardDocs. * **Thursday, Sept. 17.** The Town Board holds a workshop at 6:30 p.m. and its regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. Both are in the Town Board Meeting Room at 1002 Ridge Road. * **Saturday, Sept. 19.** The Webster Business Improvement District lists a Main Street Car Show & Beer Walk from 4 to 7 p.m. on West Main Street in the village. The BID says West Main Street will be closed from Route 250 to Corning Park for the event. The village's news page lists the event as Fall Kickoff in the Village. A flyer for the event in the village's Sept. 8 newsletter says West Main Street will close at 12:30 p.m. The BID sells Beer Walk tickets through Eventbrite at $25.30. That price includes the Eventbrite fee, according to the BID. The Webster Public Library lists a vintage book sale from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the library's Community Room at 980 Ridge Road. The town supervisor's Aug. 5 column lists the Webster Mud Run that day. Local news site websterontheweb.com reported Aug. 30 that the run is at the Webster Recreation Center, and Aug. 23 that the run is from 10 to 11:30 a.m. * **Tuesday, Sept. 22.** The Webster Central School District Board of Education holds a workshop at 5 p.m. in the second-floor Professional Development Center at the District Office, 119 South Ave. The district's approved board calendar lists the topic as Elementary Specials. ## School taxes: first installment due Tuesday, Sept. 15, and what Sept. 20 changes The town's school tax page says the first installment is due "without interest on September 15th." The payment instructions the town posts from the back of the school tax bill add 1% to a first installment paid Sept. 16 through Sept. 20. The town's 2026-2027 legal notice says that if the first installment is not paid by Sept. 20, the installment plan is no longer available. The school tax page adds that the full tax amount must then be paid. The legal notice and the payment instructions both say a service charge applies to each installment payment. Neither states the amount. The same notice says the installment option is not available to residents of Walworth and Ontario. Sept. 20 is a Sunday. The same legal notice says that when a due date falls on a weekend or holiday, payment will be accepted on the first business day following. The notice puts no interest on a full payment from Sept. 1 through Oct. 1 and a 2% interest penalty from Oct. 2 through Oct. 31. It says the Webster Receiver of Taxes will receive no payments after Oct. 31, when the school tax rolls are returned to the Monroe County and Wayne County tax offices. Payments go to the Receiver of Taxes at Webster Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road. The drop box in the front vestibule is open at all hours. A mailed payment is timed by its postmark. The Receiver of Taxes takes questions at 585-872-7060. ## Village meetings The Village of Webster's meetings page carries standing schedules for three village bodies, and all three land inside this window. * **Village Historic Preservation Commission.** Third Tuesday of the month at 7 p.m., at the Webster Museum, 18 Lapham Park. That is Sept. 15. * **Village Zoning Board of Appeals.** Third Thursday of every month at 6:30 p.m., at the Village of Webster Community Meeting Hall, 29 South Ave. That is Sept. 17. * **Village Board of Trustees.** Second and fourth Thursday of every month at 6:30 p.m., at the same hall. That is Sept. 24. The Sept. 17 Zoning Board of Appeals date is also listed on the 2026 meeting schedule posted on the village's Zoning Board page. The village's online calendar lists the Zoning Board of Appeals on Sept. 17 and the Board of Trustees on Sept. 24. The Sept. 15 Historic Preservation Commission date rests on the meetings page's third-Tuesday rule. ## At the library Programs listed by the Webster Public Library, 980 Ridge Road, include jazz with Max Robbins and Wade McClung at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 16. A Rochester Genealogical Society presenter teaches a genealogy class from 6 to 8 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 17. The Great Webster Baking Contest is at 6 p.m. Monday, Sept. 21, and registered contestants get the challenge Sept. 18. The library requires registration for all three, including baking contest spectators. The schedule is at websterlibrary.org. The library's number is 585-872-7075. ## The budget steps The posted Sept. 17 Town Board agenda includes a resolution to set the public hearing on the 2027 Preliminary Budget for Oct. 15, a step the town's published 2027 Budget Schedule also puts at the Sept. 17 meeting. Two later rows of the schedule put the hearing at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 15, and adoption of the 2027 Final Budget at the same meeting. The same schedule has the 2027 budget posted to the town website on Thursday, Oct. 1, with highlights in the Webster Today. The Town Board also meets that night, with a workshop at 6:30 p.m. and the meeting at 7:30 p.m. ## Finding the agendas The town has posted the agenda for the 7:30 p.m. Sept. 17 Town Board meeting. The town posts agendas on its AgendaCenter page. The district posts Board of Education agendas and its board calendar on BoardDocs, linked from the board page at websterschools.org. Town dates come from the town's online meeting calendars, its 2027 Budget Schedule and its posted Sept. 17 agenda. School tax dates come from the town's School Taxes page, the payment instructions on the back of the bill and the town's 2026-2027 legal notice. Village meeting dates come from the village's meetings page, 2026 Zoning Board schedule and online calendar. Car show details come from the BID's event page, the village's news page and the village's Sept. 8 newsletter. District dates come from the school district's approved board calendar and BoardDocs site. Other sources are named where they appear. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 11/09/2026
Assistant Superintendent for Business Brian Freeman told the Board of Education on Tuesday that the district has 11 small claims assessment reviews this year, against a normal range of 85 to 120. Freeman said it may be "a little calm before the reassessment."
websterledger.com
Webster schools are down to 11 residential assessment challenges, from a normal 85 to 120
Webster's school district is working through 11 small claims assessment reviews this year, against a normal range of 85 to 120, Assistant Superintendent for Business Brian Freeman told the Board of Education on Tuesday. The figures came during the district's report on pending assessment challenges. The district had four of the small claims reviews last year. Freeman called the last two years an anomaly and said the number should rise again. "I think maybe that's a little calm before the reassessment," Freeman said, "so I would imagine that would come back next year." Webster is scheduled for a townwide revaluation in 2027 and has already begun mailing property owners about it. Small claims assessment review is the low-cost path a homeowner takes to challenge an assessment without a lawyer. The challenge is to the town's assessment, and the district refunds its share of the school taxes if the assessment comes down. Larger commercial challenges go to State Supreme Court as tax certiorari cases, which Freeman presented separately, without a vote. ## The board approved a $424,420 change order at Willink The board approved Change Order No. 205-17 on the Willink Middle School site work contract. The change order covers removal and export of 4,702 cubic yards of rock beyond the 1,500 in the original contract allowance, plus additional rock drilling. The change order is 8.1 percent of the original contract sum of $5,250,700. All change orders on that contract together come to 16.6 percent. Both percentages are the Ledger's arithmetic on the sums in Freeman's Sept. 1 memo, which Monday's preview reported. Willink sits in an unusual spot geotechnically, Freeman told the board. The district knew it would have to take out bedrock for the OWL Middle School addition, short for One Webster Learning, and the parking lot expansion, and paid for testing before the work was bid. "The sampling missed a lot of bedrock," Freeman said. "The bedrock is deeper and it actually goes closer to the road than we had initially thought." "Could we have done a better job?" Freeman asked the board. The district could have paid the testing company to drill the entire property instead of sampling, he said. Freeman said the change order falls within the contingency the district budgets for every project. Crews digging utility lines at the District Office, where the board was meeting, once found a 1950s fuel tank encased in concrete, Freeman said. The tank was on no map, and that geotechnical sample came from a spot the tank was not in. A board member asked whether the contractor was sharing any of the cost, "because, again, they underestimated it." "No, it's not the contractor," Freeman said. "The contractor bids on what we set up. We provided the number and they bid on that number. And when it really came to fruition, the number we provided them was significantly less than what was needed." The Willink site work is part of the $85 million capital improvement project Webster voters approved on Oct. 11, 2023. The Ledger's July report covered the classroom addition. Tuesday's item is the separate site work contract. ## Freeman told the board the July figures may change The board approved the July 2026 treasurer's report. In the record the district published after the meeting, which the Ledger read Wednesday, that item carried a motion heading with nothing under it. The recording carries the motion, the second and the voice vote. "I will point out that on the ninth page of the Treasurer's Report, those numbers could change because our audit is still ongoing for June 30th," Freeman said. "And actually we just got all of our auditor adjustments today, so that could change our financials." Page nine is the district's fund balance summary, the table of its reserves. The report says operating cash on hand has decreased since last July, puts the drop at $8 million in investable operating cash, and attributes the decrease to significantly increased capital expenditures. The report also says the district "is in a strong financial position" and that "total cash flow is still above historical norms for this season." The district's July report a year earlier ran the other way. That report, presented to the board in October 2025, said total cash flow had produced an "$11 million increase in investable operating cash compared to July of last year." It put the district's investment portfolio yield at an average of 4.31 percent, against 3.94 percent this year. ## Citizenship awards The WREA presented its Citizenship Award to one fifth grader at each of the district's seven elementary schools, each introduced by a retired teacher. An administrator told the board the OWL Middle School's new permanent home at Willink opened Sept. 2, and that the district's theme for the year is community. ## About a third of elementary students finished the year off grade level in reading and writing The presenter on elementary literacy said about 68 percent of students finished last year reading and writing on grade level, against a long-term district goal of 90 percent. Schools added a 20-minute intervention block to the common schedule this year. A Webster Teachers Association representative told the board the union represents more than 800 members, and that a spring drive gathered more than 1,000 items for hygiene bags picked up by more than 260 families. ## The next meeting and previous coverage The board's next meeting is a workshop at 5 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 22, at the District Office, 119 South Avenue, second-floor Professional Development Center. The next regular business meeting is Oct. 13 at 5 p.m. Previously in the Ledger: Webster's Board of Assessment Review, explained (June 30) covers the grievance step before going to court. Willink Middle School construction (July 29) covers the classroom addition. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 09/09/2026
Webster's Zoning Board of Appeals closed the public hearing on both Verizon tower applications Tuesday night and voted to table them to its October meeting without deciding either. Residents who did not speak have no further opportunity before this board unless it reopens the hearing.
websterledger.com
Zoning board closes comment on both Verizon towers and tables them to October
Webster's Zoning Board of Appeals spent more than two hours Tuesday night on Verizon's two proposed cell towers and decided neither one. The board closed the public hearing on both applications, then voted to table them to its October meeting. Public comment is closed on both towers. Residents who did not speak Tuesday have no further opportunity to address this board on either application unless the board reopens the hearing. The meeting ran just over four hours at 1002 Ridge Road. The board reached the towers shortly before 9 p.m., after granting five residential requests and the Waterview Phase 3 variances 4-1. The Ledger covers the residential requests and the Waterview vote in a separate piece. ## What the two applications ask for Verizon is asking for an area variance at each site from the town's 100-foot height maximum. The Lake Road tower would stand 125 feet at the corner of Lake Road and County Line Road, plus a four-foot lightning rod. The Webster North tower would stand 135 feet near 1222 Wildflower Drive, plus the same rod. Both are also before the Planning Board, which tabled them to Oct. 6 on Sept. 1. Laura Smith of Nixon Peabody, for Verizon, asked the board to apply the public-utility standard rather than the ordinary area-variance test. Smith said New York treats wireless carriers as utilities for zoning purposes. That standard asks for a significant gap in service, a location that remedies it and the least intrusive means of filling it, Smith said. The Ledger's preview of Tuesday's hearing has the parcels, districts and code sections. ## Why this site Verizon's first approach for Webster North was to town-owned land. Smith said the company worked with the town for two to three years and was before the town board in the summer of 2025 for approval of a lease. The town board decided not to lease. Asked whether that site is still preferable to Wildflower Drive, Smith said no. The town conversation covered one parcel, with no site selection and no comparison. Verizon has since evaluated 11 other parcels and considers the proposed location better. On Lake Road, the search area is largely one private landowner's property, and Verizon evaluated seven parcels. Smith said the landowner declined the alternative locations the Planning Board identified, citing farming and conservation easement operations, and that Verizon cannot compel a lease. Smith also said there is no disagreement that the tree line at the back of that property would be less intrusive than the proposed site. ## Why it was tabled The applicant asked for it first. A member of Verizon's team told the chairman it was 11 p.m. and asked the board to table both applications until next month, saying the questions were repeating. Board members then said they wanted the Planning Board to go first. One member said the board should know what planning or changes at the site could affect a decision, and a second member agreed that was the reason to table. The motion named Oct. 14 as the return date. The town's published calendar lists the next zoning board meeting as Tuesday, Oct. 13. The Ledger has not established which of the two dates will govern. ## The town's own consultant William Johnson of RF Engineering Consultants reviewed both applications for the town, and told the board the consultants neither advocate for towers nor lobby against them. Johnson said there is a gap at both sites, whether capacity or coverage, and that the proposed heights appear to be the minimum needed. Asked whether the two sites before the board were the most minimally intrusive of those Verizon considered, Johnson said no. > "In fact, in our first report, we noted that the boards were being presented with only one option, that there were no other options. And when you're talking about something being minimally intrusive, I mean, the implication is you're comparing it to something ... and there's nothing else to be comparing it to because that was the only site that was available." ## A church offers its property A representative of Webster Presbyterian Church offered the congregation's property at 550 Webster Road as an alternative site. The church has heard the opposition and is sympathetic to it. A tower there would affect very few houses, perhaps one, the representative said. Verizon answered later the same night that the church sits outside the company's search area, and that its radio-frequency engineer vetted the property and found it does not work. ## What residents said The board took comment separately on each site. The Ledger is not naming members of the public who spoke. A Wildflower Drive resident said a petition with 95 signatures went to the Planning Board, and that everyone found with a coverage problem was a Verizon customer. The resident asked whether trees would be cleared and whether Verizon could raise the tower later. Board members answered that going higher would require coming back to the zoning board, because the motion sets a specific height, and that tree trimming would be a matter for Verizon and the landowner. A second Wildflower Drive resident, the first Wildflower speaker's husband, asked why the town rejected the water treatment plant site about 250 feet from what is now proposed. The answer was that town board members were not required to give reasons when they voted, and that at least two of the current members are new and did not vote on it. An attorney for relatives across from the Lake Road site said the Planning Board is still deliberating, so a decision would be premature. The attorney called the site maximum intrusion, open and visible with no trees and no buffering. The corner sits on a national scenic byway administered by the state Department of Transportation, the attorney said, and DOT is concerned. No visual impact study has been done, the attorney said. A County Line Road resident who lives across from that site disputed the coverage gap, describing an afternoon streaming music on a mower across five wooded acres without losing Verizon service, and asked for a measured survey rather than a study built on Verizon's data. Johnson answered that the report finds ubiquitous low-band coverage at Lake Road, that capacity on that spectrum is at times exceeded, and that buffering can hide a dropped connection. ## What comes next Smith told the board after the vote that Verizon also needs a special permit from the town board, and that it has extended the federal shot clock until after the town board's October meeting. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
Webster's Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday with eight applications on the agenda. Each Verizon tower application asks for an area variance from the town's 100-foot height limit, and Waterview Apartments Phase 3 is listed for a fourth straight meeting.
websterledger.com
Both Verizon towers are listed for a public hearing Tuesday
Both of Verizon's proposed Webster cell towers are on the Zoning Board of Appeals agenda Tuesday night, each asking for an area variance from the 100-foot maximum height the town code sets for a communication tower. The board meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. The agenda is a legal notice that the board "will conduct a public hearing" on eight applications. Approval of the Aug. 11 minutes is the only other item. Waterview Apartments Phase 3 is on the agenda for a fourth straight meeting. The other five items are requests on residential properties. ## The two towers The agenda names Robert Burgdorf as the applicant on both, for Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems d/b/a Verizon. The Lake Road tower would go at Lake Road and County Line Road, on a 7.8-acre parcel in the LL Large-Lot Residential District. The agenda describes a communication tower of 125 feet with a four-foot lightning rod, 129 feet overall, where the maximum height allowed is 100 feet. That listing cites Sections 130-10 and 350-13 of the town code. The Webster North tower would go near 1222 Wildflower Drive, on a 14.2-acre parcel in the R-3 Single-Family Residential District. The agenda describes a tower of 135 feet with a four-foot lightning rod, 139 feet overall, against the same 100-foot maximum. That listing cites Sections 130-10 and 350-12. The Lake Road tower has been before the Zoning Board of Appeals before. It was on the board's agenda in March and again in April, and was tabled both times. The Wildflower Drive tower has not been on a zoning board agenda at any meeting in the town's posted record since September 2025. Tuesday's agenda lists both tower applications among its tabled matters, under the same public hearing notice as the rest of the meeting. At the Planning Board's Sept. 1 meeting, the board was told Verizon is on this week's zoning board agenda for a preliminary introduction of the Wildflower Drive project. The Planning Board tabled both tower applications to Oct. 6 that night, on 5-1 votes. The Planning Board left the Lake Road public hearing open, so residents can still speak on that application. The Ledger's recap of the Sept. 1 meeting has the votes and the discussion. ## Waterview Apartments Phase 3 Waterview Apartments Phase 3 is the first of the three items the agenda lists under tabled matters. Legacy Development Co. is asking for two area variances at the northwest corner of Willow Point Way and Nautical Mile Drive. One would allow a front setback of 18.7 feet where 75 feet is required. The other would allow a single-family district buffer of 38.5 feet where 100 feet is required. The application covers six buildings plus a community center, 56 units in all, on a proposed 13.15-acre parcel. Each building would be two stories. The site is in the MHR Medium High Residential District, and the agenda cites Section 350-14. The June 9 agenda carried a note tabling the application to July 14. The July 14 minutes record it tabled to the Aug. 11 meeting. The Aug. 11 agenda carried a note tabling it to the September meeting. The Ledger covered the board's June 9, July 14 and Aug. 11 meetings. The Ledger's account of the July 14 meeting records neighbors along McEwen Drive opposing the application. ## Five residential requests Four of the five ask for area variances. The fifth asks for a special use permit. The Ledger is not naming the applicants on those five items. Item 4 requests a side yard setback of 12 feet where 15 feet is required, for a new garage at 1725 State Road on a 0.68-acre parcel. Item 5 requests a front setback of 49.2 feet where 60 feet is required on a corner lot, for a garage addition at 539 Countryside Lane. Item 6 requests a rear setback of 43 feet where 50 feet is required, for a covered porch at 522 Hackberry Way. Item 7 requests a special use permit for a 6-by-9-foot chicken coop and no more than eight hens at 1054 Klem Road, on a 2.2-acre parcel. The Ledger has an explainer on how Webster's backyard chicken permit works. Item 8 requests an area variance to allow the alteration or extension of a pre-existing non-conforming single-family home at 400 Lake Road, for a 460-square-foot addition. That address is a separate property from the tower site at Lake Road and County Line Road. ## How to be heard The public can speak on any of the eight applications at the hearing. The hearing is at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. The Ledger's guide to the Zoning Board of Appeals explains how to take part. Chairman Michael Short opened the board's May 12 meeting with a reminder, according to the minutes: > public discussion is going to be limited to five minutes per person per application. And discussion must pertain to the property being reviewed. The board's July 14 minutes record the same five-minute limit. The board is also scheduled Tuesday to approve the minutes of its Aug. 11 meeting, which the town had not posted when the Ledger checked Monday. The next Zoning Board of Appeals meeting is Tuesday, Oct. 13. Previously in the Ledger: How Webster reviews a cell tower application (Sept. 2) covers the 100-foot cap, the preference for sharing an existing tower and the limits federal law places on what a board may weigh. The Ledger's Sept. 1 preview of the Planning Board hearings covers both applications, the parcels and the town's own radio-frequency reviews. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 07/09/2026
The Board of Education meets at 5 p.m. Tuesday at the District Office. The board is scheduled to vote on a $424,420 Willink site work change order and to receive a report putting worst-case assessment exposure at $4.4 million against a $5 million reserve. Public comment is scheduled for 6:40 p.m.
websterledger.com
Speakers at Tuesday's Webster school board meeting are asked to sign up by noon
Anyone who wants to speak at Tuesday's Webster school board meeting is asked to sign up with the district clerk by noon Tuesday. The Webster Central School District Board of Education meets at 5 p.m. Tuesday in the second floor Professional Development Center at the District Office, 119 South Avenue. Public comment is scheduled for 6:40 p.m., at the end of the meeting. The board's visitor speaking policy asks people who want to address the board to register with the district clerk by noon on the day of the meeting. The clerk is Heather Murphy, at 585-216-0001 or heather_murphy@webstercsd.org. Fuller instructions are below. The board is scheduled to vote on a $424,420 change order on a Willink Middle School site work contract, and to receive a report on pending challenges to property assessments in the district. The agenda lists Assistant Superintendent for Business Brian Freeman on both. ## A $424,420 change order at Willink The agenda lists a motion to approve the change order. It would cover rock removal on the Willink parking lot reconstruction. The contractor is Pooler Enterprises. In a Sept. 1 memo, Freeman wrote that the change order "addresses an unforeseen field condition involving rock removal above the contract allowance." The scope covers the removal and export of 4,702 cubic yards of rock beyond the 1,500 cubic yards included in the original contract allowance, plus additional rock drilling on site. "As full-depth removal of the parking lot was taking place in both the existing parking lot areas as well as in the expansion area, significantly more bedrock was uncovered and needed to be removed than was allowed for in the original contract," Freeman wrote. In a change request to the construction manager, Pooler Enterprises priced the 4,702 cubic yards at $85 a cubic yard, or $399,670 of the $424,420. The same request puts the remaining $24,750 at additional rock drilling. The memo puts the original contract sum at $5,250,700. It puts the net change from prior change orders at $446,327.18, which takes the contract to $5,697,027.18. Approving Tuesday's change order would take the contract sum to $6,121,447.18. The project's architect is LaBella Associates, D.P.C. The construction manager is Campus CMG Inc. Freeman wrote that both have reviewed and approved the costs. The memo does not say what money would pay for the change order. The district's work at Willink runs on more than one contract. The Ledger reported on the building work in July, and Tuesday's item is the site work contract covering the parking lot. ## A worst-case $4.4 million in pending court challenges to property assessments A second memo from Freeman, dated Sept. 3, summarizes pending court challenges to property assessments inside the district. The agenda lists it as a report rather than an action. Freeman wrote that tax certiorari is "the legal process by which a property owner challenges their assessment in court, often to get a reduction in their property taxes." The memo puts total potential exposure from all pending certiorari cases at $4,423,159, and says those figures "represent a worst-case scenario and not the expected final outcome." The memo lists 33 properties, all of them in Webster or Penfield. Webster property accounts for $4,155,028 of the total and Penfield property for $268,131. Freeman calls the certiorari cases "the large commercial cases." He writes that the district handles "smaller residential assessment challenges" separately, through the Small Claims Assessment Review process. The district holds $5,051,088 in a tax certiorari reserve fund, which is more than the worst-case total. Freeman described the fund as "a separate account set aside to pay for any refunds that result from these cases, which helps protect the district's operating budget from unexpected expenses." ## Also on Tuesday's agenda The meeting opens at 5 p.m. with liaison reports from students and the WTA. The agenda schedules the WREA Citizenship Awards recognition at 5:15 p.m. Two reports follow at 5:45 p.m., a superintendent's report with campus news and a professional development report. Board business opens at 6:10 p.m. with a motion to approve the July 2026 treasurer's report. Board member highlights are set for 6:20 p.m. The consent agenda comes up at 6:35 p.m. It carries the minutes of the board's Aug. 18 meeting and a set of personnel actions. It also carries recommendations from the Committee on Special Education and the Committee on Pre-School Special Education, along with a cooperative bid for bus parts. Those items are taken in a single motion under the board's rules, and the agenda's note on the practice says items may be removed from the consent agenda at the request of any board member. ## How to be heard Tuesday The visitor speaking policy printed with the agenda says people wishing to address the board "should register with the district clerk by noon of the meeting day by phone call or visit" the district's sign-up page. Speakers are asked to limit comments to 3 to 4 minutes. The policy also asks a speaker to be recognized by the president before speaking. It asks the speaker to give a name and the agenda topic, and to name any organization they are representing. The policy does not set a consequence for missing the noon sign-up. It makes the president "responsible for the orderly conduct of the meeting," and says the president rules on the appropriateness of the subject being presented. The district's Visitor Speaking page, which the policy links, carries the sign-up form and names the clerk. It does not repeat the noon deadline. The Ledger checked that page Monday. The policy says the board "invites the public to comment on matters regarding the school district," and that "taxpayers, community citizens, school personnel, and school students may openly express themselves directly to the board." It also says the comment section "is a time for the Board of Education to listen," and that meetings "are not an opportunity to engage in dialogue and are not public forums." The agenda schedules public comment to begin at 6:40 p.m. and adjournment at 7:10 p.m. The policy says public speaking time "will be no longer than 40 minutes." The agenda does not say which of those figures governs. Under the policy, the president may impose time limits on individual speakers. The meeting is livestreamed at websterschools.org/boemeetings. The district says on that page that previous meetings may also be found there. Previously in the Ledger: Willink Middle School construction is underway as part of Webster's $85 million bond (July 29) covers the classroom addition at the school. Webster's school board votes Tuesday on the tax warrant, with bills due out next week (Aug. 18) covers the board's last regular business meeting. Webster school tax 2026: deadlines and how to pay (Aug. 25) covers the bills those rates produced. Webster's Board of Assessment Review, explained (June 30) covers the grievance step an owner takes before going to court. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
020
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 04/09/2026
The board voted 4-0 to close environmental review of the road and trail package tied to the Xerox campus. Five people spoke during Open to the Floor, one of them urging the board to require an environmental impact statement instead.
websterledger.com
Town Board closes environmental review of the Xerox-area road project, 4-0
The Webster Town Board voted 4-0 Thursday to issue a negative declaration for the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project, closing environmental review of the road and trail package tied to the Xerox campus redevelopment without an environmental impact statement. A negative declaration means the board finds the project will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. The vote came after Town Engineer Keith Mortimer told the board, "I'm not in a position to fully answer" questions a board member had sent that afternoon. The attorney for the town told the board a negative declaration "could be determined tonight without any disruption to the determination of the alienation issue," and said, "I haven't been privy to the study or the substance or the merits of it." All nine items on the agenda passed 4-0. Councilwoman Jennifer Wright was absent, and the roll call on each item named four members: Supervisor Alex Scialdone, Councilman John Cahill, Councilman Nick Hunter and Councilman Garrett Wagner. Five people spoke during Open to the Floor. ## How the board reached the vote The chair opened item 7 by saying the town engineer had received questions that afternoon, and invited a response. Mortimer said they arrived "about 5:00" and that "we've not had an opportunity to complete our responses." A board member apologized, saying the questions had been written Tuesday and were found still sitting in a drafts folder. "Should we reschedule this?" a board member asked. The open question was whether the trail in the project is parkland subject to alienation, which a board member called "a fairly legal nuance thing." Mortimer said, "I'm not prepared to answer that tonight," and told the board nothing new was being presented and the project's scope was unchanged. The town received no comment on Parts 1 and 2 of the environmental assessment "from either the public or from the board itself," Mortimer said, and impacts were found to be "no or small." Delay would carry a cost, Mortimer said: "an effect on the town being reimbursed for monies that we have spent" through the grant. The attorney for the town said the alienation issue "was not brought to my attention," and described having had "a brief opportunity to look at it during the public comment." Of the study behind the determination, the attorney said, "I haven't been privy to the study or the substance or the merits of it." A negative declaration "could be determined tonight without any disruption to the determination of the alienation issue," the attorney said, provided the change to the trail is minor. Asked what would follow if the board got it wrong, the attorney for the town said that as long as the board follows the review's procedural steps "you're fine," and that otherwise "there'll be some type of action, Article 78 or otherwise." A board member replied that an Article 78 proceeding "would bring this to a halt." Mortimer said the town has met formally twice with the Friends of Webster Trail, and that the proposed alignment "received concurrence" from the group and its trail steward. A board member noted the stewards' comments are "but one factor," and that the board "still has to determine independently ... what level the impact is." A board member said that if timing matters, "especially in the potential reimbursement for the town," it was "important for us to move forward with the vote this evening." Shortly before the motion the board was told the project had had "a very in-depth review that we've been going through with you guys in that presentation a few weeks ago." The board classified the action Type I, a classification corrected on the record before the motion, and voted to issue the negative declaration. Scialdone, Wagner, Cahill and Hunter each voted aye. ## The objection from the floor Earlier in the evening a speaker had urged the board not to issue the declaration, arguing that the state's review law requires a lead agency to "take a hard look" at the areas of environmental concern and give "a reasoned written explanation for its determination." The objection was to how the town packaged the work. The town has treated the transportation work as one project, the speaker said, and the Chiyoda Drive extension should be examined on its own. That piece "does remove a significant wooded parcel that acts as a wildlife corridor." Culverting and diverting the stream in the project's path "permanently alters the natural ecosystem" and raises water temperatures downstream, the speaker said, identifying the stream as a Mill Creek tributary. The filing the Ledger reviewed does not name the stream, so that identification is the speaker's. The speaker also argued that the project's traffic findings would put users of the Bird Song Trail at increased risk, that the comprehensive plan's goal of reducing curb cuts along Route 404 should apply to entrances on Route 250, and that the town should weigh whether the new connection is necessary at all. "A positive declaration would not stop the project," the speaker said. "It would ensure that alternatives, mitigation measures, and public comments are considered before the town commits to an infrastructure program that may shape the corridor for decades." The town's filing describes the same work. Supplemental responses say the two road extensions will clear about 4.11 acres of wooded area, and that a culvert would enclose 800 square feet of an existing streambed. The stream falls under federal jurisdiction as a Water of the United States, and an application has been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers. NYSDEC classifies the stream Class C. The stream is not subject to state Protection of Waters permitting. The board took up the packaging point during its discussion: under the way the grant is written, the town is "avoiding segmentation by including it in and not calling it out as its own separate project." The board did not take up the speaker's other arguments, among them the stream, the Bird Song Trail crossing, the curb cuts and whether the connection is necessary. ## Other business Item 1 took only the Aug. 20 workshop minutes. The chair said the town's regular attorney needed "to weigh in on a couple changes" and is on vacation, so the draft meeting minutes will be published online and go to the board at the next meeting. Item 8 authorized the supervisor to sign a benefits contract for Police Capt. Mark Reed. A board member said the captain's post was created by resolution a few years ago and is not a union position, so it lacked "the same benefits, longevity benefits that a union position would have." The resolution mimics union benefits to encourage a captain "who is potentially up for retirement next year to stay with us." Item 9 approved recycling a Dell monitor from the Assessment Department. Items 2 through 6 were bills, a prepaid warrant, purchase orders and the 2026 budget transfers and amendments. ## The other four speakers A student described growing in her faith and "learning what it means to live as a Christian young woman." No school or district was named. The Town Board does not set school policy, and the floor rules the chair read set no limit on subject. What has been difficult, she said, is "going to school every day and constantly seeing pride and LGBTQ related messages around me." She told the board, "I understand that other people have different beliefs than I do and I'm not asking anyone to change who they are or what they personally believe." Her ask: "I'm not asking my school to promote my beliefs over someone else's. I'm asking that my beliefs be given the same consideration and respect." A second speaker, who said, "I'm a combat veteran and proud resident of the town of Webster," spoke about humility in leadership, applied to a pride flag raised at Town Hall that later came down. "When the government chooses to recognize a particular group by displaying its symbol, it also creates an expectation around that recognition," the speaker said. "The division was not simply created by removing the flag. The government placed itself in the position when the decision was originally made to raise a flag representing one particular group." The speaker credited a resident who spoke at the board's last meeting, a retired priest who said he and his husband live in Webster. "I totally see people's point that it was misplaced in either taking the place of the American flag or being higher than it," the priest told the board Aug. 20. "The optics of taking it down has been received by the LGBTQ plus community as a sign that some of our neighbors don't think that we belong here." "If a standard is established for one group, we have to be willing to apply that same standard fairly to everyone," the speaker added. The American flag "does not represent one race, one religion, one political party, one sexual orientation or one particular cause," the speaker said. "It represents all of us." The board adopted a flag policy on a 3-2 vote June 4, according to the town's adopted minutes. Resolution No. 211 made the American and New York State flags the only flags to be displayed on town-owned property, and by its terms took effect June 5. The only basis the resolution states is that the town "does not currently have a defined flag policy." The resolution does not mention the pride flag, and the same minutes record no separate vote to remove it. A fourth speaker asked whether the board had taken recent action on legalizing recreational marijuana. Under the floor rules the chair read, questions are not answered the same night and speakers are asked to leave their information with the town clerk. The chair answered this one anyway: "We are not answering questions at this time, but no, I will state that for the record. No, Webster is not opting in, nor do we have intentions to bring it up." The speaker, a retired pharmacist practicing in Rochester since 1968, asked the board to weigh "what is the socially redeeming value of this" if the question returns for a vote. A Birch Trail resident asked the board to revisit a renewable natural gas project at the town's water resource recovery facility, which would have captured and sold biogas from the plant's anaerobic digesters. The project "came to an end due to questions regarding the contract with an outside vendor," the speaker said, and "would have been a money maker for Webster." The speaker recalled it being voted down 3-2 and asked the board to take it up again. On July 2 the board voted 3-2 on Resolution No. 242 to immediately cease all work by third-party vendors on the project and rescind payment authorization for work not yet performed, with $165,474 to be returned to the town, according to the town's adopted minutes. The board's last action was a 4-0 vote to go into executive session under Public Officers Law §105 on personnel. The invitation named the town board, the attorney for the town, HR Director Kelsey Feeney, Police Capt. Mark Reed and Police Chief Dennis Kohlmeier. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 03/09/2026
The vote would end environmental review for the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project. Thursday's 6:30 p.m. workshop is canceled; the 7:30 p.m. meeting is on.
websterledger.com
Town Board votes Thursday on environmental review of Xerox-area road project
The Webster Town Board will vote Thursday on a resolution closing out environmental review for the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project, the road and trail package tied to the Xerox campus redevelopment. If the board adopts the resolution, no Environmental Impact Statement is required. The 6:30 p.m. workshop Thursday is canceled. The 7:30 p.m. regular meeting is on. The meeting is in the Town Board Room, 1002 Ridge Road. The agenda opens with Open to the Floor, where speakers get five minutes each. The environmental resolution is seventh of nine numbered items, so residents can speak on the resolution before the board votes. The town's calendar lists a Hojack Trail Improvements ribbon cutting at 4 p.m. the same day, on the Hojack Trail at Klem Road. ## What the project is The transportation project is funded by a FAST NY Track C grant awarded to the Webster Economic Development Alliance, the project's sponsor, which is carrying out the work on behalf of the town and the village. The applicant's section of the form gives the grant's purpose as "to rehabilitate existing roadways and create roadway extensions to improve circulation, access, and safety in this area." The traffic report says the work will "position the campus and surrounding area for subdivision, redevelopment, and investment of vacant and underutilized property, fostering business attraction in key strategic industries." The grant triggers a process under which Xerox Corporation dedicates privately owned roadways and land to the town and the village, so the company's property can be reached from a public right-of-way and subdivided. The Town Board voted 5-0 on Aug. 20 to approve a Xerox petition to annex a Chiyoda Drive parcel from the town into the Village of Webster. That approval is one step, and the Ledger's explainer covers what still has to happen. The study area runs from North Avenue and Webster Road east to Basket Road, and from Mitcheldean Drive south to Route 104. Six road components are in the package. Two extend existing roads: Boulter Industrial Parkway west to Salt Road and Chiyoda Drive west to Route 250. The rest is reconstruction of Orchard Street, Panama Road and Mitcheldean Drive, plus a multimodal trail along Phillips Road. ## The scope of Thursday's vote The project's environmental assessment form states that the work "does not include any redevelopment or new buildings, only transportation infrastructure." Thursday's vote is a finding about the roads. The Xerox campus redevelopment those roads are built to serve is not part of the action under review. Passero Associates, the project's traffic consultant, found no significant adverse traffic impacts at completion in a July 28 report. Twenty years out, the report finds left-turn-lane warrants met and expects a signal will be needed where Salt Road, Mitcheldean Drive and the Boulter extension meet. Both findings assume build-out under part of the 2024 Reimagine Webster Brownfield Opportunity Area plan, including about 1,133 residential units and 1.8 million square feet of light industrial space. That build-out is not part of Thursday's action. The report's sole recommendation is that future development in the study area provide independent traffic impact studies. ## How the review got here The resolution and the town's June 5 notice classify the project as a Type I action, which the state's environmental review regulations treat as more likely to require an Environmental Impact Statement. The classification also requires a coordinated review among the agencies with a role in the project. Under the regulations a Type I review ends in one of two ways. A positive declaration requires an impact statement. A negative declaration does not. The board designated itself lead agency Aug. 6, after notifying involved agencies June 5. Consent is assumed if no involved agency objects in writing within 30 days. The board's environmental assessment form, dated Aug. 27 and prepared by Town Engineer Keith Mortimer, rates all 20 areas of potential impact and marks none as potentially moderate to large. The form checks the box for no significant adverse environmental impacts and no impact statement. Supplemental responses filed with the form say the Boulter Industrial Parkway and Chiyoda Drive extensions will clear about 4.11 acres of wooded area. The applicant's Part 1 identifies no species within the project limits that are rare, threatened, endangered, or of special concern and conservation need. A culvert goes into the bed and banks of an existing stream, enclosing 800 square feet of it. The stream falls under federal jurisdiction as a Water of the United States, and an application has been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers. NYSDEC classifies the stream Class C. The stream is not subject to state Protection of Waters permitting. The town says the embedded culvert design maintains natural stream substrate, aquatic organism passage and stream function. The filing also says the Xerox campus "has several sites currently undergoing remediation or that have undergone prior emergency spill remediation," and that NYSDEC "has selected No Further Action as the current remedy with the continued operation of site-wide groundwater migration control." An environmental easement limits use of portions of the site to industrial and commercial uses. The town says core samples taken for the project indicated no elevated levels of contaminants within the project area, and anticipates no impact. ## The 2027 budget Thursday is also when the 2027 tentative budget becomes the preliminary budget. Under New York Town Law §106 that conversion happens on completion of the board's review, so the conversion is not a numbered item. The town's schedule puts the filing of the tentative budget at Aug. 31. The date for residents to mark is Oct. 15. At that 7:30 p.m. meeting the board holds the public hearing on the 2027 preliminary budget and adopts the 2027 final budget, both the same night. ## In-year budget items and routine business Two items adjust the current year's budget. Item 5 is a transfer that moves money among 80 existing lines in the adopted 2026 budget, leaving total appropriations unchanged. Item 6 raises appropriations by $90,550. Part of that takes the Program for Aging from $159,000 to $176,600. Each increase carries a matching source: $45,400 in intergovernmental charges, $45,000 in departmental income and $150 drawn from fund balance. Neither item raises the tax levy. One item authorizes the supervisor to sign a benefits contract for Police Capt. Mark Reed. The contract is not in the agenda packet. The resolution says the contract will be filed in the town clerk's office. The rest is routine: Aug. 20 minutes, bills, a prepaid warrant and purchase orders as submitted by the director of finance. * * * **What the record shows:** The board votes Thursday on a negative declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The town's filing describes 4.11 acres of tree clearing and a culvert through a federally regulated stream, with an Army Corps permit still pending. **What's still open:** Whether the board adopts the resolution. It recites a completed public comment period, and no document the Ledger reviewed establishes whether such a period was held or whether the recital means the 30-day involved-agency objection window. **What we couldn't verify:** No total project cost or FAST NY grant amount appears in the agenda packet the Ledger reviewed. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 02/09/2026
The Planning Board tabled both Verizon cell tower applications to Oct. 6 on 5-1 votes, after the town's own radio-frequency consultant told members there is a real service gap at both sites. The Lake Road public hearing was left open.
websterledger.com
Both Verizon towers tabled to Oct. 6, and the Lake Road hearing stays open
The Webster Planning Board tabled both of Verizon's cell tower applications Tuesday night and will take them up again Oct. 6. The board has not finished taking public comment on the Lake Road tower. Every application before the board Tuesday, and what happened to it: * Verizon cell tower, 1222 Wildflower Drive. Tabled to Oct. 6. The chair later said the invitation to come back and speak should have been given on this application as well. * Verizon cell tower, Lake Road. Tabled to Oct. 6, and the board left the public hearing open, so residents can still speak on it. * 764 Ridge Road, a 15,000-square-foot addition. Tabled to Oct. 6. * Four sign applications. All approved, and listed below. * Exterior lighting at Bloom & Blend, 790 Ridge Road. Approved. Earlier in the Lake Road item the chair said people could come back and speak, and that the invitation should have come on the Wildflower Drive application as well. After the Lake Road vote the chair said the board would not close that public hearing. The Ledger previewed both hearings Tuesday morning. ## Why the board tabled The chair told the board it had received a large volume of material in the past couple of days, and that the board should slow down until everyone can respond to it. Tabling also gives people in the community a chance to review the same information, the chair said. Verizon did file the supplemental propagation data the board had asked for. It arrived Aug. 27, and some material arrived the day of the meeting. The vote to table was 5-1 on each application. Before the first vote, a board member argued against waiting. The supplemental material addressed the board's earlier comments and its questions about coverage, the member said, and demonstrated that the selected locations are appropriate. The member was satisfied the information was complete and not sure a delay was necessary. Someone else at the table asked what a further 30 days would produce. Derek Anderson cast the only vote against tabling, on both applications. Verizon's attorney, Laura Smith of Nixon Peabody, asked the board to let the Wildflower Drive application keep moving while the review finishes. The board was told Verizon is on next week's zoning board agenda for a preliminary introduction of the project, and the chair agreed. ## The heights The Wildflower Drive tower is 135 feet with a four-foot lightning rod, 139 feet overall. The Lake Road tower is 125 feet with a four-foot lightning rod. Webster's code caps communications towers at 100 feet, measured from the ground surface immediately surrounding the site. ## What the town's consultant told the board The consultant the town hired to check Verizon's work appeared in person Tuesday and answered questions for roughly half an hour. William Johnson of RF Engineering Consultants, a professor emeritus at Rochester Institute of Technology, reviewed both applications with Professor Steven Ciccarelli. Johnson said they went through Verizon's propagation plots and found a real service gap at both sites. At Wildflower Drive that gap runs to both coverage and capacity. There is no coverage gap at Lake Road, Johnson said, but there is a gap at mid-band frequencies. A call can fail at five bars, Johnson said, because the site serving the phone has no capacity left to carry it. A gap is the first of three questions the board has to answer on an application like this. The board has not reached the other two: whether the proposal will actually fix the gap, and whether it is the least intrusive way to do it. Asked whether a code-compliant 100-foot tower could close the gap, Johnson said reduced heights compromise coverage. Filling in with multiple shorter towers is possible, Johnson said, but the combined impact of several is arguably greater than one taller one. Verizon's head RF engineer has offered no alternative at a lower height, Johnson said. ## What neighbors told the board Comment ran heavily against both towers. One speaker across the whole night spoke in favor. A Wildflower Drive resident told the board a petition with the signatures of 95 residents of the neighborhood had been delivered on Friday to Josh Artuso, the town's Director of Community Development. Speakers argued the record should show technical justification for the amount of height requested. They raised property values, and said prospective buyers had walked away from homes near the Wildflower Drive site. They asked whether the board can require a camouflaged or stealth design. The board's attorney noted the code provides for camouflage, landscaping and aesthetic treatment, and Johnson said stealthing a tower at 125 feet is possible but unusual, with trade-offs in how many antennas the tower can carry. Speakers also raised tree removal. A resident whose property backs onto the Wildflower Drive site said trees will come down and the tower will be visible from the backyard, close enough to both see and hear. A Lake Road neighbor who lives across from that site said the objection is to that corner rather than to the tower, and that a purchase offer on one of the building sites there was canceled the day before the meeting. Several speakers raised health effects from radio-frequency emissions. Some of those speakers said themselves that health cannot be the legal ground for a denial. Webster's code says federal law bars regulating a tower on health effects where it meets FCC standards, citing Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The town's consultant gave the board exposure figures from the reports before it: less than 1 percent of the FCC general-population threshold at Wildflower Drive, and a maximum theoretical 3.27 percent at Lake Road. The one speaker in favor lives in the neighborhood. Coverage there has been bad enough for three years to interfere with work, the speaker said, and calls from home do not go through. A tower is unsightly but it is needed infrastructure. ## How the sites were chosen Verizon's siting analysis says it evaluated eleven parcels for the Wildflower Drive site. One of them, according to that analysis, was town-owned property the Town Board declined to lease. Smith told the board that decision was within the Town Board's legislative purview and a separate question from the zoning approvals now pending. Webster's code sets a district preference for tower locations that ranks co-location and commercial districts above residential, and both towers are proposed in residential districts. ## The town already tried to move the Lake Road tower The chair disclosed after the Lake Road comment period that the board had already tried to get that tower located back in the woods. Town staff and the board met with Verizon, and the supervisor took part in one of those meetings. The town got nowhere with it, the chair said. ## 764 Ridge Road also tabled The third public hearing item on the agenda was tabled to Oct. 6 as well, on a voice vote. Thomas Fitzgerald of MRB Group presented a 15,000-square-foot one-story addition to the existing 11,000-square-foot building at 764 Ridge Road. Fitzgerald appeared for a development company and Vital Signs, the sign company that presented two of the sign applications the board approved earlier in the evening. Comments from the town engineer are still outstanding. They cover ADA compliance, sidewalks, site access and a required fire sprinkler system. The applicant said those were addressed in an Aug. 28 submission. The chair proposed taking preliminary and final approval together on Oct. 6 so no time is lost. ## What did get approved Every application the board approved Tuesday was a sign or a light, and all were approved on voice votes with no dissent. * Penfield-Webster EMS, 607 Phillips Road. One 14.89-square-foot non-illuminated sign. * Supercuts, 900 Holt Road. One 28-square-foot internally illuminated sign at the Holt Road plaza. * Monroe County Water Authority, 593 Basket Road. One 18-square-foot non-illuminated double-sided roadside sign. * McAlpin Industries, 865 Hard Road. Three internally illuminated wall signs, two wayfinding signs and one monument sign, totaling 366.13 square feet. * Bloom & Blend, 790 Ridge Road. Final approval for 36 feet of decorative exterior lighting, the second lighting application the board has handled after 7 Brew. The board also approved its Aug. 4 minutes. ## Where this stands **What the record shows.** Both applications were tabled to Oct. 6 on 5-1 votes to table, with Derek Anderson voting against tabling each time. **What is still open.** Verizon has not documented its outreach to landowners of record, the one finding the town's consultant left open on both sites. The board was told Verizon is on next week's zoning board agenda for a preliminary introduction of the Wildflower Drive project. **What we could not verify.** Tuesday's recording was transcribed by machine, and no second transcription engine was available before publication. This account therefore carries no direct quotations, and everything attributed here is a paraphrase. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 02/09/2026
Webster caps communications towers at 100 feet. A guide to the three questions the Planning Board has to answer on a tower application, what the code says about camouflage and co-location, and why health effects cannot be the ground for a denial.
websterledger.com
How Webster reviews a cell tower application
Webster's code caps communications towers at 100 feet. Any tower taller than that arrives at the Planning Board carrying the same set of questions, and several of the answers are set by federal law rather than by the town. This guide draws on the town code and on what the town's own radio-frequency consultant told the Planning Board on Sept. 1, 2026, during hearings on two Verizon towers. ## The three questions the board has to answer William Johnson of RF Engineering Consultants, the firm the town hired to check Verizon's work, laid out for the board the three questions it has to answer on an application like this. The first is whether the applicant has identified a significant service gap. The second is whether the proposal will actually remedy that gap. The third is whether it is the least intrusive means that is technically feasible, which is where site selection and the applicant's control of the land come in. Answering the first question does not answer the other two. Objections about site selection, and about the choice of a full-height tower over smaller equipment, both sit under the third question. Johnson said the legal advice on all of it belongs with the board's own attorney. ## Health effects cannot be the ground for a denial Webster's code says federal law bars regulating a tower on the health effects of radio-frequency emissions where the tower meets FCC standards. The code cites Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Residents raise health at these hearings, and some say themselves that it cannot be the legal ground for a denial. Johnson told the board that municipalities are saddled with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the court decisions that followed it, and suggested residents direct their complaints to the senators and representatives who could change it. What the standard forecloses is a denial, not the analysis. The reports before the board on Sept. 1 put exposure at less than 1 percent of the FCC general-population threshold at the Wildflower Drive site, and at a maximum theoretical 3.27 percent at the Lake Road site, the town's consultant told members. ## The 100-foot cap, and where it came from The cap is 100 feet, including antennas and extensions, measured from the ground surface immediately surrounding the site. It applies townwide, not to one zoning district. Late in the Sept. 1 discussion, a board member recalled how the cap came about. The town set it years ago, when the first towers came in, expecting it would hold down the impact on neighborhoods. The member said more towers turned out to be needed instead, and the code was never changed. Johnson said the 100-foot number still serves a purpose, because an applicant who wants to build higher has to come forward and demonstrate need. That is not a bad thing, Johnson said. ## A later carrier can raise an approved tower once Johnson pointed the board to finding number 12 of the firm's July 24 review of the Wildflower Drive site. Current FCC regulations carry a provision for a second service provider coming onto an existing tower, Johnson said. The height of that tower can be raised to accommodate the new carrier without going through the kind of review the board was conducting that night. That height increase is available one time. Once it has been used, Johnson said, the next carrier has to go through the full zoning review. Johnson said that is federal law rather than Webster code, and that concerns about it belong with Congress. Johnson also said this is not a reason to deny an application, only something the board should know is possible. During the Sept. 1 hearings, Verizon's attorney, Laura Smith of Nixon Peabody, told the board separately that another carrier might well need its own tower. Smith also said Verizon itself may come back before the board to increase the height. ## Camouflage and stealth designs The code specifically provides for camouflage, landscaping and aesthetic treatment. The board's attorney raised that on Sept. 1, and noted that a site sitting on a road rather than in a tree line will be seen from the road. Johnson said stealthing a tower at 125 feet is possible but unusual, and pointed to a site Pittsford recently stealthed at about 110 feet that reads as a pine tree from some approaches and clearly does not from others. Stealth branches add wind load and torque at the base of the pole, Johnson said, which limits how many antennas the tower can carry. Johnson's summary was that it is a trade-off between how a tower looks and how it performs. ## Sharing an existing tower comes first Webster's code says shared use of an existing tower is preferred to building a new one, and requires an applicant to document good-faith efforts to co-locate on something already standing. The code also sets a district preference for tower locations. That preference runs from a property with an existing structure suitable for co-location, to commercial districts, to municipal or government-owned property, and then to residential districts, with further tiers below that. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/09/2026
Both Verizon tower applications are on the Planning Board's Tuesday agenda, each scheduled for a public hearing. Every earlier appearance was a sketch plan review. The town's own engineering reviews are now on file.
websterledger.com
Both Verizon towers go to a public hearing Tuesday. It's the Planning Board's first on either one.
Both of Verizon's proposed Webster cell towers go before the Planning Board Tuesday night, and each one is scheduled for a public hearing. The board meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Eight numbered items are on the agenda, along with approval of the Aug. 4 minutes. The applicant on both towers is Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, doing business as Verizon. The agenda lists Robert Burgdorf as the applicant's agent on both. Both applications are listed under tabled matters, and both ask for preliminary site plan approval. Tabled matters is the part of the agenda for applications the board has taken up before and is returning to. The board can act on an application at one of these hearings or table it again. The third public hearing Tuesday is on a 15,000-square-foot one-story addition to an existing 11,000-square-foot building at 764 Ridge Road. ## Tuesday is the Planning Board's first hearing on either tower Each application has been before the Planning Board once, and both of those meetings were sketch plan reviews. The Lake Road tower had its review March 3. The Wildflower Drive tower had its review May 5. A sketch plan review is informational. The board asks the applicant for materials and raises concerns, and it takes no vote on the application. Tuesday is the first public hearing the Planning Board has scheduled on either tower. Neither application appeared on the board's June 2, July 7 or Aug. 4 agendas. ## What preliminary site plan approval is Tuesday's tower hearings are on preliminary site plan approval. That is not final site plan approval, and it is not the special use permit the town code also requires. Under the town code, a communications tower in the R-3 district or the LL district needs two separate approvals. The Town Board issues the special use permit. The Planning Board grants final site plan approval. Section 130-8 requires both. Each tower carries at least two public hearings. Tuesday's Planning Board hearing is not the last one. The Town Board holds another hearing on each tower later. Under Section 130-11B, the Town Board has 62 days to hold it. The 62 days start once the Town Board has both the Planning Board's recommendation and the Planning Board's final site plan approval. ## The Lake Road tower The Lake Road tower would go on land of Windmill Farms LLC, near the southwest corner of Lake Road and Monroe-Wayne County Line Road. The parcel is 7.8 acres in the LL Large-Lot Residential District. The tax parcel number is 037.03-1-44. The tower would be a 125-foot monopole standing 129 feet overall with a four-foot lightning rod. The lease area is 100 by 100 feet. The tower is designed to carry three carriers. The board recorded two requests to the applicant in the results of the March 3 sketch plan review. It asked Verizon to evaluate alternative locations on the same property farther west of County Line Road. It also asked Verizon to consider whether the portion of the property that lies in Wayne County is suitable for the tower. ## The Wildflower Drive tower The Wildflower Drive tower would go on a 14.2-acre parcel in the R-3 Single Family Residential District. The agenda gives the location as 1222 Wildflower Drive. The town's July 24 engineering review describes the site as private land near that address. The tax parcel number is 065.05-1-48. The July 24 review puts the lease area at 80 by 125 feet and the fenced compound at roughly 34 by 77 feet. This tower is also designed to carry three carriers. The July 24 review describes a 135-foot monopole standing 139 feet overall with a four-foot lightning rod. The agenda lists 125 feet. The Planning Board confirmed on the record in May that the tower is 135 feet and that the 125-foot figure on the board's agenda was a mistake. ## The height limit and the variance Chapter 130 of the town code sets a maximum height of 100 feet for communications towers, measured from the ground surface immediately surrounding the site. That figure includes antennas, extensions and any other device that extends above the tower. The cap sits in the chapter itself and is not a rule of either zoning district. A tower that cannot meet that cap needs an area variance under Section 130-24. Verizon has filed an area-variance exhibit with both applications. ## The town's own reviews are on file The town retained its own radio-frequency engineers on both applications. William P. Johnson and Steven M. Ciccarelli of RF Engineering Consultants of Rochester filed preliminary radio-frequency site reviews with the Planning Board. The Wildflower Drive review is dated July 24, 2026. The Lake Road review is dated Aug. 3, 2026. Both are addressed to Josh Artuso, the town's Director of Community Development. Both are posted with Tuesday's agenda. ## What the board can and cannot consider The town code says federal law prohibits the regulation of cellular and personal communication service towers on the basis of the environmental effects of radio-frequency emissions, where those emissions comply with FCC standards. Section 130-12F cites Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 130-12C says shared use of an existing tower is preferred to building a new one. The section requires an applicant to document good-faith efforts to co-locate. Section 130-12E(2) requires the base of a tower to sit at least its own height from any property line. Where the underlying district requires a larger setback, the district minimum governs. ## How to be heard Residents can speak at each of the three hearings. The Planning Board meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Section 130-23 sets two notice rules. A legal notice runs in the town's official newspaper at least five days before a hearing. The applicant has to post a sign the town provides at least 10 days before the hearing and keep it up through the hearing date. The sign goes in a conspicuous place at or in front of the front property line. The town code does not require the town to mail notice of these hearings to nearby property owners. Previously in the Ledger: The week ahead in Webster: school starts Wednesday, three hearings Tuesday (Aug. 28) carries the full eight-item agenda. Verizon cell tower at 1222 Wildflower Drive goes before the Planning Board tonight (May 5) covers the Wildflower application's history and the code path it follows. Webster Planning Board orders outside review of 135-foot Verizon tower (May 6) covers the board's confirmation of the 135-foot height. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 28/08/2026
School starts Wednesday. The Planning Board holds three public hearings Tuesday, Sept. 1. Thursday's 6:30 p.m. Town Board workshop is canceled, and the 7:30 p.m. meeting is still on.
websterledger.com
The week ahead in Webster: school starts Wednesday, three hearings Tuesday
Students in the Webster Central School District return to class Wednesday, Sept. 2. The Planning Board, the Town Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals each meet once between Monday, Aug. 31, and Tuesday, Sept. 8. The school board also meets Sept. 8. The town's 2027 budget passes three milestones on its published schedule. The Town Board workshop set for 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 3, is canceled. The regular Town Board meeting at 7:30 p.m. that night is still on, in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. ## Day by day * **Monday, Aug. 31.** No school. Webster Central School District staff have a Superintendent's Conference Day. The town supervisor files the 2027 Tentative Budget with the Town Clerk. Community Office Hours with the supervisor start at 5:30 p.m. at 1002 Ridge Road. * **Tuesday, Sept. 1.** No school. Staff have a second Superintendent's Conference Day. The Planning Board meets at 7 p.m. in the Town Board Room, 1002 Ridge Road. * **Wednesday, Sept. 2.** First day of school for Webster Central School District students. * **Thursday, Sept. 3.** The 6:30 p.m. Town Board workshop is canceled. The Town Board meets at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Board Room. The board is scheduled to approve the Tentative Budget as presented, which makes it the Preliminary Budget. * **Friday, Sept. 4.** No school. The Preliminary Budget is filed with the Town Clerk. * **Monday, Sept. 7.** Labor Day. Town Hall is closed and there is no school. * **Tuesday, Sept. 8.** The Webster Central School District Board of Education meets at 5 p.m. at Spry Middle School, 119 South Ave., in the second-floor PDC. The school shares that address with the district office. The meeting listing names professional development and the WREA Citizenship Awardees. The district livestreams its board meetings. The Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. in the Town Board Room, 1002 Ridge Road. ## Three chances to speak Tuesday, Sept. 1 The Planning Board's Sept. 1 agenda carries three public hearings. A public hearing is the part of a meeting set aside for residents to address the board on a specific application. Two of the three are Verizon Wireless tower applications. The applicant on both is Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, doing business as Verizon. * **1222 Wildflower Drive.** Preliminary site plan approval for a 125-foot telecommunications tower with a four-foot lightning rod, along with ground-mounted equipment. The parcel is 14.2 acres in the R-3 Single Family Residential District. * **Lake Road and County Line Road.** Preliminary site plan approval for a 125-foot tower with a four-foot lightning rod. The parcel is 7.8 acres in the LL Large-Lot Residential District. * **764 Ridge Road.** Preliminary site plan approval for a 15,000-square-foot one-story addition to an existing 11,000-square-foot building. ## The rest of Tuesday's agenda Five other items are scheduled without public hearings. Four of them are sign applications. * **Penfield-Webster EMS, 607 Phillips Road.** One non-illuminated sign of 14.89 square feet. * **Supercuts, 900 Holt Road.** One internally illuminated sign of 28 square feet. * **Monroe County Water Authority, 593 Basket Road.** One non-illuminated sign of 18 square feet. * **McAlpin Industries, 865 Hard Road.** Three internally illuminated wall-mounted signs, two wayfinding signs and one monument sign. They total 366.13 square feet. The fifth item is final site plan approval for 36 feet of decorative exterior lighting at Bloom & Blend, 790 Ridge Road. The board is also set to act on its Aug. 4 minutes. ## The budget steps this week The budget items on Monday, Thursday and Friday come from the town's published 2027 Budget Schedule. The town supervisor files the Tentative Budget with the Town Clerk on Monday. The Town Board is scheduled to approve it as presented on Thursday, which makes it the Preliminary Budget. That document is filed with the Town Clerk on Friday. The same schedule sets the public hearing on the 2027 Preliminary Budget for 7:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 15, and adoption of the 2027 Final Budget for the same meeting. That is the night residents can speak on the Preliminary Budget. ## Finding the agendas The Sept. 1 Planning Board agenda is posted. The Sept. 3 Town Board agenda had not been posted as of Friday. The town posts agendas on its AgendaCenter page. The district posts Board of Education agendas, minutes and its board calendar on BoardDocs, linked from the board page at websterschools.org. Dates here come from the town's online meeting calendars, the town's 2027 Budget Schedule, the Webster Central School District calendar and the posted Sept. 1 Planning Board agenda. Previously in the Ledger: Back to school in Webster: what parents need to know for Sept. 2 (Aug. 26). ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/08/2026
The 5-0 vote Aug. 20 was one of two consents the annexation needs. What General Municipal Law Article 17 requires next, who decides, and what changes for the 28-acre parcel.
websterledger.com
Webster's town board said yes to the Xerox annexation. Here's what still has to happen.
The Webster Town Board voted 5-0 on Aug. 20 to approve a petition moving roughly 28 acres of the Xerox campus out of the Town of Webster and into the Village of Webster. That vote is one of two consents the annexation needs. Under New York's General Municipal Law, a town board is one of two governing bodies that has to act on an annexation petition like this one. The village board has its own decision to make, on its own clock, under a rule most residents have never run into: if it says nothing at all, the annexation is approved anyway. The village board meets Thursday evening, its first regular meeting since the town's vote. Here is what the statute requires, who decides next, and what changes for the parcel if the municipal line moves. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. ## What the vote did, and what it didn't The land would move from the town to the village, not the other way. The paperwork states that direction plainly. Xerox Corporation's filing, submitted under General Municipal Law Section 703, describes itself as a "petition for the annexation of territory known as Tax ID # 65.03-1-41 to the Village of Webster." The cover letter transmitting it to the town describes the request as one "for the Village to annex a portion of the Site currently under the jurisdiction of the Town." The parcel is 28.04 acres at 1345 Chiyoda Drive, owned by Xerox Corporation and assessed at $3,231,900. The petition swears that the number of inhabitants of the territory is zero and that Xerox owns 100 percent of its assessed valuation, a statement certified by the town assessor. Nobody lives there. It is also not a trade. "It's not a swap," a board member said at the Aug. 20 meeting, adding that people had thought the town and village were exchanging land. Supervisor Alex Scialdone, Deputy Supervisor Nick Hunter, Councilmen John Cahill and Garrett Wagner, and Councilwoman Jennifer Wright all voted aye. The town has not yet posted minutes of the Aug. 20 meeting, so board members quoted here are identified by role rather than by name. A board member said the municipal line between town and village runs directly through the Xerox parcel, and that the split makes it less desirable for a developer to buy and revamp. The point of the move, the member said, is to put the West Campus inside the village so that a developer deals with a single municipality. The environmental determination was not on the posted agenda. The town attorney raised it from the floor, before the presiding officer took up the annexation, and the board then adopted a resolution classifying the annexation as an unlisted action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and finding that it will have no adverse environmental impact. The petition package includes Part 1 of a short Environmental Assessment Form, prepared and certified by the applicant. That is how the state's form is designed to work: it assigns Part 1 to the applicant or project sponsor, and the answers are subject to public review and further verification. ## Two boundary proposals, running in opposite directions Some of the confusion has a real source: there have been two separate boundary proposals on the Xerox campus this year, and they run opposite ways. The first went to Village of Webster voters at a special election on June 16. That one concerned two portions of a different parcel, 065.19-1-1.1: roughly 32 acres off Phillips Road, Mitcheldean Drive and Resende Road, plus about 1.3 acres along Ridge Road near Route 104. It would have moved land the other direction, out of the village and into the town, under a different procedure entirely: a boundary diminishment under Village Law, decided at the ballot box rather than by the boards. The proposition failed 125 to 130, with 19 blank ballots out of 274 cast, according to the Monroe County Board of Canvassers. A board member pointed to that outcome on Aug. 20: "The village referendum did not pass the public, so it is now on us." That referendum concerned different land and a different procedure. The petition the town board acted on in August is a different parcel, a different direction and a different statute. It runs under General Municipal Law Article 17, where the two governing boards decide, not the voters. Both proposals trace back to the same underlying planning effort: the Reimagine Webster Brownfield Opportunity Area plan, or BOA plan, which the town and village jointly asked the New York State Department of State to designate in April 2025 and which received a certificate of designation that June. Xerox's petition calls the annexation "a key step to implementing the vision established in the BOA Plan." A Brownfield Opportunity Area is a state Department of State planning designation covering an area, not an approval covering a project. A BOA designation does not itself approve development or change zoning, and it does not by itself require or complete any cleanup. It is a plan, not a permit. On site conditions, the application states that the adjoining Xerox campus underwent completed remediation for hazardous waste. That characterization comes from the applicant's own filing and has not been independently verified by the Ledger. ## What Article 17 actually requires The statute lays out a sequence, and Webster is partway through it. **The petition.** Section 703 lets the owners of a territory petition for annexation. Xerox's was transmitted to the town on April 23, 2026. **Notice.** Section 704 requires notice to be published and mailed within 20 days after a petition is received, with the hearing set not less than 20 nor more than 40 days after that. **A joint hearing.** Section 705 makes the hearing a joint one. Both boards sit together, and the record has to address whether the petition is sufficient and whether the annexation is in the "over-all public interest" of the territory, the annexing municipality, the area left behind, and any affected school or fire districts. **The determination, within 90 days.** Section 711 gives each affected governing board 90 days after the hearing is concluded to determine by majority vote whether the annexation serves that over-all public interest, and to adopt a resolution with findings and file a signed written order. **And silence counts as yes.** A board that wants to reject the annexation has to say so in writing, on time. If the 90 days pass and no written order has been filed, Section 711 says the board "shall be deemed to have approved the proposed annexation." Approval happens by operation of law, without anyone taking a vote. That rule was on the town board's mind. "This is the last board meeting we have before the 90 day from the joint public hearing that we had with the village," a board member said Aug. 20. "So if we do not vote tonight it will default to a yes automatically." ## The village board's turn The town has consented. The village board's determination is the remaining consent. The Ledger has not been able to establish from the village's posted record whether the board has acted on the petition, or when the 90 days expire. Three things can happen from here. **If the village board approves** , Section 711 makes the determination "final and conclusive." There is no appeal on the merits. A challenge would have to come as an Article 78 proceeding within 30 days of the order being filed. **If the village board does nothing** , the deemed-approval rule applies and the annexation is treated as approved when the 90 days run out. **If the village board refuses** , the case can go to the Appellate Division, but not at Xerox's initiative. Section 712 gives that right to "the governing board of any other affected local government," which here means the town board. The petitioner has no standing to appeal a village refusal. The application would be due within 30 days after the order is filed with the county clerk. The statute is asymmetrical. It builds a review route into a refusal, which another affected board can take to the Appellate Division. It builds none into an approval, or into a silence that becomes one. ## What changes for the parcel, and what doesn't **The village would become the land-use authority.** That is the largest practical change on this list. Going forward, village zoning and village boards would govern development on the parcel, and the town's boards would no longer have a role in approving what gets built there. Village officials are elected by village voters, so residents of the town outside the village would have no vote for the officials deciding what gets built on the parcel. The Ledger has not been able to establish from the village's posted record which zoning district the parcel would receive, or whether the village must act to assign one. **Schools do not change.** The parcel already sits in the Webster Central School District, which covers both the town and the village. As a general rule school district boundaries are independent of municipal boundaries and do not automatically follow an annexation, but here the question is moot in both directions. No student assignment changes and no one's school tax jurisdiction changes because of this. **Whether the town's moratorium reaches this parcel is not settled by the record.** Webster's development moratorium is Local Law No. 2 of 2026, adopted June 4, 2026. It bars subdivisions producing more than four parcels, large-scale solar projects and data centers on real property in six named zoning districts: O-P, MC, HC, CO, LC-1 and LC-2, as identified on the town's zoning map last dated May 2021. That map lists IN Industrial as a district distinct from those six, and the Ledger has not been able to establish which town zoning district covers this parcel. If the boundary moves, the moratorium stops applying either way, because the law by its own terms binds boards of the Town of Webster and property in the town's listed districts. **The tax roll shifts on a fiscal-year boundary, not on the day of the vote.** Once the approving orders are filed with the clerks of the affected local governments, Section 714 requires the annexing board to set an effective date by local law, with due regard to the taxable status dates and fiscal years of the governments involved. Section 710 handles the money: taxes already owed when annexation takes effect stay collectible as if the territory had never been annexed, and from the first fiscal year beginning after the effective date the annexing government collects. In plain terms, the village would gain the parcel on its roll and the town would lose it from the town-wide levy, while county and school jurisdiction are unaffected. "Town taxpayers have no negative impact on this," a board member said Aug. 20. No public document quantifies the levy effect on either side, and the Ledger is not going to estimate one. **Whether the parcel leaves the town's special districts is not settled by the record.** The assessment roll lists it in the Northeast Joint Fire District along with water, sewer and drainage districts. General Municipal Law Section 709 addresses fire districts only where a city is doing the annexing, so it does not settle what happens when a village does. ## What to watch The village board meets Thursday, Aug. 27 at 6:30 p.m. in the Community Meeting Hall at 29 South Ave., and its meetings stream live on the village's Facebook page. The Village of Webster Board of Trustees sits on the second and fourth Thursday of each month. The Ledger has not been able to establish from the village's posted record whether the petition is on the agenda for that meeting, or whether the board takes public comment on it. The other markers are the village board's minutes and the town's minutes of the Aug. 20 meeting, which the town posts once the board approves them at a subsequent meeting. One date is still unsettled. The town's posted record does not establish when the joint hearing closed, which is the event that starts the 90-day clock. Previously in the Ledger: Xerox parcel annexation, traffic law update head Thursday's Town Board agenda (Aug. 20) and Webster Town Board approves petition to annex part of Xerox campus, 5-0 (Aug. 21). ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 26/08/2026
Classes start Wednesday, Sept. 2, and the first week is only two days long. Bell times, a coming traffic change at Willink, the paperwork that will bite you, and what is actually new this year.
websterledger.com
Back to school in Webster: what parents need to know for Sept. 2
Webster Central School District classes resume Wednesday, Sept. 2, and the first week is two days long. Students attend Wednesday and Thursday, and then there is no school Friday, Sept. 4 or Monday, Sept. 7 for Labor Day weekend. The first full week does not start until Tuesday, Sept. 8. For families lining up childcare, be prepared for that. ## The first two weeks, at a glance * **Monday, Aug. 31 and Tuesday, Sept. 1:** Superintendent's Conference Days. Staff report; no students are in buildings. * **Wednesday, Sept. 2:** first day of classes for all students. * **Thursday, Sept. 3:** day two, and the last day of the first week. * **Friday, Sept. 4 and Monday, Sept. 7:** no school, Labor Day weekend. * **Tuesday, Sept. 8:** the first full week begins, and the school year's first Board of Education meeting is that afternoon at 5 p.m. * **Bell times:** most elementary schools run 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.; Klem Road North and Plank Road North run 7:40 a.m. to 2:10 p.m.; all middle and high schools run 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. * **Meals:** breakfast and lunch are free for every student, starting the first day. Nearly everything below comes from two district documents: the Back to School 2026-27 newsletter, the 16-page issue mailed to Webster homes, and the Board of Education's adopted 2026-27 school calendar. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. ## What time your school starts Bell times are printed in the newsletter's school directory. Five of the seven elementary schools run 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m. Two of them, Klem Road North and Plank Road North, start 10 minutes earlier, at 7:40 a.m. Families with children in two different elementary buildings should check both rows. All middle and high schools run 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. School| Hours| Principal ---|---|--- DeWitt Road Elementary, 722 DeWitt Road| 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.| Mark Schichtel Klem Road North Elementary, 1015 Klem Road| 7:40 a.m. to 2:10 p.m.| Laura Ballou Klem Road South Elementary, 1025 Klem Road| 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.| Martha End Plank Road North Elementary, 705 Plank Road| 7:40 a.m. to 2:10 p.m.| Craig Bodensteiner Plank Road South Elementary, 715 Plank Road| 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.| Jill Doyle Schlegel Road Elementary, 1548 Schlegel Road| 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.| Kate Hesla State Road Elementary, 1401 State Road| 7:50 a.m. to 2:20 p.m.| Anthony Kunecki Spry Middle School, 119 South Ave.| 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.| Jacqueline Goodwine (interim) Willink Middle School, 900 Publishers Parkway| 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.| Brian Powers Webster Schroeder High School, 875 Ridge Road| 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.| Paul Benz Webster Thomas High School, 800 Five Mile Line Road| 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.| Glenn Widor The district's alternative programs keep their own hours: GOAL, 8:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.; One Webster Learning (OWL) High, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.; OWL Middle, 8:55 a.m. to 2:55 p.m.; OWL Elementary, 7:50 a.m. to 2 p.m. The newsletter announces no change to school hours this year. ## Buses The district says its Infinite Campus parent portal carries bus schedules, along with attendance, grades and report cards, so that is where to look for your child's stop. No release date for 2026-27 routes is published, so check the portal rather than waiting for an announcement. Transportation answers at 585-265-3840, 6 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. One thing the district does say, in its transportation FAQ: after school starts, bus numbers and stop times can change whenever a route is adjusted, even when the stop location itself holds. A route confirmed this week is not necessarily the route in October. ## Willink families, the parking lot is changing The district says a complete restoration of Willink Middle School's parking lot is underway, and that it "will create a new traffic pattern for pick up and drop off." It also says the specifics are not out yet. In the newsletter's capital project update, the district writes: "Stay tuned for more details as that work is completed closer to the start of school." That is the whole of what has been published. As of publication, neither the district's Willink construction page nor the school's own page described the new pattern. Willink parents should expect the arrival and dismissal routine to be different on Sept. 2 and should watch for the district's notice. Also at Willink, the district says the OWL addition is "taking shape with work to be completed in time for school to start this fall." The Ledger reported the Willink construction project on July 29, when no building-by-building schedule had been released. ## At Spry, a two-year bathroom project A remodel of all bathroom facilities at Spry Middle School began this summer. The district says it will be a two-year process, staggered across areas of the building. ## Meals are free, and you should still fill out the form Every Webster student receives one complete free breakfast and one complete free lunch daily starting on the first day of school. The district attributes this to its participation in the federal Community Eligibility Provision. Even so, the district asks families to complete a Free/Reduced Price Meal Application, one per family. Approved applications unlock fee waivers for other district programs, including AP exams and driver's education. No deadline is published: the district says a family may submit or update an application at any time during the school year as circumstances change. The application is online through the Parent Portal under the Food Service section, and paper forms are available at each school. Second meals and a la carte items are not free and cannot be charged. Prepaid accounts run through MySchoolBucks, which supports low-balance alerts and auto-replenishment. Checks are payable to "Webster Food Services," one per building. Questions about dietary modifications go to the Food Service Office, 585-670-5104. ## The paperwork that will bite you **Immunizations.** The district's line is blunt: students whose immunization records are not in compliance "will not be permitted in school." All students need DPT, DT or DTaP; hepatitis B; MMR; polio; and varicella. Grades 6 through 12 need one dose of Tdap. Meningococcal is one dose for grades 7 through 11 and two doses in grade 12. UPK adds Hib and pneumococcal. Medical exemptions only, on the state health department's form, approved by the district physician and renewed annually. Free immunizations are available at the Monroe County Department of Public Health, 111 Westfall Road, 585-753-5150. **Physicals.** Health appraisals are required for all new entrants and for students in PreK, K, and grades 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. New York now requires the exam on the state School Health Examination Form, and the district says it is no longer permitted to accept other forms. An exam dated on or after Sept. 1, 2025 meets the requirement and should reach the school health office within 30 days of attendance. For Section V sports in grades 7 through 12, the exam must be dated on or after Aug. 1, 2025. **Over-the-counter medication.** The district flags this one itself as an important change. Administering an over-the-counter product in a school health office now requires both a written order from a licensed health care provider and written parental consent. **Registration.** Registration for 2026-27 is open online through Infinite Campus. No deadline is published, which is a reason to do it now rather than later. The registration office is at 119 South Avenue, 585-216-0029, weekdays 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. **PreK and kindergarten.** The 2026-27 PreK lottery closed March 13, and applications filed after that go to a waitlist. The district opened this year's application window in mid-February, so families with a 4-year-old should start watching for next year's announcement around then. For kindergarten, a child must be 5 years old on or before Dec. 1 to be eligible to register, and a child who turns 6 on or before Dec. 1 is required to attend instruction that September. ## What is actually new this year **Four new administrators.** The district hired four this summer, most of them replacing retirees. Chris Callahan, a Webster graduate who started in the district in 2010 and had been Spry's principal since 2023, is now assistant superintendent for human resources. That move is why Spry opens the year with an interim principal, Jacqueline Goodwine, an assistant principal at Webster Schroeder since 2014. Jenna Felice joins Spry as assistant principal, from Penfield. Chris Golamb is the new director of health, physical education and athletics for Webster Thomas and Willink. **A water safety notice you have not seen before.** A new state law, Education Law section 926, took effect July 1 and requires districts to give parents and guardians information on drowning prevention, water safety and safe and healthy swimming at the beginning of the school year. Webster is posting the state health department's "Safe Swimming Tips for Everyone" card under District, then Legal Notices, on its website. **Replacing a lost student ID badge is free once, then $10.** Each student gets one free replacement if a badge is lost or damaged. Every additional replacement is $10. The district suggests a backpack clip or lanyard. **The student code of conduct.** The board took up a revised 2026-27 student code of conduct at its Aug. 18 meeting. As proposed, it would define the unauthorized use of "artificial intelligence ('AI') technology or tools" as a form of academic dishonesty; add language stating that the dress code does not limit a student's ability "to wear certain protective hairstyles (including but not limited to braids, locks, and twists)"; and require a building principal or designee to notify local law enforcement of code violations that constitute a crime and substantially affect school order or security, no later than the close of business the day they learn of it. Those provisions are described here as proposed because the Ledger has not confirmed what the board did with the revision on Aug. 18. Whatever version the board adopts is the one that governs, once the district posts it. ## Phones, in year two The phone rule is not new, but it gets reported as new every August. New York's statewide bell-to-bell restriction on smartphones took effect in September 2025. Webster's implementing policy, Policy 7316, was approved by the board and took effect last school year. What it means for a student starting sixth grade who has never lived under it: personal internet-enabled devices stay put away for the entire school day. The newsletter spells out the span, from the opening homeroom bell through classes, study halls, lunch, recess and passing time. The district writes about the policy in the past tense, as a settled part of the school day rather than a change coming this fall. ## Dates to mark The first board meeting of the school year is Tuesday, Sept. 8 at 5 p.m. The board normally meets in the second-floor professional development center at Spry Middle School, 119 South Avenue, unless the agenda notes otherwise, so check the agenda before you go. Meetings are livestreamed and archived at websterschools.org/boemeetings. Anyone who wants to speak should fill out the online speaker form linked at websterschools.org/boemeetings. Families who are unable to complete the form can contact District Clerk Heather Murphy at 585-216-0001 or heather_murphy@webstercsd.org. From the district calendar, with the district's own caveat that dates are subject to change and that families should plan vacations around test days: * Oct. 9: Superintendent's Conference Day, no school * Oct. 12: No school * Nov. 11: No school * Nov. 19, 20, 23 and 24: PreK-5 parent-teacher conferences, half days * Nov. 25 to 27: No school * Dec. 23 to Jan. 1: No school * Jan. 18: No school * Jan. 26 to 28: Regents exams * Feb. 15 to 19: No school * March 11, 12, 18 and 19: PreK-5 parent-teacher conferences, half days * March 22 to 26: No school * April 14 and 15: Grades 3-8 ELA testing * April 28 and 29: Grades 3-8 math testing * May 18: Annual budget vote and board election * June 14: Last day of classes, grades 9-12 * June 21: Last day of classes, grades 6-8 * June 22: Last day of classes, PreK-5 Eight of those days are half days, four in November and four in March, all of them PreK-5 conference days. That is worth putting on a childcare calendar now. That list is not the whole school year. The district calendar carries additional non-attendance days, several of which apply only to certain grade levels, and a parent planning the full year should work from the district's published 2026-27 calendar, printed on page 13 of the Back to School newsletter. Two things parents look for every fall are not on that calendar at all. The district's published calendar carries no marking-period end dates and no report card dates, and open house and orientation dates are set building by building rather than published district-wide. For both, watch ParentSquare and your child's school. ## Numbers and links * Supply lists, one district-wide document: 2026-27 school supply lists * Registration: websterschools.org/registration, 585-216-0029 * Transportation: 585-265-3840 * Food Service: 585-670-5104 * District Clerk and board meetings: 585-216-0001, websterschools.org/boemeetings * Monroe County Department of Public Health immunization clinic: 585-753-5150 ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 25/08/2026
Bills go out this week. Full payment runs penalty-free through Oct. 1, the installment plan disappears if the first payment misses Sept. 20, and installments two and three go to the county, not Town Hall.
websterledger.com
Webster school tax bills go out this week. Miss Sept. 20 and the installment plan is gone.
Webster homeowners who plan to pay their school taxes in three installments have until Sept. 20 to make the first one. Miss that date and the entire bill comes due. Webster Central School District tax bills go out this week, and for most homeowners that bill is the largest single tax charge of the year. The first installment is due Sept. 15, and the whole bill can be paid with no interest through Oct. 1. Neither is the date that decides how expensive this gets. Sept. 20 is the cliff. The Town of Webster's legal notice for the 2026-2027 collection puts it in one sentence: "If the first installment is not paid by September 20th, the installment plan is no longer available." The entire school tax then comes due, with the Oct. 1 clock still running. The school board took up the 2026-2027 tax warrant on Aug. 18, and the Receiver of Taxes has since received the warrant and the tax roll. For what the charges on the bill are, and why your neighbor's total differs from yours, see the Ledger's July 10 explainer, How to read your Webster property tax bill. What follows is the calendar. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. ## Two ways to pay, and what each one commits you to **Pay in full.** Sept. 1 through Oct. 1, no interest. Oct. 2 through Oct. 31, add 2 percent, applied to the entire amount of the bill, not to some remaining balance. **Pay in three installments.** The installments are due Sept. 15, Oct. 15 and Nov. 15, and only the first one is paid to Webster Town Hall. The plan costs extra. The legal notice says that "if you elect to use the installment option, there is a service charge on ALL three payments," and the payment instructions printed on the back of the bill say it must be paid with every installment. Neither document states the amount. It is printed on your bill. **A calendar problem.** Sept. 20, 2026 is a Sunday. The legal notice says that when a due date falls on a weekend or holiday, payment will be accepted on the first business day following. But Sept. 20 is written as a cutoff, not as a due date, and no published source resolves whether the plan survives into Monday, Sept. 21. Treat Friday, Sept. 18 as the last safe day to pay in person, or mail it postmarked no later than Saturday, Sept. 19. Do not plan around Monday. The school installment plan carries no stated minimum bill amount. Do not assume a threshold applies here. ## Installments two and three do not go to Webster Town Hall This is the most common way a taxpayer on the installment plan ends up delinquent without meaning to. Only the first installment goes to the Town of Webster. The second and third go to the **Monroe County Treasurer** , PO Box 14420, Rochester, NY 14614, or in person at 39 W. Main St., Room B-2. The county's number for tax payments is 585-753-1200. The third installment is due Nov. 15, another Sunday, and here the published rules appear to disagree. The instructions printed on the bill say Nov. 16 through Nov. 18 adds 1 percent to the third installment, which is hard to square with the weekend-rollover rule in the town's notice. No published source reconciles them, so treat Friday, Nov. 13 as the safe date. ## The whole calendar, and what being late costs * **Sept. 1 through Oct. 1:** full payment, no interest, to the Webster Receiver. * **Sept. 15:** first installment due, to the Webster Receiver. The payment instructions printed on the back of the county bill allow it from Sept. 16 through Sept. 20 with 1 percent added. * **Sept. 20:** the installment plan ends. A first installment still unpaid after this date voids the plan for the year and the full bill comes due. Sept. 20 is a Sunday, and no published source says the cutoff rolls to Monday. * **Oct. 2 through Oct. 31:** full payment plus 2 percent of the entire bill, to the Webster Receiver. * **Oct. 15:** second installment due, to the **Monroe County Treasurer** , not Webster Town Hall. The printed payment instructions allow it from Oct. 16 through Oct. 31 with 1 percent added. * **Oct. 31:** the last day the Webster Receiver accepts anything, after which the school tax rolls return to the Monroe County and Wayne County tax offices. Oct. 31 is a Saturday this year and Town Hall is closed, so the last day to pay in person is Friday, Oct. 30. The drop box and the postmark still work on the 31st. * **Nov. 1 through Nov. 18:** the Monroe County Treasurer still accepts payment. Full payment carries 5 percent. A second installment still outstanding carries 2 percent. * **Nov. 15:** third installment due, to the **Monroe County Treasurer**. It falls on a Sunday, and the published rules conflict on what that means. See the caution above. * **Nov. 18:** the end. The payment instructions printed on the bill say it in capital letters: "NO PAYMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER NOVEMBER 18." Everything from Nov. 1 forward comes from the payment instructions printed on the back of the county bill and from Perinton's published page, not from Webster's legal notice. The town's notice ends at Oct. 31 and does not describe the November county window at all. ## After Nov. 18, the school bill becomes a January problem Monroe County's treasury describes the mechanism plainly: if school taxes are not fully paid, the outstanding balance plus penalty and interest is re-levied as a county tax on the next combined town and county tax bill, the one that arrives in January 2027. The county does not publish the percentage. The Town of Perinton, collecting under the same county schedule, puts the add-on at 7 percent. Whether a Webster relevy carries that same rate is not stated in any county document. The debt becomes a county tax line inside a bill with its own escalating interest schedule, starting in February at 1.5 percent per month, and a delinquency of record against the parcel. ## Where and how to hand over the money **In person.** Town Clerk's Office, Webster Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. No credit or debit cards. **By mail.** Payable to Danene M. Marr, Receiver of Taxes, 1000 Ridge Road, Webster, NY 14580. The postmark governs: "any payment postmarked on or before the due date will be considered on time." A private postage-meter mark does not qualify. **Drop box.** Front vestibule of Town Hall, open 24 hours, checks and money orders only, emptied each morning. **Online.** Through www.monroecounty.gov. A credit card adds a 2.75 percent service charge, per the 2026-2027 legal notice. The county does not publish its e-check fee, and a fee table posted by the Town of Penfield lists it at $10, so read the fee off the payment screen before confirming. Questions about a bill or a payment go to the Webster Receiver of Taxes at 585-872-7064, the number the school district and the town's School Taxes page publish. The town's Receiver of Taxes page lists a second line, 585-872-7060. Start with 7064. ## If your bank pays the bill for you If a mortgage lender escrows your taxes, the bill goes to the lender, not to you. Verify rather than assume: Monroe County's real property portal shows paid and unpaid status by parcel. Check it in the last week of September, early enough to still pay in full by Oct. 1 with no interest if it has not posted. That timing is the Ledger's recommendation, not an official instruction. ## STAR, and why your bill may look like the discount vanished There are two STAR benefits. The STAR credit arrives as a check or direct deposit from New York State and does not reduce your bill; anyone who bought in Webster since 2015 has this version. The STAR exemption does reduce the bill. So a bill with no STAR line is not evidence of a mistake, and a credit that has not arrived is not a reason to pay late. ## If the bill looks wrong A bill that looks wrong is not a grievance matter now. Webster's grievance window runs in May and the final roll closed July 1, so pay the bill and take the assessment up next spring with the Ledger's guide, What is the Board of Assessment Review, and why it matters. ## Not every Webster address is on this schedule Walworth and Ontario residents in the district, its Wayne County portions, have no installment option and pay in full only. Penfield residents pay the Penfield Receiver of Taxes, 585-340-8625, and some Town of Webster parcels sit in the Wayne Central School District, which collects at Ontario Town Hall. Check your own bill for the collector and the dates. The amount on the bill is set. The only variable any homeowner controls is when it gets paid, and to whom. Sept. 20 is where that choice narrows. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 25/08/2026
What needs a permit in the Town of Webster, what it costs, and who inspects the work.
websterledger.com
Pulling a home improvement permit in Webster
A shed needs a building permit in the Town of Webster. So do a fence, a deck, a pool and a roof replacement. Starting without one costs double. The town's 2026 fee schedule prices work done with no prior permit application at two times the required fees. The reason the town cares about that paperwork: a permit is the record that the wiring, framing and drainage were checked by someone other than the person who eventually sells you the house. The Building Department is at Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road. Its number is (585) 872-7036 and it is open weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The department's page urges residents who are unsure to call for confirmation before starting a project. Everything below comes from documents the town and the village publish. On the town side those are the permit applications and their supplements, the Building Department and Code Enforcement pages, the forms pages and the 2026 fee schedule. The town FAQ supplies one phone number, and the village section comes from the village's own Building Department page. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. ## Town or village Two governments issue building permits inside Webster. The Town of Webster covers most addresses. The Village of Webster runs its own Building Department for addresses inside village limits, with its own inspector and its own forms. The rest of this article describes the town's rules. If you live in the village, start at 28 West Main Street or call (585) 265-3770. The village office is open Monday through Thursday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. The village lists permits as required for: * Fences, sheds, pools and decks * Generators and driveways * Re-roofs * New construction, additions and renovations * Change of use or occupancy * Signs and demolition * Fireplaces, HVAC and plumbing Many village applications can be filed through online forms. The village's instructions say staff will confirm receipt, then contact the applicant to review the application and determine whether more documentation is needed. They also say not to start a project until that has happened. ## What needs a permit The town's Building Department publishes a list of common projects that require a permit. It says the list is not exhaustive. * Accessory buildings * Additions * Change of use or tenant * Decks * Fences * Interior remodeling that may include electrical, plumbing or structural changes * New construction * Roof replacement * Temporary signs, with permanent signs requiring Planning Board approval * Solar panels, roof-mounted or ground-mounted * Standby generators * Swimming pools and hot tubs * Utility sheds The submission requirements sheet attached to the building permit application adds more. It names cabanas, gazebos and arbors. It names finished areas such as basements or bonus rooms. It also names egress windows and bilco doors, along with demolition of a building and tank removal. It says permits are required for all signs. ## What does not need a permit The department lists these as common projects that do not require a building permit. * Cosmetic work such as painting, and replacement of flooring, cabinets and appliances * Patios, platforms or walks less than 12 inches above grade * Playgrounds * Swing sets * Window and door replacements, if you are not changing the size ## Sheds The town allows one utility shed per lot. It has to sit in a side yard or a rear yard in a residential district, no closer than five feet to any boundary line. No part of it may fall inside the allowable front setback. The law sets four size limits. Building area cannot exceed 200 square feet. The longest outside dimension cannot exceed 20 feet. The maximum average building height is 10 feet, which the law measures from the roof peak to the highest eave. A shed also cannot push a lot past its coverage limit. Those limits come from Local Law No. 2 of 2022, which the town reproduces inside its shed application packet. The Town Board adopted it May 5, 2022. The same law limits a shed's contents to equipment for maintaining the lot, such as lawn and garden tools, snow blowers and pool supplies. A utility shed may not be used at any time as a dwelling or for sleeping. A shed permit costs $20 plus a $30 inspection fee. ## Garages and other accessory buildings A garage, a barn or a workshop is an accessory building, and the town treats it differently from a shed. One accessory building is permitted per lot, in addition to the one shed. Size runs off two ratios. An accessory building cannot be larger than 25% of the main building's square footage or habitable floor area, or 2% of the lot size, whichever of those is larger. The hard ceiling is 2,500 square feet. The town's application packet works an example on a 0.482-acre lot, where 2% comes to 420 square feet. Placement and height are limited too. An accessory building cannot sit nearer the front property line than the rear line or footprint of the house. It has to meet the setbacks that apply to other buildings in the district. It cannot be taller than the main structure, cannot exceed the zoning district's maximum height and cannot exceed 20 feet in any event. **Over 500 square feet, the Planning Board reviews it.** The code section reproduced in the accessory structure application requires Planning Board review of any accessory building larger than 500 square feet, with sketch plan review not required. The town's fee schedule separately lists a $120 accessory building fee under the Planning Department. Ask the Building Department which fees apply before you file. The building permit fee for an accessory structure or garage is 20 cents per square foot with a $100 minimum, plus a $30 inspection fee. The same code section exempts farms from the size limits, from the Planning Board review requirement and from the plan requirements. ## Fences A fence needs a permit, and where it can go depends on how tall it is. In a front setback, no fence may exceed four feet. Stockade fences, other solid fences and chain link are not permitted in the front setback of a residential lot. In rear and side setbacks, the town ties height to distance from the property line. A fence six feet or under can go right up to the line. A seven-foot fence has to sit 10 feet back. An eight-foot fence has to sit 15 feet back. The rest of the fence rules apply anywhere in town. The face side has to face the nearest abutting property, with posts and supports on the inside unless they form an integral part of the face. Barbed wire, razor wire and electric fencing are not permitted on residential lots, though they may be permitted on farms and to enclose horse paddocks. No fence may sit in a buffer area or a town easement without prior Town Board approval and a filed licensing agreement. The application asks for a site plan or instrument survey map showing the height and placement of the fence. A fence permit costs $20 plus a $30 inspection fee. Invisible fencing is $20 with no inspection fee. ## Decks and patios Decks are on the permit list. Patios, platforms and walks less than 12 inches above grade are on the no-permit list. The town does not publish the point at which a low deck stops counting as a platform, so call if yours will sit close to grade. A deck application needs construction drawings showing footing size and depth, framing size and spans, and the square footage. It also needs an instrument survey showing where the deck will sit. The town includes a residential deck construction guide in the packet, with joist and beam span charts. That guide requires posts set at least 42 inches below grade and prohibits the sandwich method of attaching beams to posts. A deck or porch permit is 15 cents per square foot with a $50 minimum, plus a $30 inspection fee. A pergola or gazebo is priced the same way. ## Pools and hot tubs The town's pool supplement defines a pool by depth. Its definition reads: > Any structure, basin, chamber or tank which is intended for swimming, diving, recreational bathing or wading and which contains, is designed to contain, or is capable of containing water more than 24 inches deep at any point. That definition explicitly includes inflatable pools. It also covers in-ground, above-ground and on-ground pools. Indoor pools, hot tubs, spas and fixed-in-place wading pools are inside the definition as well. For an in-ground pool, a fence or enclosure plan has to be submitted before the permit is issued. Existing site drainage cannot be altered, and grading is part of the final inspection. An above-ground pool needs an enclosure plan in any of these cases: * The pool has an attached deck * A deck is attached to the house * Any excavation is done to level the ground for installation The same drainage and grading rules apply. The barrier itself is state law, and the packet says so. It points to the Residential Code of New York State for the pool enclosure and barrier requirements. An enclosure plan has to show barrier height and the location of self-closing, self-latching gates. Where the house forms part of the permanent barrier, doors within the pool area need alarms compliant with UL 2017, and windows within the pool area may not open more than four inches. For an above-ground pool those plan contents apply where the pool edge is less than 48 inches or where a deck gives access to the pool. Every pool has to have an installed, functioning surface alarm, and the packet requires that alarm to comply with ASTM F2208. A hot tub or spa with sides less than 48 inches high from any accessible area needs a fence or enclosure plan. The alternative the supplement accepts is a safety cover compliant with ASTM F1346. The supplement states that a pool, hot tub or spa may not be used until all inspections are made and a certificate of compliance has been issued. It also puts the final inspection on the applicant, who schedules it by calling (585) 872-7036. Pool fees from the 2026 schedule: an in-ground pool is $85 and an above-ground pool is $60. A temporary pool is $60. A hot tub or jacuzzi is $60. Each carries a $30 inspection fee. ## Roofs, generators and equipment Roof replacement needs a permit, and a residential roof replacement is a flat $50. The re-roof form opens by asking how many layers of existing material are on the roof and whether they will be removed. It then asks for five confirmations. Water-soaked coverings will be removed. Deteriorated sheathing will be replaced. Five named coverings will be stripped before new material goes on: wood shake, slate, clay, cement and asbestos cement tile. Everything will be stripped wherever two or more layers of any covering already exist. The new covering, ice and water barrier, flashing and valleys will be installed in accordance with the New York State Uniform Building Code. Answering no to any of those five confirmations means submitting the manufacturer's installation instructions and a detailed scope of work for approval. Standby generators need a permit. A residential generator is $50 plus a $30 inspection fee. Roof-mounted solar is $50 plus inspection and ground-mounted solar is $100 plus inspection. A retaining wall over five feet in height is $50 plus inspection. Several other pieces of equipment carry flat fees with no inspection fee listed. A residential EV charging station is $50. A geothermal heating system is $50. Residential mechanical equipment is $50. A residential sewer lateral permit is $50. Wood stoves and gas inserts run through the fire marshal instead of the Building Department. A fuel burning appliance permit is $45. It covers a wood stove or insert, a gas insert and a freestanding gas stove. ## Furnaces, water heaters and a gap in the published lists Three published town lines touch equipment replacement and none of them names a furnace or a water heater. The no-permit list calls replacement of appliances cosmetic work. The permit list covers interior remodeling that may include electrical, plumbing or structural changes. The fee schedule carries a line for residential mechanical equipment at $50. The town does not publish a threshold that settles it. Call the Building Department at (585) 872-7036 before the installer starts. That is what the department's own page tells residents to do when they are unsure. ## Driveways Repaving your own driveway appears on neither of the town's published lists, and the department notes that its permit list is not exhaustive. Call the Building Department at (585) 872-7036 to ask about work on your own property. Work in the town right-of-way is a different permit and a different office. It runs through the Highway Department at (585) 872-1443. The 2026 fee schedule prices an individual driveway permit at $25 and a driveway culvert permit at $35. A road cut permit is $35 plus a $1,500 refundable deposit. Village residents should note that the village does list driveways among the projects requiring a permit. ## How you apply Every project starts from the same two-page building permit application. Seven project-specific packets sit alongside it on the town's Forms and Applications page: * Accessory buildings * Decks * Fences * Sheds * Pools and hot tubs * Roofs * Change of use or tenant The application asks for the job site address, the parties involved and a description of the work, along with the construction cost. It also asks whether the Zoning Board or the Planning Board has approved the project, and it allows "unknown" as an answer. Three things come with every application. * **A survey map to scale** showing the location of the work on the property. The form prints that requirement in capital letters. * **Proof of liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance.** A homeowner doing the work without a contractor files a Certificate of Attestation of Exemption, state form CE-200. It waives the workers' compensation requirement only. The liability insurance requirement stands. * **Certificates naming the town as certificate holder** , listed as the Town of Webster, 1000 Ridge Rd, Webster, NY 14580. Additions to a residential property need an instrument survey and construction drawings. Two stamped sets are required if the construction runs over $20,000, plus one more copy as a PDF. Interior renovations need a floor plan. A finished basement needs an egress window that meets the state building code, and the window has to be shown on the plans. Neither the town's Building Department page nor its permit forms describe an online submission option. Every packet is a PDF that contains a signature line, and the department's counter is at 1000 Ridge Road. ## What it costs Residential permits are either a flat fee or a rate per square foot with a minimum. Most add a $30 inspection fee on top. * **Shed:** $20 plus $30 inspection * **Fence:** $20 plus $30 inspection * **Deck or porch:** $0.15 per square foot, $50 minimum, plus $30 inspection * **Accessory structure or garage:** $0.20 per square foot, $100 minimum, plus $30 inspection * **Residential building permit:** $0.20 per square foot, $100 minimum, plus $30 inspection * **Residential remodeling permit:** $0.20 per square foot, $100 minimum, plus $30 inspection * **Above-ground pool:** $60 plus $30 inspection * **In-ground pool:** $85 plus $30 inspection * **Hot tub or jacuzzi:** $60 plus $30 inspection * **Residential generator:** $50 plus $30 inspection * **Residential roof replacement:** $50 * **Residential demolition permit:** $50 * **Residential certificate of occupancy:** $50 A re-inspection is $25 an hour, and a residential certificate of occupancy reinspection is $25. A duplicate certificate of occupancy is $5. A permit renewal is $20, and the fee schedule notes that only two renewals are allowed. Fees change. Every figure here comes from the town's 2026 fee schedule, dated Dec. 8, 2025. Confirm the current amount with the Building Department before you write the check. ## How long it takes The town does not publish a review timeframe. Neither the Building Department page nor the permit applications state how long review takes, or how long a permit stays valid once it is issued. The village publishes a process rather than a timeframe. Its instructions say staff confirm receipt with an email, then contact the applicant to review the application and identify any additional documentation. ## Inspections The building permit application carries a checklist of inspections, and the Building Department marks the ones a given project needs. The printed options are: * Footing * Foundation * Insulation * Rough framing * Rough plumbing * Under-slab plumbing * Electrical * Final certificate of occupancy * Final certificate of compliance The form also leaves an "other" line. Electrical inspections do not come from the town. The Building Department directs residents to three licensed agencies: * Middle Department Inspection Service, (585) 454-5191 * Commonwealth Electrical Inspection Service, (585) 624-2380 * New York Electrical Inspection Agency, (585) 436-4460 The department's page says inspections by a building official are required at various stages of many projects, but it does not say who schedules them. The pool supplement states it outright: the applicant is responsible for the final inspection and schedules it by calling the Building Department. When a project is finished, the building official issues a certificate. The department's page says that certificate has to be obtained before the structure is used or occupied, and that it verifies the building and its proposed use comply with all applicable building and zoning regulations. ## If you skip it The 2026 fee schedule publishes two direct costs. Work done with no prior permit application is charged two times the required fees. Removing a stop work order sign costs $150. Code Enforcement publishes the path it follows once it finds a violation, whether from a complaint or from a staff observation. It starts with a violation warning letter that names the violation, the code violated and the actions and timeframe required to correct it. If that deadline passes, a notice and order may be issued, often with a shorter deadline. If that passes, the town issues an appearance ticket for Town Court. A Town Justice there can impose fines, sanctions or court orders. Code violation matters are generally heard on the second Friday of each month at 9 a.m. in the Van Ingen Courthouse at 1002 Ridge Road, and those sessions are open to the public. The certificate the town issues at the end of a permitted project is the record that the work was inspected and found to comply with building and zoning regulations, and the department says a structure cannot be used or occupied without one. Work done without a permit produces no such record. A duplicate certificate costs $5, which is how a homeowner or a prospective buyer gets a copy of what was permitted. The town does not publish guidance on what happens when unpermitted work turns up during a sale. Code enforcement questions go to (585) 872-7035 or codeenforcement@ci.webster.ny.us. ## Zoning is a separate question A building permit answers whether the work meets the code. Zoning answers whether it can sit where you want to put it, and the two are decided by different bodies. The building permit application has a line for the zoning district and lines for front, side and rear setbacks, filled in by the office. It also asks whether the Zoning Board or the Planning Board has already approved the project. If a project cannot meet a setback or a height limit, the route is an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. A residential variance application is $120 under the 2026 fee schedule, and an appeal for an interpretation of the code is $300. The Zoning Board of Appeals application and the area variance standards are published on the Planning and Zoning Boards' Forms and Documents page, which is a different page from the Building Department's permit forms. Some projects go to the Planning Board instead. An accessory building over 500 square feet is the one a homeowner is most likely to hit. Permanent signs also require Planning Board approval. Zoning questions go to Community Planning & Development at (585) 872-7037. ## The bottom line If you're staring at a project and unsure whether it needs a permit, don't guess. The town's own list isn't exhaustive, and the price of finding out later is steep: work done without a prior permit is charged at two times the required fee, on top of a possible stop work order and a trip to Town Court. One phone call settles it. For a project inside the Town of Webster, call the Building Department at (585) 872-7036 before you start. If your property sits inside the Village of Webster, call the village at (585) 265-3770. Either way, a two-minute conversation is cheaper than a doubled fee and a certificate you can't produce when you sell. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 21/08/2026
The board voted Thursday night to approve a petition to annex a portion of the Xerox campus from the town into the Village of Webster. It also enacted Local Law #3 and adopted an environmental review determination after the town attorney raised the requirement from the floor.
websterledger.com
Webster Town Board approves petition to annex part of Xerox campus, 5-0
The Webster Town Board voted 5-0 Thursday night to approve a petition to annex a portion of land on the Xerox campus from the Town of Webster to the Village of Webster. Supervisor Alex Scialdone, Councilman John Cahill, Councilwoman Jennifer Wright, Councilman Nick Hunter and Councilman Garrett Wagner each voted aye. The annexation petition identifies the land as Tax ID #65.03-1-41. The packet's assessment-roll extract lists the parcel at 1345 Chiyoda Drive and 28.04 acres, owned by Xerox Corporation. The town's recordings of the meeting and of the 6 p.m. workshop that preceded it are on its YouTube channel. This recap covers the highlights. ## The annexation A board member said the municipal line between the town and village "goes directly through" the Xerox parcel. The idea, the member said, is to move the West Campus into the village so a developer deals with one municipality. An earlier attempt to settle the boundary went through the village's voters. "The village referendum did not pass the public, so it is now on us," a member said. A member said the town's wastewater plant is on board with the village taking the waste. Another member qualified that it is not a done deal yet. A member said the two boards should sign a memorandum of understanding, so there is a record of what they intended if nothing happens for six years. "It's not a swap," a member said. The member said people had thought the town and village were exchanging land. "Town taxpayers have no negative impact on this," a member said. "This is the last board meeting we have before the 90 day from the joint public hearing that we had with the village," a board member said. "So if we do not vote tonight it will default to a yes automatically." Under General Municipal Law § 711, each affected local government has ninety days after the close of the joint public hearing to determine by majority vote whether the annexation is in the overall public interest, and a governing board that does not make, sign and file a written order within that period is deemed to have approved the annexation when the ninety days expire. The town's record does not establish the date the joint hearing closed, so whether Thursday was the last board meeting before the deadline remains the member's characterization. ## A resolution raised from the floor The presiding officer announced the annexation resolution. The town attorney interrupted from the floor and told the supervisor that an accompanying resolution had to be taken up first. That resolution was not on the agenda the town posted for the meeting. The annexation is an unlisted action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, the attorney told the board. A member then moved that the annexation is an unlisted action under SEQR and will have no adverse environmental impact. The motion was seconded and adopted, immediately before the annexation vote. ## What the public said Open to the Floor came first, before regular town business. Four people spoke, described below in the order they took the podium. Two of the four addressed the same subject from opposite directions: a pride flag that had been raised at Town Hall days before the board adopted a flag policy in June, and that later came down. The board adopted that policy, Resolution No. 211, on June 4, according to the town's adopted minutes of that meeting. It provides that "the American and New York State Flags shall be the official flags and the only flags of the Town of Webster to be displayed on properties owned by the Town of Webster." Its only stated basis is that the town "does not currently have a defined flag policy." The resolution does not mention the pride flag, and the town's adopted June minutes record no separate vote to remove it. The vote was 3-2. Cahill, Wright and Wagner voted aye. Scialdone and Hunter voted no. At the same meeting Scialdone said displaying the pride flag had been his own decision as town supervisor, not the board's. A resident who identified himself as a combat veteran spoke about public trust. He said trust does not require agreement, but it does require believing that officials act in the public interest. "The decision to raise the pride flag on town property is what first brought me to this podium," he said. "Government should exercise sound judgment whenever it acts in an official capacity," he said. "Its role is not to promote one cause over another but to serve every resident equally." A second speaker brought a public-safety request and physical exhibits. He said he came across the remains of a Bigfoot specimen in Adirondack Park in 2024. "Up here near Chimney Bluffs and off 104, we've seen a lot of activity lately, and there's been a string of accidents," he said. "This could be as simple as some signage along 104 indicating that this could be a Bigfoot Crossing area." A third speaker talked about local solar projects. A fourth speaker, a retired priest who said he and his husband live in Webster, spoke about the same flag from the other direction. "The optics of taking it down has been received by the LGBTQ plus community as a sign that some of our neighbors don't think that we belong here," he said. "And I'm afraid that this action, even if it wasn't meant to, the optics of it are that it's pushing the community even further to the margins." He told the board he accepted the criticism that the flag had been misplaced, and said he understood the decision to remove it to have been made in a spirit of fairness to all residents. ## The rest of the agenda The board enacted Local Law #3 of 2026, amending Sections 320-1, 320-4 and 320-6 of the Webster Town Code relating to traffic regulations. The vote was 5-0. Scialdone, Cahill, Wright, Hunter and Wagner each voted aye. The board also approved three sets of minutes, the bills, the prepaid warrant, purchase orders, two fence licenses in town drainage easements, a 30-day liquor notification waiver for United Buffet 941, Inc., and the disposition of two police vehicles. A member moved that the board go into executive session for labor and personnel, citing Public Officers Law §105. The town's recording ends during that motion. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 20/08/2026
The Webster Town Board weighs a petition to annex a Xerox parcel into the Village of Webster, votes on updated traffic regulations, and hears from summer interns and the town engineer at Thursday's meeting.
websterledger.com
Xerox parcel annexation, traffic law update head Thursday's Town Board agenda
The Webster Town Board will consider a petition to annex a Xerox-owned parcel from the town into the Village of Webster when it meets Thursday, Aug. 20. The petition ties directly to a brownfield redevelopment designation the town and village sought together last year. The board meets in two sessions Thursday. Both are in the Town Board Room at Town Hall, 1002 Ridge Road. The building sits behind the main Town Hall next to the Justice Courts, easy to spot by its blue roof. A workshop with two presentations and no votes starts at 6 p.m. The regular meeting has 10 numbered items and starts at 7:30 p.m. It opens with the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call and a public comment period. ## Xerox annexation Xerox Corporation has petitioned to annex Tax ID #65.03-1-41, a Xerox-owned parcel on Chiyoda Drive, from the Town of Webster into the Village of Webster. The filing was made under New York General Municipal Law §703. Xerox filed the petition through attorney Matthew A. Eldred of Harter Secrest & Emery LLP in an April 23, 2026 letter. No one lives on the parcel. Xerox owns 100% of its assessed valuation, according to a certification from Town Assessor Donna M. Komor. The petition frames the annexation as a step toward the Reimagine Webster Brownfield Opportunity Area plan. A BOA designation does not itself approve development or change zoning. The town and village jointly asked the New York State Department of State for that designation after a 30-day public comment period in April 2025. The state issued a Certificate of Designation in June 2025. The petition states the annexation is "a key step to implementing the vision established in the BOA Plan." Part 1 of a Short Environmental Assessment Form attached to the petition is prepared and certified by the applicant, not by the town or an independent reviewer. The form reports no substantial traffic increase from the annexation. It states the site is not in a Critical Environmental Area. It identifies no wetlands on the parcel. The application states the adjoining Xerox campus underwent completed remediation for hazardous waste. That characterization comes from the applicant's own filing and has not been independently verified by the Ledger. ## Traffic law update The board's agenda schedules a vote to enact Local Law No. 3 of 2026, updating and restating the town's traffic control provisions across dozens of streets. The law covers no-stopping and no-parking locations under town code §320-1, stop-sign-controlled intersections under §320-4, and left-turn-only lanes under §320-6. The resolution classifies the law as a Type II action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a category presumed not to have significant environmental impact. The attached text is a full restatement of the existing code sections rather than a marked list of changes. Many individual entries carry citations to prior resolutions dating back to 2011, 2017, 2020 and 2023. Those provisions are already in effect and are being republished as part of the restatement rather than added new. The town held a public hearing on the law Aug. 6, 2026. Notice was published in the Webster Herald on July 22, 2026. The enactment resolution states only that "all interested persons have been heard." ## Workshop: interns and a transportation project briefing Michael DeBalso is an architecture student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Alana Pigula studies geography and environmental science at Miami University. Both served as this year's summer interns in the town's Community Development and Engineering Department and will present on their work at 6 p.m. Their work covered stormwater outfall inspections and inspections tied to the town's stormwater pollution prevention plan. They also assessed conditions along Lake Road, researched requirements for the Climate Smart Communities program and explored park-district options. They worked on mobile vendor permitting and produced outreach materials for the Conservation Board. At 6:20 p.m., Town Engineer Keith Mortimer will present on the State Environmental Quality Review Act as it applies to the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project. The agenda describes it as a presentation during the workshop time. ## Routine business The board's 10-item regular agenda opens with approval of minutes from the July 30 and Aug. 6 budget workshops and the Aug. 6 regular meeting. It also includes bills, a prepaid warrant and purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance. Two resolutions would grant fence-easement licenses inside town stormwater drainage easements. One covers a six-foot vinyl privacy fence on John Leo Drive. The other covers a wooden privacy fence on Glendowan Terrace. A resolution would waive the standard 30-day notice period on a liquor license application for United Buffet 941, Inc. at 941 Hard Road. The waiver was filed by liquor-license consultant Justin Juliano. It is procedural; a full license application follows separately. The board will also act on the disposition of two Police Department vehicles, one to be declared a salvage total loss and one sent to auction. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 19/08/2026
Webster's community development director told the Town Board on Aug. 6, 2026, that the moratorium has not changed the number of single-family homes likely to be built over the next 12 to 18 months. Local Law No. 2 of 2026 covers six commercial and office districts.
websterledger.com
Webster's moratorium hasn't slowed single-family homebuilding, the town's development director says
Webster's development moratorium has not changed how many single-family homes are likely to be built over the next 12 to 18 months, the town's Director of Community Development told the Town Board at its Aug. 6, 2026, budget workshop. The large approved subdivisions in town either predate the moratorium or are exempt from it, he said. The law covers six of the town's commercial and office districts and three kinds of development activity, and it carries three exemptions. None of the six is a residential district. The same workshop heard that the Building Department took in $86,000 in permit revenue in July 2026 alone. ## Reminder of what the law covers The moratorium is Local Law No. 2 of 2026. The Town Board adopted it 5-0 on June 4, 2026. Section 5 applies the moratorium to the subdivision of land resulting in more than four parcels, to large-scale solar projects and to data centers. It also applies to all real property in six of the town's commercial and office districts, as identified on the town zoning map last dated May 2021: * Office Park North (O-P) * Medium Intensity Commercial (MC) * High Intensity Commercial (HC) * CO Commercial Outdoor Storage (CO) * Low Intensity Commercial 1 (LC-1) * Low Intensity Commercial 2 (LC-2) The law's own sentence names Low Intensity Commercial once and lists both of its map designations, LC-1 and LC-2. They are two districts on the zoning map. Section 5 is open on one further point. It names the subdivision, solar and data center activities alongside the six districts, and the text alone does not settle whether the four-parcel subdivision threshold applies townwide or only inside those districts. The minutes of the June 4 meeting record the law being announced before the vote in terms that applied it to large-scale solar projects, data centers, large-scale residential developments and projects in commercial zones — the announcement's terms, not the enacted section's, which names subdivision of land resulting in more than four parcels, not large-scale residential developments. The town's moratorium page lists the six districts and, separately, subdivisions creating more than four parcels. No Webster board and no town attorney has stated a position on the question on any record located here. Section 6 bars the town from acting on a new site plan, subdivision plan or special permit application for those properties and activities while the moratorium runs. The bar reaches every town board, commission, agency, department, officer, employee, consultant and agent. It covers processing, review, hearings, approvals and decisions. Section 8 exempts three things: * Development applications that had received preliminary site plan or special permit approval as of the law's effective date * Development applications for the redevelopment or rehabilitation of existing structures * Development applications related to ordinary repairs, maintenance or interior renovations The first exemption turns on the effective date: whether an application already held preliminary site plan or special permit approval as of that date decides whether the moratorium reaches it. Section 7 expires the moratorium six months after its effective date, and allows the Town Board to extend it by resolution for up to two additional three-month periods. Section 13 sets the effective date as the day the law is filed with the New York State Secretary of State. The Ledger's explainer covers why the Town Board adopted the moratorium, what it exempts and which projects were affected when it took effect. That Secretary of State filing date does not appear on any record reviewed here, so the moratorium's exact expiration date is not established. ## What the director told the board Director of Community Development Josh Artuso presented the Building Department's 2027 budget request at the Aug. 6 workshop. Invited to add anything further, he raised the moratorium himself and named the subdivisions already approved or under construction. > "Prior to the moratorium going into effect, and really exempt from the moratorium, we have Aberdeen phases two and three, they've been approved. They're a significant single-family home project. We still have building that's occurring as part of Westwood. We still have building that's occurring as part of Meadows 2, as well as Bella Terra. Those phases are still in their infancy right now, and we have Sienna Reserve that is anticipated starting construction of that development in the first of the year." > "So because the moratorium has gone into effect, but it has not changed probably the number of potential single-family homes that could get built within the next 12 to 18 months." Artuso qualified that as he said it, using the word "probably" rather than giving the board a firm projection. Three of the projects he named came before the Planning Board in 2026. Bella Terra Phase 3, 66 single-family lots, won final site plan and subdivision approval on May 5, a month before the Town Board adopted the law. Sienna Reserve, ten single-family lots on Orchard Road, had its subdivision approval extended by one year on July 7. Aberdeen Estate Phase 3, 36 single-family lots on 52.44 acres off Hazelhead Lane, received final site plan and subdivision approval 4-0 on Aug. 4. Aberdeen Estate Phase 3 sits in the R-3 Single-Family Residential district and Bella Terra Phase 3 in Low-Medium Residential (LMR). Neither is among the six districts Section 5 lists, so the moratorium's district provision did not reach either one. Two of those three board actions came after the Town Board adopted the law. Aberdeen Estate Phase 3 is also a 36-lot subdivision, which falls under the first activity Section 5 names. Section 8 exempts applications that held preliminary site plan or special permit approval as of the effective date, and it does not name subdivision approval. The public record of the Aug. 4 meeting carries no statement of which basis applied. Artuso's answer placed Aberdeen phases two and three among the projects approved before the moratorium or exempt from it. Lot counts play no part in that test either way: the exemption turns only on whether preliminary approval existed by the effective date, not on how many homes a project covers. And the dates above are approval-vote dates, not the date land was actually subdivided, which this record does not establish. ## Permit revenue ran ahead of budget The Building Department's own numbers were part of the same presentation. > "Just in the month of July alone, we brought in $86,000 in permit revenue in one month. So yeah, the staff has been working their tails off, if you will." Artuso told the board 2026 permit fee revenue had passed $215,000 in the first seven months, against the $120,000 he had budgeted for the year. He held that line flat at $120,000 in the 2027 request anyway. He said he checked the projection for distortion from unusually large projects before leaving it there. He said that check turned up one project, McAlpin Industries, which he described as fairly large. He gave the board a second reason the workload was up. > "There was a new code, a New York State Building Code, the 2025 code that took effect in January. There's a lot of additional inspections that are now required. So in an attempt to be able to comply with all of the regulatory requirements, we really would like some additional staff support in this particular division of our operation." The 2027 request presented Aug. 6 moves part-time employee funding from $35,771 to $91,745 and holds the vacant full-time assistant building inspector line flat at $63,142. Artuso told the board the department could not fill the full-time post and found part-time applicants instead: serving fire investigators who already hold the code enforcement officer certification and wanted the extra hours. He said three of them were funded out of the vacant full-time line. He also told the board Webster has one code enforcement officer covering about 45,000 residents and 19,000 properties. ## How relief works, and the Aug. 6 denial Section 9 lets an applicant ask the Town Board for limited relief. The application goes to the Town Clerk with a $150 fee. The applicant has to show by clear and convincing evidence that the moratorium leaves no reasonable use of the property and causes irreparable injury. The law requires what it calls "dollars and cents proof." The applicant also has to show that it would be unreasonable and unjust not to grant relief. The Town Board took up one of those requests on Aug. 6, 2026, for the proposed Dinks and Links recreation facility on Five Mile Line Road. Those parcels sit in one of the six districts the moratorium covers. The draft resolution posted with the agenda would have granted the exemption. A board member moved from the floor to deny instead, and the board denied the request, 5-0, after testimony from the applicant's representative and public comment from four residents. The Ledger's full recap of the Aug. 6 meeting covers that testimony and the board's stated reasoning in full. This reporting speaks to single-family homebuilding. It does not establish what the moratorium did or did not do to large-scale solar or data center applications, which Section 5 also names, and neither Artuso's remarks nor the workshop record reviewed here carries a figure for how many homes the three projects above represent beyond what is stated. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 18/08/2026
The Board of Education meets at 5 p.m. Tuesday with the 2026-27 tax warrant, a public hearing on the student code of conduct and $6.25 million in reserve transfers on its agenda. Public comment is at 6:05 p.m., after the votes.
websterledger.com
Webster's school board votes Tuesday on the tax warrant, with bills due out next week
The Webster Central School District Board of Education is scheduled to vote Tuesday on the 2026-27 tax warrant. The warrant sets the school tax rates. The district's presentation says the bills carrying them go out next week. The meeting starts at 5 p.m. at the District Office, 119 South Avenue. The public comment period is scheduled for 6:05 p.m., at the end of the meeting and after the votes. The board's policy says speakers should register with the district clerk by noon Tuesday. That deadline passed. Someone who did not register may not get to speak. Comment on the student code of conduct comes earlier, at a 5:05 p.m. public hearing. The agenda does not say whether the registration policy applies to that hearing. The district clerk can confirm: 585-216-0001. Fuller instructions are below. Three different numbers get called the school tax, and Tuesday's packet carries all three. The **levy** is the total dollar amount the district collects. The proposed levy is $131,771,231. The **rate** is charged per $1,000 of assessed value and differs by town. The district taxes property in four towns across two counties. For property in the town of Webster that lies within the Webster school district, the proposed 2026-27 rate is $29.566322 per $1,000. That is up 3.01 percent from $28.702192. The **bill** is what an individual owner pays. It depends on that owner's assessment and exemptions, not on the district-wide figures alone. In an Aug. 13 memo to Superintendent Brian Neenan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Brian Freeman wrote that "equalization rate drops continue to be the most significant factor influencing year-over-year tax rate fluctuations across all towns." Webster's equalization rate falls from 48 percent to 43 percent for 2026-27. A lower equalization rate means assessments sit further below market value. The New York State Office of Real Property Tax Services, not the school district, sets equalization rates. A Webster home whose assessment does not change would see its school tax line rise about 3 percent before exemptions. The presentation includes a Webster row for a home assessed at $250,000. It shows $7,175.55 last year and $7,391.58 this year, an increase of $216.03. That row describes a home assessed at $250,000, not one that would sell for $250,000. At Webster's 43 percent equalization rate, a $250,000 assessment corresponds to roughly $580,000 of market value. That conversion is the Ledger's arithmetic on the district's own equalization rate (not directly from the district). STAR is New York's School Tax Relief program, which reduces school property taxes for eligible homeowners. STAR savings shrink separately. The district's slide lists Webster's Basic STAR amount at $448, down $49 from $497. Enhanced STAR falls to $1,285 from $1,391, a decrease of $106. Enhanced STAR is limited to households where at least one resident owner is 65 or older. It also carries an income limit. For a household that receives STAR, the smaller STAR amount and the higher rate both push the bill up. The presentation also warns the board that Tuesday's numbers may not be final. It says last-minute assessment changes may force rates to be recalculated. In that case, it says, "the new rate on your tax bill may not match what was approved tonight." ## A code of conduct hearing at 5:05 p.m., a vote at 5:15 The agenda schedules a public hearing on the 2026-27 student code of conduct for 5:05 p.m., with 10 minutes allotted. It schedules the motion to approve the same code for 5:15 p.m. The code is proposed, and it is not adopted unless that motion carries. Dr. Robert Chalwell, the district's Assistant Superintendent for Achievement & Student & Community Engagement, is listed on the agenda as presenting both. The packet does not include a redline. The document attached to the agenda is the complete 2026-27 code with nothing marking what changed. The presentation that would list the revisions is a scanned file whose text could not be extracted. The Ledger compared the proposed code against the 2025-26 version in the board's Aug. 19, 2025 meeting packet. Three provisions appear in the proposed code and do not appear in that earlier document. Artificial intelligence enters the discipline section in the proposed version. It lists among forms of academic dishonesty the "unauthorized use of artificial intelligence ('AI') technology or tools." The word "artificial" does not appear anywhere in the 2025-26 document. The proposed dress code adds protective hairstyles. Its text says nothing in it limits students' ability "to wear certain protective hairstyles (including but not limited to braids, locks, and twists) or to wear their hair in a particular texture." Parallel language is added to the code's definitions of discrimination and harassment. The proposed code also adds a reporting duty on building principals. It states that the Building Principal or a designee "must notify the appropriate local law enforcement agency of those Code violations that constitute a crime and substantially affect the order or security of a school as soon as practical, but in no event later than the close of business the day" they learn of the violation. None of that language appears in the 2025-26 document. The code of conduct comparison above is targeted at the discipline, dress and reporting provisions. It is not a complete list of changes. The Ledger also did not separately confirm that the Aug. 19, 2025 document it used as the baseline is the version the board adopted. ## Also on Tuesday's agenda The agenda puts the 2025-26 reserve transfers ahead of the warrant vote. Freeman's Aug. 10 memo asks for that order, stating the transfers "must be completed before setting the tax warrant for the 2026-27 fiscal year." He recommends transfers totaling $6.25 million. The largest is $3.75 million into the 2026 Capital Reserve Fund. The board approved estimated transfers for 2025-26 on July 6. Tuesday's item is the final version of that action. Two policies come to the board for a second reading: Policy 6410 (Acceptable Use, Personnel) and Policy 7241 (Student Directory Information). The board approved first readings July 6. Neither takes effect unless Tuesday's motion carries. ## How to be heard Tuesday Tuesday's agenda has two comment opportunities. The public hearing at 5:05 p.m. is limited to the code of conduct, and it is the only one that comes before the vote on the code. Neither the agenda nor the code of conduct states whether the noon registration requirement covers that hearing. The requirement appears in the board's visitor speaking policy, which governs the 6:05 p.m. comment period. The district clerk's office can confirm which applies, at 585-216-0001. Visitor's speaking time is scheduled for 6:05 p.m. and runs up to 40 minutes. It falls at the end of the meeting, after every vote on the agenda, including the tax warrant. The policy says anyone wanting to speak should "register with the district clerk by noon of the meeting day." That registration closed at noon. The policy sets speaking time at 3 to 4 minutes per speaker. The meeting is at 5 p.m. Tuesday in the second floor Professional Development Center at the District Office, 119 South Avenue. It is livestreamed at websterschools.org/boemeetings. Scheduled adjournment is 6:45 p.m. The district clerk is Heather Murphy, at 585-216-0001 or heather_murphy@webstercsd.org. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
001
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 17/08/2026
WEDA hosts a design open house Monday evening at 29 South Ave. Results of the project's environmental review are expected at the Town Board's Thursday meeting.
websterledger.com
Webster road project backed by $9.8 million state grant goes on view Monday
Road work in Webster's northeast industrial corridor, backed by a $9.8 million state grant, goes on public view Monday evening. The Webster Economic Development Alliance is hosting an open house from 6 to 7:30 p.m. at the Village of Webster Community Meeting Room, 29 South Ave. _This is not the typical Town Board meeting location._ New York awarded the money in August 2025 through its FAST NY program. The town calls the work the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project. The environmental review of the same project runs on a separate track. That track is expected to reach the Town Board on Thursday. ## What the project builds The work rebuilds three streets and extends two more in the blocks around the Xerox campus. It adds what the project calls multimodal improvements along four streets. WEDA describes the scope as "key roadway improvements in the vicinity of the Xerox Campus to facilitate future redevelopment opportunities consistent with the Reimagine Webster Brownfield Opportunity Area." The state's award announcement calls the location the Northeast Area for Technology, or NEAT. The town's March 2025 presentation to the Town Board put the total project cost at $17.3 million. The state grant covers $9.8 million of that. A village HUD grant covers $500,000. The town's grant application resolution describes the remaining $7 million as investment the town had already made in sanitary sewer upgrades, counted as its equity in the project. The table's other lines cover road and planning work. Boulter Industrial Parkway gets an extension at $3.2 million. Chiyoda Drive gets an extension at $2.3 million. Mitcheldean Drive is rebuilt at $1.6 million. Orchard Street and Panama Road are rebuilt together at $1.4 million. Phillips Road gets multimodal improvements at $800,000. A further $500,000 of work on Orchard, Panama and Phillips is carried on the village HUD grant. Electrical infrastructure planning is budgeted at $500,000. Those are March 2025 estimates and may have moved since. The package crosses two jurisdictions. Chiyoda Drive and Boulter Industrial Parkway are listed as town work. Mitcheldean Drive, Orchard Street, Panama Road and Phillips Road are listed as village work. The map in the town's presentation puts every piece of it in the industrial blocks in the northeast of town. Route 250 bounds that area on the west and Basket Road on the east. Klem Road is the rough northern edge and Route 104 the southern one. ## What Monday's notice does and doesn't say WEDA's notice says the project is in preliminary design and invites the community to "view the latest design plans and speak with members of the project team." It does not mention SEQR, environmental review or lead agency. It does not say whether comment will be taken, recorded or entered into any record. It sets no comment deadline and asks for no RSVP. It lists no contact person, phone number or email address. It does not say whether the evening is a drop-in or a seated presentation. ## What lead agency means The Town Board voted 5-0 on Aug. 6 to designate itself lead agency for the project's environmental review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. It had declared its intent to take the role on June 4. The resolution classifies the work as a Type 1 action. Type 1 is the state's most serious tier, the class of actions the regulation treats as more likely to require a full environmental impact statement. When more than one government agency has a say over a project, one of them has to run the review. State regulation gives the involved agencies 30 days to agree on which one. Supervisor Alex Scialdone told the board on Aug. 6 that no other agency had come forward to claim the role. The next decision is the determination of significance. The lead agency has 20 days from its establishment to make it, or 20 days from receiving all the information it reasonably needs, whichever comes later. Two outcomes are available. A negative declaration finds no significant adverse environmental impact, and the review ends there. A positive declaration finds the project may carry at least one significant adverse impact. That requires an environmental impact statement, and it opens a formal scoping process with public participation. The determination binds the other agencies. Once the lead agency issues it after a coordinated review, no other involved agency can require its own environmental assessment form, negative declaration or impact statement. For a Type 1 action, the regulation sets no public comment period on a negative declaration. Part 617 does carry a 30-day comment period, but it attaches to a conditioned negative declaration, an instrument the state makes available only for what it calls Unlisted actions. The public's guaranteed formal entry point under SEQR arrives only if the board issues a positive declaration and an impact statement follows. ## Thursday, Aug. 20 The Town Board meets Thursday at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Board Room, with a workshop at 6:30. Scialdone said on Aug. 6 that the project team would be back Aug. 20 to go over the results of the environmental review. The Ledger has not confirmed that the determination of significance is on the Aug. 20 agenda. Regular Town Board meetings carry a public comment period called Open to the Floor. On the Aug. 6 agenda it sat ahead of the numbered business items, and each speaker was allowed five minutes. Monday's event is hosted by WEDA, and its notice does not mention comment. Thursday's is a Town Board meeting. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 14/08/2026
One county dispatcher takes every Webster 911 call. What arrives next may be a town department, one of two independently elected fire districts, or a nonprofit ambulance corps.
websterledger.com
Who answers when you call 911 in Webster
Dial 911 anywhere in Webster and the phone rings in the same building it would ring in if you dialed from Greece, Brighton or the city of Rochester. Monroe County runs one emergency dispatch center for the whole county. What happens after that call is where Webster gets complicated. Who shows up depends on what you need. It may be a town department, or one of two fire districts, or a nonprofit ambulance corps. The fire districts are separate units of local government with their own elected boards and their own power to tax. The ambulance corps bills your insurance. None of that is visible from the call. Here is who is on the other end, who pays them, and who you actually vote for. ## One number, one dispatcher Monroe County's 911 center is the Public Safety Answering Point for the entire county. Every 911 call from Webster lands there first. That is true whether the caller needs police, a fire crew or an ambulance. The dispatcher decides which agency or agencies to send. This is the part of the system residents are least likely to get wrong, because there is only one way in. There is no separate number for Webster police as opposed to the fire district. The same holds inside a school with a police officer assigned to the building. The town's school resource officer agreement tells staff that when a situation requires police involvement, "school staff should call 911 and notify the SRO if possible." ## Police: a town department The Webster Police Department is a department of the Town of Webster. It is paid for out of the town's property tax levy rather than through a separate special district. Dennis Kohlmeier is the police chief. The Town Board approves the department's budget each year as part of the town budget. The Monroe County Sheriff's Office holds countywide jurisdiction that applies in Webster the same as anywhere else in the county. Its role there includes the jail, the courts, civil process, marine patrol and mutual aid. Whether sheriff's deputies run routine road patrol inside Webster town limits day to day is not established by the public records the Ledger reviewed. ## Two officers in the schools The clearest example of how the police budget touches another local government is the school resource officer program. The Town Board took up an inter-municipal agreement with the Webster Central School District on July 16, 2026. The town's posted agenda for that meeting records the resolution as approved, authorizing the supervisor to sign the 2026-27 school resource officer contract. The item had been rescheduled from the board's meeting of July 2, 2026. The agreement covers two officers and runs through June 30, 2027. The agreement says "the TOWN will provide two School Resource Officers." Any officer assigned "shall be sworn Webster Police Officer(s)." They report through the police department's chain of command. The agreement provides that discipline arising from their SRO duties may only be administered by the police department and only in accordance with the applicable laws, rules, regulations and contractual obligations the department observes. The money moves in one direction, and not the way most people assume. The district does not buy police coverage at a negotiated price. The district reimburses the town for actual salary and benefits for the time the officers are assigned. The town invoices twice a year, in January for September through December and in July for January through June. Overtime is billed separately every 30 days. Overtime for after-school events is charged to the individual school that asked for the officer. The agreement contains no dollar figure anywhere in it. The cost is whatever the two officers cost, worked out after the fact. The town keeps everything else. It sets compensation and benefits, runs payroll, reports pension service and withholds taxes. The district may ask that an officer be reassigned or replaced on performance grounds. The agreement does not oblige the town to agree. It says the town "will receive and consider any such requests." A few other terms matter if you have children in those buildings. The officers have authority to stop, question, interview and take police action without the principal's permission and without contacting parents first. Administrative searches must be at the direction and control of district staff, the agreement says. At no time shall an officer request that such a search be conducted for law enforcement purposes, or have school staff act as the officer's agent. On discipline the language is softer. The principal "should ensure" that non-criminal discipline stays with school staff. The police department also reserves the right to pull the officers out of the schools to keep road patrol staffed or to respond to a critical incident. ## Fire: two districts, and neither matches the town line Webster has no town fire department. Fire protection comes from two fire districts, which are independent units of local government under New York Town Law. Each has its own elected five-member board of fire commissioners. Each levies its own tax on the properties it covers. Neither district stops at the town line. Both also cover part of the Town of Penfield. The North East Joint Fire District covers the east side of Webster and the Village of Webster. It was formed on Jan. 1, 2005. Three predecessors merged into it: the East Webster Fire Protection District, the Penfield North East Fire District and the Village of Webster's own fire department. The village has not run a separate fire department since. The district operates three volunteer-staffed stations, on South Avenue, Salt Road and Phillips Road. The West Webster Fire District covers the west side of town and part of Penfield. It has been volunteer staffed since 1926. It operates three stations, on Gravel Road, Backus Road and Plank Road. One title is easy to confuse with these districts. The town's fire marshal is a code enforcement position, not a firefighting one. Andrew Vorndran is the town fire marshal. The marshal inspects buildings for compliance with the state fire code. The marshal does not run trucks or respond to fire calls. ## The ambulance is the piece that works differently Emergency medical service in Webster now comes from Penfield Volunteer Emergency Ambulance Service, a nonprofit based on Jackson Road in Penfield. The previous provider, Northeast Quadrant Advanced Life Support, gave the town 90 days' notice at the end of December 2023. The Town Board named the Penfield corps the primary agency for West Webster in January 2024. It extended that to the northeast district in March 2024. On July 3, 2025, the board voted 5 to 0 to authorize the supervisor to sign a five-year contract with the corps, according to the approved minutes of that meeting. Police and fire response are paid for before you need them, through taxes. An ambulance transport is billed afterward, to the patient. The corps bills Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers per transport through an outside billing company. That distinction surprises people the first time they open the envelope. The town has also paid the corps directly. At the July 2025 meeting, then-Supervisor Thomas J. Flaherty told the board that Webster contributes $100,000 a year and Penfield $200,000, according to the minutes. He said the hope was that the corps could become self-sustaining within a year or two and that town subsidies could end. What the town pays the corps now, if anything, is not established in the records the Ledger reviewed. Neither is whether either fire district pays the corps anything of its own. ## The Village of Webster The Village of Webster is a separate incorporated government inside the town, with its own mayor and board. On fire service the answer is settled. The village department merged into the North East Joint Fire District in 2005. Police is less clear from the public record. The village lists five departments on its own website: administration, building, finance, public works and wastewater. Police is not among them. That is a fact about the list, not a confirmation of what the village does or does not have. ## What this looks like on your tax bill Four separate charges pay for what arrives when you call. The town tax line funds the police department, along with the rest of town government. A fire district line funds one of the two districts. Which one depends on your address rather than on whether you live in the village or elsewhere in the town. The county tax line funds county government, including the 911 center. The fourth is on your phone bill. New York collects a public safety communications surcharge on wireless service, and counties collect a separate 911 surcharge on access lines. Both support emergency dispatch. The Ledger did not confirm Monroe County's current rate or what share of the 911 center's budget it covers, so no figure appears here. ## Electing the fire commissioners Both fire districts hold elections every year, on the second Tuesday of December. Each board has five commissioners serving staggered five-year terms. That means at least one seat is on the ballot every December, and a vacancy can add a second. In December 2025 the North East Joint Fire District elected one commissioner to a five-year term and one to fill a two-year vacancy. These are the officials who set a tax line on your bill. They are elected on their own day, separate from town, county and school district voting. ## How to reach them For any emergency the number is 911, whichever service you need. One dispatcher sorts the rest. For everything else, each organization keeps its own non-emergency line and publishes it. The Town of Webster's site lists the police department and the fire marshal. Each fire district runs its own site. So does the ambulance corps. If you are not sure which fire district covers your address, the town's website lists both. That is worth settling before December, when the commissioners are on the ballot. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 13/08/2026
Webster's police cars carry cameras that read license plates. Police Chief Dennis Kohlmeier disclosed the capability at a budget workshop. New York's model policy binds nobody, and the state records schedule it points to sets a one-year retention where local governments have adopted it.
websterledger.com
Webster's new in-car police cameras also read license plates
Webster's police cars carry cameras that read license plates. Police Chief Dennis Kohlmeier disclosed the capability to the Town Board on Aug. 6, at the town's second and last budget workshop for 2027. The department put the cameras in its patrol cars for the first time in 2026. He volunteered it, unprompted, inside his explanation of a single budget line at a public meeting the town livestreamed. Kohlmeier described the system to the board in one stretch of remarks: > "In 2026, for the first time as an agency, we implemented in-car cameras. It's from the same manufacturer as our body-worn cameras, so they work integrated. An example would be when an officer is driving down the road, the camera is always recording at least a 30-second loop. So if there's an accident, that accident is captured on camera. Otherwise, when the officer turns the lights on, the camera will activate. It also activates the body-worn camera through the same signal. ... Those in-car cameras are also license plate readers, so they also provide the functionality of processing the license plates that are being captured by the camera. That helps officers on patrol. It helps them on traffic stops, things like that. So it was a big improvement to operational capability by switching vendors, and so far we've had a lot of success with that." The presentation ended with a call for questions. The board asked whether the department is short of active duty officers, and asked Kohlmeier to email members the spreadsheet he had prepared. No one on the board came back to the plate readers, and they did not come up again anywhere in the recording of the meeting. New York has a model policy for plate readers, and it binds nobody. The justification memo behind a bill now pending in the state Senate says the state has no uniform standards governing the use of the systems. A state records schedule sets a one-year retention for license plate reader data. The current model policy points to that schedule, and the State Archives says local governments must adopt it by resolution before using it. ## What the budget papers show The line he was explaining is A3120.40102 Service Contracts. The department requests $88,716 for 2027 against $69,500 in 2026, an increase of 27.6%. A second line moves the other way. Capital Purchases, Miscellaneous falls to $18,000 for 2027 from $65,000 in 2026. Kohlmeier said the 2026 figure carried a temporary increase for body-worn camera purchases. The police worksheet is dated July 14, so any figure in it may have moved since. ## What the state says, and what it does not The Municipal Police Training Council, part of the state Division of Criminal Justice Services, published a License Plate Reader Model Policy in June 2022. Its stated purpose is "to provide guidance to law enforcement agencies in developing written policies and procedures." Agencies, it says, "are encouraged to customize these protocols to meet their agency's needs." A bill to set statewide standards is pending. Senate Bill S963, sponsored by Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, would direct the training council to develop minimum standards for plate reader systems and require agencies to post them. Its justification memo states that "New York currently does not have uniform standards in place governing the use of ALPRs." The bill sits in the Senate Consumer Protection Committee. The model sets a retention period. Section VI.B says plate reads "shall be retained for a minimum of one year in accordance with NYS Archives retention and disposition schedule." A footnote sends that to Public Safety Item 1241 of the State Archives retention schedule for local governments. The Archives says local governments must adopt that schedule by resolution before using it. The item sets one year for license plate reader data. It holds hot list hits drawn from the state's eJusticeNY Integrated Justice Portal for as long as the case investigation they relate to is held. Logs of who searched the data are to be kept six years, a period the policy ties to the same schedule. The model also defines what plates may be checked against, and the definition is broad. It runs from stolen vehicles and stolen plates to wanted persons, suspended or revoked registrations, AMBER Alerts and national files such as the National Crime Information Center. It also covers plates entered by hand and tied to crimes in any local jurisdiction or to "other investigative targets." On a hit, the model says an officer "shall verify" that the captured image matches the plate number and state of registration before making a stop. It treats plate data as for official use only. It allows sharing for legitimate law enforcement purposes, and it directs that outside disclosures be documented by requester and reason. ## The county has its own related program Webster's system is not the county's. The Monroe County Legislature approved an Automatic License Plate Reader program for the Sheriff's Office, announced by County Executive Adam Bello and Sheriff Todd Baxter on May 23, 2025. The announcement says the program is fully funded by a state Division of Criminal Justice Services law enforcement technology grant. It says the Sheriff's Office was awarded the largest amount of the 378 New York agencies that applied. It also says Monroe was then the only major county in the state without such a program. It names Erie, Onondaga, Albany and New York City as places that had already deployed one. The two systems capture plates differently. The county's cameras are fixed at locations. WXXI reported in April 2025 that 85 sites were proposed. Webster's readers are mounted in patrol cars and move with them. The state leaves the rest to each agency. The sharing arrangements and the written rules for day to day use are decided by the department and by the Town Board that funds it. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 12/08/2026
The Zoning Board of Appeals approved a privacy fence and a front setback Tuesday, both 5-0. A request to park a food truck in a backyard was tabled to December at the applicant's request.
websterledger.com
Webster zoning board approves two variances, food truck request tabled to December
The Webster Zoning Board of Appeals approved two residential area variances Tuesday night, one for a six-foot privacy fence on a corner lot and one for a new house that will sit inside the required front setback. Both votes were 5-0. A third application, to park a food truck in a backyard, was tabled to December at the applicant's request. ## A six-foot fence on a corner lot The board granted a Cardile Drive homeowner permission to build a six-foot privacy fence in the front yard of a corner lot. The code bars solid and chain-link fences from a front setback outright, and holds any other fence there to four feet. Under the code a corner lot's side yard counts as a front yard, which is what made the fence a variance request. The applicant said he had moved in a few weeks earlier, and that he and his wife have a young dog and a child on the way. Asked what six feet achieves that four cannot, he said he understood the code to allow four feet, in picket or chain link. "I just rather feel more comfortable with the six foot so I'm not on display with the rest of the neighborhood," he said. At least two residents spoke, both with questions rather than objections. One asked whether drivers would be able to see around the fence. A board member answered that two oak trees stand at the corner with the fence line set inside them. The other said they had lived in the neighborhood since 2004, when the town allowed fences only where there was a pool and none at all on corner lots. They asked what had changed, and whether other neighbors could now do the same. A board member said front-yard fences are not permitted under the code, that the applicant was asking for relief from that rule, and that the board was looking only at this property. The board had granted the same relief on July 14, approving a six-foot privacy fence in the front yard of a corner lot on Bright Stream Way, where it noted an existing tree line that screened the fence from view. The board found that a four-foot fence would not give the applicant the privacy he wanted, and that the variance was not significant, describing it as two additional feet. It found the difficulty self-created because the applicant had bought a corner lot. The applicant still needs a permit for the fence itself and has one year to finish the work. ## A food truck, and a request to wait A Hailey Drive homeowner asked to keep a 20-foot commercial food truck in their backyard, on a crushed stone pad next to a shed. The applicant told the board they had made the same request a little over a year earlier, and that the truck would sit there seasonally, May through September, starting next year. Town agendas show that earlier application was withdrawn before the board acted on it. The truck is currently in the way of deliveries and driveway parking, the applicant said, and completely visible to adjoining neighbors. The pad would put it "completely out of the way covered by foliage during these months." The neighbors next door are in the process of moving out but are still there, the applicant said, and they have a problem with the request. The applicant asked the board whether to wait until they had gone. The applicant was told the board would not give advice, and that an applicant controls the application and can go forward or ask to have it held. Tabling the request would not make the board set aside the visibility and aesthetic questions that would apply to anyone living in that neighboring property, whether or not those neighbors come to speak. The board had already heard the application once, the applicant was told, and it was not clear how much a delay would change its review. The applicant asked to have the application held. Offered October 14, November 17 and December 8, the applicant chose December 8, and was told, "We'll see you on 12-8." ## What the 41 feet is measured to The third application was for a new single-family home on Vosburg Road. It sought a front setback of 41 feet where the code requires 50. David Cox, P.E., a civil engineer representing the homeowners, told the board the 41 feet is measured to a covered entryway. The house itself would sit farther back. "The majority of the structure would be 46 feet with that small covered entryway being 41 feet in the front setback," he said. This lot is also a corner lot, which gives it two front setbacks. Cox said the mature trees along Vosburg would be preserved, and that shifting the house to clear the front setback would push it toward a closer neighbor. One resident, who said they live across the street, asked how large the house would be and raised construction debris and traffic. A board member said the plan appeared to address most of those concerns, and that the board's decision was limited to the setback. The board found that the corner lot reduces the buildable area and that the difficulty was therefore not self-created. It approved the variance 5-0. Permitting follows, with one year to reach substantial completion. ## Waterview Phase 3 was not discussed Waterview Apartments Phase 3, a 56-unit apartment project at Willow Point Way and Nautical Mile Drive, was listed first on the agenda, under tabled matters, with a note saying it is tabled until September. The recording of Tuesday's meeting contains no discussion of it. The chair opened by saying the board had three scheduled matters, and the three it took up were the fence, the food truck and the Vosburg Road home. The agenda names no date for that meeting, and no one named one on the recording. The town's published calendar puts the board's September meeting on Sept. 8. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 11/08/2026
The agenda for Tuesday's Zoning Board of Appeals meeting says Waterview Apartments Phase 3 is tabled to September. A fence, a food truck and a front setback are the three scheduled matters left on the docket.
websterledger.com
Webster's zoning agenda for Tuesday lists Waterview Phase 3 as tabled to September
The agenda for Tuesday's Webster Zoning Board of Appeals meeting states that Waterview Apartments Phase 3 is tabled to the September meeting. The application is listed first, under tabled matters. The agenda does not give a date for the September meeting. Waterview Phase 3 is a 56-unit project the board tabled in July. The variance requests on the agenda are the same ones the board had in front of it July 14. Legacy Development Co., Inc. is asking for a front setback of 18.7 feet where 75 feet is required, and a buffer of 38.5 feet from the adjacent single-family district where 100 feet is required. The front setback sought is roughly a quarter of what the code requires. The buffer is under 40 percent of the required distance. The plan is six buildings plus a community center, each building two stories, at the northwest corner of Willow Point Way and Nautical Mile Drive. The agenda describes the site as a proposed 13.15-acre parcel. The parcel is in the MHR Medium High Residential district, and the agenda cites Section 350-14 of the town code. The application was on the board's June 9 docket as well. That agenda carries a similar note, recording the application as tabled to the July 14 meeting. Before any public business that night, the board chair announced that it would be tabled until July. The Ledger's account of that meeting records no reason for the announcement and no vote by the board on the application. The board did not vote on the variances July 14. A member drafted a motion to grant them with conditions. Those conditions included specific building shifts, buffer plantings and a recommendation that the town study traffic control at two nearby intersections. Before the board could vote, a dispute arose over whether the motion had a valid second, and the member who had seconded it withdrew. The applicant's attorney, Chris Nadler, asked the board to table the matter rather than risk having the motion fail outright. The board voted unanimously to table it until further notice. The application has been on three consecutive ZBA agendas. The board has not voted on the merits at either of the first two. The July 14 requests were renewals. The board granted the same two variances roughly a year earlier, and those variances expired before the developer acted on them. Nadler gave the board an account of the delay in July. Nadler told the board July 14 that finalizing the plans had been stalled by a state court order out of Albany. He said the order had frozen the state Department of Environmental Conservation from issuing the wetland jurisdictional determinations the project needs. That was his account to the board four weeks ago. The Ledger has not confirmed the current status of that order in either direction. Neighbors along McEwen Drive opposed the renewal in July. They disputed the applicant's account that the new buildings would match existing setbacks. They also objected to the project's density and its proximity to nearby single-family homes. Letters from other McEwen Drive residents were referenced at that meeting. ## Three residential requests, and the July minutes The agenda lists three scheduled matters. An application on Cardile Drive seeks a 6-foot privacy fence in the front yard of a corner lot. The parcel is 0.41 acres in the R-3 Single-Family Residential district. The agenda cites Sections 350-12 and 350-79. The board approved similar relief on Bright Stream Way on July 14, citing an existing tree line. A second application, on Hailey Drive, asks to park a 20-foot commercial food truck on a crushed stone pad in the backyard. The parcel is 0.66 acres, also in the R-3 district. The agenda cites Sections 350-12 and 350-44. The third, on Vosburg Road, seeks a front setback of 41 feet where 50 feet is required for a new single-family home. The lot is 0.57 acres in the R-2 Single Family Residential district, and the agenda cites Section 350-11. David Cox, P.E., is listed as the representing agent. The board is also set to take up the minutes of its July 14 meeting. The Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 11, in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. The three scheduled matters are the applications the agenda has set for Tuesday. The Ledger's guide to the Zoning Board of Appeals explains how residents can participate and what the board does. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 10/08/2026
Police, highway, the library and the town's zoning line came to Webster's second and last 2027 budget workshop. Three of the biggest levy lines are flat, falling or zero. None got there by spending less.
websterledger.com
Webster's biggest departments close budget season with flat levies, and none got there by spending less
Three of Webster's largest departments closed the town's 2027 budget season Thursday with a tax levy line that is flat, falling or set at zero. None of the three got there by spending less. The police department's law enforcement levy falls $11,949 for 2027. An $85,000 federal bonus line that ends accounts for more than that entire decrease, and a separate police benefits block in the same worksheet rises $175,000. The highway department's part-town fund raises nothing at all in taxes. It balances on a $3 million draw from fund balance, which is $400,000 larger than last year's draw. The library's levy line also reads $0, because the library is paid for by a transfer out of the general fund rather than a levy of its own. That is how the library fund is built, not a change for 2027. The levy line stayed at zero while the transfer rose: $3,000,768 for 2027, up $241,766. A board member told the room the budgets will not stay as flat as they look, because three union contracts are still open. **In this piece:** * Why three levy lines read zero * Police: a levy that falls because a federal line ends * Highway: a $3 million draw holds the part-town levy at zero * The library: the $0 levy line and the transfer underneath it * The $150,000 zoning line, and the grant that has not yet been awarded * The raises question now has four different answers * What happens next Six worksheets covering seven presentations came to the Webster Town Board on Thursday afternoon, at the second and last of the town's 2027 budget workshops. Community development, engineering, the town clerk, the police department, the sewer fund, the Webster Public Library and the highway department each walked the board through a request. These were the departments the chair had called "all of the big ones" when he closed the first workshop on July 30. The sewer fund, which residents pay through a bill rather than a tax, is covered in a separate piece. A budget workshop is department heads explaining their own numbers to the board that oversees them. There is no public comment period and no adversarial voice in the room. Each department posted a worksheet with the agenda, showing 2027 against 2026 line by line. Five of the six are dated July 23. The police worksheet is one revision older, dated July 14, so any police figure below may have moved since. These are departmental worksheets, not the compiled tentative budget the supervisor files with the town clerk, and that filing is still to come. ## Why three levy lines read zero The six worksheets span five separate funds, and they do not sit on the same tax base. That matters before any of the numbers below make sense. The general fund town-wide and the highway town-wide fund are paid by every town taxpayer. The general fund part-town and the highway part-town fund are paid only by property owners outside the Village of Webster. The sewer fund is paid by sewer ratepayers, not by taxes at all. The library fund carries a $0 levy line and is funded by a transfer from the general fund. Our guide to reading a Webster property tax bill walks through which of those lines lands on which bill. So "the library raises nothing in taxes" and "highway part-town raises nothing in taxes" are both accurate, and neither describes what the town actually spends. There is no single figure for what the six departments add up to, because there is no single tax base underneath them. The town-wide portion is comparable. Adding the general fund town-wide levy lines across the four worksheets that carry them gives $10,930,715 for 2027 against $10,737,905 for 2026, an increase of $192,810 or 1.80%. That excludes tax collection, which has no levy line and runs a planned surplus. It is not comparable to the $3,767,666 total published after the first workshop, which covered seven units that all sat in one fund. ## Police: a levy that falls because a federal line ends Law enforcement appropriations rise $11,251 for 2027, to $5,870,275. The amount to be raised by taxes goes the other way, down $11,949 to $5,605,775. One line explains most of that. A3120.10054 Officer ARPA Bonus Compensation carried $85,000 in 2026 and carries $0 in 2027. The chief of police told the board it was not a discretionary payment the town chose to stop making. > "One for discussion, ARPA bonus. That was a contractual benefit for the officers as part of the last contract negotiations. Obviously that's not carrying over to '27, so that's not in the budget." That is the second workshop in a row where Webster's remaining federal pandemic aid shows up as something ending. At the first workshop it was parks and recreation, where the money was never a line item at all and its end showed up only in which account paid for a program. Here it has an account number of its own, and the account goes to zero. Policing does not cost less next year. A separate employee benefits block in the same worksheet rises $175,000, or 4.8%, to $3,822,000. Medical insurance for police goes from $560,000 to $670,000. Medical insurance for police retirees goes from $1,220,000 to $1,327,000. The retirement contribution line falls $50,000 and partly offsets both. Both blocks sit in the general fund town-wide, on the same worksheet. The chief flagged the retiree line specifically. Officers retire young and then spend a long stretch on retiree benefits, he told the board, and the town has been using contract terms that reduce the retiree contribution for officers who stay longer. ## Highway: a $3 million draw holds the part-town levy at zero Highway Superintendent Patrick Stephens presented a budget spread across four funds. The highway town-wide fund is nearly flat. Its amount to be raised by taxes is $1,306,066 against $1,303,639, up $2,427. That is a separate fund from the general fund town-wide lines counted earlier, which include highway administration, so the two figures do not overlap. The highway administration lines, which sit in the general fund town-wide rather than the highway town-wide fund, move for a reason that is easy to misread. Stephens said seasonal part-timers have been consolidated out of several seasonal labor lines into the part-time employee line, and that the reclassification accounts for about three-quarters of the increase in that section. It is bookkeeping, not hiring. The part-town side is where the pressure sits. Appropriations rise $329,951, or 5.0%, to $6,875,937. Two things close that gap, and neither is a tax. The fund's share of Monroe County sales tax falls $134,000 to $3,283,000. The worksheet labels that share as 49% for 2027 against 51% for 2026. And the appropriated fund balance line goes from $2.6 million to $3 million. The mechanism was stated plainly on the record. New York's tax cap limits how much a local government can increase its property tax levy from one year to the next, and a town board can exceed it only by adopting a local law to override it. > "The highway part-town fund has a sizable fund balance to keep us under the tax cap." > "This highway part-town fund, we actually reduced the tax rate to zero, which allows us to use sales tax money in the general town-wide fund, which actually is helping pay for some of the debt service on the highway building. So we're going to do that as long as we can. At some point I'll have to flip back, but it's been a pretty good strategy so far." It is not a highway quirk. Two hours earlier, closing the community development presentation, the finance director described the same approach for the general part-town fund: the levy brought to zero so the sales tax can be used town-wide, and the town trying to keep that going as long as it can. This is at least the fourth consecutive year both part-town levies have been set to zero this way. The town's 2025 adopted budget says it used sales tax revenue and appropriated fund balance to bring the part-town tax rate to zero for 2024 and 2025, and the 2026 adopted budget carried the same combination forward. What changed for 2027 is the cost of continuing it in the highway part-town fund, where the draw grows $400,000 while that fund's sales tax share shrinks. A fund balance draw is a one-time source by definition. The worksheets show what is being drawn and not what remains, so they do not answer how long the approach can run. The other half of the sales tax story sits in the community development worksheet, where the part-town general fund's share rises from 12% to 18%, worth $402,000. The finance director told the board the reallocation is deliberate and happens every year. > "It's paid to us on a quarterly basis and it's currently being split between the general town-wide fund, this fund here which is the general part-town fund, and the highway part-town fund. So I do reallocate it each year to maximize the benefit, and we actually had a pretty good increase here of $402,000." Those two lines together are up 6.3% across the two funds. Departments that presented at the first workshop carry their own sales tax lines, so this is a subtotal and not the town's sales tax revenue. ## The library: the $0 levy line and the transfer underneath it The library's total appropriations rise 9.3%, from $2,835,740 to $3,099,339, and none of that lands on a library tax line. The levy line reads $0, and the general fund transfer that pays for the library instead is $3,000,768 for 2027, up $241,766. The line driving most of the increase was conditional on a vote that had not happened. L9950.90000 Transfer to Library Capital Reserve carries $150,000 against $0, followed by a footnote in the worksheet itself: "This line item is dependent on the Webster Public Library Board establishing a capital reserve at the next scheduled board meeting." Strip that line out and the library's appropriations rise 4.0%. Library Director Adam Traub used a different measure and reached 3.3%: with the reserve removed, that is how much more the library is asking of the general fund. Either way, he told the board, the reserve is more than half of his increase. ## The $150,000 zoning line, and the grant that has not yet been awarded One line in the six worksheets carries no offsetting revenue for 2027. B8020.40296 Masterplan / Smart Growth Zoning Revisions goes from $50,000 to $150,000. The line that offset it last year, B410.03989 Masterplan Grant Revenue, goes from $50,000 to $0. The combined effect is that the Planning Board's amount to be raised by taxes rises from $71,954 to $221,503, an increase of 207.8% and the largest percentage jump in the set. That line sits inside the general fund part-town, the fund whose bottom-line levy is brought to zero, so it is a worksheet allocation rather than a levy a taxpayer is billed. That is not a grant that went away. It is a grant the town has applied for and has decided not to book until it is awarded. Webster asked New York State for $150,000 to rewrite its zoning code through the state's Smart Growth Community Planning Program, as we reported last month. The state has not announced awards. Director of Community Development Josh Artuso explained the budget treatment. > "You will see the smart growth zoning revisions as being reflected as a $150,000 expense. We did just last week submit the grant application to New York State by the deadline. But nonetheless, we must reflect this in our budget." The finance director answered immediately: "We'll hold off on showing the revenue until we know for sure." So the 207.8% is a worst case, and Artuso told the board he is hopeful the state grant will offset it. If the state funds the application, the revenue side comes back and the levy impact largely disappears. If it does not, the worksheet line carries it. The worksheet shows the second outcome because that is the one the town can currently prove. ## The raises question now has four different answers The first workshop's headline was that no department request included a cost-of-living adjustment, because the town's three union contracts are all being negotiated. That was restated Thursday. > "I should probably say that the 2027 budget does not include COLA increases for the employees because our three union contracts are all being negotiated currently. So those numbers won't go in until we know them. So that's why you see some of the salary amounts are relatively flat year to year." Thursday's presentations showed the picture is not uniform. Most town departments carry no COLA and flat salary lines, as described. The sewer fund did budget a placeholder. Asked about a compensation line roughly $100,000 higher, the presenter said part of it is a requested maintenance mechanic and part of it is provision for a settlement. "We have budgeted in COLA just in case, and step increases," he said. A board member noted on the record that this "differs from our other lines, our other departments." The highway department carries no COLA and no blue-collar contract, and still budgets salary growth. > "It's flat, but it doesn't include the blue collar contract. It doesn't include the COLA. So I take the, I assess the 36 or so employees that we have and try to anticipate merit increases. What we look at represents about a 5% increase across the board, through just which folks get merit, which ones don't. That's based on an estimate by me. I try to be conservative. If I think somebody's on the right track, we put that in the budget. It doesn't mean they automatically get it. They still have to earn it." And the library, outside collective bargaining entirely, budgeted a 3% cost-of-living increase and 1% steps. So "the 2027 budget contains no raises" is not accurate. The largest single unknown in the budget is still the settlement of three union contracts covering town employees. What Thursday added is that different funds have made different assumptions about how that lands. The board made the point itself. A member observed that the budgets look flat year over year because of the open white collar, blue collar and police negotiations, and asked when there would be any insight into the increases. The finance director said not at this time, that it was too preliminary. > "It's going to change. It's not going to be as flat as it appears." ## What happens next One town-wide cost is still an assumption rather than a number. The finance director told the board he applied the same medical insurance increase, about 12%, across every fund presented Thursday, calculated off actual spending rather than off a quoted premium, and that he hopes to know the real figure in September. It is why medical insurance rises in parallel in departments that have nothing else in common, up 19.6% in the police worksheet and 31.4% in sewer, and again at the library. After that the numbers move into the compiled tentative budget the supervisor files with the town clerk, then to board review, a preliminary budget published for the public, a public hearing and a vote. Monroe County towns are required to file a tentative budget with the town clerk by Oct. 30 under state Town Law. Webster filed on Aug. 29 last cycle and adopted on Oct. 16, which is the town's habit rather than the statutory schedule. The board met again at 7:30 the same evening for its regular meeting, on a separate agenda. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 10/08/2026
Webster's sewer plant brought its 2027 budget to the Town Board on Thursday. The combined per-unit charge falls $8.89. The revenue that makes that possible is not contractually guaranteed, the department told the board.
websterledger.com
Webster's sewer rate falls $8.89 a unit for 2027
Webster's sewer plant brought its 2027 budget to the Town Board on Thursday, at the second and last of the town's 2027 budget workshops. The sewer fund is the only one presented Thursday that a resident pays through a bill rather than a tax, and it is the only one where the combined charge is falling. > "For O&M we're at a rate of $141.36, which is down about $23 from the previous year. But you'll see that the capital rate went up about $15. Overall, the rate is down about $8 when you combine the two." The worksheet matches those figures. Combined, a unit is billed $249.54 for 2027 against $258.43, a decrease of $8.89. That decrease rests on the Fairlife revenue described below, which the department told the board is not contractually guaranteed. Behind that, the amount to be raised by operations and maintenance charges falls $350,181, or 13.8%. The amount to be raised by capital charges rises $235,532, or 15.8%. Across both, ratepayers are asked for $114,649 less than in 2026. Total expenditures fall 1.4% to $11,118,232. A budget workshop is department heads explaining their own numbers to the board that oversees them. There is no public comment period and no adversarial voice in the room. These are departmental worksheets, not the compiled tentative budget the supervisor files with the town clerk, and that filing is still to come. The rest of Thursday's presentations are covered in a separate piece. ## The largest revenue growth is not contractually guaranteed Fairlife is the largest reason the operating side can fall. G210.02118 Fairlife Sewer Rents goes from $590,400 to $851,620, and the worksheet shows the billed unit count rising from 3,600 to 6,083. G210.02129 Fairlife Capital Charges nearly doubles, from $331,200 to $650,881. The plant built its revenue assumptions on that relationship, and said so plainly while walking through the hauled-in waste lines. > "We were banking on five or six trucks a day, which was 65,000 gallons a day... But we didn't want to talk about any other haulers, that was just going to be upside. So we were going to be conservative because we knew Fairlife was pretty much guaranteed." Fairlife brought one truck a day for the first several months and brings two now. The department budgeted $1.98 million for the current year across the hauled-in lines and expects to land near $1.8 million. "First year is tough. We have no history to go on," the outgoing chief plant operator said. A board member then asked whether Fairlife was guaranteed. > "I have a question about Fairlife, because you said Fairlife is guaranteed. Is Fairlife guaranteed? Do we have a contract that it's guaranteed? Because I thought they had options." The answer: > "Guarantee was a strong word. They have that much, and we're the closest one. It will save them to bring it to us, and our price is very competitive with around the area." The outgoing chief plant operator then corrected the word: "Not guaranteed, I'm sorry. I wish it was guaranteed." On the sewer rent side the estimate runs the other way, and the department said so. "We have currently collected $871,000 in the first two quarters, and we were only budgeted for $590,000. Again, very conservative on that." The 2027 request for that line is $851,620, below what two quarters of 2026 already brought in. One 2027 revenue line is new and describes a service the plant has not started performing. G210.02124 Septic Waste appears at $260,000 against nothing in 2026. "Septic waste, we haven't taken any in, and we are projecting at about $260,000, but I think that's a very conservative number," the department told the board. The rest of the customer base is not shrinking. Commercial sewer rents fall 14.6% on a unit count that is flat at 1,500, and Penfield's fall 11.3% even though its billed units rise from 1,220 to 1,268. Both are billed less because the town cut the per-unit rate, not because they sent less. Xerox is the one class that loses units, from 600 to 550, and its rents fall 21.7%. A second industrial customer is on the way. Industrial pretreatment rises from $5,000 to $7,000, because Fairlife has been added to the sampling schedule and because the plant expects McAlpin online at some point in 2027. That is the only place McAlpin appears in the sewer fund. It carries no revenue line, and the department made no estimate of what it will send. ## Where the costs moved Chemicals are the largest cost pressure among the plant's supplies. Polymer rises $64,850 to $194,850 on the plant's new processes, and ferric chloride rises to $213,750, partly because outside waste brings in more phosphorus. Sludge hauling moves the other way, down $110,000 to $250,000, which the department credited to its new sludge dryer. In June the plant ran the belt press alone for the first half of the month and added the dryer for the second, and hauling cost in that second half came in 80% lower in dollar terms. That is one half-month against the one before it, offered as an early example rather than a settled result. The department also brought a list of reductions it worked out with the finance director and the board's sewer liaison, including cuts to repairs and cleaning and a shift of several capital items into an already bonded project contingency. Telephone costs fall from about $21,000 to $4,000, after staff replaced copper phone lines at the town's 22 pump stations with cellular connections on the existing alarm keypads. Plant staff put the saving at about $12,000 a year, and said the copper was not pulled until the cellular connections had run for a test month. The plant is also facing a permit change. Its total residual chlorine limit is being cut to 0.25 milligrams per liter from a current 2, and the department has a study before the state Department of Environmental Conservation on how to get there within five years. The options it is weighing range from repurposing the old village clarifiers as a contact tank to ultraviolet disinfection, which it called very expensive. ## Staffing On staffing, two salary lines move. G8130.10147 Chief Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator falls 19.8%, from $157,443 to $126,197. That is the retirement the board handled in June, when it appointed Dwayne Hilfiker as chief plant operator effective July 4 and set him to cross-train with outgoing chief Rick Kenealy. Hilfiker rose internally and is not at the top of the scale. Kenealy told the board the line falls "with me leaving and Dwayne stepping in at the lower scale." G8110.10150 Deputy Commissioner of Public Works goes from $117,730 to $0, and that change was proposed months earlier. At an April 2 workshop, Kenealy and the town's personnel director presented the board a reorganization that would put the chief operator at the top of the plant's structure, un-fund the deputy commissioner post and use that money to create an additional full-time operator position, keeping overall staffing at the same number. The minutes record a presentation and a general discussion, not a vote, and note that several of the changes require Town Board approval while others must be negotiated with the union. Kenealy described the same change on Thursday as a new organization chart that defunded the position. The worksheet's arithmetic does not support reading the two budget lines as one job merging into the other. Sewer debt service is close to flat overall, with bond anticipation note principal up 55.4% against interest down 25.4%. The finance director said the town sold a note at a net interest rate of about 2.8%, against 3% budgeted, and expects to roll it into a serial bond in 2027. Sewer debt service is part of Webster's $132 million in outstanding debt. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 07/08/2026
The draft resolution posted with the agenda would have granted relief. No one moved it. A motion made from the floor to deny recited the same findings in the negative and carried unanimously.
websterledger.com
Webster Town Board denies Dinks and Links moratorium exemption, 5-0
The Webster Town Board denied a hardship exemption from the town's development moratorium Thursday night. The vote was 5-0. The exemption would have let the proposed Dinks and Links project keep pursuing approvals while the moratorium runs. The draft resolution posted with the agenda would have granted it. No board member moved that resolution. Supervisor Alex Scialdone instead moved from the floor to deny, reciting the same findings in the negative. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Dinks and Links is a proposed indoor and outdoor recreation facility of about 39,100 square feet at 912 and 922 Five Mile Line Road. The parcels sit in one of the six commercial and office districts the moratorium covers. Section 9(B) of Local Law No. 2 of 2026 sets the standard. An applicant must show, by clear and convincing evidence including dollars-and-cents proof, that it is unable to make any reasonable use of the property. It must also show irreparable injury and that denying relief would be unreasonable and unjust. ## The case and the questions Joseph Cattalani appeared for Dinks and Links LLC. He said the project had been before the Planning Board for about a year. The building and the site plan had been moved three separate times to satisfy the town, the state Department of Environmental Conservation and Lowe's. He said the DEC would not issue a permit until the town completed environmental review. "When we came into this a year ago, there was no speak of a moratorium," he said. The chair reminded the room that the question was not the merits of the project but whether the findings for relief could be made. He asked whether the applicant had sought an extension from his lender or the property owner. Cattalani said he had, and had not been turned down. Asked for an exact dollar amount spent to date, he said he did not have one and put the amount at more than $100,000. No documentation of that figure was given to the board. Councilman John Cahill asked whether the applicant owned the property. "We do not," Cattalani said. "We are under contract. This is the owner over here." A member said the board had been given no proof of the spending or of any extension. Cattalani offered to supply documentation. He said he could produce the contract covering the extensions and "an M&T letter saying that they're going to extend us through late October." The chair moved on to the next board member. Councilman Garrett Wagner pressed on the dollars-and-cents question, and Cattalani answered on the project's timeline rather than its costs. Asked whether the delays had occurred before the moratorium, he said all of them had. Asked whether any had occurred as a result of the moratorium, he said the project's financing, staffing, foundation work and construction trades would all come into play. The motion to deny came shortly after. ## What the public said Four residents spoke during Open to the Floor. Most of the comment concerned the exemption. A resident who said he owns the adjoining Sunset Valley community urged the board to deny. He said the applicant does not own the land, pays no property tax on it and holds only a purchase contract. An exemption, he said, would set a precedent other developers would come looking for. A second speaker who also said she owns the adjoining Sunset Valley community spoke for herself and for 70 residents of what she described as an affordable senior housing community bordering the property. She asked what financial proof could exist when the applicant does not own the land. She said items from the Planning Board's review remained outstanding. Another speaker walked the Planning Board's handling of the application date by date. He said the public record does not show that the project received the preliminary site plan approval or special permit that Section 8 of the law exempts automatically. "The proposed resolution reaches legal conclusions, but it does not identify the evidence supporting them," he said. A fourth speaker argued in support, saying the project should have been grandfathered. He said the moratorium carries costs of its own, pointing to a lumberyard parcel on Holt Road that he said has been left unmaintained under it. A landowner in that position has no reason to do more, he said: "I've got to pay my taxes, but I'm not going to do anything else." He called that a byproduct of the moratorium. He also said speeding on Holt Road is out of hand and said the police department should hold a community meeting with the chief about it, putting the police budget at $9.5 million a year against 64 speeding tickets written in 2024. He said the department's 2025 annual report has not been posted, and that he had watched a town budget presentation earlier that day and could not read the police budget on the screen. The Ledger has not verified the ticket count or the status of the report. ## The motion and the vote Scialdone moved to deny, saying the prospect of lost financing alongside available extensions was not clear and convincing evidence with dollars-and-cents proof. Town Attorney Kyle Taylor advised the board to read the criteria into the resolution. One more speaker was allowed before the vote. He said he had been with the property owner's business for 51 years and that it would be unfair for the applicant not to be able to proceed. "We are here to follow the law in this portion here and we need to follow the guidelines set within the moratorium," Scialdone answered. "We can't let personal beliefs get involved in this." The motion, as restated, found that "the applicant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence including dollars and cents proof that the moratorium prevents reasonable use of the property." It found no demonstration of irreparable injury, and none that denying relief would be unreasonable and unjust. Scialdone, Councilman Nick Hunter, Cahill, Councilwoman Jennifer Wright and Wagner each voted aye. "If you get the extensions, it's only a six-month moratorium," the chair told the applicant afterward. Local Law No. 2 says the moratorium expires six months after its effective date without further action, with up to two three-month extensions available. The town says the moratorium is active. ## A resolution finished on the floor The board adopted a video and audio recording policy for town boards the same night, after writing part of it aloud. In the posted draft of Item 6, the list of bodies the policy covers sat inside highlighted angle brackets. It appeared that way twice, in the first recital and in the operative clause. Those are drafting markers for language that has not been settled. The brackets held four names: the Town Board, the Planning Board, the Zoning Board and the Conservation Board. Rather than hold the vote, the board settled the language in the room. Hunter introduced the item and said it had not originated with him. He said the Conservation Board meets monthly and is not currently recorded. The four specific boards were named in discussion, matching a suggestion from the town clerk. A fifth body was then added: the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. Director of Community Development Josh Artuso, who oversees that committee, said its meetings are already recorded and that it did not need to be named in a resolution. "The committee is a temporary thing, it's not a governing body like the other boards are," he said. The board included it anyway, with a member saying there was no harm in doing so and that naming a committee already being recorded closed the loop and would end when the committee did. The Conservation Board has never been recorded. A member said the town's communications director wanted an August meeting to prepare it first, and recommended starting Sept. 1. An annual review was added on the town clerk's suggestion. "Yes, we're doing some live workshopping people here, so stay with us," the chair told the room. The adopted motion covers the four bracketed boards plus the steering committee. It takes effect Sept. 1, 2026, and is to be reviewed annually at the town organizational meeting. It passed 5-0. ## An item that was not on the agenda The board also approved something the posted agenda did not carry: an amendment to Monroe County's cooperation agreement for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships programs. The federally funded program runs through the county in three-year cycles, and the town has taken part since 2002. The amendment bars the town from selling, trading or transferring HUD funds provided by the county. The town sent a notarized signature and then learned a board resolution was also required. The deadline is next week, the chair said. A board member asked whether a drafted agreement existed, noting it was not in the town's SharePoint. "I did review it minutes before this meeting here," Taylor said. "It's a one-page amendment." Scialdone said he could not move a resolution authorizing himself to sign. Hunter moved it. It passed 5-0. ## The rest of the agenda Nobody spoke at the public hearing on Local Law #3, the town's vehicle and traffic regulations. A member recommended waiting until the Aug. 20 meeting to vote and the chair agreed. Three items concerned the townwide reassessment planned for 2027. The board accepted a resignation from the Board of Assessment Review and engaged GAR Appraisal LLC to appraise the Fairlife plant at a cost not to exceed $7,000. Both were 5-0. It also moved and seconded a resolution creating a temporary Board of Assessment Review member position. The board voted 5-0 to authorize up to $256,476 in contingency and client savings spending at the wastewater treatment plant. Two other sewer items did not come up: a heating and cooling contract for the plant, and a contract amendment shifting asphalt paving from the town's scope of work to a contractor's. Neither drew a motion or any discussion, and no explanation was given. Item 12 also departed from the posted resolution. At Cahill's request the board added the Chief Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator title to the handbook's commuter use vehicle chart rather than replacing the Deputy Commissioner of Public Works title, as the resolution proposed. The board also declared its intent to be designated lead agency for environmental review of the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project. It appointed a school tax collector for the Wayne Central School District portion of Webster. It approved six surplus Parks Department assets for recycling. Minutes, bills, warrants and purchase orders passed in separate votes. All were 5-0. The board took 15 recorded roll call votes in all. It meets next on Aug. 20. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 06/08/2026
Item 8 would grant hardship relief from the town's development moratorium for a proposed recreation facility on Five Mile Line Road. The draft resolution is posted with the agenda. The applicant's submission is not.
websterledger.com
Webster's Town Board votes tonight on a moratorium exemption for the Dinks and Links project
The Webster Town Board meets tonight with a request for relief from the town's development moratorium on the agenda. Item 8 would grant a hardship exemption to the proposed Dinks and Links project, an indoor and outdoor recreation facility of about 39,100 square feet planned for 912 and 922 Five Mile Line Road, just west of the Lowe's store. The parcels sit in one of the six commercial and office districts the moratorium covers. To grant relief, the law requires an applicant to show by clear and convincing evidence, including dollars-and-cents proof, that the moratorium leaves no reasonable use of the property. The draft resolution granting the exemption is posted with the agenda. The applicant's submission is not. The resolution says dollars-and-cents proof was provided, but does not summarize it or give a figure. The project needs the exemption because it did not hold preliminary site plan approval, which is what the law exempts. The Planning Board tabled it on June 2, two days before the Town Board adopted the moratorium. The town says the moratorium is active and runs through the end of 2026. The Town Board decides this exemption on its own, and a vote tonight is final. ## The public hearing: Local Law #3 The meeting opens at 7:30 p.m. with a public hearing on Local Law #3, Vehicle and Traffic Regulations. Each speaker gets five minutes. It is the only item on tonight's agenda that takes public comment. The board scheduled the hearing at its July 16 meeting, where Town Engineer Keith Mortimer had previewed what the law covers. ## Also up for a vote Item 6 would establish a policy on video and audio recording for the town's boards and committees, and on making those recordings public. It is a final decision tonight, and the draft resolution is posted with the agenda. Three items concern the wastewater treatment plant. The largest, Item 15, would shift the plant's asphalt paving from one contractor to another. The resolution recites a proposed paving cost of about $1.86 million from Navitas, the incoming contractor. That is a figure quoted in the resolution rather than an amount the board is approving. The rest of the night runs shorter. Item 5 opens environmental review on a town transportation project. Items 9, 10 and 11 staff up for a townwide reassessment in 2027, including temporary seats on the Board of Assessment Review. Item 12 moves a 24-hour take-home vehicle assignment to the Chief Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator. Item 16 clears six lots of Parks Department equipment for recycling. Items 1 through 4 are the consent block of minutes, bills, warrants and purchase orders. All 16 numbered items are up for a vote. ## Before the meeting: a budget workshop at 4:30 The board's second 2027 budget workshop starts at 4:30 p.m. Seven department heads present tentative budgets in slots running to 6:10 p.m. Workshops carry no resolutions and take no votes. ## If you want to be there The workshop starts at 4:30 p.m. today, Aug. 6, and the regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. Both are in the Town Board Room, which is located behind the main Town Hall building next to the Justice Courts (building with the blue roof) at 1002 Ridge Road. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 05/08/2026
The site plan approval for Cobblestone Place Phase 2 was set to expire Wednesday. A four-member board granted a one-year extension Tuesday night, after a public hearing at which nobody spoke.
websterledger.com
Webster Planning Board extends a 47-apartment approval with a day to spare
The Webster Planning Board voted Tuesday night to extend the site plan approval for Cobblestone Place Phase 2 by one year, to Aug. 4, 2027. The approval was set to expire the next day. The Ledger reported Tuesday morning that the approval ran out Aug. 5. The board's next meeting is Sept. 1, after the lapse. Under Section 269-17A, an applicant whose final site plan approval has expired "shall be required to reapply for preliminary and final approval." Had the board not acted Tuesday, the review of a 47-apartment building would have started over. The public hearing opened and closed with no speakers. The board granted the extension on a voice vote. The applicant's engineer explained the delay. Monroe County's health department has finished its plan review with no further comments. It is waiting on a utility easement for a private water main the project is installing. A meeting with the adjacent owner, identified on the record as U-Haul, was set for the next day to finalize it. "We just had to file for the extension due to the easement request," the engineer said. The engineer said the Monroe County Water Authority has signed the mylar set and the state stormwater filing is complete. A contractor is engaged for the site work. All of that is the applicant's own account. The chair returned to a concern from the original review. The site is tight, and there is nowhere obvious to put snow. The engineer pointed to 10 garage spaces under the building and a corner of the property for piling. ## An offer nobody took Four of the board's seven members were present: chair Anthony Casciani, Mark Giardina, Sven Vetter and Peggy Maltman. Four is a quorum. Before the first item, the chair offered every applicant the chance to wait for a fuller board. > There's nothing really too big, but we only have four members of the board out of seven. We do have a quorum, but I will offer the chance if anybody that has an application does not want to work with just the four, rather have a full board, you're more than welcome to. We'll set it up for another meeting. Nobody took it. All five applications were heard. The board acted on four. The fifth was a sketch plan review, which calls for no vote. ## Aberdeen's next 36 lots Aberdeen Estate Phase 3 won final site plan and subdivision approval 4-0. It was the only roll-call vote of the night. The approval covers 36 single-family lots on 52.44 acres off Hazelhead Lane, for Forest Creek Equity Corp. The item had been tabled since March. The discussion took about four minutes. The chair recalled earlier concerns about a berm and a conservation easement. Both were treated as resolved. The revised plan set marks the easement area, and a copy has gone to the town. The approval carries a long list of conditions. Stormwater facilities go in first. Downspouts connect to the storm sewer. The project engineer must certify the work before any certificate of occupancy issues. The board set its own deadline too: significant construction within one year, which the motion put at Aug. 4, 2027. The approved drawings are dated Jan. 13, 2026. The board could not make out the drawing number in its own file and used that date instead. ## Why the sign company's addition went back a step Vital Sign Building Addition at 764 Ridge Road came in for sketch plan review. No vote was taken. The code calls for none at that stage. The preview left a question open. The paperwork asked for preliminary and final review in July, but the project turned up a month later at the earlier step. Thomas Fitzgerald, the representing agent, answered it. The application had been headed for preliminary and final review, he told the board, and was postponed over development issues involving cargo boxes at the rear of the site. Town engineering had one open item. The oil-water separator has to tie into the sanitary sewer. The plans show it tying into the storm sewer. The chair closed on that point: "The only thing would be that your drains, your floor drains, tie into the sanitary and not the storm." Two other notes came up. The town asked for an as-built drawing of the original building and got the approved site plan instead, which lacked what the sewer department needed. The board was also told Webster sets a lower land-disturbance threshold than the state for requiring a stormwater pollution prevention plan. This project falls just under the 25,000-square-foot mark. Total site disturbance is about half an acre, on the applicant's figure. The rear setback measures 103 feet against a 100-foot requirement. The applicant returns for preliminary and final review, with no date set. ## Two sign packages, one code question The board approved the 7 Brew sign package at 935 Hard Road on a voice vote. A separate resolution first classified it a Type II action under the state's environmental review rules. The agenda lists five signs totaling 107.11 square feet. That closes the signage the board held out of its July 7 final approval. Ryan Kiely, the applicant of record, did not appear. A colleague presented in Kiely's place, citing a family conflict. The package is one internally illuminated round sign on the front elevation facing Hard Road. The drawings show nothing on the rear. Both side elevations carry the logo, plus non-illuminated directional arrows and the words "drive-through coffee." No member raised a question. The board also approved four internally illuminated wall signs for Canandaigua National Bank at 1155 Ridge Road. Again on a voice vote, again after a Type II resolution. The applicant is Melissa Driskell of Sign and Lighting Services LLC. The bank has rebranded and is replacing signs at branches across the county. The four wall signs are channel letters and a channel logo. The plans include night renderings showing the lettering and logo lit against a dark wall. That is the arrangement the town's sign code asks for. The longest exchange was about a different sign. The monument sign out at the road is shared with three other businesses. The bank is not building it. It is swapping two panel faces on a structure that already exists. A member asked how the "National Bank" wording at its lower left is lit. "It's a white acrylic that's lit from the inside," the bank's representative said. A member replied that the code calls for only the lettering to be lit, not the lit white background behind it. The code writes that point as a guideline, not a requirement. Section 265-4A(3) says signs with interior illumination "should" have only letters and logos lighted, not backgrounds. Three other requirements in the same subsection say "shall." The plans show the member had found the one piece of the application that departs from the guideline. The monument panel is a white face with the graphics on its surface, so the background glows and the lettering does not. The representative said the replacement matches the panel beside it, belonging to a children's day care, which is also white acrylic lit from inside. The board asked whether that panel is lit at night. Nobody was certain. It heard no objection and approved the four wall signs. Earlier in the item, a member asked whether it matters that the monument sign carries no street number. Section 265-4B says the property address "shall" be displayed on the top center of all monument signs. The representative said the sign advertises businesses at several different addresses. The plans bear that out: four businesses share it. The board approved the signs without resolving the question. Nothing in the chapter creates an exception for shared signs. Nothing in it says whether swapping a panel on an existing sign triggers the rule at all. ## Adjourned in 32 minutes The board approved the minutes of its July 7 meeting. The whole thing ran 32 minutes. The next meeting is Sept. 1. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 04/08/2026
The board takes public comment Tuesday night on extending the Cobblestone Place Phase 2 site plan approval, which runs out the next day. Also on the docket: 36 more Aberdeen lots and a building addition on Ridge Road.
websterledger.com
A 47-apartment approval expires Wednesday. Webster's Planning Board holds the hearing Tuesday.
The Webster Planning Board holds a public hearing Tuesday night on whether to extend the site plan approval for Cobblestone Place Phase 2. It is a three-story, 47-unit apartment building at 1025 Ravenside Lane, behind Webster Plaza off Ridge Road. The approval expires the next day, Aug. 5. The board's next scheduled meeting after Tuesday is Sept. 1, which falls after the approval lapses. That makes Tuesday the last regular meeting at which the board can act on it. Under Section 269-17A, if a final site plan approval has expired and the applicant still wants to proceed, "the applicant shall be required to reapply for preliminary and final approval." The whole review starts over. Section 269-17B requires an extension request before the approval lapses. It has to come early enough to allow publication, notice and a public hearing. That hearing "shall be held to consider whether such extension shall be granted." The code also lets the board attach "additional conditions or modifications" to the approval. The same board granted a one-year extension to the Sienna Reserve subdivision on July 7, after a hearing at which neighbors raised drainage concerns. Members said then that the question was whether to extend the approval, not to reopen the design. The board is not deciding Tuesday whether an apartment building is allowed on this site. That was settled last August. After a public hearing, the board granted preliminary and final site plan approval for a three-story building on a five-acre lot in the Medium High Residential district. The town's approval describes its 47 apartments as market rate. The approval went to VOA Cobblestone Place HDFC Inc. with conditions. Among them was a provision making it "subject to the determination of the ZBA for requested variances." The clock comes from the town's own approval letter, whose final approval checklist reads: "Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning Board, to expire on 8.5.26." That is the letter's wording. Under Section 269-10B, a final site plan approval expires after one year unless a building permit has been taken out within that year for the work shown on the plan and site development or construction has begun, as the board determines. An extension is the remedy the code provides when that one-year test has not been met. The plan set has kept moving through town and county comments, with revisions logged in December, February and May and a mylar issued July 6. The applicant on Tuesday's agenda is Brickwood Management of Rochester. The extension application was signed July 12, three weeks before the hearing. The plans give a completion target of fall 2027. Phase 1 is already built next door at 1023 Ravenside Lane. The agenda calls the item a final site plan and subdivision approval extension. The approval letter grants site plan approval only. The application checks Site Plan Review and lists one lot. The underlying plats were filed with Monroe County in 2011 and 2020. The site plan approval is the live item. ## Thirty-six more lots at Aberdeen Aberdeen Estate Phase 3 returns Tuesday under tabled matters. Forest Creek Equity Corp. is seeking final site plan and subdivision approval for 36 single-family lots on a 52.44-acre parcel off Hazelhead Lane, in the R-3 Single-Family Residential district. The item has not been before the board since March 3, when it was tabled. The same meeting approved Aberdeen Phase 2 with conditions, 20 lots on 17.10 acres. The two phases share a developer, a subdivision and a parent parcel: 56 single-family lots moving through the board inside six months. For scale, the board approved Bella Terra Phase 3, a 66-lot subdivision on Webster's south side on May 5. Aberdeen Estates is an active Ryan Homes community. Phase 3 expands a neighborhood people already live in. ## A sign company's own building, at sketch plan review Vital Sign Building Addition at 764 Ridge Road is up for sketch plan review. The plan is a 15,000-square-foot one-story addition to an existing 11,000-square-foot building on about four acres. The parcel sits in the CO Commercial Outdoor Storage district, one of six commercial districts named in the development moratorium the Town Board adopted in June. The owner and applicant of record is Webster Auto Mall LLC. The business operating there makes interior and exterior signage. The paperwork asks for a later step than the item lands on Tuesday. A June 16 letter of intent from the project's engineer asked the town to put it on the July 7 agenda "for preliminary & final review," with an $820 check enclosed for that review. It was not on the July 7 agenda. It appears Aug. 4 at sketch plan review. Under the code that step comes before preliminary approval and "shall not be a public hearing." Whether and when it returns for preliminary and final approval is a question for Tuesday night. Monroe County reviewed it in June under General Municipal Law Section 239-m and urged electric-vehicle charging infrastructure. ## Two sign packages The 7 Brew drive-through coffee stand on Hard Road is back with the signage the board held out of its final approval July 7, when it gave the applicant about a month to file a separate signage plan. The agenda lists five signs totaling 107.11 square feet in the High-Intensity Commercial district, at 935 Hard Road. That is the address the parcel lacked in July, and the one emergency services require on the building. Canandaigua National Bank is seeking four internally illuminated wall signs totaling 122.12 square feet at its branch at 1155 Ridge Road, in the Medium-Intensity Commercial district. Neither sign item carries a public hearing. Both come to the board under Section 265-7 of the town code. ## If you want to speak The Planning Board meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 4, in the Town Board Room at 1002 Ridge Road. Cobblestone Place Phase 2 is the only item on the agenda that carries a public hearing. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 03/08/2026
Six town departments and the justice court brought opening 2027 requests to the Town Board. None include raises, which are still being negotiated.
websterledger.com
Webster opens 2027 budget season with raises not yet negotiated
Six town departments and the justice court brought opening 2027 budget requests to the Webster Town Board on Thursday, at the first of two public workshops that open the town's budget season. Assessing, finance, human resources, information technology, parks and recreation, the court and communications each walked the board through a request. Every figure they presented shares the same missing piece: none of them include a cost-of-living adjustment for town employees. That is deliberate, and it was disclosed before the first department spoke. Finance Director Paul Adams told the board the budget carries no COLA because the town's union contracts all expire at the end of 2026 and negotiations for new ones are underway. "Once we know that number we'll put it in," he said. Step increases, the scheduled movement of employees up a pay scale, are already built in. That movement is not itemized. It sits inside each salary line, which is why the worksheets put no price on it. The placeholder is the largest open variable in the 2027 budget. Personnel accounts for about 55% of Webster's annual budget. The town's own 2026 budget message puts employee compensation, benefits and retiree benefits together at that share of a $48.4 million net expenditure budget, and a consultant's proposal to handle the town's labor negotiations, posted in the town's online document center, states it as 55.5%. Three union contracts, covering roughly 125 full-time employees, all expire Dec. 31, 2026. That is unusual on its own: the same proposal notes the CSEA and police contracts have historically been offset by a year. The proposal also puts a price on precision. "A settlement difference of ¼% per year saves $255,000 during a three-year contract period," it states. A budget workshop is a particular kind of event. Department heads explain their own numbers to the board that oversees them. The chair said at the open that this was a workshop rather than a formal board meeting, with no public comment period, and there was no opposing party in the room. Each department posted a worksheet with the workshop agenda, dated July 14, showing 2027 against 2026 line by line. The numbers below come from those worksheets. That makes them checkable. It does not make them settled. Every line is a department request, none of it carries COLA, and the compiled tentative budget the supervisor files with the town clerk is still to come. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. ## Assessing: the revaluation spike starts coming down Assessing brought the night's largest decrease by a wide margin. The worksheet takes the amount to be raised by taxes from $844,704 to $625,509, a drop of $219,195. The driver is the townwide revaluation. The town pays its revaluation contractor for a full twelve months in 2026 but not in 2027. The reassessments line falls from $264,000 to $83,000, and Assessor Donna Komor told the board that the remaining money "will disappear in 2028." It does not reach zero in 2027. "That's the spike year and I'm coming back down closer to normal," she said. Two lines move the other way, both tied to what comes after a revaluation. Wages for the Board of Assessment Review triple, from $5,000 to $15,000, and legal consulting rises from $12,000 to $15,000, in anticipation of more property owners challenging their new assessments. Komor called the grievance-wage figure a best guess and said she may revise it, pending a board decision on adding members to the review board. Property owners are in the data-correction phase of that revaluation now. The town had asked that any changes to property inventory be made and returned by Aug. 1. ## Finance: an AI invoice module, and an unbudgeted arbitrage check Adams put his department's total appropriations at about $570,000, up roughly $29,000, covering three full-time employees and one part-time. That figure spans two blocks on the worksheet: $523,124 for the finance department against $496,842 in 2026, plus a separate audit accounting block of $47,000 against $44,800. Together, $570,124 against $541,642, an increase of $28,482. The finance department's own $523,124 draws $463,124 from the tax levy in 2027, against $436,842 in 2026. A $60,000 transfer from the sewer fund covers the difference. The new item is a Munis Automation Module, an add-on to the town's financial software that would use AI to pull information off invoices. Adams budgeted about $4,500 to implement it and roughly $1,500 for training, and he volunteered the caveats: the product is still in development, is being beta tested at a couple of other sites, and is not expected to be fully available until the end of the year. "I put it in the budget, but it's kind of an unknown whether we're actually gonna go with it or not at this point," he said. His part-time personnel line does fall, from $24,812 to $18,850. Asked directly whether that reflected the automation, he said no. "I've actually have not reduced any of the employee costs due to the automation." Also in the request: $6,000 to engage a third-party consultant as the town's Munis systems administrator, which Adams framed as an internal-control improvement after former Director of Personnel Brayton Connard, who had handled many of those duties, retired. The financial consultants line rises by exactly that amount, from $10,800 to $16,800. One item has no money behind it. Adams told the board he did not include a consultant for an arbitrage calculation, the check on how much interest a municipality earns on money it borrowed for capital projects. Earnings above a federal limit have to be rebated to the IRS. Webster borrowed $101,141,000 in August 2025 through a bond anticipation note and a serial bond, and Adams said he has been tracking the earnings himself. "We probably should have the calculation done sooner than later," he said. ## Human resources: a $17,000 decrease, almost all of it one line Director of Personnel Kelsey Feeney presented a budget down about $17,000, and said nearly all of it comes from a single line. Human resources takes $123,569 from the tax levy in 2027 against $141,236 in 2026, a drop of $17,667, and the director of personnel salary alone accounts for $16,407 of that, falling from $102,876 to $86,469. Feeney gave the board the reason. Connard was at the top step of the pay scale, she said, and she is not. ## Information technology: a deferred year catches up Information technology's capital line jumps from $21,300 to $103,908, nearly fivefold and the largest single line increase in the seven worksheets. The department takes $377,140 from the tax levy in 2027 against $302,083 in 2026. Director of Information Technology Steve Peace framed the jump as deferral catching up rather than growth: the 2026 capital line came in far below a historical norm he put near $70,000, because a network infrastructure upgrade consumed the year and nothing new was bought. The main 2027 items are three new servers, which Peace said he hopes to get for about $15,000 apiece, additional Wi-Fi access points for the recreation and highway departments, and a roughly $30,000 one-time software purchase licensed for 44 months so it expires alongside the support on equipment already installed. Peace listed offsets, and the worksheet carries them. Computer system technical support falls from $38,700 to $32,731 as the town drops outside monitoring contracts and brings that work in house. The worksheet lists exactly three payroll lines: a network administrator at $94,907, a systems assistant at $75,112 and a help-desk position at $50,482. ## Parks and recreation: the last of the ARPA money Parks and Recreation Commissioner Chris Bilow gave the longest presentation, covering seniors, recreation and parks. Across all three accounts he put 2027 revenue at $1,419,600 against appropriations of $3,077,273, calling them up about 6% and about 5%. The worksheets match both totals to the dollar: revenue rises 6.1% and appropriations 5.6%. The request includes no new full-time positions. The recreation center billed about 560 monthly memberships before COVID and roughly 200 at the pandemic trough. "This past month we were at 760," Bilow said, well above the pre-COVID peak. Membership revenue rises from $210,000 to $260,000, while drop-in classes fall from $20,000 to $7,500 as people who try a single class convert to full memberships. This is also the department where Webster's remaining federal pandemic aid runs out, and it does not appear as a line item. There is no ARPA entry anywhere in the worksheets, in either year. The town has been using American Rescue Plan Act money to offset senior and youth program costs, and Bilow said the remaining funds "are gone actually as of November this year." The federal deadline for spending State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds is Dec. 31, 2026. On the seniors side, Bilow flagged one revenue assumption. The town budgets nutrition revenue conservatively, he said, because "we do have some seniors that even that daily lunch fee is a struggle." Department-wide, tax support rises 5.2%, slightly slower than spending, and that total conceals a split. The amount raised by taxes for the senior account rises 17.5%, from $54,539 to $64,109, and for recreation 14.8%, from $591,920 to $679,586. Those are the two areas Bilow named as ARPA-funded, "both in our senior as well as our youth program areas." The park account moves the other way, down 1.6% to $913,978, mostly because capital improvements fall from $150,000 to $80,000, and that decline is what pulls the department total back down. The programs continue and no new positions were requested. The two accounts Bilow named are the two rising fastest. How much of that the end of the federal money accounts for cannot be read off these worksheets, which carry no ARPA line in either year. Part of it is not ARPA. About $27,500 of recreation's increase is a part-time payroll line Bilow said had been broken out of another line and should have carried about $26,000 in 2026. Net that out and recreation's tax support rises about 10% rather than 14.8%. Across the three accounts, tax support rises by $81,937. One board member added the caveat that applies to every number presented Thursday: "of course we don't have the COLA in there." ## Justice court: $180,862 collected, $83,230 kept The justice court presented a small and stable budget. Appropriations total $375,788, up $3,545 from 2026, against $82,000 in budgeted fine revenue, leaving $293,788 to be raised by taxes. The justices' salaries are unchanged at $102,760, or $51,380 each. Court security rises from $49,000 to $52,000. Judge Thomas DiSalvo turned to what a town court actually returns to the town. He handed out the State Comptroller's report showing Webster court fines of $180,862 in 2025. Comptroller's Justice Court Fund data for the Town of Webster puts the exact total at $180,862.50, of which $79,257.25 went to New York State, $18,375.00 to Monroe County and $83,230.25 back to the Town of Webster. That is a distribution of money actually collected in 2025, not the $82,000 the town has penciled in as fine revenue for 2027. "We're not in the business of collecting fines," DiSalvo said, describing fines as set against the offense and the defendant's ability to pay. He also said state legislation, which he placed in June 2023, took away the court's ability to have a driver "scoffed" for unpaid fines, and that this has had "a chilling effect" on collection. ## Communications: three new lines, and year four of five Director of Communications Bridget Harvey presented for the town's newest department, which takes $179,863 from the tax levy in 2027 against $176,275 in 2026. Three lines that carried nothing in 2026 are funded: subscriptions at $2,400 for design, recording and email software; citizen outreach at $1,200 for production and postage on other departments' mailings, including the revaluation and the comprehensive plan; and mileage at $400 for a communications assistant who travels between town locations nearly daily in a personal vehicle. The $20,000 website design and maintenance line is the town's contract with its website vendor, spread across a five-year redesign cycle now in its fourth year. Both staff and board members expressed frustration with the platform, describing it as not user friendly, and a board member undertook to review the contract for flexibility. "If there's flexibility in that contract, I'll find it," the member said. ## What happens next Across the seven units that presented, the amount to be raised by taxes comes to $3,767,666 for 2027 against $3,813,919 for 2026, down $46,253 before COLA. Assessing's one-time revaluation drop accounts for more than all of it. Strip Assessing out and the other six rise 5.8%. The big departments have not been heard yet. Highway, police, sewer, the library, the town clerk, community development and engineering did not present Thursday, and the chair closed by telling the room, "I will see you all next week for all of the big ones." A second budget workshop is set for Thursday, Aug. 6 at 4:30 p.m., according to a July 22 column in which Supervisor Alex Scialdone called the workshops "the midpoint of the budget process." The town posted that agenda Monday, and it schedules those seven remaining units between 4:30 and 6:10 p.m. That same evening the Town Board holds its regular meeting, which includes a public hearing on Local Law No. 3, set by board motion July 16. After the workshops, the numbers move through the rest of the process: a tentative budget filed with the town clerk, board review, a preliminary budget published for the public, a hearing, and a vote. Every figure presented Thursday will change at least once before then, because none of them include the raises. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 31/07/2026
A follow-up to our May primer on town and village government, focused on the concrete places the two actually meet: a tax fund that splits by law, a wastewater permit that split in 2024, a five-party economic development partnership, and a summer vote that put a boundary change to Village voters.
websterledger.com
How Webster's two governments actually diverge and cooperate
This year, Webster's Town and Village governments have drawn certain tax dollars through legally distinct channels, held separate state permits for what used to be one shared wastewater arrangement, sat together at the same economic development table, and let a private company put a piece of the map up for a public vote. Readers who want the basic structure first (the two boards, the two tax bills, the election calendar) should start with our earlier primer, Town or village? A plain-English guide to how Webster is actually governed. This piece assumes that ground is already covered and goes into what actually happens when the two governments' jobs meet. ## Where the town tax bill splits by law New York Town Law requires any town that contains an incorporated village to keep certain budget lines separate: a town-wide fund that every parcel pays into, village included, and a part-town fund that only the parcels outside the village pay into. The logic is that village residents already fund an equivalent service through their own village government, so charging them again for the town's version of it would double-charge them. Webster's 2026 adopted budget shows the mechanism in its fund structure. Fund A, the General Fund, is town-wide and covers all 16,894 parcels in the town, village included. Fund B, the General Fund's part-town counterpart, and Fund DB, the part-town Highway Fund, apply only to the roughly 15,397 parcels outside the village. This is a different mechanism from the Village's own tax rate, covered in our May piece. That rate layers directly on top of the town tax village residents already pay. The part-town funds are a legally required split inside the town's own levy. One wrinkle applies to this year specifically. The Town zeroed out its part-town tax rate for 2026, drawing on sales-tax revenue and fund balance instead. Village and non-village residents are currently paying the identical $5.52 per $1,000 of equalized assessed value. The zero rate is a budget choice the Town Board made for this year. It does not mean the part-town and town-wide split has disappeared structurally; the funds still exist on the books and could carry different rates again in a future budget. ## A wastewater permit that used to be shared, and now isn't For years, the Village of Webster's wastewater treatment plant at 613 Webster Road pre-treated its effluent and sent it to the Town's plant for chlorination and discharge, all under the Town's State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit, NY0021610. That is still how the Village's own website describes the arrangement. Records from the state Department of Environmental Conservation show something changed on paper in 2024: the Village requested and received its own SPDES permit, NY0026794, effective March 2024 through February 2029, authorizing the Village's plant to discharge up to 2.5 million gallons a day to Lake Ontario under that permit rather than the Town's. On the ground, though, the routing has not changed: the Village's flow still runs into the Town's plant. DEC's Region 8 draft permit for NY0026794, dated Feb. 24, 2026, includes a Monitoring Locations diagram that labels the link directly: an "Effluent Pipe (Village WWTP to Town WPCF)" feeding a "Combined Outfall at Town WPCF" before the water reaches Lake Ontario. The separation the Village asked for still has to be built. That same draft permit's Schedule of Compliance carries a target completion date of Sept. 1, 2028 for an independent Village disposal system, and the final post-separation effluent limits take effect only once the work is done and the state accepts it. The Village's project page for the plant does not publish a cost estimate for that work. The Town's plant, still operating under NY0021610, is partway through a $94.3 million bonded upgrade, reported 86.8 percent complete on the Town's wastewater project page. ## Two governments, two park systems Parks are another place where the same word means two different budgets depending on which side of the village line a resident stands on. The Village independently operates five parks totaling 22 acres: Milton R. Case Memorial Park, Wilmorite Recreation Area, Schantz Park, Veterans Memorial Park, and Harmony Park. That system runs on its own village parks budget, distinct from the Town's spending on its recreation facilities, which include Sandbar Park, a Town capital project with roughly $9.5 million in bonded improvements across four sub-projects. Ask "which government maintains this park" in Webster, and the honest answer is: it depends on the parcel. ## Where they sit at the same table Division is not the whole story. The Webster Economic Development Alliance, known as WEDA, is a five-party partnership formed in 2009: the Town of Webster, the Village of Webster, Webster Central School District, the Webster Chamber of Commerce, and the Village of Webster Business Improvement District all sit on the same nonprofit board. Since 2014, WEDA has secured more than $10 million in state and federal funding for local projects, most recently a $9.8 million FAST NY grant for infrastructure near the former Xerox Wilson Campus. ## When the boundary itself went on the ballot Town and village lines are not permanent by default. New York Village Law Section 18-1804 allows a village boundary to be adjusted by petition and referendum, and Webster tested that this year. The June 16, 2026 Village general election ballot included a proposition, filed by Xerox, to shift roughly 33 acres of an industrial parcel out of the Village and into the Town. Had it passed, the territory would have left the Village entirely, and the Town would have become the sole authority for zoning, land use and permitting there instead of the two governments each signing off. The proposition was tied to the Reimagine Webster Brownfield Opportunity Area Plan, a redevelopment framework the Town and Village jointly designated and the state certified in June 2025. That joint designation is itself a case of the two governments planning together even while remaining legally separate. The proposition failed, 130 no to 125 yes, with 19 blank ballots cast out of 274 total, a five-vote margin, according to the Monroe County Board of Canvassers' official certification. ## The bottom line Webster is still two separate elected governments sharing one ZIP code. What 2026 shows is what that structure produces day to day: a tax levy that splits by law even when this year's rate does not show it, a wastewater arrangement that is mid-change on paper, a shared parks vocabulary that hides two budgets, a five-party partnership that raises real money together, and a boundary that can be put to a vote, even if that vote comes up short. For a fuller map of which board decides what for the town, see Who decides what in Webster: the Planning Board, Town Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals, explained. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 30/07/2026
The correction window on Webster's revaluation mailers is closing soon, per the town. Here's what the mailer covers, how to fix it, and what the 2027 timeline looks like from here.
websterledger.com
Revaluation mailers are back: what happens between now and the 2027 roll
Webster property owners have had a form sitting in a kitchen drawer since early June: a Property Inventory sheet listing the acreage, square footage, age, and condition the town has on file for their home or land, with a request to flag anything that's wrong. It's the first public-facing step in the town's 2027 townwide revaluation, and the correction window is closing soon. The town has said corrections are due by August 1, a date that comes from Supervisor Alex Scialdone's June column rather than the mailer itself (more on that below). This piece walks through what the mailer is, how to correct it, and what happens next, all the way to the tax bill that will eventually reflect it. ## What the mailer actually is The Assessor's Office, working with consultant KLW Municipal, Inc. of Buffalo, mailed Property Inventory forms to Webster's roughly 17,000 property owners in early June as the start of Phase 1 (Data Analysis) of the town's three-phase 2027 Townwide Revaluation Project. The form asks owners to check the physical details the town has on record and report discrepancies before the town moves into valuation work. The idea is straightforward: an accurate inventory produces a more accurate assessed value later. Webster's last townwide revaluation was in 2004. ## The cover letter mixup Some of the early-June mailings went out with the inventory form but without the cover letter that was supposed to explain what to do with it. The town posted a corrected letter, which opens by apologizing for the confusion and explaining that the letter was meant to accompany the form all along. One detail worth noting for anyone trying to nail down a deadline: the corrected letter itself lists the correction channels and the meeting schedule, but it does not state a return-by date. The August 1 date comes only from the Supervisor's June 10 column, not from the letter residents actually received. ## How to correct your form: three channels The corrected letter lays out three ways to submit a change: * **Online:** go to websterny.gov/77/Assessment-Office, choose "Verify Property Data," search your property in the town's Beacon portal, and use the Feedback Form button in the lower left to submit a correction. * **Email:** scan your marked-up form and send it to Webster@klwgroup.com. * **In person or by mail:** drop it at the Assessor's Office at Town Hall, 1000 Ridge Road (there's a drop box in the vestibule after hours), or mail it to the same address. The town also held five informational sessions this summer: three in mid-June led by KLW's Robert Koszarek, plus two additional sessions on June 23 that were added specifically because some of the original mailings had gone out without that cover letter. All five have already happened, so this is a matter of record for anyone who missed them rather than something still on the calendar. ## What "redistributes, not raises" means, and what it doesn't The town's standing message on this project is that reassessment does not raise the property tax levy, it redistributes it. That line is accurate for the town as a whole: reassessment does not let the town collect more money in total. It does not mean every household's bill stays flat. Here's the distinction. The total levy is fixed by the town's budget process, separate from reassessment. What reassessment changes is each property's share of that total, based on how its assessed value moved relative to the townwide average. A property that appreciated faster than the town average will end up carrying a larger share of the levy after reassessment. One that appreciated more slowly, or lost value, will carry a smaller share. Then-Supervisor Tom Flaherty described the mechanism this way when the project launched in July 2025: assessed values would likely roughly double townwide, he said, while the tax rate per $1,000 of assessed value would be cut by about half, an average effect that leaves the typical tax bill close to unchanged. That describes the average case, not a guarantee for every owner. Whether your share goes up or down depends on your property specifically, not the townwide total. It's also worth separating this from a second, unrelated source of change: a given tax bill can move from year to year because of ordinary budget and levy decisions (town, school, county) that have nothing to do with reassessment. Reassessment affects how the existing levy is split up among properties; it doesn't determine whether the levy itself grows in a given year. ## What happens next, through the 2027 roll Per the town's own project materials, the corrections window now underway is followed by several more months of work before any new value reaches a tax bill: * Through the rest of 2026, the town and KLW move into sales and market data analysis, then valuation and valuation review. * Full disclosure notices, showing each property's new assessed value and an estimated tax impact, are expected to mail in early 2027. Per the town's most recent published timeline, that falls in the February to March 2027 window. * Owners get at least two opportunities to ask questions about their new value before formal Grievance Day, including informal by-appointment meetings with KLW staff. Per that same timeline, those sessions also fall in the February to March 2027 window. * The Tentative Assessment Roll is expected to be filed May 1, 2027, with formal Grievance Day following on May 25, 2027 (the fourth Tuesday of May, consistent with the town's standard annual assessment calendar rather than an exception to it). * The Final Assessment Roll is expected July 1, 2027. * Any change from the revaluation first shows up on the September 2027 school tax bill and the bills that follow. Those month-specific 2027 dates come from KLW's 2025 planning presentation to the Town Board, the most recent published timeline available. The near-term facts, the early-2027 disclosure mailing and the September 2027 tax bill, are confirmed independently in the town's own Revaluation Fact Sheet. ## Where to go for more The town's project page is websterny.gov/874/2027-Townwide-Revaluation-Project, with the Data Mailers page at websterny.gov/945/Data-Mailers. Questions can go to reval@websterny.gov or 585-412-2320. ## Get Webster news in your inbox Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe free Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
000
Webster Ledger @news.websterledger.com.ap.brid.gy · 29/07/2026
Willink Middle School is the only WCSD building the district describes as under construction this summer, part of Webster's $85 million bond. Work at Schroeder is already finished, and more is bid for future summers.
websterledger.com
Willink Middle School construction is underway as part of Webster's $85 million bond
Construction crews have broken ground on a new classroom addition at Willink Middle School, the clearest sign yet that Webster Central School District's $85 million "Building Our Future" bond has moved from blueprints to physical work this summer. The addition is being built for the district's OWL (One Webster Learning) Middle School Program, according to the district's own construction updates for the building. WCSD describes OWL as a special education program that integrates social emotional learning with academics and related services, one the district says lets it keep students in its own buildings instead of referring them to a program outside the district. The program currently spills into hallway space, and the new southeast-wing addition is designed to give it dedicated classrooms. Elsewhere in the building, WCSD says it is adding a new bathroom on the second floor and overhauling the main office, including new wiring, lighting, and a renovated conference room. The district's page for the building also lists a canopy project among the work underway, though it has not published details on that piece. ## An $85 million bond, approved in 2023 Webster voters approved the Building Our Future bond on Oct. 11, 2023, authorizing $85 million in capital work across all 11 WCSD buildings: seven elementary schools, Spry and Willink middle schools, and Webster Schroeder and Webster Thomas high schools. According to the district's bond materials, the Willink addition is the only entirely new construction in the whole program; the rest of the bond funds renovations and replacements such as roofs, elevators, lighting, and bus loops. District materials from 2023 said the borrowing was structured so the project would have no impact on the tax levy, combining state aid with money already set aside in the district's capital reserve. ## More work bid for future summers According to a summary of the district's December 2025 board meeting, the WCSD Board of Education accepted bids for what was described as a multi-year package of capital work covering three summers. The package includes projects at Spry and Thomas, roof work, and other smaller-dollar work. The district has not published a building-by-building schedule showing which of those projects will happen this summer as opposed to 2027 or 2028. ## Already finished: Schroeder's Phase 1 work At Webster Schroeder High School, bond-funded work described on the district's site is already done. WCSD says the south athletic parking lot has been fully restored, interior ceilings and lighting have been upgraded, and new accessibility buttons are active at the main entrance and bus loop. ## Where residents can check the project themselves WCSD maintains a capital project page at websterschools.org/capitalproject with the original bond scope, and separate construction-update pages for Willink and Schroeder. The district does not currently publish a live budget-to-actual tracker or construction dashboard, so residents looking for itemized costs or a running timeline of the work will not find one on the district's site. ## Sign up for Webster Ledger Independent local journalism for Webster, NY. Subscribe Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. * * * _AI tools were used in drafting and research._
010